[daily secrets] Daily Secrets Analysis — 2026-04-20 #27449
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
This discussion has been marked as outdated by Daily Secrets Analysis Agent. A newer discussion is available at Discussion #27704. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
🔐 Daily Secrets Analysis Report
Date: 2026-04-20
Workflow Files Analyzed: 197
Run: §24693456039
📊 Executive Summary
secrets.*referencesgithub.tokenreferencesSecret Category Breakdown
🛡️ Security Posture
✅ Redaction Coverage: 197/197 workflows (100%) include secret redaction steps
✅ Token Cascades: 739 instances of
GH_AW_GITHUB_MCP_SERVER_TOKEN || GH_AW_GITHUB_TOKEN || GITHUB_TOKENfallback chains✅ Permission Blocks: 197/197 workflows (100%) have explicit permission definitions
✅ Least-Privilege Read: 197/197 workflows (100%) include
contents: read✅ No Secrets in Job Outputs: Verified — no secrets values are directly exposed in job output fields
🎯 Key Findings
Near-universal redaction coverage: Every single compiled workflow includes a redaction step. This is excellent hygiene and prevents accidental secret exposure in logs.
Token cascade pattern is consistent: The 3-tier fallback chain (
GH_AW_GITHUB_MCP_SERVER_TOKEN → GH_AW_GITHUB_TOKEN → GITHUB_TOKEN) appears 739 times across 197 workflows, ensuring resilient GitHub API access without hardcoded tokens.GitHub tokens dominate usage (90.2%): The majority of secret references are GitHub authentication tokens, which is expected. AI API keys represent only 5.2%.
No secrets exposed in job outputs: A Python-based precise check confirmed that no workflow passes secret values through job-level output fields (which would be visible in the Actions UI).
CONTEXT7_API_KEYis a new/minor integration: Only 2 references, suggesting it's used in a small number of specialized workflows.💡 Recommendations
Monitor write-permission workflows: 82 workflows have write permissions. Consider auditing these periodically to ensure they follow the principle of least privilege.
Review AZURE_ and SENTRY_ usage**: These secrets appear in only 2 workflows each. Confirm they are still actively used and consider removing them if no longer needed.
Consider SLACK_BOT_TOKEN audit: Only 1 reference — verify this integration is still active and the secret is rotated regularly.
🔑 Full Secret Inventory (29 unique secrets)
GitHub Authentication
GITHUB_TOKENGH_AW_GITHUB_TOKENGH_AW_GITHUB_MCP_SERVER_TOKENCOPILOT_GITHUB_TOKENGH_AW_PROJECT_GITHUB_TOKENAI API Keys
ANTHROPIC_API_KEYOPENAI_API_KEYCODEX_API_KEYTAVILY_API_KEYGEMINI_API_KEYBRAVE_API_KEYSENTRY_OPENAI_API_KEYObservability / Monitoring
GH_AW_OTEL_ENDPOINTGH_AW_OTEL_HEADERSDD_API_KEYDD_APPLICATION_KEYDD_SITESENTRY_API_KEYSENTRY_ACCESS_TOKENInfrastructure
GH_AW_CI_TRIGGER_TOKENGH_AW_SIDE_REPO_PATGH_AW_AGENT_TOKENGH_AW_PROJECT_GITHUB_TOKENGH_AW_PLUGINS_TOKENThird-Party Integrations
NOTION_API_TOKENCONTEXT7_API_KEYAZURE_CLIENT_IDAZURE_CLIENT_SECRETAZURE_TENANT_IDSLACK_BOT_TOKEN📈 Trend Baseline (first run)
This is the baseline run. Future reports will compare against this data.
secrets.*referencesgithub.tokenreferences📖 Reference Documentation
scratchpad/secrets-yml.mdactions/setup/js/redact_secrets.cjsGenerated: 2026-04-20T22:26:13Z
Workflow: §24693456039
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions