Replies: 2 comments
-
|
@akvas, I agree that introducing a new PlatformEquipment type for sensors would be a valuable addition. It would enhance the clarity and usability of the platform metadata. Regards, Waley. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
Hi Andres, I am wondering if you have any updates on this idea. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi all,
I want to start a discussion about introducing a new PlatformEquipment type to the Platform file format.
In GNSS meteorology it is generally the case to have sensors (pressure, temperature, relative humidity) co-located with the GNSS station to accurately measure the local meteorological conditions. As is the case with receivers and antennas, these sensors may be replaced over time.
In order to properly track and document these changes, it would be useful to store these sensor changes with other platform (station) metadata. This can currently be done with the PlatformEquipment "other", however, this makes it difficult to use it in programs because it cannot be distinguished via type.
If you agree that this might be a useful feature, I am happy to create a PR.
Cheers,
Andreas
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions