Skip to content

Concat falls back to copy when there is only a single bottom blob#570

Closed
kloudkl wants to merge 1 commit intoBVLC:devfrom
kloudkl:concat-or-copy
Closed

Concat falls back to copy when there is only a single bottom blob#570
kloudkl wants to merge 1 commit intoBVLC:devfrom
kloudkl:concat-or-copy

Conversation

@kloudkl
Copy link
Contributor

@kloudkl kloudkl commented Jun 30, 2014

No description provided.

@jeffdonahue
Copy link
Contributor

Huh? What's the use case for this?

@sguada
Copy link
Contributor

sguada commented Jun 30, 2014

There was Check to avoid that. We don't need concat with only one blob,
although we could just do nothing in that case and just share data

On Monday, June 30, 2014, Jeff Donahue notifications@github.com wrote:

Huh? What's the use case for this?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#570 (comment).

Sergio

@kloudkl
Copy link
Contributor Author

kloudkl commented Jul 1, 2014

In #560, when there is only a single pyramid level, the concat layer receives vectors with such bottom blobs. I didn't want to deal with the single and multiple pyramid levels differently.

@kloudkl
Copy link
Contributor Author

kloudkl commented Jul 1, 2014

I should handle the special case directly.

@kloudkl kloudkl closed this Jul 1, 2014
@kloudkl kloudkl deleted the concat-or-copy branch July 1, 2014 00:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

Comments