fix: respect updated v:count when using . repeat
#253
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
numToStr
changed the title
v:count value when using . repeatv:count when using . repeat
numToStr
force-pushed
the
count
branch
2 times, most recently
from
61d716d to
11402f7
Compare
numToStr
changed the title
v:count when using . repeatv:count when using . repeat
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Previously, when you press
3gcc3 lines will be (un)commented then pressing.also (un)comments 3 lines. This is fine. But if you press4.(prefixing the.with acount) it (un)comments 3 lines instead of 4 which is wrong. As.repeat should respect the updated value of thev:count, in this case,4should be used instead of3.With this PR,
.will respect the updated value ofv:countby removing an old workaround. This PR also replacesvim.v.countwithvim.api.nvim_get_vvar('count').