Clarification on ISMC #420
Manouselis
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hey @evan-palmer . I am reading through your Angler article and at some point you note:
This makes sense as you want to stay on the sliding surface from the get-go in order to guarantee robustness from
t=0. However, based on how you defined the sliding variable you would need the proportional gainsK_pto be equal to identity in order to gets(0) = 0. Looking through your code (i.e.,control_integration/config/bluerov2_heavy_controllers.yaml), I see that theK_pis defined as[10.0, 10.0, 6.0, 3.0, 6.0, 10.0]which will in turn make s(0) not equal to 0.Am I missing something?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions