Conversation
|
Unfortunately, the rebase to |
12940d0 to
62bccbd
Compare
Yeah, I think in the future we should not rebase develop on main (if main is updated directly) and instead do a merge. I don't see a real advantage to having the same linear history for main and develop, and it seems the rebase has a pretty big downside. |
Indeed. Although rebasing might be no big deal for branches with 1-2 commits, it is a huge waste of time for a branch with any appreciable amount of development. |
drreynolds
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I still need to look at the changes in src/arkode, but I wanted to share my comments so far.
drreynolds
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
One more set of comments, covering the rest of this draft PR.
drreynolds
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I've finished reviewing the documentation updates. I'll review the code soon.
Co-authored-by: Daniel R. Reynolds <reynolds@smu.edu>
Co-authored-by: Daniel R. Reynolds <reynolds@smu.edu>
Co-authored-by: Daniel R. Reynolds <reynolds@smu.edu>
Co-authored-by: Daniel R. Reynolds <reynolds@smu.edu>
Co-authored-by: Daniel R. Reynolds <reynolds@smu.edu>
drreynolds
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
One minor item (I'll commit it myself in a moment).
Broke long comment into multiple lines.
gardner48
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This looks good. Once the CI passes I'll merge sundials-codes/answers#39 and update the submodule here.
Output files for LSRKStep, see llnl/sundials#541
Add LSRKStep module to ARKODE with RKC, RKL, and SSPs methods. --------- Co-authored-by: Daniel R. Reynolds <reynolds@smu.edu> Co-authored-by: David Gardner <gardner48@llnl.gov>
This is a draft PR for feedback on new STS module.