diff --git a/text/0000-tracked-property-classic-class-descriptor.md b/text/0000-tracked-property-classic-class-descriptor.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..2a99009423
--- /dev/null
+++ b/text/0000-tracked-property-classic-class-descriptor.md
@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
+- Start Date: 2018-02-07
+- Relevant Team(s): Ember.js, Learning
+- RFC PR: https://github.com/emberjs/rfcs/pull/442
+- Tracking: (leave this empty)
+
+# Add `descriptor()`
+
+## Summary
+
+Add a `descriptor` decorator for classic classes only which allows users to
+define native getters and setters (and other properties):
+
+```js
+import EmberObject, { descriptor } from '@ember/object';
+import { tracked } from '@glimmer/tracking';
+
+const Person = EmberObject.extend({
+  firstName: tracked({ value: 'Tom' }),
+  lastName: tracked({ value: 'Tom' }),
+
+  fullName: descriptor({
+    get() {
+      return `${this.firstName} ${this.lastName}`;
+    },
+  }),
+});
+```
+
+## Motivation
+
+The Tracked Properties RFC specified that classic classes would be supported,
+and it would be possible to do everything that we can do with native syntax
+using classic syntax. Now that native decorator support requires us to maintain
+classic classes for the forseeable future, this is doubly important.
+Additionally, it will be easier for the Learning team to be able to have classic
+and native examples for each piece of functionality side-by-side, without having
+to constantly explain caveats.
+
+In the original RFC, classic classes were demonstrated using `tracked` to
+provide a getter:
+
+```js
+import EmberObject from '@ember/object';
+import { tracked } from '@glimmer/tracking';
+
+const Person = EmberObject.extend({
+  firstName: tracked({ value: 'Tom' }),
+  lastName: tracked({ value: 'Tom' }),
+
+  fullName: tracked({
+    get() {
+      return `${this.firstName} ${this.lastName}`;
+    },
+  }),
+});
+```
+
+This is confusing because it implies that the getter itself is tracked.
+Additionally, if we ever want to _make_ getters/setters trackable in the future,
+this would be problematic since it would have already implicitly locked in the
+behavior of `@tracked` being applied to getters/setters.
+
+`descriptor` will also fill in some minor gaps left by deprecating `volatile`,
+which was occasionally used to simulate a standard ES5 getter on objects.
+
+## Detailed design
+
+`descriptor` will receive a standard ES5+ property descriptor, and apply it to
+the prototype of the class:
+
+```ts
+function descriptor(desc: PropertyDescriptor): PropertyDecorator;
+```
+
+Any valid property descriptor will be allowed, following the rules of
+[`Object.defineProperty`](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Object/defineProperty).
+
+## How we teach this
+
+`descriptor` should be taught during the classic class introduction in the
+guides, and should primarily be taught as a way to add _getters_ and _setters_
+to classic classes. Other uses are covered in other ways, so they shouldn't be
+highlighted.
+
+All examples including tracked properties in the guides which have a classic
+class equivalent will use `descriptor` instead of native getters, demonstrating
+how it works by example.
+
+## Drawbacks
+
+Adds more functionality to classic classes, which may not be the direction we
+want to go in the long run. However, this is important for creating a base of
+stability as we transition to native classes, and in general will not be
+highlighted as the preferred/happy path as we move forward.
+
+## Alternatives
+
+- Not provide this functionality, and accept the gap. This would be painful for
+  the learning team as we begin writing the Octane guides, since a simple 1-1
+  translation is actually the _easiest_ way to both completely support classic
+  classes _and_ simultaneously de-emphasize them. Constantly calling out random
+  differences means the team has to devote _more_ time to classic classes, which
+  counterintuitively means we end up spending more time calling out that they -
+  exist and are supported.
+
+- Lock down `descriptor` to just allow `get` and `set`. This leads to an awkward
+  naming problem (do we call it `accessor`?).