From a700f2d3e7e36db5cb5e24278e94ea281c280344 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Caitin <34535727+CaitinChen@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2020 17:33:17 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] faq: fix the sysbench link (#1963) --- faq/tidb.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/faq/tidb.md b/faq/tidb.md index 18b8db7836511..4e351bea37c0e 100644 --- a/faq/tidb.md +++ b/faq/tidb.md @@ -736,7 +736,7 @@ No. TiDB (or data created from the transactional API) relies on a specific key f At the beginning, many users tend to do a benchmark test or a comparison test between TiDB and MySQL. We have also done a similar official test and find the test result is consistent at large, although the test data has some bias. Because the architecture of TiDB differs greatly from MySQL, it is hard to find a benchmark point. The suggestions are as follows: - Do not spend too much time on the benchmark test. Pay more attention to the difference of scenarios using TiDB. -- See [Performance test result for TiDB using Sysbench](https://github.com/pingcap/docs/blob/master/dev/benchmark/sysbench-v4.md). +- See [Performance test result for TiDB using Sysbench](/benchmark/sysbench-v4.md). #### What's the relationship between the TiDB cluster capacity (QPS) and the number of nodes? How does TiDB compare to MySQL? From 03799ae99763eb6487124d1aac0d284fb3ff2260 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Caitin <34535727+CaitinChen@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2020 20:22:42 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Update a link --- faq/tidb.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/faq/tidb.md b/faq/tidb.md index 4e351bea37c0e..11828c5b15075 100644 --- a/faq/tidb.md +++ b/faq/tidb.md @@ -736,7 +736,7 @@ No. TiDB (or data created from the transactional API) relies on a specific key f At the beginning, many users tend to do a benchmark test or a comparison test between TiDB and MySQL. We have also done a similar official test and find the test result is consistent at large, although the test data has some bias. Because the architecture of TiDB differs greatly from MySQL, it is hard to find a benchmark point. The suggestions are as follows: - Do not spend too much time on the benchmark test. Pay more attention to the difference of scenarios using TiDB. -- See [Performance test result for TiDB using Sysbench](/benchmark/sysbench-v4.md). +- See [Performance test result for TiDB using Sysbench](/benchmark/sysbench-v3.md). #### What's the relationship between the TiDB cluster capacity (QPS) and the number of nodes? How does TiDB compare to MySQL?