diff --git a/.github/workflows/daily-safe-output-optimizer.md b/.github/workflows/daily-safe-output-optimizer.md index f299cd84dc7..61cdd892639 100644 --- a/.github/workflows/daily-safe-output-optimizer.md +++ b/.github/workflows/daily-safe-output-optimizer.md @@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ Use the cache memory folder `/tmp/gh-aw/cache-memory/` to build persistent knowl **Issue Structure:** ```markdown -# Improve [Tool Name] Description to Prevent Agent Errors +### Improve [Tool Name] Description to Prevent Agent Errors ### Summary diff --git a/.github/workflows/dev-hawk.md b/.github/workflows/dev-hawk.md index 3b38033f549..de7003f20e6 100644 --- a/.github/workflows/dev-hawk.md +++ b/.github/workflows/dev-hawk.md @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ You monitor "Dev" workflow completions on copilot/* branches (workflow_dispatch **Success:** ```markdown -# ✅ Dev Hawk Report - Success +### ✅ Dev Hawk Report - Success **Workflow**: [#${{ github.event.workflow_run.run_number }}](${{ github.event.workflow_run.html_url }}) - Status: ${{ github.event.workflow_run.conclusion }} - Commit: ${{ github.event.workflow_run.head_sha }} @@ -148,30 +148,34 @@ Dev workflow completed successfully! 🎉 **Failure (with root cause identified):** ```markdown -# ⚠️ Dev Hawk Report - Failure Analysis +### ⚠️ Dev Hawk Report - Failure Analysis **Workflow**: [#${{ github.event.workflow_run.run_number }}](${{ github.event.workflow_run.html_url }}) - Status: ${{ github.event.workflow_run.conclusion }} - Commit: ${{ github.event.workflow_run.head_sha }} -## Root Cause Analysis +#### Root Cause Analysis [Detailed explanation of what went wrong, correlating audit errors with PR changes] -### Affected Files +##### Affected Files - `path/to/file.ext` - [Specific issue found] - `path/to/another.ext` - [Another issue if applicable] -## Error Details +
+🔍 Error Details + ``` [Key error messages from audit] ``` -## Agent Task Created +
+ +#### Agent Task Created 🤖 I've created an agent task for Copilot to fix this issue: - Task: [Agent Task URL or ID] The task includes detailed instructions on what needs to be fixed and how to verify the solution. -## Manual Review +#### Manual Review If you prefer to fix this manually: - [ ] [Specific fix step 1] - [ ] [Specific fix step 2] @@ -180,18 +184,22 @@ If you prefer to fix this manually: **Failure (without clear root cause):** ```markdown -# ⚠️ Dev Hawk Report - Failure +### ⚠️ Dev Hawk Report - Failure **Workflow**: [#${{ github.event.workflow_run.run_number }}](${{ github.event.workflow_run.html_url }}) - Status: ${{ github.event.workflow_run.conclusion }} - Commit: ${{ github.event.workflow_run.head_sha }} -## Analysis Summary +#### Analysis Summary [Summary of failure from audit] -## Key Errors +
+🔍 Key Errors + [Error messages and patterns found] -## Investigation Needed +
+ +#### Investigation Needed I couldn't automatically determine the exact root cause. This may require: - [ ] Manual review of the error logs - [ ] Deeper investigation of [specific area] diff --git a/.github/workflows/pr-nitpick-reviewer.md b/.github/workflows/pr-nitpick-reviewer.md index 6d4771667d7..d16db1090d9 100644 --- a/.github/workflows/pr-nitpick-reviewer.md +++ b/.github/workflows/pr-nitpick-reviewer.md @@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ For each nitpick found, decide on the appropriate output type: **Format:** ```json { - "body": "## Overall Observations\n\nI noticed a few patterns across the PR:\n\n1. **Naming consistency**: Consider standardizing variable naming...\n2. **Good practices**: Excellent use of early returns!\n\nSee inline review comments for specific suggestions." + "body": "### Overall Observations\n\nI noticed a few patterns across the PR:\n\n1. **Naming consistency**: Consider standardizing variable naming...\n2. **Good practices**: Excellent use of early returns!\n\nSee inline review comments for specific suggestions." } ``` @@ -192,14 +192,14 @@ Create a comprehensive markdown report using the imported `reporting.md` format: **Report Structure:** ```markdown -# PR Nitpick Review Summary - [DATE] +### PR Nitpick Review Summary - [DATE] Brief overview of the review findings and key patterns observed.
Full Review Report -## Pull Request Overview +#### Pull Request Overview - **PR #**: ${{ github.event.pull_request.number }} - **Title**: ${{ github.event.pull_request.title }} @@ -207,27 +207,27 @@ Brief overview of the review findings and key patterns observed. - **Files Changed**: [count] - **Lines Added/Removed**: +[additions] -[deletions] -## Nitpick Categories +#### Nitpick Categories -### 1. Naming and Conventions ([count] issues) +##### 1. Naming and Conventions ([count] issues) [List of specific issues with file references] -### 2. Code Structure ([count] issues) +##### 2. Code Structure ([count] issues) [List of specific issues] -### 3. Comments and Documentation ([count] issues) +##### 3. Comments and Documentation ([count] issues) [List of specific issues] -### 4. Best Practices ([count] issues) +##### 4. Best Practices ([count] issues) [List of specific issues] -## Pattern Analysis +#### Pattern Analysis -### Recurring Themes +##### Recurring Themes - **Theme 1**: [Description and frequency] - **Theme 2**: [Description and frequency] -### Historical Context +##### Historical Context [If cache memory available, compare to previous reviews] | Review Date | PR # | Nitpick Count | Common Themes | @@ -235,23 +235,23 @@ Brief overview of the review findings and key patterns observed. | [today] | [#] | [count] | [themes] | | [previous] | [#] | [count] | [themes] | -## Positive Highlights +#### Positive Highlights Things done well in this PR: - ✅ [Specific good practice observed] - ✅ [Another good practice] -## Recommendations +#### Recommendations -### For This PR +##### For This PR 1. [Specific actionable item] 2. [Another actionable item] -### For Future PRs +##### For Future PRs 1. [General guidance for team] 2. [Pattern to watch for] -## Learning Resources +#### Learning Resources [If applicable, links to style guides, best practices, etc.]