only issue "variant of the expected type" suggestion for enums

Felix S. Klock II pointed out that this suggestion (introduced in
pull-request #43178 / eac7410) was being issued for one-field-struct
expected types (in which case it is misleading and outright wrong),
even though it was only intended for one-field enum-variants (most
notably, `Some`). Particularly tender-hearted code-historians may be
inclined to show mercy towards the author of #43178 on the grounds
that it's somewhat confusing that struct field definitions are given
in a type called `ty::VariantDef`.

Add a conditional to adhere to the original intent. (It would be
possible to generalize to structs, but not obviously net desirable.)
This adds a level of indentation, so the diff here is going to be
easier to read in ignore-whitespace mode (`-w`).

Resolves #55250.

Author: zackmdavis

src/librustc_typeck/check/demand.rs

@@ -111,10 +111,10 @@ impl<'a, 'gcx, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'gcx, 'tcx> {
         let expr_ty = self.resolve_type_vars_with_obligations(checked_ty);
         let mut err = self.report_mismatched_types(&cause, expected, expr_ty, e);
 
-        // If the expected type is an enum with any variants whose sole
-        // field is of the found type, suggest such variants. See Issue
-        // #42764.
+        // If the expected type is an enum (Issue #55250) with any variants whose
+        // sole field is of the found type, suggest such variants. (Issue #42764)
         if let ty::Adt(expected_adt, substs) = expected.sty {
+            if expected_adt.is_enum() {
                 let mut compatible_variants = expected_adt.variants
                     .iter()
                     .filter(|variant| variant.fields.len() == 1)
@@ -131,8 +131,8 @@ impl<'a, 'gcx, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'gcx, 'tcx> {
 
                 if compatible_variants.peek().is_some() {
                     let expr_text = print::to_string(print::NO_ANN, |s| s.print_expr(expr));
-                let suggestions = compatible_variants.map(|v|
-                    format!("{}({})", v, expr_text)).collect::<Vec<_>>();
+                    let suggestions = compatible_variants
+                        .map(|v| format!("{}({})", v, expr_text)).collect::<Vec<_>>();
                     err.span_suggestions_with_applicability(
                         expr.span,
                         "try using a variant of the expected type",
@@ -141,6 +141,7 @@ impl<'a, 'gcx, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'gcx, 'tcx> {
                     );
                 }
             }
+        }
 
         self.suggest_ref_or_into(&mut err, expr, expected, expr_ty);
 

src/test/ui/did_you_mean/issue-42764.rs

@@ -20,4 +20,20 @@ fn main() {
     let n: usize = 42;
     this_function_expects_a_double_option(n);
     //~^ ERROR mismatched types
+    //~| HELP try using a variant of the expected type
+}
+
+
+// But don't issue the "try using a variant" help if the one-"variant" ADT is
+// actually a one-field struct.
+
+struct Payload;
+
+struct Wrapper { payload: Payload }
+
+struct Context { wrapper: Wrapper }
+
+fn overton() {
+    let _c = Context { wrapper: Payload{} };
+    //~^ ERROR mismatched types
 }

src/test/ui/did_you_mean/issue-42764.stderr

@@ -13,6 +13,15 @@ LL |     this_function_expects_a_double_option(DoubleOption::FirstSome(n));
 LL |     this_function_expects_a_double_option(DoubleOption::AlternativeSome(n));
    |                                           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 
-error: aborting due to previous error
+error[E0308]: mismatched types
+  --> $DIR/issue-42764.rs:37:33
+   |
+LL |     let _c = Context { wrapper: Payload{} };
+   |                                 ^^^^^^^^^ expected struct `Wrapper`, found struct `Payload`
+   |
+   = note: expected type `Wrapper`
+              found type `Payload`
+
+error: aborting due to 2 previous errors
 
 For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0308`.