Skip to content

Implement WARPLossLayer#257

Closed
kloudkl wants to merge 2 commits intoBVLC:devfrom
kloudkl:warp_loss_layer
Closed

Implement WARPLossLayer#257
kloudkl wants to merge 2 commits intoBVLC:devfrom
kloudkl:warp_loss_layer

Conversation

@kloudkl
Copy link
Contributor

@kloudkl kloudkl commented Mar 25, 2014

This PR sets the target of #126 to the dev branch and will continue to make it work with the other layers. For the detailed motivations, references and discussions, please refer to the original PR.

@kloudkl kloudkl changed the title Add WARPLossLayer Implement WARPLossLayer Mar 25, 2014
@kloudkl kloudkl mentioned this pull request Mar 25, 2014
@zyan0
Copy link

zyan0 commented Apr 11, 2014

@jay2002 👍 Thank you. You are right.
Is there anything helpful to print out in the forward function of WARPLossLayer?

@sergeyk
Copy link
Contributor

sergeyk commented May 21, 2014

@kloudkl The warp loss test currently fails for this PR. Do you intend to work further on this?

I have rebased your code on the latest dev, moving the WarpLossLayer definition to loss_layers.hpp, and making it a subclass of LossLayer. Please start with these changes: https://github.com/sergeyk/caffe/tree/kloudkl-warp_loss_layer

@kloudkl
Copy link
Contributor Author

kloudkl commented Jun 8, 2014

Thanks. I will complete it this month after finishing #415 and the Java API of Caffe in the spirit of OpenCV.

@bhack
Copy link
Contributor

bhack commented Dec 22, 2014

@shelhamer Core members can periodically review the status of old tickets like this one?

@elaksana
Copy link

@kloudkl Have you finished working on this? We have a new application in mind, and hopefully, it will be merged soon.

@shelhamer
Copy link
Member

Closed as abandoned -- feel free to rescue if interested since a ranking loss could be useful.

@shelhamer shelhamer closed this Mar 9, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

Comments