From 55837914e3cd370bb2a7d3724ffadda0f5a8239e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 18:59:04 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] IsTxSafeForMining should not fail if ChainLocks are enabled
 but not enforced

---
 src/llmq/quorums_chainlocks.cpp | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/src/llmq/quorums_chainlocks.cpp b/src/llmq/quorums_chainlocks.cpp
index 6a36a73b4eaa..edbe36e92755 100644
--- a/src/llmq/quorums_chainlocks.cpp
+++ b/src/llmq/quorums_chainlocks.cpp
@@ -469,7 +469,7 @@ bool CChainLocksHandler::IsTxSafeForMining(const uint256& txid)
     int64_t txAge = 0;
     {
         LOCK(cs);
-        if (!isSporkActive) {
+        if (!isSporkActive || !isEnforced) {
             return true;
         }
         auto it = txFirstSeenTime.find(txid);