|
1 | 1 | type typeName facet quality_score quality_max quality_level title content |
2 | | -D Decision 5 5 strong Runtime-contract reconciled to five modes + five mode-bound roles + general + observer canon/methods/spawned-agent-session-runtime-contract.md updated to align with sessions-mirror-modes principle: Mode dimension values expanded from 4 to 5 (added resolution); Role dimension rewritten with five mode-bound roles (explorer/planner/builder/validator/resolver) + general (escape hatch) + observer (non-mode-bound continuous observation). New Mode sub-section for Resolution. Mode-collapse anti-patterns extended from 6 to 9 with three resolution-specific items. Composition Rules forbidden combinations expanded to include validator→resolution and resolution→re-validation same-session refusals plus cross-mode parallelism on same artifact. Well-trodden combinations table updated with new role names and a new governance-author entry showing the worked-override case. See Also includes the new principle and constraint as primary references. |
3 | | -D Decision 5 5 strong Governance creation named as worked operator-override use case klappy://canon/constraints/mode-transitions-require-encoded-handoff §Worked Use Cases now names two categories where override is operationally legitimate: production incidents (urgency-driven) and governance creation (oscillation-driven). Governance creation rationale: drafting principles surfaces constraints, drafting constraints surfaces principle refinements, refinements surface unexamined assumptions requiring exploration. Work oscillates across modes faster than handoff norms can yet encode. Override-with-record produces governance with full audit trail of how-the-governance-was-made; clean sessions with poor handoffs would produce governance whose drafting context died at every gate. The signal is not abandoning discipline; it is that the encoding norms are still maturing for this category. |
4 | | -L Learning 5 5 strong The aspiration: clean sessions become transient ephemeral transparent through orchestration Operator framing: "with explicit handoffs and forced working in the same branches we can encode and create enough details that behind the scenes clean sessions are transient and ephemeral and transparent to the operator. It requires plugging gaps in the handoff contract to ensure this is possible and will only come with contact with reality." This is the architecture's eventual state — the conversational ergonomic the operator experiences (continuity, no manual session management) layered over architectural enforcement (fresh sessions per mode, encoded handoffs at every gate). The orchestrator is the consumer pattern that bridges the two. Reaching that state requires contact with reality: the encoding norms are learned through trying and failing, not through theory. Documented in the operator-override section as the aspirational arc; codified separately in the conversational-mode-orchestration follow-up doc once an orchestrator exists. |
5 | | -O Observation 5 5 strong This canon set was itself drafted in a collapsed session under operator-acknowledged override Recursive worked example: the constraint document that codifies operator-override was drafted (along with the principle, the runtime contract, the persona-shaped runtime, and the epistemic-modes patch) in a single collapsed session with the operator. The explorer-planner-builder-validator-resolver oscillation moved faster than handoff norms could yet capture — drafting the principle surfaced the need for a constraint; drafting the constraint surfaced the need for failure-mode sections; the failure-mode framing surfaced the operator's insight about governance creation as a use case. Each of these would have required explicit gate transitions in the architecture's full form; in this session they happened within minutes inside one context. The override produced output that would have been worse if attempted as five clean sessions with handoffs at this norm-maturity level. The constraint doc names this recursion explicitly so future readers see the worked example. |
6 | | -C Constraint 5 5 strong Handoff norms mature only through contact with reality Drafted handoff norms cannot anticipate every dynamic type, every implicit context, every load-bearing-but-unwritten assumption. Norms catch up to failures only after failures occur. Therefore: (1) the override is a legitimate operational tool, not a discipline failure, when used in categories where norms are still maturing; (2) projects should expect to discover handoff-norm gaps through observed failures (sessions flagging handoffs as insufficient, downstream rework caused by missing context); (3) the runtime's handoff-insufficiency signaling is the learning input that drives norm refinement; (4) governance creation is one of the first categories where this learning loop is expected to operate, because governance work is itself meta-cognitive and resists prior encoding. |
7 | | -H Handoff 5 5 strong PR #187 fourth commit — runtime-contract alignment + governance-override worked example klappy.dev branch claude/runtime-canon-acd1. Files modified in this commit: (1) canon/methods/spawned-agent-session-runtime-contract.md — frontmatter, dimensions table, Mode section (added Resolution), anti-patterns list (3→9), Role section (full rewrite to five mode-bound roles + general + observer), Composition Rules (forbidden + well-trodden updated), See Also. (2) canon/constraints/mode-transitions-require-encoded-handoff.md — added §Worked Use Cases naming production-incidents and governance-creation as override categories, plus the recursive observation that this canon set was itself drafted under override. PR #187 will pick up the changes; mergeable_state should remain clean. |
| 2 | +D Decision 5 5 strong Runtime-contract reconciled to five modes + five mode-bound roles + general + observer canon/methods/spawned-agent-session-runtime-contract.md updated to align with sessions-mirror-modes principle: Mode dimension values expanded from 4 to 5 (added resolution); Role dimension rewritten with five mode-bound roles (explorer/planner/builder/validator/resolver) + general (escape hatch) + observer (non-mode-bound continuous observation). New Mode sub-section for Resolution. Mode-collapse anti-patterns extended from 6 to 9 with three resolution-specific items. Composition Rules forbidden combinations expanded to include validator→resolution and resolution→re-validation same-session refusals plus cross-mode parallelism on same artifact. Well-trodden combinations table updated with new role names and a new governance-author entry showing the worked-override case. See Also includes the new principle and constraint as primary references. |
| 3 | +D Decision 5 5 strong Governance creation named as worked operator-override use case klappy://canon/constraints/mode-transitions-require-encoded-handoff §Worked Use Cases now names two categories where override is operationally legitimate: production incidents (urgency-driven) and governance creation (oscillation-driven). Governance creation rationale: drafting principles surfaces constraints, drafting constraints surfaces principle refinements, refinements surface unexamined assumptions requiring exploration. Work oscillates across modes faster than handoff norms can yet encode. Override-with-record produces governance with full audit trail of how-the-governance-was-made; clean sessions with poor handoffs would produce governance whose drafting context died at every gate. The signal is not abandoning discipline; it is that the encoding norms are still maturing for this category. |
| 4 | +L Learning 5 5 strong The aspiration: clean sessions become transient ephemeral transparent through orchestration Operator framing: "with explicit handoffs and forced working in the same branches we can encode and create enough details that behind the scenes clean sessions are transient and ephemeral and transparent to the operator. It requires plugging gaps in the handoff contract to ensure this is possible and will only come with contact with reality." This is the architecture's eventual state — the conversational ergonomic the operator experiences (continuity, no manual session management) layered over architectural enforcement (fresh sessions per mode, encoded handoffs at every gate). The orchestrator is the consumer pattern that bridges the two. Reaching that state requires contact with reality: the encoding norms are learned through trying and failing, not through theory. Documented in the operator-override section as the aspirational arc; codified separately in the conversational-mode-orchestration follow-up doc once an orchestrator exists. |
| 5 | +O Observation 5 5 strong This canon set was itself drafted in a collapsed session under operator-acknowledged override Recursive worked example: the constraint document that codifies operator-override was drafted (along with the principle, the runtime contract, the persona-shaped runtime, and the epistemic-modes patch) in a single collapsed session with the operator. The explorer-planner-builder-validator-resolver oscillation moved faster than handoff norms could yet capture — drafting the principle surfaced the need for a constraint; drafting the constraint surfaced the need for failure-mode sections; the failure-mode framing surfaced the operator's insight about governance creation as a use case. Each of these would have required explicit gate transitions in the architecture's full form; in this session they happened within minutes inside one context. The override produced output that would have been worse if attempted as five clean sessions with handoffs at this norm-maturity level. The constraint doc names this recursion explicitly so future readers see the worked example. |
| 6 | +C Constraint 5 5 strong Handoff norms mature only through contact with reality Drafted handoff norms cannot anticipate every dynamic type, every implicit context, every load-bearing-but-unwritten assumption. Norms catch up to failures only after failures occur. Therefore: (1) the override is a legitimate operational tool, not a discipline failure, when used in categories where norms are still maturing; (2) projects should expect to discover handoff-norm gaps through observed failures (sessions flagging handoffs as insufficient, downstream rework caused by missing context); (3) the runtime's handoff-insufficiency signaling is the learning input that drives norm refinement; (4) governance creation is one of the first categories where this learning loop is expected to operate, because governance work is itself meta-cognitive and resists prior encoding. |
| 7 | +H Handoff 5 5 strong PR #187 fourth commit — runtime-contract alignment + governance-override worked example klappy.dev branch claude/runtime-canon-acd1. Files modified in this commit: (1) canon/methods/spawned-agent-session-runtime-contract.md — frontmatter, dimensions table, Mode section (added Resolution), anti-patterns list (3→9), Role section (full rewrite to five mode-bound roles + general + observer), Composition Rules (forbidden + well-trodden updated), See Also. (2) canon/constraints/mode-transitions-require-encoded-handoff.md — added §Worked Use Cases naming production-incidents and governance-creation as override categories, plus the recursive observation that this canon set was itself drafted under override. PR #187 will pick up the changes; mergeable_state should remain clean. |
0 commit comments