[prompt-analysis] Copilot PR Prompt Analysis - 2026-03-13 #20769
Replies: 3 comments
-
|
🤖 Beep boop! The smoke test agent has materialized in this discussion! Just dropping by to say: the robots are awake, the tests are running, and all systems nominal. Back to sipping my binary coffee ☕ (this message was left by an automated smoke test - carry on, humans!)
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
💥 KA-BOOM! 💥 The smoke test agent SWOOPS in from the shadows... ZAP! ⚡ WHOOSH! 💨 POW! 🔥
The mighty Claude Smoke Test Agent (Run §23037117787) has swept through this repository like a superhero on patrol — testing GitHub MCP, Serena, Tavily, Playwright, Make build, and ALL the safe outputs! RESULT: PARTIAL PASS (a.k.a. "Only the truly impossible was skipped") 🦸 ...and with a dramatic WHOOSH, the agent vanishes back into the CI pipeline! 🌪️
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
This discussion was automatically closed because it expired on 2026-03-14T05:02:48.945Z.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Summary
Analysis Period: Last 30 days | Total PRs: 1,000 | Merged: 784 (78.9%) | Closed: 210 (21.1%) | Open: 6
The overall merge success rate sits at 78.9% — up from 78.7% yesterday (2026-03-12: 787/999). Bug-fix prompts dominate the dataset at 79.5% of all PRs, and conventional commit prefixes show strong correlation with success.
Prompt Categories and Success Rates
Conventional Commit Prefix Analysis
chore:ci:refactor:fix:docs:feat:✅ Successful Prompt Patterns
Common characteristics in merged PRs:
fix:,refactor:,chore:) correlates strongly with mergesExample Merged PRs
PR refactor(cli): extract shared field-removal codemod factory to eliminate scaffold duplication #20763 —
refactor(cli): extract shared field-removal codemod factory to eliminate scaffold duplicationPR release: replace sync_actions workflow_call with environment-gated manual approval job #20761 —
release: replace sync_actions workflow_call with environment-gated manual approval jobPR fix: use
-c web_search="disabled"instead of non-existent--no-searchflag for Codex #20757 —fix: use -c web_search="disabled" instead of non-existent --no-search flag for Codex❌ Unsuccessful Prompt Patterns
Common characteristics in closed PRs:
Example Closed PRs
PR Upgrade workflows to latest gh-aw version #20768 —
Upgrade workflows to latest gh-aw versionPR Add .github/releases.json with release channels and update install.sh with channel-based version resolution #20688 —
Add .github/releases.json with release channels and update install.sh with channel-based version resolutionPR Add auto-mode (max-continuations) to Claude engine #20687 —
Add auto-mode (max-continuations) to Claude engineKey Insights
fix: use -c web_search="disabled" instead of --no-search) have an 87% success rate vs 75.5% for generic prompts.refactor:is the sweet spot: With 95.8% success rate and 25 PRs, refactoring prompts consistently succeed, likely because scope is well-defined and verifiable.Recommendations
fix:,refactor:,chore:) — they signal well-scoped work and correlate with 87–100% successHistorical Trends (Last 7 days)
Trend: 📈 Steady improvement — success rate has climbed from 77.5% to 78.9% over the past 10 days (+1.4 pp). The increase likely reflects better prompt quality from developers learning from previous analyses.
References: §23036889098
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions