From 20a69fd7ca9af3efb43f4bf878f4064ae508faa5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sasa Junuzovic Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2026 21:28:46 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 1/6] fix: restore responder to working version (f2a4b14) minus resolve Exact match to the version that successfully addressed review threads (run 23117978475, 2026-03-15), with only two changes: 1. Added if: label gate for aw PRs 2. Removed resolve-pull-request-review-thread safe-output and step 6e (orchestrator handles resolution) No other changes. This commit should not be modified. Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> --- .github/workflows/review-responder.md | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/.github/workflows/review-responder.md b/.github/workflows/review-responder.md index 9fa6920..ed88a0b 100644 --- a/.github/workflows/review-responder.md +++ b/.github/workflows/review-responder.md @@ -58,13 +58,11 @@ This workflow runs when a review is submitted on a pull request. 6. For each unresolved review comment thread (up to 10): a. Read the comment and understand what change is being requested b. Read the relevant file and surrounding code context - c. Make the requested fix in the code (edit the file locally — do NOT push yet) + c. Make the requested fix in the code d. Reply to the comment thread explaining what you changed 7. After addressing all comments, run the CI checks locally to make sure your fixes don't break anything: `uv sync && uv run ruff check --fix . && uv run ruff format . && uv run pyright && uv run pytest --cov --cov-fail-under=80 -v` -8. Push all changes in a single commit with message "fix: address review comments". Reply to all threads BEFORE pushing — replies after a push will appear on outdated code. +8. Push all changes in a single commit with message "fix: address review comments". If a review comment requests a change that would be architecturally significant or you're unsure about, reply to the thread explaining your concern rather than making the change blindly. - -NOTE: Thread resolution is handled separately by the pipeline orchestrator after this workflow completes. Your job is to fix the code and reply to threads — do NOT attempt to resolve threads. From 38394561f4f181a0f20d8080c72a0c1ff30cb0f8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sasa Junuzovic Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2026 21:51:58 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 2/6] feat: switch responder to workflow_dispatch trigger MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Replace pull_request_review trigger with workflow_dispatch + pr_number input. No more loops from stray review events. Orchestrator or manual dispatch controls when responder runs. Removed aw label check and triggering review check — no longer applicable with workflow_dispatch. Renumbered steps. Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> --- .github/workflows/review-responder.lock.yml | 44 ++++++--------------- .github/workflows/review-responder.md | 31 +++++++-------- 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-) diff --git a/.github/workflows/review-responder.lock.yml b/.github/workflows/review-responder.lock.yml index 26e31f2..422356a 100644 --- a/.github/workflows/review-responder.lock.yml +++ b/.github/workflows/review-responder.lock.yml @@ -22,40 +22,34 @@ # For more information: https://github.github.com/gh-aw/introduction/overview/ # # -# gh-aw-metadata: {"schema_version":"v2","frontmatter_hash":"1f273805d83429b3a54dcfbae6be92e73d936e61f45a40685d07d6aea98ec2ad","compiler_version":"v0.60.0","strict":true} +# gh-aw-metadata: {"schema_version":"v2","frontmatter_hash":"18ea3aea8412a09391cfc10b7bb4fdb762ed47ac575855ee07f24644e6fb3cc7","compiler_version":"v0.60.0","strict":true} name: "Review Responder" "on": - # bots: # Bots processed as bot check in pre-activation job - # - Copilot # Bots processed as bot check in pre-activation job - # - copilot-pull-request-reviewer # Bots processed as bot check in pre-activation job - pull_request_review: - types: - - submitted - # roles: all # Roles processed as role check in pre-activation job + workflow_dispatch: + inputs: + pr_number: + description: PR number to address review comments on + required: true + type: string permissions: {} concurrency: - group: "gh-aw-${{ github.workflow }}-${{ github.event.pull_request.number || github.ref || github.run_id }}" - cancel-in-progress: true + group: "gh-aw-${{ github.workflow }}" run-name: "Review Responder" jobs: activation: - if: contains(github.event.pull_request.labels.*.name, 'aw') runs-on: ubuntu-slim permissions: contents: read outputs: - body: ${{ steps.sanitized.outputs.body }} comment_id: "" comment_repo: "" model: ${{ steps.generate_aw_info.outputs.model }} secret_verification_result: ${{ steps.validate-secret.outputs.verification_result }} - text: ${{ steps.sanitized.outputs.text }} - title: ${{ steps.sanitized.outputs.title }} steps: - name: Setup Scripts uses: github/gh-aw-actions/setup@v0.60.0 @@ -109,17 +103,6 @@ jobs: setupGlobals(core, github, context, exec, io); const { main } = require('/opt/gh-aw/actions/check_workflow_timestamp_api.cjs'); await main(); - - name: Compute current body text - id: sanitized - uses: actions/github-script@ed597411d8f924073f98dfc5c65a23a2325f34cd # v8 - env: - GH_AW_ALLOWED_BOTS: Copilot,copilot-pull-request-reviewer - with: - script: | - const { setupGlobals } = require('/opt/gh-aw/actions/setup_globals.cjs'); - setupGlobals(core, github, context, exec, io); - const { main } = require('/opt/gh-aw/actions/compute_text.cjs'); - await main(); - name: Create prompt with built-in context env: GH_AW_PROMPT: /tmp/gh-aw/aw-prompts/prompt.txt @@ -132,7 +115,7 @@ jobs: GH_AW_GITHUB_REPOSITORY: ${{ github.repository }} GH_AW_GITHUB_RUN_ID: ${{ github.run_id }} GH_AW_GITHUB_WORKSPACE: ${{ github.workspace }} - GH_AW_IS_PR_COMMENT: ${{ github.event.issue.pull_request && 'true' || '' }} + GH_AW_INPUTS_PR_NUMBER: ${{ inputs.pr_number }} run: | bash /opt/gh-aw/actions/create_prompt_first.sh { @@ -180,9 +163,6 @@ jobs: GH_AW_PROMPT_EOF cat "/opt/gh-aw/prompts/github_mcp_tools_with_safeoutputs_prompt.md" - if [ "$GITHUB_EVENT_NAME" = "issue_comment" ] && [ -n "$GH_AW_IS_PR_COMMENT" ] || [ "$GITHUB_EVENT_NAME" = "pull_request_review_comment" ] || [ "$GITHUB_EVENT_NAME" = "pull_request_review" ]; then - cat "/opt/gh-aw/prompts/pr_context_prompt.md" - fi cat << 'GH_AW_PROMPT_EOF' GH_AW_PROMPT_EOF @@ -194,7 +174,7 @@ jobs: uses: actions/github-script@ed597411d8f924073f98dfc5c65a23a2325f34cd # v8 env: GH_AW_PROMPT: /tmp/gh-aw/aw-prompts/prompt.txt - GH_AW_GITHUB_EVENT_PULL_REQUEST_NUMBER: ${{ github.event.pull_request.number }} + GH_AW_INPUTS_PR_NUMBER: ${{ inputs.pr_number }} with: script: | const { setupGlobals } = require('/opt/gh-aw/actions/setup_globals.cjs'); @@ -213,7 +193,7 @@ jobs: GH_AW_GITHUB_REPOSITORY: ${{ github.repository }} GH_AW_GITHUB_RUN_ID: ${{ github.run_id }} GH_AW_GITHUB_WORKSPACE: ${{ github.workspace }} - GH_AW_IS_PR_COMMENT: ${{ github.event.issue.pull_request && 'true' || '' }} + GH_AW_INPUTS_PR_NUMBER: ${{ inputs.pr_number }} with: script: | const { setupGlobals } = require('/opt/gh-aw/actions/setup_globals.cjs'); @@ -233,7 +213,7 @@ jobs: GH_AW_GITHUB_REPOSITORY: process.env.GH_AW_GITHUB_REPOSITORY, GH_AW_GITHUB_RUN_ID: process.env.GH_AW_GITHUB_RUN_ID, GH_AW_GITHUB_WORKSPACE: process.env.GH_AW_GITHUB_WORKSPACE, - GH_AW_IS_PR_COMMENT: process.env.GH_AW_IS_PR_COMMENT + GH_AW_INPUTS_PR_NUMBER: process.env.GH_AW_INPUTS_PR_NUMBER } }); - name: Validate prompt placeholders diff --git a/.github/workflows/review-responder.md b/.github/workflows/review-responder.md index ed88a0b..5ab78bf 100644 --- a/.github/workflows/review-responder.md +++ b/.github/workflows/review-responder.md @@ -1,10 +1,11 @@ --- -if: "contains(github.event.pull_request.labels.*.name, 'aw')" on: - pull_request_review: - types: [submitted] - roles: all - bots: [Copilot, copilot-pull-request-reviewer] + workflow_dispatch: + inputs: + pr_number: + description: "PR number to address review comments on" + required: true + type: string permissions: contents: read @@ -39,30 +40,26 @@ safe-outputs: # Review Responder -Address review comments on pull request #${{ github.event.pull_request.number }}. +Address review comments on pull request #${{ inputs.pr_number }}. ## Instructions -This workflow runs when a review is submitted on a pull request. +This workflow addresses unresolved review comments on a pull request. -1. First, check if the PR has the `aw` label. If it does NOT have the `aw` label, stop immediately — this workflow only handles agent-created PRs. +1. Check if the PR already has the label `review-response-attempted`. If it does, add a comment to the PR saying "Review response already attempted — stopping to prevent loops. Manual intervention needed." and stop. -2. Check the review that triggered this workflow. If the review has no comments (e.g., a plain approval with no inline comments), stop — there is nothing to address. +2. Add the label `review-response-attempted` to the PR. -3. Check if the PR already has the label `review-response-attempted`. If it does, add a comment to the PR saying "Review response already attempted — stopping to prevent loops. Manual intervention needed." and stop. +3. Read the unresolved review comment threads on the PR (not just the latest review — get all unresolved threads). If there are more than 10 unresolved threads, address the first 10 and leave a summary comment on the PR noting how many remain for manual follow-up. -4. Add the label `review-response-attempted` to the PR. - -5. Read the unresolved review comment threads on the PR (not just the latest review — get all unresolved threads). If there are more than 10 unresolved threads, address the first 10 and leave a summary comment on the PR noting how many remain for manual follow-up. - -6. For each unresolved review comment thread (up to 10): +4. For each unresolved review comment thread (up to 10): a. Read the comment and understand what change is being requested b. Read the relevant file and surrounding code context c. Make the requested fix in the code d. Reply to the comment thread explaining what you changed -7. After addressing all comments, run the CI checks locally to make sure your fixes don't break anything: `uv sync && uv run ruff check --fix . && uv run ruff format . && uv run pyright && uv run pytest --cov --cov-fail-under=80 -v` +5. After addressing all comments, run the CI checks locally to make sure your fixes don't break anything: `uv sync && uv run ruff check --fix . && uv run ruff format . && uv run pyright && uv run pytest --cov --cov-fail-under=80 -v` -8. Push all changes in a single commit with message "fix: address review comments". +6. Push all changes in a single commit with message "fix: address review comments". If a review comment requests a change that would be architecturally significant or you're unsure about, reply to the thread explaining your concern rather than making the change blindly. From af4ee63cbe100c3f6217c83791f080b013ef63fb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sasa Junuzovic Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2026 21:52:14 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 3/6] feat: responder fixes CI failures before pushing If CI checks fail after addressing review comments, fix the issues and re-run until they pass. Do not push broken code. Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> --- .github/workflows/review-responder.md | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/.github/workflows/review-responder.md b/.github/workflows/review-responder.md index 5ab78bf..3ca813c 100644 --- a/.github/workflows/review-responder.md +++ b/.github/workflows/review-responder.md @@ -60,6 +60,8 @@ This workflow addresses unresolved review comments on a pull request. 5. After addressing all comments, run the CI checks locally to make sure your fixes don't break anything: `uv sync && uv run ruff check --fix . && uv run ruff format . && uv run pyright && uv run pytest --cov --cov-fail-under=80 -v` -6. Push all changes in a single commit with message "fix: address review comments". +6. If CI checks fail, fix the issues and re-run until they pass. Do not push broken code. + +7. Push all changes in a single commit with message "fix: address review comments". If a review comment requests a change that would be architecturally significant or you're unsure about, reply to the thread explaining your concern rather than making the change blindly. From 69cf6915e288497e314e86d35347b85a2815d27c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sasa Junuzovic Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2026 22:55:47 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 4/6] feat: set target '*' on safe outputs for workflow_dispatch support The reply-to-pull-request-review-comment and push-to-pull-request-branch safe output handlers default to target 'triggering' which requires a pull_request event context. Setting target to '*' lets the agent specify the PR number in each message, enabling workflow_dispatch. Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> --- .github/workflows/review-responder.lock.yml | 16 +++++++++++++--- .github/workflows/review-responder.md | 7 +++++++ 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/.github/workflows/review-responder.lock.yml b/.github/workflows/review-responder.lock.yml index 422356a..4e7b882 100644 --- a/.github/workflows/review-responder.lock.yml +++ b/.github/workflows/review-responder.lock.yml @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ # For more information: https://github.github.com/gh-aw/introduction/overview/ # # -# gh-aw-metadata: {"schema_version":"v2","frontmatter_hash":"18ea3aea8412a09391cfc10b7bb4fdb762ed47ac575855ee07f24644e6fb3cc7","compiler_version":"v0.60.0","strict":true} +# gh-aw-metadata: {"schema_version":"v2","frontmatter_hash":"e9dedf9ee2f5a6beffd74f5c1ac40c9263eda4f41e3db146c13a4d8576fd3970","compiler_version":"v0.60.0","strict":true} name: "Review Responder" "on": @@ -159,6 +159,9 @@ jobs: {{#if __GH_AW_GITHUB_RUN_ID__ }} - **workflow-run-id**: __GH_AW_GITHUB_RUN_ID__ {{/if}} + - **checkouts**: The following repositories have been checked out and are available in the workspace: + - `$GITHUB_WORKSPACE` → `__GH_AW_GITHUB_REPOSITORY__` (cwd) [full history, all branches available as remote-tracking refs] [additional refs fetched: *] + - **Note**: If a branch you need is not in the list above and is not listed as an additional fetched ref, it has NOT been checked out. For private repositories you cannot fetch it without proper authentication. If the branch is required and not available, exit with an error and ask the user to add it to the `fetch:` option of the `checkout:` configuration (e.g., `fetch: ["refs/pulls/open/*"]` for all open PR refs, or `fetch: ["main", "feature/my-branch"]` for specific branches). GH_AW_PROMPT_EOF @@ -269,6 +272,13 @@ jobs: uses: actions/checkout@de0fac2e4500dabe0009e67214ff5f5447ce83dd # v6.0.2 with: persist-credentials: false + fetch-depth: 0 + - name: Fetch additional refs + env: + GH_AW_FETCH_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GH_AW_GITHUB_MCP_SERVER_TOKEN || secrets.GH_AW_GITHUB_TOKEN || secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} + run: | + header=$(printf "x-access-token:%s" "${GH_AW_FETCH_TOKEN}" | base64 -w 0) + git -c "http.extraheader=Authorization: Basic ${header}" fetch origin '+refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*' - name: Create gh-aw temp directory run: bash /opt/gh-aw/actions/create_gh_aw_tmp_dir.sh - name: Configure Git credentials @@ -321,7 +331,7 @@ jobs: mkdir -p /tmp/gh-aw/safeoutputs mkdir -p /tmp/gh-aw/mcp-logs/safeoutputs cat > /opt/gh-aw/safeoutputs/config.json << 'GH_AW_SAFE_OUTPUTS_CONFIG_EOF' - {"add_labels":{"max":3},"missing_data":{},"missing_tool":{},"noop":{"max":1},"push_to_pull_request_branch":{"max":1},"reply_to_pull_request_review_comment":{"max":10}} + {"add_labels":{"max":3},"missing_data":{},"missing_tool":{},"noop":{"max":1},"push_to_pull_request_branch":{"max":1,"target":"*"},"reply_to_pull_request_review_comment":{"max":10,"target":"*"}} GH_AW_SAFE_OUTPUTS_CONFIG_EOF - name: Write Safe Outputs Tools run: | @@ -1050,7 +1060,7 @@ jobs: GH_AW_ALLOWED_DOMAINS: "*.pythonhosted.org,anaconda.org,api.business.githubcopilot.com,api.enterprise.githubcopilot.com,api.github.com,api.githubcopilot.com,api.individual.githubcopilot.com,api.snapcraft.io,archive.ubuntu.com,azure.archive.ubuntu.com,binstar.org,bootstrap.pypa.io,conda.anaconda.org,conda.binstar.org,crates.io,crl.geotrust.com,crl.globalsign.com,crl.identrust.com,crl.sectigo.com,crl.thawte.com,crl.usertrust.com,crl.verisign.com,crl3.digicert.com,crl4.digicert.com,crls.ssl.com,files.pythonhosted.org,github.com,host.docker.internal,index.crates.io,json-schema.org,json.schemastore.org,keyserver.ubuntu.com,ocsp.digicert.com,ocsp.geotrust.com,ocsp.globalsign.com,ocsp.identrust.com,ocsp.sectigo.com,ocsp.ssl.com,ocsp.thawte.com,ocsp.usertrust.com,ocsp.verisign.com,packagecloud.io,packages.cloud.google.com,packages.microsoft.com,pip.pypa.io,ppa.launchpad.net,pypi.org,pypi.python.org,raw.githubusercontent.com,registry.npmjs.org,repo.anaconda.com,repo.continuum.io,s.symcb.com,s.symcd.com,security.ubuntu.com,static.crates.io,telemetry.enterprise.githubcopilot.com,ts-crl.ws.symantec.com,ts-ocsp.ws.symantec.com" GITHUB_SERVER_URL: ${{ github.server_url }} GITHUB_API_URL: ${{ github.api_url }} - GH_AW_SAFE_OUTPUTS_HANDLER_CONFIG: "{\"add_labels\":{\"github-token\":\"${{ secrets.GH_AW_WRITE_TOKEN }}\"},\"missing_data\":{},\"missing_tool\":{},\"push_to_pull_request_branch\":{\"github-token\":\"${{ secrets.GH_AW_WRITE_TOKEN }}\",\"if_no_changes\":\"warn\",\"max_patch_size\":1024,\"protected_files\":[\"package.json\",\"bun.lockb\",\"bunfig.toml\",\"deno.json\",\"deno.jsonc\",\"deno.lock\",\"global.json\",\"NuGet.Config\",\"Directory.Packages.props\",\"mix.exs\",\"mix.lock\",\"go.mod\",\"go.sum\",\"stack.yaml\",\"stack.yaml.lock\",\"pom.xml\",\"build.gradle\",\"build.gradle.kts\",\"settings.gradle\",\"settings.gradle.kts\",\"gradle.properties\",\"package-lock.json\",\"yarn.lock\",\"pnpm-lock.yaml\",\"npm-shrinkwrap.json\",\"requirements.txt\",\"Pipfile\",\"Pipfile.lock\",\"pyproject.toml\",\"setup.py\",\"setup.cfg\",\"Gemfile\",\"Gemfile.lock\",\"uv.lock\",\"AGENTS.md\"],\"protected_path_prefixes\":[\".github/\",\".agents/\"]},\"reply_to_pull_request_review_comment\":{\"github-token\":\"${{ secrets.GH_AW_WRITE_TOKEN }}\",\"max\":10}}" + GH_AW_SAFE_OUTPUTS_HANDLER_CONFIG: "{\"add_labels\":{\"github-token\":\"${{ secrets.GH_AW_WRITE_TOKEN }}\"},\"missing_data\":{},\"missing_tool\":{},\"push_to_pull_request_branch\":{\"github-token\":\"${{ secrets.GH_AW_WRITE_TOKEN }}\",\"if_no_changes\":\"warn\",\"labels\":[\"aw\"],\"max_patch_size\":1024,\"protected_files\":[\"package.json\",\"bun.lockb\",\"bunfig.toml\",\"deno.json\",\"deno.jsonc\",\"deno.lock\",\"global.json\",\"NuGet.Config\",\"Directory.Packages.props\",\"mix.exs\",\"mix.lock\",\"go.mod\",\"go.sum\",\"stack.yaml\",\"stack.yaml.lock\",\"pom.xml\",\"build.gradle\",\"build.gradle.kts\",\"settings.gradle\",\"settings.gradle.kts\",\"gradle.properties\",\"package-lock.json\",\"yarn.lock\",\"pnpm-lock.yaml\",\"npm-shrinkwrap.json\",\"requirements.txt\",\"Pipfile\",\"Pipfile.lock\",\"pyproject.toml\",\"setup.py\",\"setup.cfg\",\"Gemfile\",\"Gemfile.lock\",\"uv.lock\",\"AGENTS.md\"],\"protected_path_prefixes\":[\".github/\",\".agents/\"],\"target\":\"*\"},\"reply_to_pull_request_review_comment\":{\"github-token\":\"${{ secrets.GH_AW_WRITE_TOKEN }}\",\"max\":10,\"target\":\"*\"}}" GH_AW_CI_TRIGGER_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GH_AW_CI_TRIGGER_TOKEN }} GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GH_AW_WRITE_TOKEN }} with: diff --git a/.github/workflows/review-responder.md b/.github/workflows/review-responder.md index 3ca813c..c0d1a44 100644 --- a/.github/workflows/review-responder.md +++ b/.github/workflows/review-responder.md @@ -12,6 +12,10 @@ permissions: issues: read pull-requests: read +checkout: + fetch: ["*"] + fetch-depth: 0 + engine: id: copilot model: claude-opus-4.6 @@ -29,8 +33,11 @@ safe-outputs: noop: report-as-issue: false push-to-pull-request-branch: + target: "*" + labels: [aw] github-token: ${{ secrets.GH_AW_WRITE_TOKEN }} reply-to-pull-request-review-comment: + target: "*" max: 10 github-token: ${{ secrets.GH_AW_WRITE_TOKEN }} add-labels: From 7e65cfbd34e3e7c16febb2dccdfb953a920a5298 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sasa Junuzovic Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2026 20:54:53 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 5/6] test: add responder sandbox file for testing review response Intentionally imperfect code for testing the review-responder agent. DO NOT MERGE this branch to main. --- tests/test_responder_sandbox.py | 16 ++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tests/test_responder_sandbox.py diff --git a/tests/test_responder_sandbox.py b/tests/test_responder_sandbox.py new file mode 100644 index 0000000..2098409 --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/test_responder_sandbox.py @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +# Responder Sandbox — intentionally imperfect code for testing + + +def calculate_total(lst: list[int]) -> int: + x = 0 + for i in lst: + x = x + i + return x + + +def format_output(data: list[str], verbose: bool) -> str: + result = "" + for item in data: + suffix = "\n" if verbose else ", " + result = result + str(item) + suffix + return result From aac05d45b6b9701666e43ba36fb1eb62646e407f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "github-actions[bot]" Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2026 06:04:55 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 6/6] fix: address review comments Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> --- tests/test_responder_sandbox.py | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/tests/test_responder_sandbox.py b/tests/test_responder_sandbox.py index 2098409..7057f71 100644 --- a/tests/test_responder_sandbox.py +++ b/tests/test_responder_sandbox.py @@ -2,10 +2,10 @@ def calculate_total(lst: list[int]) -> int: - x = 0 + total = 0 for i in lst: - x = x + i - return x + total = total + i + return total def format_output(data: list[str], verbose: bool) -> str: