Skip to content

llvm-wrapper: adapt for LLVM API changes#150480

Closed
krasimirgg wants to merge 1 commit into
rust-lang:mainfrom
krasimirgg:passes
Closed

llvm-wrapper: adapt for LLVM API changes#150480
krasimirgg wants to merge 1 commit into
rust-lang:mainfrom
krasimirgg:passes

Conversation

@krasimirgg
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No functional changes intended.

Adapts the wrapper for llvm/llvm-project@f54df0d.

@rustbot label: +llvm-main
@r? @durin42

@rustbot rustbot added A-LLVM Area: Code generation parts specific to LLVM. Both correctness bugs and optimization-related issues. S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. llvm-main Marks PRs that are making Rust work with LLVM main (this label is consumed by CI tooling) labels Dec 29, 2025
@rustbot

This comment has been minimized.

No functional changes intended.

Adapts the wrapper for llvm/llvm-project@f54df0d.

@rustbot label: +llvm-main
@rustbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

rustbot commented Dec 29, 2025

This PR was rebased onto a different main commit. Here's a range-diff highlighting what actually changed.

Rebasing is a normal part of keeping PRs up to date, so no action is needed—this note is just to help reviewers.

@nikic
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

nikic commented Dec 29, 2025

Duplicate of #150394.

@krasimirgg krasimirgg closed this Dec 29, 2025
@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Dec 29, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

A-LLVM Area: Code generation parts specific to LLVM. Both correctness bugs and optimization-related issues. llvm-main Marks PRs that are making Rust work with LLVM main (this label is consumed by CI tooling) T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants