diff --git a/text/0000-router-link-and-helpers.md b/text/0000-router-link-and-helpers.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..c5d0d1e462
--- /dev/null
+++ b/text/0000-router-link-and-helpers.md
@@ -0,0 +1,124 @@
+- Start Date: 2018-06-15
+- RFC PR:
+- Ember Issue:
+
+# Add a Link component and routing helpers
+
+## Summary
+
+The purpose of this is to add a single component, `Link`, that wraps up some routing helpers for default usage of linking / routing.
+
+## Motivation
+
+Positional arguments are not planned for use with Angle Bracket invocations. For clarity, and with some inspiration from react-router, It may be beneficial for Ember to include a `Link` component, similar to the existing `link-to`, but with only named arguments. This will help with clarity of intent, and also allow for easier transitioning from other communities who already have named-argument links.
+
+## Detailed design
+
+*Phase 1*
+- add built-in helpers for custom link-like behavior
+- add `Link` component with `@to` named argument -- all other named arguments will be the params
+
+*Phase 2*
+- deprecate `LinkTo`
+
+*Phase 3*
+- remove `LinkTo` and the corresponding deprecation
+
+### Details
+
+*Helpers to be implemented*
+
+ - `transition`
+ this is a helper that would tie into the router to be able to achieve the same functionality as the navigational usage of `link-to`
+
+ examples:
+
+ ```hbs
+
+ Edit
+
+
+
+ Login
+
+ ```
+
+
+
+ - `is-route-active`
+ this returns a boolean representing whether or not the current route matches the passed argument.
+
+ example:
+
+ ```hbs
+
+ ```
+
+ this may need to support multiple invocation styles, for when there aren't parameters and the dev wants to be concise:
+
+ examples:
+
+ ```hbs
+
+ No model params provided
+
+ ```
+
+
+*Add `Link` Component*
+
+`Link` could just be tagless component with the following template:
+
+```hbs
+{{!-- components/link/template.hbs --}}
+
+
+ {{yield}}
+
+
+```
+
+Usage:
+```hbs
+Edit Post
+```
+
+where `@models` can be a `hash`, `array`, or just a single object or id.
+
+Starting with @rwjblue's [ember-router-helpers](https://github.com/rwjblue/ember-router-helpers) as a base, `is-route-active` is already implemented (as `is-active`, so this would need to be renamed), along with `route-params`, `transition-to`, and `url-for`.
+
+A [PR](https://github.com/rwjblue/ember-router-helpers/pull/46) has been started that upgrades `ember-router-helpers` and adds tests in preparation for implementing the helper renames and `Link` component.
+
+
+
+**Deprecation** `link-to`
+
+The goal of `Link` and the route helpers is to provide a flexible way of routing from the template while providing a sample component with sensible defaults. This would achieve the exact same functionality as `link-to`, so `link-to` would no longer be needed and could eventually be removed.
+
+## How we teach this
+
+We'll want to make it very clear that the traditional `link-to` technique of linking will still be available, but will eventually be deprecated.
+
+The documentation and guides would need to be incrementally upgraded to inform people about the new linking strategy -- but because the old way would still work, having some docs say `link-to` instead of `Link` wouldn't be the worst thing.
+
+## Drawbacks
+
+The biggest drawback is that all routing documentation would be out of date, and there is a lot of routing documentation and blog posts throughout the web.
+
+Without positional params, the alternative may need to use the `array` helper for the `@to` argument... which would feel awkward enough to make people wonder why `link-to` (as `LinkTo`) didn't get a named argument for the route / route params. With the `Link` component, the arguments would read more ergonomically -- `