[daily-firewall-report] Daily Firewall Report - 2026-04-06 #24875
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
This discussion has been marked as outdated by Daily Firewall Logs Collector and Reporter. A newer discussion is available at Discussion #25080. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Daily network firewall analysis for all agentic workflows that use the firewall feature, covering runs from 2026-04-06. This report identifies blocked domains, access patterns, and security insights to help maintain optimal network permission configurations.
Summary
Key Metrics
Block rate of 0.49% — the firewall is operating cleanly with minimal friction for correctly-configured workflows.
Top Blocked Domains
github.comchatgpt.comapi.github.comPolicy Rule Attribution
Policy configuration: 6 rules (deny-unsafe-ports, deny-connect-unsafe-ports, deny-raw-ipv4, deny-raw-ipv6, allow-both-plain, deny-default). SSL Bump disabled, DLP disabled.
Policy Rule Hit Summary
allow-both-plaindeny-defaultdeny-unsafe-portsdeny-raw-ipv4deny-raw-ipv6Denied Requests with Attribution
github.comgit/2.53.0deny-defaultchatgpt.comcodex_exec/0.118.0deny-defaultapi.github.comcodex_exec/0.118.0deny-defaultgithub.comgit/2.53.0deny-defaultchatgpt.comcodex_exec/0.118.0deny-defaultapi.github.comcodex_exec/0.118.0deny-defaultRule effectiveness: The
deny-defaultcatch-all rule is doing all the blocking work (100% of denials), which is expected. The more specific deny rules (ports, IP-based) had zero hits, indicating no unusual connection attempts to non-standard ports or raw IP addresses.📈 Firewall Activity Trends
Request Patterns by Workflow
The overwhelming majority of workflows operate with zero blocked requests. The two workflows with blocked traffic (AI Moderator and Schema Feature Coverage Checker) both used the Codex engine and both failed — suggesting the missing network permissions directly contributed to their failures.
Top Blocked Domains
All 6 blocked requests were from Codex engine workflows with insufficient network permissions. The
chatgpt.comdomain stands out — Codex CLI attempts to reach ChatGPT (rather than the standardapi.openai.com) which many workflows do not allow.github.comandapi.github.comblocks indicate git operations and GitHub API calls being attempted without the corresponding allowlist entries.View Detailed Request Patterns by Workflow
Workflow: AI Moderator (1 run analyzed)
api.anthropic.comgithub.comchatgpt.comapi.github.com.openai.comand standard CDN/package/certificate domains — GitHub andchatgpt.comnot includedWorkflow: Schema Feature Coverage Checker (1 run analyzed)
api.anthropic.comgithub.comchatgpt.comapi.github.comchatgpt.comblockedAllowed Domains Observed Across All Workflows
The following domains were successfully accessed across 39 firewall-enabled workflow runs:
api.anthropic.comapi.githubcopilot.comapi.openai.comcodeload.github.comgithub.compkg.go.devproxy.golang.orgpypi.orgraw.githubusercontent.comregistry.npmjs.orgstorage.googleapis.comsum.golang.orgView Complete Blocked Domains List
All unique blocked domains from the analysis period (alphabetical order):
api.github.comchatgpt.comgithub.comNote: An additional 1 blocked request for domain
"value"was reported by the audit tool for the Instructions Janitor workflow, but this appears to be a data artifact — no correspondingTCP_DENIEDentry exists in the Squid access log. This may be a template placeholder that leaked into detection metadata.Security Recommendations
🔧 Actionable Fixes
AI Moderator — Add missing network permissions to the workflow frontmatter:
The Codex engine also attempts to reach
chatgpt.com. If this is intentional, add it; if not, the workflow may need to be configured to useapi.openai.comonly.Schema Feature Coverage Checker — Same issue as AI Moderator. The Codex CLI needs GitHub access for git operations. Add the same network permissions.
🔍 Security Insights
chatgpt.comdomain: The Codex CLI (codex_exec/0.118.0) attempts connections tochatgpt.com(consumer product URL) in addition toapi.openai.com. Workflows using Codex that need external AI access may need to explicitly allowlist this domain — or investigate whether the Codex CLI should be using the API endpoint instead.Pattern: Both blocked workflows used the Codex engine and both failed. Codex engine workflows consistently attempt
github.com,api.github.com, andchatgpt.comin addition toapi.openai.com. All Codex-based workflows should audit their network permissions to ensure these are explicitly allowed if needed.deny-defaultrule coverage: All 6 blocked requests were caught by thedeny-defaultcatch-all rule rather than specific deny rules. This is the expected and secure behavior — it confirms no workflows are attempting to bypass security via raw IPs or unsafe ports.Zero false positives on legitimate domains: All workflows that should have access to
github.com,api.anthropic.com,api.openai.com, etc. accessed them successfully. The firewall is not over-blocking.References:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions