diff --git a/.github/CODEOWNERS b/.github/CODEOWNERS index d52242858ec..a7446103a64 100644 --- a/.github/CODEOWNERS +++ b/.github/CODEOWNERS @@ -493,7 +493,7 @@ pep-0635.rst @brandtbucher @gvanrossum pep-0636.rst @brandtbucher @gvanrossum pep-0637.rst @stevendaprano pep-0638.rst @markshannon -pep-0639.rst @pfmoore +pep-0639.rst @pfmoore @CAM-Gerlach pep-0640.rst @Yhg1s pep-0641.rst @zooba @warsaw @brettcannon pep-0642.rst @ncoghlan diff --git a/pep-0639.rst b/pep-0639.rst index d628e43af32..9c7e8b15ca9 100644 --- a/pep-0639.rst +++ b/pep-0639.rst @@ -5,13 +5,13 @@ Last-Modified: $Date$ Author: Philippe Ombredanne , C.A.M. Gerlach Sponsor: Paul Moore -PEP-Delegate: Paul Moore +PEP-Delegate: Brett Cannon Discussions-To: https://discuss.python.org/t/12622 Status: Draft Type: Standards Track Content-Type: text/x-rst Created: 15-Aug-2019 -Post-History: +Post-History: 15-Aug-2019, 17-Dec-2021 Resolution: @@ -1396,7 +1396,7 @@ but re-using the ``license`` key for the license expression, either by defining it as the (previously reserved) string value for the ``license`` key, retaining the ``expression`` subkey in the ``license`` table, or allowing both. Indeed, this would seem to have been envisioned by PEP 621 -itself with this PEP in mind, in particular the first approach:: +itself with this PEP in mind, in particular the first approach: A practical string value for the license key has been purposefully left out to allow for a future PEP to specify support for SPDX expressions