From 4a340ab22330edbbb1e418dc4e86feaa0d599f9b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: erict875 Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2025 21:36:00 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/3] chore(version): bump to 1.0.2-SNAPSHOT across all modules --- .github/workflows/release.yml | 24 ++++++- nostr-java-api/pom.xml | 2 +- .../src/main/resources/relays.properties | 2 - nostr-java-base/pom.xml | 2 +- nostr-java-client/pom.xml | 2 +- nostr-java-crypto/pom.xml | 2 +- nostr-java-encryption/pom.xml | 2 +- nostr-java-event/pom.xml | 2 +- nostr-java-examples/pom.xml | 2 +- nostr-java-id/pom.xml | 2 +- nostr-java-util/pom.xml | 2 +- pom.xml | 68 ++++++++++++++++++- scripts/release.sh | 24 ++++--- 13 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) diff --git a/.github/workflows/release.yml b/.github/workflows/release.yml index 74dc91c93..59fa1d205 100644 --- a/.github/workflows/release.yml +++ b/.github/workflows/release.yml @@ -10,6 +10,9 @@ on: description: 'Version to release (used only for visibility)' required: false +permissions: + contents: write + jobs: build-and-publish: runs-on: ubuntu-latest @@ -17,12 +20,14 @@ jobs: env: CENTRAL_USERNAME: ${{ secrets.CENTRAL_USERNAME }} CENTRAL_PASSWORD: ${{ secrets.CENTRAL_PASSWORD }} + GPG_PRIVATE_KEY: ${{ secrets.GPG_PRIVATE_KEY }} + GPG_PASSPHRASE: ${{ secrets.GPG_PASSPHRASE }} steps: - name: Checkout uses: actions/checkout@v4 - name: Check required secrets are present - if: ${{ !secrets.CENTRAL_USERNAME || !secrets.CENTRAL_PASSWORD || !secrets.GPG_PRIVATE_KEY || !secrets.GPG_PASSPHRASE }} + if: ${{ env.CENTRAL_USERNAME == '' || env.CENTRAL_PASSWORD == '' || env.GPG_PRIVATE_KEY == '' || env.GPG_PASSPHRASE == '' }} run: | echo "One or more required secrets are missing: CENTRAL_USERNAME, CENTRAL_PASSWORD, GPG_PRIVATE_KEY, GPG_PASSPHRASE" >&2 exit 1 @@ -39,6 +44,19 @@ jobs: gpg-private-key: ${{ secrets.GPG_PRIVATE_KEY }} gpg-passphrase: ${{ secrets.GPG_PASSPHRASE }} + - name: Validate GPG key import and passphrase + shell: bash + env: + GPG_PASSPHRASE: ${{ secrets.GPG_PASSPHRASE }} + run: | + echo "Listing imported secret keys (redacted):" + gpg --list-secret-keys --keyid-format=long || true + echo "Testing passphrase with a dummy signing operation..." + echo "ok" | gpg --batch --yes --pinentry-mode loopback --passphrase "$GPG_PASSPHRASE" -s >/dev/null || { + echo "GPG passphrase appears incorrect or not usable in CI." >&2 + exit 1 + } + - name: Make release script executable run: chmod +x scripts/release.sh @@ -60,7 +78,9 @@ jobs: env: CENTRAL_USERNAME: ${{ secrets.CENTRAL_USERNAME }} CENTRAL_PASSWORD: ${{ secrets.CENTRAL_PASSWORD }} - run: scripts/release.sh publish --no-docker + GPG_PASSPHRASE: ${{ secrets.GPG_PASSPHRASE }} + MAVEN_GPG_PASSPHRASE: ${{ secrets.GPG_PASSPHRASE }} + run: scripts/release.sh publish --no-docker --repo central - name: Create GitHub Release uses: softprops/action-gh-release@v2 diff --git a/nostr-java-api/pom.xml b/nostr-java-api/pom.xml index 692d0ccf0..0faaed2f2 100644 --- a/nostr-java-api/pom.xml +++ b/nostr-java-api/pom.xml @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ xyz.tcheeric nostr-java - 1.0.1-SNAPSHOT + 1.0.2-SNAPSHOT ../pom.xml diff --git a/nostr-java-api/src/main/resources/relays.properties b/nostr-java-api/src/main/resources/relays.properties index 2f786775e..238ea990a 100644 --- a/nostr-java-api/src/main/resources/relays.properties +++ b/nostr-java-api/src/main/resources/relays.properties @@ -1,4 +1,2 @@ # Relay configuration in `relays.=` format relays.nostr_rs_relay=ws://127.0.0.1:5555 -#relays.relay_strfry=ws://localhost:3333 -#relays.relay_badgr=wss://relay.badgr.space diff --git a/nostr-java-base/pom.xml b/nostr-java-base/pom.xml index 716f2c856..348ad56b2 100644 --- a/nostr-java-base/pom.xml +++ b/nostr-java-base/pom.xml @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ xyz.tcheeric nostr-java - 1.0.1-SNAPSHOT + 1.0.2-SNAPSHOT ../pom.xml diff --git a/nostr-java-client/pom.xml b/nostr-java-client/pom.xml index 627ad6837..14e7ef6be 100644 --- a/nostr-java-client/pom.xml +++ b/nostr-java-client/pom.xml @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ xyz.tcheeric nostr-java - 1.0.1-SNAPSHOT + 1.0.2-SNAPSHOT ../pom.xml diff --git a/nostr-java-crypto/pom.xml b/nostr-java-crypto/pom.xml index ab35abc9a..c4e866893 100644 --- a/nostr-java-crypto/pom.xml +++ b/nostr-java-crypto/pom.xml @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ xyz.tcheeric nostr-java - 1.0.1-SNAPSHOT + 1.0.2-SNAPSHOT ../pom.xml diff --git a/nostr-java-encryption/pom.xml b/nostr-java-encryption/pom.xml index e97e13964..538d29d4a 100644 --- a/nostr-java-encryption/pom.xml +++ b/nostr-java-encryption/pom.xml @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ xyz.tcheeric nostr-java - 1.0.1-SNAPSHOT + 1.0.2-SNAPSHOT ../pom.xml diff --git a/nostr-java-event/pom.xml b/nostr-java-event/pom.xml index 137d19341..fe8f2babb 100644 --- a/nostr-java-event/pom.xml +++ b/nostr-java-event/pom.xml @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ xyz.tcheeric nostr-java - 1.0.1-SNAPSHOT + 1.0.2-SNAPSHOT ../pom.xml diff --git a/nostr-java-examples/pom.xml b/nostr-java-examples/pom.xml index e76880396..4796971f9 100644 --- a/nostr-java-examples/pom.xml +++ b/nostr-java-examples/pom.xml @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ xyz.tcheeric nostr-java - 1.0.1-SNAPSHOT + 1.0.2-SNAPSHOT ../pom.xml diff --git a/nostr-java-id/pom.xml b/nostr-java-id/pom.xml index f2aa64d37..0b81bfbbd 100644 --- a/nostr-java-id/pom.xml +++ b/nostr-java-id/pom.xml @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ xyz.tcheeric nostr-java - 1.0.1-SNAPSHOT + 1.0.2-SNAPSHOT ../pom.xml diff --git a/nostr-java-util/pom.xml b/nostr-java-util/pom.xml index 5466a49a0..242af10f5 100644 --- a/nostr-java-util/pom.xml +++ b/nostr-java-util/pom.xml @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ xyz.tcheeric nostr-java - 1.0.1-SNAPSHOT + 1.0.2-SNAPSHOT ../pom.xml diff --git a/pom.xml b/pom.xml index 4e9fa9934..712fd241b 100644 --- a/pom.xml +++ b/pom.xml @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ xyz.tcheeric nostr-java - 1.0.1-SNAPSHOT + 1.0.2-SNAPSHOT pom ${project.artifactId} @@ -75,8 +75,7 @@ UTF-8 - 1.1.1 - 0.6.5-SNAPSHOT + 1.1.8 0.9.0 @@ -371,5 +370,68 @@ + + + + release-398ja + + + reposilite-releases + https://maven.398ja.xyz/releases + + + reposilite-snapshots + https://maven.398ja.xyz/snapshots + + + + + reposilite-releases + https://maven.398ja.xyz/releases + + + reposilite-snapshots + https://maven.398ja.xyz/snapshots + + + + + + + release-central + + + + org.apache.maven.plugins + maven-gpg-plugin + ${maven.gpg.plugin.version} + + ${env.GPG_PASSPHRASE} + + --batch + --yes + --pinentry-mode + loopback + + + + + sign-artifacts + verify + + sign + + + + + + org.sonatype.central + central-publishing-maven-plugin + ${central.publishing.plugin.version} + true + + + + diff --git a/scripts/release.sh b/scripts/release.sh index 5ecda1737..8ad4186b6 100755 --- a/scripts/release.sh +++ b/scripts/release.sh @@ -6,7 +6,8 @@ set -euo pipefail # bump --version Set root version to x.y.z and commit # verify [--no-docker] Run mvn clean verify (optionally -DnoDocker=true) # tag --version [--push] Create annotated tag vX.Y.Z (and optionally push) -# publish [--no-docker] Deploy artifacts to Central via release profile +# publish [--no-docker] [--repo central|398ja] +# Deploy artifacts to selected repository profile # next-snapshot --version Set next SNAPSHOT (e.g., 1.0.1-SNAPSHOT) and commit # # Notes: @@ -24,8 +25,8 @@ Commands: verify [--no-docker] [--skip-tests] [--dry-run] Run mvn clean verify (optionally -DnoDocker=true) tag --version [--push] Create annotated tag vX.Y.Z (and optionally push) - publish [--no-docker] [--skip-tests] [--dry-run] - Deploy artifacts to Central via release profile + publish [--no-docker] [--skip-tests] [--repo central|398ja] [--dry-run] + Deploy artifacts to selected repository profile next-snapshot --version Set next SNAPSHOT version and commit Examples: @@ -104,19 +105,26 @@ cmd_tag() { } cmd_publish() { - local no_docker=false skip_tests=false + local no_docker=false skip_tests=false repo="central" while [[ $# -gt 0 ]]; do case "$1" in --no-docker) no_docker=true; shift ;; --skip-tests) skip_tests=true; shift ;; + --repo) repo="$2"; shift 2 ;; --dry-run) DRYRUN=true; shift ;; *) echo "Unknown option: $1" >&2; usage; exit 1 ;; esac done - local mvn_args=(-q -P release deploy) - $no_docker && mvn_args=(-q -DnoDocker=true -P release deploy) - $skip_tests && mvn_args=(-q -DskipTests -P release deploy) - if $no_docker && $skip_tests; then mvn_args=(-q -DskipTests -DnoDocker=true -P release deploy); fi + local profile + case "$repo" in + central) profile=release-central ;; + 398ja|reposilite) profile=release-398ja ;; + *) echo "Unknown repo '$repo'. Use 'central' or '398ja'." >&2; exit 1 ;; + esac + local mvn_args=(-q -P "$profile" deploy) + $no_docker && mvn_args=(-q -DnoDocker=true -P "$profile" deploy) + $skip_tests && mvn_args=(-q -DskipTests -P "$profile" deploy) + if $no_docker && $skip_tests; then mvn_args=(-q -DskipTests -DnoDocker=true -P "$profile" deploy); fi run_cmd mvn "${mvn_args[@]}" } From 796773cded06b0ab3937bb24b259de5248e873de Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: erict875 Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2025 23:56:36 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 2/3] chore: release version 1.0.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Update project version from 1.0.2-SNAPSHOT to 1.0.0 for first stable release. Changes: - Update parent POM version to 1.0.0 - Update all 9 module POM versions to reference parent 1.0.0 - Remove .project-management/ from git tracking (add to .gitignore) - Update roadmap script with comprehensive 1.0.0 task tracking All deprecated APIs removed, critical bugs fixed, and comprehensive verification completed. Project is ready for 1.0.0 release. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude --- .gitignore | 3 + .project-management/CODE_REVIEW_REPORT.md | 1380 ----------------- .../CODE_REVIEW_UPDATE_2025-10-06.md | 980 ------------ .../EXCEPTION_MESSAGE_STANDARDS.md | 331 ---- .../FINDING_10.2_COMPLETION.md | 324 ---- .project-management/FINDING_2.4_COMPLETION.md | 313 ---- .../INTEGRATION_TEST_ANALYSIS.md | 501 ------ .project-management/ISSUES_OPERATIONS.md | 30 - .project-management/LOGGING_REVIEW.md | 377 ----- .../NIP_COMPLIANCE_TEST_ANALYSIS.md | 534 ------- .project-management/PHASE_1_COMPLETION.md | 401 ----- .project-management/PHASE_2_PROGRESS.md | 663 -------- .project-management/PHASE_3_PROGRESS.md | 356 ----- .project-management/PHASE_4_PROGRESS.md | 518 ------- .../PR_CRITICAL_TESTS_AND_PHASE_3_4.md | 267 ---- .../PR_LOGGING_IMPROVEMENTS_0.6.1.md | 395 ----- .../PR_PHASE_2_DOCUMENTATION.md | 131 -- .project-management/README.md | 43 - .project-management/TEST_COVERAGE_ANALYSIS.md | 410 ----- .project-management/TEST_FAILURE_ANALYSIS.md | 246 --- .../TEST_IMPLEMENTATION_PROGRESS.md | 281 ---- QODANA_TODOS.md | 526 ------- nostr-java-api/pom.xml | 2 +- nostr-java-base/pom.xml | 2 +- nostr-java-client/pom.xml | 2 +- nostr-java-crypto/pom.xml | 2 +- nostr-java-encryption/pom.xml | 2 +- nostr-java-event/pom.xml | 2 +- nostr-java-examples/pom.xml | 2 +- nostr-java-id/pom.xml | 2 +- nostr-java-util/pom.xml | 2 +- pom.xml | 2 +- scripts/create-roadmap-project.sh | 167 +- 33 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 9080 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 .project-management/CODE_REVIEW_REPORT.md delete mode 100644 .project-management/CODE_REVIEW_UPDATE_2025-10-06.md delete mode 100644 .project-management/EXCEPTION_MESSAGE_STANDARDS.md delete mode 100644 .project-management/FINDING_10.2_COMPLETION.md delete mode 100644 .project-management/FINDING_2.4_COMPLETION.md delete mode 100644 .project-management/INTEGRATION_TEST_ANALYSIS.md delete mode 100644 .project-management/ISSUES_OPERATIONS.md delete mode 100644 .project-management/LOGGING_REVIEW.md delete mode 100644 .project-management/NIP_COMPLIANCE_TEST_ANALYSIS.md delete mode 100644 .project-management/PHASE_1_COMPLETION.md delete mode 100644 .project-management/PHASE_2_PROGRESS.md delete mode 100644 .project-management/PHASE_3_PROGRESS.md delete mode 100644 .project-management/PHASE_4_PROGRESS.md delete mode 100644 .project-management/PR_CRITICAL_TESTS_AND_PHASE_3_4.md delete mode 100644 .project-management/PR_LOGGING_IMPROVEMENTS_0.6.1.md delete mode 100644 .project-management/PR_PHASE_2_DOCUMENTATION.md delete mode 100644 .project-management/README.md delete mode 100644 .project-management/TEST_COVERAGE_ANALYSIS.md delete mode 100644 .project-management/TEST_FAILURE_ANALYSIS.md delete mode 100644 .project-management/TEST_IMPLEMENTATION_PROGRESS.md delete mode 100644 QODANA_TODOS.md diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 162709204..261b37d37 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -226,3 +226,6 @@ data *.orig /.qodana/ /.claude/ + +# Project management documents (local only) +.project-management/ diff --git a/.project-management/CODE_REVIEW_REPORT.md b/.project-management/CODE_REVIEW_REPORT.md deleted file mode 100644 index 6b8e7e6ac..000000000 --- a/.project-management/CODE_REVIEW_REPORT.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,1380 +0,0 @@ -# Nostr-Java Comprehensive Code Review Report - -**Date:** 2025-10-06 -**Reviewer:** AI Code Analyst -**Scope:** Main source code (src/main/java) across all modules -**Guidelines:** Clean Code (Chapters 2, 3, 4, 7, 10, 17), Clean Architecture (Part III, IV, Chapters 7-14), Design Patterns, NIP Compliance - ---- - -## Executive Summary - -The nostr-java codebase consists of **252 Java files** with approximately **16,334 lines of code** across 8 modular components. The project demonstrates good architectural separation with distinct modules for API, base types, events, crypto, encryption, client, identity, and utilities. Overall code quality is **B+**, with strong adherence to modularization principles but several areas requiring improvement in Clean Code practices. - -### Key Strengths -- Well-modularized architecture with clear separation of concerns -- Comprehensive NIP protocol coverage -- Good use of Lombok to reduce boilerplate -- Strong typing with interfaces and abstractions -- Factory pattern implementation for event/tag creation - -### Key Weaknesses -- Inconsistent error handling patterns (mixing checked/unchecked exceptions) -- God class tendencies in some NIP implementation classes -- Overuse of `@SneakyThrows` hiding exception handling -- Generic `Exception` catching in multiple places -- Some classes exceed recommended length (>300 lines) -- Singleton pattern with double-checked locking issues -- Comments contain template boilerplate and TODO items - ---- - -## Overall Assessment by Category - -| Category | Grade | Notes | -|----------|-------|-------| -| **Meaningful Names** | B+ | Generally good, some abbreviations (NIP, pubKey) acceptable in domain | -| **Functions** | B | Some methods too long, parameter lists mostly reasonable | -| **Comments** | C+ | Template comments, TODOs, minimal JavaDoc on some methods | -| **Error Handling** | C | Mixed exceptions, generic catching, @SneakyThrows misuse | -| **Classes** | B | Good SRP in most cases, some god classes in NIP implementations | -| **Code Smells** | C+ | Magic numbers, feature envy, primitive obsession in places | -| **Clean Architecture** | A- | Excellent module boundaries, dependency rules followed | -| **Design Patterns** | B+ | Factory, Singleton, Strategy well implemented | -| **Lombok Usage** | A | Appropriate and effective use throughout | -| **Test Quality** | N/A | Not in scope (main source only) | -| **NIP Compliance** | A | Strong protocol adherence, comprehensive coverage | - -**Overall Grade: B** - ---- - -## Findings by Milestone - -### Milestone 1: Critical Error Handling & Exception Design (Priority: CRITICAL) - -#### Finding 1.1: Generic Exception Catching (Anti-pattern) -**Severity:** Critical -**Principle Violated:** Clean Code Chapter 7 (Error Handling) -**Impact:** Swallows specific errors, makes debugging difficult, violates fail-fast principle - -**Locations:** -- `/home/eric/IdeaProjects/nostr-java/nostr-java-id/src/main/java/nostr/id/Identity.java:78-80` - ```java - } catch (Exception ex) { - log.error("Failed to derive public key", ex); - throw new IllegalStateException("Failed to derive public key", ex); - } - ``` - -- `/home/eric/IdeaProjects/nostr-java/nostr-java-id/src/main/java/nostr/id/Identity.java:113-115` - ```java - } catch (Exception ex) { - log.error("Signing failed", ex); - throw new SigningException("Failed to sign with provided key", ex); - } - ``` - -- `/home/eric/IdeaProjects/nostr-java/nostr-java-base/src/main/java/nostr/base/BaseKey.java:32-34` - ```java - } catch (Exception ex) { - log.error("Failed to convert {} key to Bech32 format with prefix {}", type, prefix, ex); - throw new RuntimeException("Failed to convert key to Bech32: " + ex.getMessage(), ex); - } - ``` - -- Multiple locations in StandardWebSocketClient, WebSocketClientHandler, NostrSpringWebSocketClient - -**Recommendation:** -1. Catch specific exceptions only (NoSuchAlgorithmException, SigningException, etc.) -2. Let unexpected exceptions bubble up -3. Use multi-catch for multiple specific exceptions if needed -4. Create custom checked exceptions for recoverable errors - -**Example Fix:** -```java -// Before -try { - return Schnorr.sign(...); -} catch (Exception ex) { - throw new SigningException("Failed to sign", ex); -} - -// After -try { - return Schnorr.sign(...); -} catch (NoSuchAlgorithmException ex) { - throw new IllegalStateException("SHA-256 not available", ex); -} catch (InvalidKeyException ex) { - throw new SigningException("Invalid key for signing", ex); -} -``` - -**NIP Compliance:** Maintained - specific error handling improves protocol error reporting - ---- - -#### Finding 1.2: Excessive @SneakyThrows Usage -**Severity:** High -**Principle Violated:** Clean Code Chapter 7 (Error Handling) -**Impact:** Hides checked exceptions, reduces code transparency, violates explicit error handling - -**Locations:** -- `/home/eric/IdeaProjects/nostr-java/nostr-java-event/src/main/java/nostr/event/impl/NostrMarketplaceEvent.java:28` - ```java - @SneakyThrows - public Product getProduct() { - return IEvent.MAPPER_BLACKBIRD.readValue(getContent(), Product.class); - } - ``` - -- `/home/eric/IdeaProjects/nostr-java/nostr-java-api/src/main/java/nostr/api/NIP57.java:187` -- Multiple event deserializer classes -- Entity model classes (CashuProof, etc.) - -**Recommendation:** -1. Replace @SneakyThrows with proper exception handling -2. Wrap checked exceptions in unchecked domain exceptions when appropriate -3. Document exceptions in JavaDoc @throws tags -4. Only use @SneakyThrows for truly impossible scenarios - -**Example Fix:** -```java -// Before -@SneakyThrows -public Product getProduct() { - return IEvent.MAPPER_BLACKBIRD.readValue(getContent(), Product.class); -} - -// After -public Product getProduct() { - try { - return IEvent.MAPPER_BLACKBIRD.readValue(getContent(), Product.class); - } catch (JsonProcessingException ex) { - throw new EventDecodingException("Failed to parse product content", ex); - } -} -``` - -**NIP Compliance:** Maintained - improves error reporting for malformed event content - ---- - -#### Finding 1.3: Inconsistent Exception Hierarchy -**Severity:** Medium -**Principle Violated:** Clean Code Chapter 7, Clean Architecture Chapter 22 -**Impact:** Mixing checked/unchecked exceptions confuses error handling strategy - -**Locations:** -- `NostrException` extends Exception (checked) -- `SigningException` extends RuntimeException (unchecked) -- `EventEncodingException` extends RuntimeException (unchecked) -- Multiple RuntimeException wrapping patterns - -**Analysis:** -```java -// Checked exception -@StandardException -public class NostrException extends Exception { - public NostrException(String message) { - super(message); - } -} - -// Unchecked exceptions -@StandardException -public class SigningException extends RuntimeException {} - -@StandardException -public class EventEncodingException extends RuntimeException {} -``` - -**Recommendation:** -1. Establish clear policy: domain exceptions should be unchecked (RuntimeException) -2. Convert NostrException to unchecked -3. Create hierarchy: - - `NostrRuntimeException` (base) - - `NostrProtocolException` (NIP violations) - - `NostrCryptoException` (signing, encryption) - - `NostrEncodingException` (serialization) - - `NostrNetworkException` (relay communication) - -**NIP Compliance:** Enhanced - better categorization of protocol vs implementation errors - ---- - -### Milestone 2: Class Design & Single Responsibility (Priority: HIGH) - -#### Finding 2.1: God Class - NIP01 -**Severity:** High -**Principle Violated:** Clean Code Chapter 10 (Classes), SRP -**Impact:** Class has multiple responsibilities, difficult to maintain - -**Location:** `/home/eric/IdeaProjects/nostr-java/nostr-java-api/src/main/java/nostr/api/NIP01.java` -**Lines:** 452 lines -**Responsibilities:** -1. Event creation (text notes, metadata, replaceable, ephemeral, addressable) -2. Tag creation (event tags, pubkey tags, identifier tags, address tags) -3. Message creation (EventMessage, ReqMessage, CloseMessage, EoseMessage, NoticeMessage) -4. Builder pattern for events -5. Static factory methods - -**Recommendation:** -Refactor into focused classes: -``` -NIP01EventBuilder - event creation methods -NIP01TagFactory - tag creation (already partially exists) -NIP01MessageFactory - message creation -NIP01 - coordination/facade pattern -``` - -**Example Refactor:** -```java -// Current -public class NIP01 extends EventNostr { - public NIP01 createTextNoteEvent(String content) {...} - public static BaseTag createEventTag(String id) {...} - public static EventMessage createEventMessage(...) {...} -} - -// Refactored -public class NIP01 extends EventNostr { - private final NIP01EventBuilder eventBuilder; - private final NIP01TagFactory tagFactory; - - public NIP01 createTextNoteEvent(String content) { - return eventBuilder.buildTextNote(getSender(), content); - } -} - -public class NIP01TagFactory { - public static BaseTag createEventTag(String id) {...} - public static BaseTag createPubKeyTag(PublicKey pk) {...} -} -``` - -**NIP Compliance:** Maintained - clearer separation of NIP-01 concerns - ---- - -#### Finding 2.2: God Class - NIP57 -**Severity:** High -**Principle Violated:** Clean Code Chapter 10 (Classes), SRP -**Impact:** Similar to NIP01, multiple responsibilities - -**Location:** `/home/eric/IdeaProjects/nostr-java/nostr-java-api/src/main/java/nostr/api/NIP57.java` -**Lines:** 449 lines -**Responsibilities:** -1. Zap request event creation (6 overloaded methods) -2. Zap receipt event creation -3. Tag addition (10+ methods) -4. Tag creation (8+ static factory methods) - -**Recommendation:** -Apply same pattern as NIP01: -- `NIP57ZapRequestBuilder` -- `NIP57ZapReceiptBuilder` -- `NIP57TagFactory` -- `NIP57` facade - -**NIP Compliance:** Maintained - improved organization of NIP-57 implementation - ---- - -#### Finding 2.3: NostrSpringWebSocketClient - Multiple Responsibilities -**Severity:** Medium -**Principle Violated:** Clean Code Chapter 10 (Classes) -**Impact:** Class handles client management, relay configuration, subscription, and singleton - -**Location:** `/home/eric/IdeaProjects/nostr-java/nostr-java-api/src/main/java/nostr/api/NostrSpringWebSocketClient.java` -**Lines:** 369 lines -**Responsibilities:** -1. WebSocket client lifecycle management -2. Relay configuration -3. Event sending -4. Request/subscription handling -5. Singleton pattern -6. Event signing/verification -7. Client handler factory - -**Recommendation:** -Extract responsibilities: -``` -NostrClientManager - client lifecycle -NostrRelayRegistry - relay management -NostrEventSender - event transmission -NostrSubscriptionManager - subscription handling -NostrClientFactory - client creation (replace singleton) -``` - -**NIP Compliance:** Maintained - clearer separation improves protocol implementation - ---- - -#### Finding 2.4: GenericEvent - Data Class with Business Logic -**Severity:** Medium -**Principle Violated:** Clean Code Chapter 10, Clean Architecture -**Impact:** Mixing data structure with validation, serialization, tag management - -**Location:** `/home/eric/IdeaProjects/nostr-java/nostr-java-event/src/main/java/nostr/event/impl/GenericEvent.java` -**Lines:** 367 lines -**Responsibilities:** -1. Event data structure -2. Event validation (validate, validateKind, validateTags, validateContent) -3. Event serialization -4. Tag management (addTag, getTag, getTags, requireTag) -5. Event type checking (isReplaceable, isEphemeral, isAddressable) -6. Event conversion (static convert method) -7. Bech32 encoding - -**Recommendation:** -Extract validators and utilities: -```java -// Data class -@Data -public class GenericEvent extends BaseEvent { - private String id; - private PublicKey pubKey; - // ... fields only -} - -// Separate concerns -public class EventValidator { - public void validate(GenericEvent event) {...} -} - -public class EventSerializer { - public String serialize(GenericEvent event) {...} -} - -public class EventTypeChecker { - public boolean isReplaceable(int kind) {...} -} -``` - -**NIP Compliance:** Maintained - validation logic ensures NIP-01 compliance - ---- - -### Milestone 3: Method Design & Complexity (Priority: HIGH) - -#### Finding 3.1: Long Method - WebSocketClientHandler.subscribe() -**Severity:** Medium -**Principle Violated:** Clean Code Chapter 3 (Functions should be small) -**Impact:** Complex error handling logic, difficult to test - -**Location:** `/home/eric/IdeaProjects/nostr-java/nostr-java-api/src/main/java/nostr/api/WebSocketClientHandler.java:96-189` -**Lines:** 93 lines in one method - -**Recommendation:** -Extract methods: -```java -public AutoCloseable subscribe(...) { - SpringWebSocketClient client = getOrCreateRequestClient(subscriptionId); - Consumer safeError = createSafeErrorHandler(errorListener, relayName, subscriptionId); - - AutoCloseable delegate = establishSubscription(client, filters, subscriptionId, listener, safeError); - - return createCloseableHandle(delegate, client, subscriptionId, safeError); -} - -private AutoCloseable establishSubscription(...) {...} -private AutoCloseable createCloseableHandle(...) {...} -private Consumer createSafeErrorHandler(...) {...} -``` - -**NIP Compliance:** Maintained - clearer subscription lifecycle management - ---- - -#### Finding 3.2: Long Method - NostrSpringWebSocketClient.subscribe() -**Severity:** Medium -**Principle Violated:** Clean Code Chapter 3 -**Impact:** Nested error handling, resource cleanup complexity - -**Location:** `/home/eric/IdeaProjects/nostr-java/nostr-java-api/src/main/java/nostr/api/NostrSpringWebSocketClient.java:224-291` -**Lines:** 67 lines with complex error handling - -**Recommendation:** -Extract error handling and cleanup logic into separate methods - -**NIP Compliance:** Maintained - ---- - -#### Finding 3.3: Method Parameter Count - NIP57.createZapRequestEvent() -**Severity:** Low -**Principle Violated:** Clean Code Chapter 3 (Limit function arguments) -**Impact:** 7 parameters in some overloads, cognitive load - -**Location:** `/home/eric/IdeaProjects/nostr-java/nostr-java-api/src/main/java/nostr/api/NIP57.java:42-73, 87-124, 138-149` - -**Analysis:** -```java -public NIP57 createZapRequestEvent( - @NonNull Long amount, - @NonNull String lnUrl, - @NonNull List relays, - @NonNull String content, - PublicKey recipientPubKey, - GenericEvent zappedEvent, - BaseTag addressTag) // 7 parameters -``` - -**Recommendation:** -Use parameter object pattern: -```java -@Builder -public class ZapRequestParams { - private Long amount; - private String lnUrl; - private List relays; - private String content; - private PublicKey recipientPubKey; - private GenericEvent zappedEvent; - private BaseTag addressTag; -} - -public NIP57 createZapRequestEvent(ZapRequestParams params) { - // Implementation -} -``` - -**NIP Compliance:** Maintained - parameters match NIP-57 specification - ---- - -### Milestone 4: Comments & Documentation (Priority: MEDIUM) - -#### Finding 4.1: Template Boilerplate Comments -**Severity:** Low -**Principle Violated:** Clean Code Chapter 4 (Comments should explain why, not what) -**Impact:** Noise, reduces code readability - -**Locations:** -- `/home/eric/IdeaProjects/nostr-java/nostr-java-api/src/main/java/nostr/api/EventNostr.java:1-4` - ```java - /* - * Click nbfs://nbhost/SystemFileSystem/Templates/Licenses/license-default.txt to change this license - * Click nbfs://nbhost/SystemFileSystem/Templates/Classes/Class.java to edit this template - */ - ``` - -- `/home/eric/IdeaProjects/nostr-java/nostr-java-api/src/main/java/nostr/api/NIP01.java:1-4` - -**Recommendation:** -Remove all template comments or replace with meaningful file-level JavaDoc - -**Example:** -```java -/** - * NIP-01 implementation providing basic Nostr protocol functionality. - * - *

This class implements event creation, tag management, and message - * construction according to the NIP-01 specification. - * - * @see NIP-01 - */ -public class NIP01 extends EventNostr { -``` - -**NIP Compliance:** Enhanced - better documentation of protocol implementation - ---- - -#### Finding 4.2: TODO Comments in Production Code -**Severity:** Low -**Principle Violated:** Clean Code Chapter 4, Chapter 17 (TODO comments) -**Impact:** Indicates incomplete implementation or deferred work - -**Locations:** -- `/home/eric/IdeaProjects/nostr-java/nostr-java-event/src/main/java/nostr/event/impl/NostrMarketplaceEvent.java:23` - ```java - // TODO: Create the Kinds for the events and use it - ``` - -- `/home/eric/IdeaProjects/nostr-java/nostr-java-api/src/main/java/nostr/api/NIP01.java:303` - ```java - // TODO - Method overloading with Relay as second parameter - ``` - -- `/home/eric/IdeaProjects/nostr-java/nostr-java-api/src/main/java/nostr/api/NIP60.java` - ```java - // TODO: Consider writing a GenericTagListEncoder class for this - ``` - -- Multiple deserializer classes - ```java - // TODO: below methods needs comprehensive tags assignment completion - ``` - -- `/home/eric/IdeaProjects/nostr-java/nostr-java-event/src/main/java/nostr/event/message/CanonicalAuthenticationMessage.java` - ```java - // TODO - This needs to be reviewed - // TODO: stream optional - ``` - -**Recommendation:** -1. Create GitHub issues for each TODO -2. Remove TODO comments and reference issues in commit messages -3. Complete trivial TODOs immediately -4. Add @deprecated if functionality is incomplete but released - -**NIP Compliance:** Some TODOs indicate incomplete NIP implementation (calendar events) - ---- - -#### Finding 4.3: Minimal JavaDoc on Public APIs -**Severity:** Medium -**Principle Violated:** Clean Code Chapter 4 (Good comments) -**Impact:** Reduced API discoverability, harder for library users - -**Locations:** -- Most public methods in NIP implementation classes have good JavaDoc -- Some utility methods lack documentation -- Interface methods generally well-documented -- Exception classes have minimal JavaDoc - -**Examples of Good Documentation:** -```java -/** - * Sign the supplied {@link nostr.base.ISignable} using this identity's private key. - * - * @param signable the entity to sign - * @return the generated signature - * @throws IllegalStateException if the SHA-256 algorithm is unavailable - * @throws SigningException if the signature cannot be created - */ -public Signature sign(@NonNull ISignable signable) { -``` - -**Recommendation:** -1. Add JavaDoc to all public classes and methods -2. Document exception conditions with @throws -3. Include usage examples for complex APIs -4. Link to relevant NIPs in class-level JavaDoc - -**NIP Compliance:** Enhanced documentation helps users understand NIP compliance - ---- - -### Milestone 5: Naming Conventions (Priority: LOW) - -#### Finding 5.1: Inconsistent Field Naming -**Severity:** Low -**Principle Violated:** Clean Code Chapter 2 (Use intention-revealing names) -**Impact:** Minor inconsistency in naming patterns - -**Locations:** -- `/home/eric/IdeaProjects/nostr-java/nostr-java-event/src/main/java/nostr/event/impl/GenericEvent.java:80` - ```java - @JsonIgnore private byte[] _serializedEvent; // Leading underscore - ``` - -**Analysis:** -Leading underscores are unconventional in Java for private fields. The field represents cached serialization state. - -**Recommendation:** -```java -// Current -private byte[] _serializedEvent; - -// Better -private byte[] serializedEventCache; -// or -private byte[] cachedSerializedEvent; -``` - -**NIP Compliance:** Maintained - internal implementation detail - ---- - -#### Finding 5.2: Abbreviations in Core Types -**Severity:** Low (Acceptable) -**Principle Violated:** Clean Code Chapter 2 (Avoid encodings) -**Impact:** Domain-standard abbreviations are acceptable - -**Locations:** -- `pubKey` vs `publicKey` - Domain standard in Nostr -- `NIPxx` class names - Protocol standard -- `sig` vs `signature` - Used in JSON serialization per NIP-01 - -**Recommendation:** -Keep as-is - these abbreviations match the Nostr protocol specification and improve alignment with NIPs. - -**NIP Compliance:** Required - matches NIP-01 event field names - ---- - -### Milestone 6: Design Patterns & Architecture (Priority: MEDIUM) - -#### Finding 6.1: Singleton Pattern with Thread Safety Issues -**Severity:** High -**Principle Violated:** Effective Java Item 83, Clean Code Chapter 17 -**Impact:** Potential race conditions, non-final INSTANCE field - -**Location:** `/home/eric/IdeaProjects/nostr-java/nostr-java-api/src/main/java/nostr/api/NostrSpringWebSocketClient.java:40, 70-95` - -**Analysis:** -```java -private static volatile NostrSpringWebSocketClient INSTANCE; - -public static NostrIF getInstance() { - if (INSTANCE == null) { - synchronized (NostrSpringWebSocketClient.class) { - if (INSTANCE == null) { - INSTANCE = new NostrSpringWebSocketClient(); - } - } - } - return INSTANCE; -} -``` - -Issues: -1. Double-checked locking with mutable INSTANCE field -2. getInstance() and getInstance(Identity) can cause inconsistent state -3. Singleton makes testing difficult -4. Not compatible with Spring's bean lifecycle - -**Recommendation:** -Replace with dependency injection or initialization-on-demand holder: - -```java -// Option 1: Initialization-on-demand holder idiom -private static class InstanceHolder { - private static final NostrSpringWebSocketClient INSTANCE = new NostrSpringWebSocketClient(); -} - -public static NostrIF getInstance() { - return InstanceHolder.INSTANCE; -} - -// Option 2: Remove singleton, use Spring @Bean -@Configuration -public class NostrConfig { - @Bean - @Scope("prototype") - public NostrIF nostrClient() { - return new NostrSpringWebSocketClient(); - } -} -``` - -**NIP Compliance:** Maintained - architectural change only - ---- - -#### Finding 6.2: Factory Pattern Well-Implemented -**Severity:** N/A (Positive Finding) -**Principle:** Design Patterns - Factory Method -**Impact:** Good separation of object creation - -**Locations:** -- `GenericEventFactory` -- `BaseTagFactory` -- `EventMessageFactory` -- `TagRegistry` with registry pattern - -**Analysis:** -The factory pattern is well-applied for event and tag creation, following NIP specifications. - -**Recommendation:** -Continue this pattern for new NIPs. Consider abstract factory pattern for related object families. - -**NIP Compliance:** Excellent - factories ensure NIP-compliant object creation - ---- - -#### Finding 6.3: Strategy Pattern in Encryption -**Severity:** N/A (Positive Finding) -**Principle:** Design Patterns - Strategy -**Impact:** Good abstraction for different encryption methods - -**Locations:** -- `MessageCipher` interface -- `MessageCipher04` (NIP-04 implementation) -- `MessageCipher44` (NIP-44 implementation) - -**Recommendation:** -Exemplary design, continue for new encryption NIPs - -**NIP Compliance:** Excellent - supports multiple NIP encryption standards - ---- - -#### Finding 6.4: Static ObjectMapper in Interface -**Severity:** Medium -**Principle Violated:** Clean Architecture, Effective Java Item 22 -**Impact:** Forces Jackson dependency on all IEvent implementations - -**Location:** `/home/eric/IdeaProjects/nostr-java/nostr-java-base/src/main/java/nostr/base/IEvent.java:11` - -**Analysis:** -```java -public interface IEvent extends IElement, IBech32Encodable { - ObjectMapper MAPPER_BLACKBIRD = JsonMapper.builder().addModule(new BlackbirdModule()).build(); - String getId(); -} -``` - -**Issues:** -1. Violates interface segregation principle -2. Couples all events to Jackson implementation -3. No way to customize mapper per implementation -4. Static initialization in interface is anti-pattern - -**Recommendation:** -Extract to separate utility class: -```java -public interface IEvent extends IElement, IBech32Encodable { - String getId(); -} - -public final class EventJsonMapper { - private EventJsonMapper() {} - - public static ObjectMapper getDefaultMapper() { - return MapperHolder.INSTANCE; - } - - private static class MapperHolder { - private static final ObjectMapper INSTANCE = - JsonMapper.builder().addModule(new BlackbirdModule()).build(); - } -} -``` - -**NIP Compliance:** Maintained - cleaner architecture for JSON serialization - ---- - -### Milestone 7: Clean Architecture Boundaries (Priority: MEDIUM) - -#### Finding 7.1: Module Dependency Analysis -**Severity:** N/A (Positive Finding) -**Principle:** Clean Architecture - Dependency Rule -**Impact:** Well-designed module structure - -**Analysis:** -Module structure follows clean architecture principles: - -``` -nostr-java-api (highest level) - ↓ depends on -nostr-java-event, nostr-java-client, nostr-java-id - ↓ depends on -nostr-java-base, nostr-java-crypto, nostr-java-encryption, nostr-java-util -``` - -Dependency direction is correct: -- Higher-level modules depend on lower-level abstractions -- Base module contains interfaces and core types -- Implementation modules depend on base, not vice versa - -**Recommendation:** -Maintain this structure for new modules. Document in architecture decision records (ADRs). - -**NIP Compliance:** Excellent - modular structure supports independent NIP implementation - ---- - -#### Finding 7.2: Spring Framework Coupling in Base Modules -**Severity:** Low -**Principle Violated:** Clean Architecture - Framework Independence -**Impact:** WebSocket client tightly coupled to Spring - -**Location:** `/home/eric/IdeaProjects/nostr-java/nostr-java-client/src/main/java/nostr/client/springwebsocket/` - -**Analysis:** -- `SpringWebSocketClient` and `StandardWebSocketClient` use Spring WebSocket directly -- No abstraction layer for alternative WebSocket implementations -- Annotations: `@Component`, `@Value`, `@Scope` - -**Recommendation:** -Consider adding abstraction layer: -```java -public interface WebSocketClientProvider { - WebSocketSession createSession(String uri); -} - -public class SpringWebSocketProvider implements WebSocketClientProvider { - // Spring-specific implementation -} - -public class JavaWebSocketProvider implements WebSocketClientProvider { - // javax.websocket implementation -} -``` - -**NIP Compliance:** Maintained - architectural flexibility for different platforms - ---- - -### Milestone 8: Code Smells & Heuristics (Priority: MEDIUM) - -#### Finding 8.1: Magic Numbers -**Severity:** Low -**Principle Violated:** Clean Code Chapter 17 (G25 - Replace Magic Numbers with Named Constants) -**Impact:** Reduced readability, unclear intent - -**Locations:** -- `/home/eric/IdeaProjects/nostr-java/nostr-java-event/src/main/java/nostr/event/impl/GenericEvent.java:159-170` - ```java - public boolean isReplaceable() { - return this.kind != null && this.kind >= 10000 && this.kind < 20000; - } - - public boolean isEphemeral() { - return this.kind != null && this.kind >= 20000 && this.kind < 30000; - } - - public boolean isAddressable() { - return this.kind != null && this.kind >= 30000 && this.kind < 40000; - } - ``` - -- `/home/eric/IdeaProjects/nostr-java/nostr-java-event/src/main/java/nostr/event/filter/Filters.java:18` - ```java - public static final int DEFAULT_FILTERS_LIMIT = 10; - ``` - -**Recommendation:** -Extract to constants class: -```java -public final class NIPConstants { - private NIPConstants() {} - - // NIP-01 Event Kind Ranges - public static final int REPLACEABLE_KIND_MIN = 10_000; - public static final int REPLACEABLE_KIND_MAX = 20_000; - public static final int EPHEMERAL_KIND_MIN = 20_000; - public static final int EPHEMERAL_KIND_MAX = 30_000; - public static final int ADDRESSABLE_KIND_MIN = 30_000; - public static final int ADDRESSABLE_KIND_MAX = 40_000; - - // Validation limits - public static final int HEX_PUBKEY_LENGTH = 64; - public static final int HEX_SIGNATURE_LENGTH = 128; -} - -public boolean isReplaceable() { - return this.kind != null && - this.kind >= NIPConstants.REPLACEABLE_KIND_MIN && - this.kind < NIPConstants.REPLACEABLE_KIND_MAX; -} -``` - -**NIP Compliance:** Enhanced - constants document NIP-01 kind range rules - ---- - -#### Finding 8.2: Primitive Obsession -**Severity:** Low -**Principle Violated:** Clean Code Chapter 17 (G18 - Inappropriate Static), Effective Java Item 50 -**Impact:** String used for event IDs, public keys instead of value objects - -**Locations:** -- Event IDs as String instead of EventId value object -- Subscription IDs as String -- Relay URIs as String instead of RelayURI value object - -**Analysis:** -Some primitives are wrapped (PublicKey, PrivateKey, Signature), but others remain raw strings. - -**Recommendation:** -Consider value objects for: -```java -@Value -public class EventId { - private String hexValue; - - public EventId(String hexValue) { - HexStringValidator.validateHex(hexValue, 64); - this.hexValue = hexValue; - } -} - -@Value -public class SubscriptionId { - private String value; - - public SubscriptionId(String value) { - if (value == null || value.isEmpty()) { - throw new IllegalArgumentException("Subscription ID cannot be empty"); - } - this.value = value; - } -} -``` - -**NIP Compliance:** Enhanced - type safety prevents invalid identifiers - ---- - -#### Finding 8.3: Feature Envy - BaseTag accessing IEvent parent -**Severity:** Low -**Principle Violated:** Clean Code Chapter 17 (G14 - Feature Envy) -**Impact:** Tag knows too much about parent event structure - -**Location:** `/home/eric/IdeaProjects/nostr-java/nostr-java-event/src/main/java/nostr/event/BaseTag.java:40-45` - -**Analysis:** -```java -@JsonIgnore private IEvent parent; - -@Override -public void setParent(IEvent event) { - this.parent = event; -} -``` - -Tags maintain reference to parent event but don't use it much. This bidirectional relationship increases coupling. - -**Recommendation:** -Evaluate if parent reference is necessary. If needed only for validation, pass event as parameter instead of storing reference. - -**NIP Compliance:** Maintained - internal implementation detail - ---- - -#### Finding 8.4: Dead Code - Deprecated Methods -**Severity:** Low -**Principle Violated:** Clean Code Chapter 17 (G9 - Dead Code) -**Impact:** Code bloat, maintenance burden - -**Locations:** -- `/home/eric/IdeaProjects/nostr-java/nostr-java-client/src/main/java/nostr/client/springwebsocket/SpringWebSocketClient.java:199-204` - ```java - /** - * @deprecated use {@link #close()} instead. - */ - @Deprecated - public void closeSocket() throws IOException { - close(); - } - ``` - -- `/home/eric/IdeaProjects/nostr-java/nostr-java-event/src/main/java/nostr/event/BaseTag.java:76-89` - ```java - /** - * nip parameter to be removed - * @deprecated use {@link #create(String, String...)} instead. - */ - @Deprecated(forRemoval = true) - public static BaseTag create(String code, Integer nip, List params) { - return create(code, params); - } - ``` - -**Recommendation:** -1. Remove methods marked @Deprecated(forRemoval = true) in next major version -2. Add @Deprecated(since = "0.x.x", forRemoval = true) to all deprecated methods -3. Document migration path in JavaDoc - -**NIP Compliance:** Maintained - cleanup only - ---- - -### Milestone 9: Lombok Usage Review (Priority: LOW) - -#### Finding 9.1: Appropriate Lombok Usage -**Severity:** N/A (Positive Finding) -**Principle:** Lombok best practices -**Impact:** Significant boilerplate reduction - -**Analysis:** -Lombok is used appropriately throughout: -- `@Data` on DTOs and entities -- `@Getter/@Setter` on specific fields -- `@NonNull` for null-safety -- `@NoArgsConstructor` for framework compatibility -- `@EqualsAndHashCode` with proper field inclusion/exclusion -- `@Builder` for complex construction (in some places) -- `@Slf4j` for logging -- `@Value` for immutable types - -**Example:** -```java -@Data -@EqualsAndHashCode(callSuper = false) -public class GenericEvent extends BaseEvent implements ISignable, Deleteable { - @Key @EqualsAndHashCode.Include private String id; - @Key @EqualsAndHashCode.Include private PublicKey pubKey; - @Key @EqualsAndHashCode.Exclude private Long createdAt; -} -``` - -**Recommendation:** -Continue current usage. Consider adding `@Builder` to more parameter-heavy classes (e.g., ZapRequestParams). - -**NIP Compliance:** Excellent - Lombok doesn't affect protocol compliance - ---- - -#### Finding 9.2: Potential @Builder Candidates -**Severity:** Low -**Principle:** Clean Code Chapter 3 (Reduce function arguments) -**Impact:** Could improve readability for complex constructors - -**Candidates:** -- `GenericEvent` constructor -- `ZapRequest` construction -- Tag creation with multiple parameters - -**Recommendation:** -```java -@Builder -@Data -public class GenericEvent extends BaseEvent { - private String id; - private PublicKey pubKey; - private Long createdAt; - private Integer kind; - private List tags; - private String content; - private Signature signature; - - // Builder provides named parameters -} - -// Usage -GenericEvent event = GenericEvent.builder() - .pubKey(publicKey) - .kind(1) - .content("Hello Nostr") - .tags(List.of(tag1, tag2)) - .build(); -``` - -**NIP Compliance:** Maintained - cleaner event construction API - ---- - -### Milestone 10: NIP Compliance Verification (Priority: CRITICAL) - -#### Finding 10.1: Comprehensive NIP Coverage -**Severity:** N/A (Positive Finding) -**Principle:** Protocol Compliance -**Impact:** Strong implementation of Nostr protocol - -**Implemented NIPs:** -Based on class analysis and AGENTS.md: -- NIP-01 ✓ (Basic protocol) -- NIP-02 ✓ (Contact List and Petnames) -- NIP-03 ✓ (OpenTimestamps) -- NIP-04 ✓ (Encrypted Direct Messages) -- NIP-05 ✓ (Mapping Nostr keys to DNS) -- NIP-09 ✓ (Event Deletion) -- NIP-12 ✓ (Generic Tag Queries) -- NIP-14 ✓ (Subject tag) -- NIP-15 ✓ (Nostr Marketplace) -- NIP-20 ✓ (Command Results) -- NIP-23 ✓ (Long-form Content) -- NIP-25 ✓ (Reactions) -- NIP-28 ✓ (Public Chat) -- NIP-30 ✓ (Custom Emoji) -- NIP-31 ✓ (Alt Tag) -- NIP-32 ✓ (Labeling) -- NIP-40 ✓ (Expiration) -- NIP-42 ✓ (Authentication) -- NIP-44 ✓ (Encrypted Payloads) -- NIP-46 ✓ (Nostr Connect) -- NIP-52 ✓ (Calendar Events) -- NIP-57 ✓ (Lightning Zaps) -- NIP-60 ✓ (Cashu Wallet) -- NIP-61 ✓ (Nutzaps) -- NIP-65 ✓ (Relay List Metadata) -- NIP-99 ✓ (Classified Listings) - -**Recommendation:** -Excellent coverage. Document NIP compliance in README with support matrix. - ---- - -#### Finding 10.2: Incomplete Calendar Event Implementation -**Severity:** Medium -**Principle:** NIP-52 Compliance -**Impact:** TODO comments indicate incomplete tag assignment - -**Location:** -- `/home/eric/IdeaProjects/nostr-java/nostr-java-event/src/main/java/nostr/event/json/deserializer/CalendarDateBasedEventDeserializer.java` -- `/home/eric/IdeaProjects/nostr-java/nostr-java-event/src/main/java/nostr/event/json/deserializer/CalendarEventDeserializer.java` -- `/home/eric/IdeaProjects/nostr-java/nostr-java-event/src/main/java/nostr/event/json/deserializer/CalendarTimeBasedEventDeserializer.java` -- `/home/eric/IdeaProjects/nostr-java/nostr-java-event/src/main/java/nostr/event/json/deserializer/CalendarRsvpEventDeserializer.java` - -**Analysis:** -All calendar deserializers have: -```java -// TODO: below methods needs comprehensive tags assignment completion -``` - -**Recommendation:** -1. Complete tag assignment according to NIP-52 specification -2. Add comprehensive tests for calendar event deserialization -3. Verify all NIP-52 tags are supported: - - `start` (required) - - `end` (optional) - - `start_tzid` (optional) - - `end_tzid` (optional) - - `summary` (optional) - - `location` (optional) - -**NIP Compliance:** Partial - needs completion for full NIP-52 compliance - ---- - -#### Finding 10.3: Kind Enum vs Constants Inconsistency -**Severity:** Low -**Principle:** NIP-01 Event Kinds -**Impact:** Two sources of truth for event kinds - -**Locations:** -- `/home/eric/IdeaProjects/nostr-java/nostr-java-base/src/main/java/nostr/base/Kind.java` (enum) -- `/home/eric/IdeaProjects/nostr-java/nostr-java-api/src/main/java/nostr/config/Constants.java` (static constants) - -**Analysis:** -```java -// Kind enum -public enum Kind { - TEXT_NOTE(1, "text_note"), - // ... -} - -// Constants class -public static final class Kind { - public static final int SHORT_TEXT_NOTE = 1; - // ... -} -``` - -Different names for same kind: `TEXT_NOTE` vs `SHORT_TEXT_NOTE` - -**Recommendation:** -1. Standardize on enum approach -2. Deprecate Constants.Kind -3. Ensure enum covers all NIPs -4. Use consistent naming - -**NIP Compliance:** Enhanced - single source of truth for NIP kinds - ---- - -#### Finding 10.4: Event Validation Alignment with NIP-01 -**Severity:** N/A (Positive Finding) -**Principle:** NIP-01 Event Structure -**Impact:** Strong validation ensures protocol compliance - -**Location:** `/home/eric/IdeaProjects/nostr-java/nostr-java-event/src/main/java/nostr/event/impl/GenericEvent.java:206-247` - -**Analysis:** -Validation correctly enforces NIP-01 requirements: -```java -public void validate() { - // Validate `id` field - 64 hex chars - Objects.requireNonNull(this.id, "Missing required `id` field."); - HexStringValidator.validateHex(this.id, 64); - - // Validate `pubkey` field - 64 hex chars - Objects.requireNonNull(this.pubKey, "Missing required `pubkey` field."); - HexStringValidator.validateHex(this.pubKey.toString(), 64); - - // Validate `sig` field - 128 hex chars (Schnorr signature) - Objects.requireNonNull(this.signature, "Missing required `sig` field."); - HexStringValidator.validateHex(this.signature.toString(), 128); - - // Validate `created_at` - non-negative integer - if (this.createdAt == null || this.createdAt < 0) { - throw new AssertionError("Invalid `created_at`: Must be a non-negative integer."); - } -} -``` - -**Recommendation:** -Exemplary implementation. Continue this validation approach for all NIPs. - -**NIP Compliance:** Excellent - enforces NIP-01 event structure - ---- - -## Prioritized Action Items - -### Immediate Actions (Complete in Sprint 1) - -1. **Fix Generic Exception Catching** (Finding 1.1) - - Replace all `catch (Exception e)` with specific exceptions - - Priority: CRITICAL - - Effort: 2-3 days - - Files: 14 files affected - -2. **Remove @SneakyThrows** (Finding 1.2) - - Replace with proper exception handling - - Priority: HIGH - - Effort: 1-2 days - - Files: 16 files affected - -3. **Complete Calendar Event Deserializers** (Finding 10.2) - - Implement TODO tag assignments - - Priority: HIGH (NIP compliance) - - Effort: 1 day - - Files: 4 deserializer classes - -4. **Remove Template Comments** (Finding 4.1) - - Clean up boilerplate - - Priority: LOW - - Effort: 1 hour - - Files: ~50 files - -### Short-term Actions (Complete in Sprint 2-3) - -5. **Refactor Exception Hierarchy** (Finding 1.3) - - Create unified exception hierarchy - - Priority: MEDIUM - - Effort: 2 days - - Impact: All modules - -6. **Fix Singleton Pattern** (Finding 6.1) - - Replace double-checked locking - - Priority: HIGH - - Effort: 1 day - - Files: NostrSpringWebSocketClient - -7. **Refactor NIP01 God Class** (Finding 2.1) - - Split into EventBuilder, TagFactory, MessageFactory - - Priority: HIGH - - Effort: 3-4 days - - Files: NIP01.java - -8. **Refactor NIP57 God Class** (Finding 2.2) - - Apply same pattern as NIP01 - - Priority: HIGH - - Effort: 2-3 days - - Files: NIP57.java - -9. **Extract Magic Numbers** (Finding 8.1) - - Create NIPConstants class - - Priority: MEDIUM - - Effort: 1 day - - Files: ~10 files - -### Medium-term Actions (Complete in Sprint 4-6) - -10. **Refactor GenericEvent** (Finding 2.4) - - Separate data, validation, serialization - - Priority: MEDIUM - - Effort: 3-4 days - - Files: GenericEvent and related classes - -11. **Refactor NostrSpringWebSocketClient** (Finding 2.3) - - Extract responsibilities - - Priority: MEDIUM - - Effort: 4-5 days - - Files: Client management classes - -12. **Extract Static ObjectMapper** (Finding 6.4) - - Create EventJsonMapper utility - - Priority: MEDIUM - - Effort: 1 day - - Files: IEvent interface - -13. **Improve Method Design** (Findings 3.1, 3.2, 3.3) - - Extract long methods - - Introduce parameter objects - - Priority: MEDIUM - - Effort: 2-3 days - - Files: WebSocketClientHandler, NostrSpringWebSocketClient, NIP57 - -14. **Add Comprehensive JavaDoc** (Finding 4.3) - - Document all public APIs - - Priority: MEDIUM - - Effort: 5-7 days - - Files: All public classes - -### Long-term Actions (Complete in Sprint 7+) - -15. **Create TODO GitHub Issues** (Finding 4.2) - - Track all deferred work - - Priority: LOW - - Effort: 2 hours - -16. **Standardize Kind Definitions** (Finding 10.3) - - Deprecate Constants.Kind - - Priority: LOW - - Effort: 1 day - -17. **Evaluate Value Objects** (Finding 8.2) - - EventId, SubscriptionId value objects - - Priority: LOW - - Effort: 2-3 days - -18. **Add WebSocket Abstraction** (Finding 7.2) - - Decouple from Spring WebSocket - - Priority: LOW - - Effort: 3-4 days - -19. **Remove Deprecated Methods** (Finding 8.4) - - Clean up in next major version - - Priority: LOW - - Effort: 1 day - -20. **Add Builder Pattern** (Finding 9.2) - - Apply to complex constructors - - Priority: LOW - - Effort: 2 days - ---- - -## NIP Compliance Summary - -### Fully Compliant NIPs -✓ NIP-01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 09, 12, 14, 15, 20, 23, 25, 28, 30, 31, 32, 40, 42, 44, 46, 57, 60, 61, 65, 99 - -### Partially Compliant NIPs -⚠ NIP-52 (Calendar Events) - Deserializer tag assignment incomplete - -### Compliance Verification Recommendations - -1. **Add NIP Compliance Tests** - - Create test suite validating each NIP implementation - - Use official NIP test vectors where available - - Document compliance in test class JavaDoc - -2. **Create NIP Compliance Matrix** - - Document which classes implement which NIPs - - Track feature support level (full/partial/planned) - - Update AGENTS.md with compliance status - -3. **Monitor NIP Updates** - - Subscribe to nostr-protocol/nips repository - - Review changes for breaking updates - - Update implementation to match spec changes - ---- - -## Conclusion - -The nostr-java codebase demonstrates strong architectural design with modular structure and comprehensive NIP coverage. The main areas for improvement are: - -1. **Error Handling** - Most critical issue affecting reliability -2. **Class Design** - Several god classes need refactoring for maintainability -3. **Documentation** - Good but could be enhanced with more comprehensive JavaDoc -4. **Code Smells** - Minor issues with magic numbers and TODO comments - -The code follows Clean Architecture principles well, with proper dependency direction and module boundaries. The use of design patterns (Factory, Strategy, Singleton) is generally appropriate, though some implementations (singleton) need refinement. - -**Recommended Priority Order:** -1. Fix critical error handling issues (Findings 1.1, 1.2, 1.3) -2. Complete NIP-52 implementation (Finding 10.2) -3. Refactor god classes (Findings 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4) -4. Improve method design and documentation (Milestones 3, 4) -5. Address code smells and long-term improvements (Milestones 5, 8, 9) - -With focused effort on error handling and class design refactoring, the codebase can move from **B to A- grade** while maintaining full NIP compliance. - ---- - -**Review Completed:** 2025-10-06 -**Files Analyzed:** 252 Java source files -**Total Findings:** 38 (4 Critical, 8 High, 17 Medium, 9 Low) -**Positive Findings:** 6 -**Next Review:** Recommended after Milestone 2 completion diff --git a/.project-management/CODE_REVIEW_UPDATE_2025-10-06.md b/.project-management/CODE_REVIEW_UPDATE_2025-10-06.md deleted file mode 100644 index 9e0d8672c..000000000 --- a/.project-management/CODE_REVIEW_UPDATE_2025-10-06.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,980 +0,0 @@ -# Code Review Progress Update - Post-Refactoring - -**Date:** 2025-10-06 (Updated) -**Context:** Progress review after major refactoring implementation -**Previous Grade:** B -**Current Grade:** A- - ---- - -## Executive Summary - -The nostr-java codebase has undergone significant refactoring based on the CODE_REVIEW_REPORT.md recommendations. The project now consists of **283 Java files** (up from 252) with improved architectural patterns, cleaner code organization, and better adherence to Clean Code and Clean Architecture principles. - -### Major Improvements - -✅ **22 of 38 findings addressed** (58% completion rate) ⬆️ -✅ **All 4 critical findings resolved** -✅ **8 of 8 high-priority findings resolved** ⬆️ 100% -✅ **Line count reductions:** -- NIP01: 452 → 358 lines (21% reduction) -- NIP57: 449 → 251 lines (44% reduction) -- NostrSpringWebSocketClient: 369 → 232 lines (37% reduction) -- GenericEvent: Extracted 472 lines to 3 utility classes - ---- - -## Milestone 1: Critical Error Handling ✅ COMPLETED - -### Finding 1.1: Generic Exception Catching ✅ RESOLVED -**Status:** FULLY ADDRESSED -**Evidence:** -- No instances of `catch (Exception e)` found in nostr-java-id module -- No instances of `catch (Exception e)` found in nostr-java-api module -- Specific exception catching implemented throughout - -**Files Modified:** -- `Identity.java` - Now catches `IllegalArgumentException` and `SchnorrException` specifically -- `BaseKey.java` - Now catches `IllegalArgumentException` and `Bech32EncodingException` specifically -- All WebSocket client classes updated with specific exception handling - -### Finding 1.2: Excessive @SneakyThrows Usage ✅ RESOLVED -**Status:** FULLY ADDRESSED -**Evidence:** -- 0 instances of `@SneakyThrows` found in nostr-java-api module -- Proper exception handling with try-catch blocks implemented -- Custom domain exceptions used appropriately - -### Finding 1.3: Inconsistent Exception Hierarchy ✅ RESOLVED -**Status:** FULLY ADDRESSED -**Evidence:** New unified exception hierarchy created: - -``` -NostrRuntimeException (base - unchecked) -├── NostrProtocolException (NIP violations) -│ └── NostrException (legacy, now extends NostrProtocolException) -├── NostrCryptoException (signing, encryption) -│ ├── SigningException -│ └── SchnorrException -├── NostrEncodingException (serialization) -│ ├── KeyEncodingException -│ ├── EventEncodingException -│ └── Bech32EncodingException -└── NostrNetworkException (relay communication) -``` - -**Files Created:** -- `nostr-java-util/src/main/java/nostr/util/exception/NostrRuntimeException.java` -- `nostr-java-util/src/main/java/nostr/util/exception/NostrProtocolException.java` -- `nostr-java-util/src/main/java/nostr/util/exception/NostrCryptoException.java` -- `nostr-java-util/src/main/java/nostr/util/exception/NostrEncodingException.java` -- `nostr-java-util/src/main/java/nostr/util/exception/NostrNetworkException.java` - -**Impact:** All domain exceptions are now unchecked (RuntimeException) with clear hierarchy - ---- - -## Milestone 2: Class Design & Single Responsibility ✅ COMPLETED - -### Finding 2.1: God Class - NIP01 ✅ RESOLVED -**Status:** FULLY ADDRESSED -**Previous:** 452 lines with multiple responsibilities -**Current:** 358 lines with focused responsibilities - -**Evidence:** Extracted classes created: -1. `NIP01EventBuilder` - Event creation methods -2. `NIP01TagFactory` - Tag creation methods -3. `NIP01MessageFactory` - Message creation methods -4. `NIP01` - Now serves as facade/coordinator - -**Files Created:** -- `/nostr-java-api/src/main/java/nostr/api/nip01/NIP01EventBuilder.java` (92 lines) -- `/nostr-java-api/src/main/java/nostr/api/nip01/NIP01TagFactory.java` (97 lines) -- `/nostr-java-api/src/main/java/nostr/api/nip01/NIP01MessageFactory.java` (39 lines) - -**Total extracted:** 228 lines of focused functionality - -### Finding 2.2: God Class - NIP57 ✅ RESOLVED -**Status:** FULLY ADDRESSED -**Previous:** 449 lines with multiple responsibilities -**Current:** 251 lines with focused responsibilities - -**Evidence:** Extracted classes created: -1. `NIP57ZapRequestBuilder` - Zap request construction -2. `NIP57ZapReceiptBuilder` - Zap receipt construction -3. `NIP57TagFactory` - Tag creation -4. `ZapRequestParameters` - Parameter object pattern -5. `NIP57` - Now serves as facade - -**Files Created:** -- `/nostr-java-api/src/main/java/nostr/api/nip57/NIP57ZapRequestBuilder.java` (159 lines) -- `/nostr-java-api/src/main/java/nostr/api/nip57/NIP57ZapReceiptBuilder.java` (70 lines) -- `/nostr-java-api/src/main/java/nostr/api/nip57/NIP57TagFactory.java` (57 lines) -- `/nostr-java-api/src/main/java/nostr/api/nip57/ZapRequestParameters.java` (46 lines) - -**Total extracted:** 332 lines of focused functionality -**Improvement:** 44% size reduction + parameter object pattern - -### Finding 2.3: NostrSpringWebSocketClient - Multiple Responsibilities ✅ RESOLVED -**Status:** FULLY ADDRESSED -**Previous:** 369 lines with 7 responsibilities -**Current:** 232 lines with focused coordination - -**Evidence:** Extracted responsibilities: -1. `NostrRelayRegistry` - Relay lifecycle management -2. `NostrEventDispatcher` - Event transmission -3. `NostrRequestDispatcher` - Request handling -4. `NostrSubscriptionManager` - Subscription lifecycle -5. `WebSocketClientHandlerFactory` - Handler creation - -**Files Created:** -- `/nostr-java-api/src/main/java/nostr/api/client/NostrRelayRegistry.java` (127 lines) -- `/nostr-java-api/src/main/java/nostr/api/client/NostrEventDispatcher.java` (68 lines) -- `/nostr-java-api/src/main/java/nostr/api/client/NostrRequestDispatcher.java` (78 lines) -- `/nostr-java-api/src/main/java/nostr/api/client/NostrSubscriptionManager.java` (91 lines) -- `/nostr-java-api/src/main/java/nostr/api/client/WebSocketClientHandlerFactory.java` (23 lines) - -**Total extracted:** 387 lines of focused functionality -**Improvement:** 37% size reduction + clear separation of concerns - -### Finding 2.4: GenericEvent - Data Class with Business Logic ✅ RESOLVED -**Status:** FULLY ADDRESSED - -**Evidence:** Extracted business logic to focused utility classes: -1. **EventValidator** (158 lines) - NIP-01 validation logic -2. **EventSerializer** (151 lines) - Canonical serialization and event ID computation -3. **EventTypeChecker** (163 lines) - Event kind range classification - -**Files Created:** -- `/nostr-java-event/src/main/java/nostr/event/validator/EventValidator.java` -- `/nostr-java-event/src/main/java/nostr/event/serializer/EventSerializer.java` -- `/nostr-java-event/src/main/java/nostr/event/util/EventTypeChecker.java` - -**GenericEvent Changes:** -- Delegated validation to `EventValidator` while preserving template method pattern -- Delegated serialization to `EventSerializer` -- Delegated type checking to `EventTypeChecker` -- Maintained backward compatibility -- All 170 event tests passing - -**Total extracted:** 472 lines of focused, reusable functionality - -**Documentation:** See `FINDING_2.4_COMPLETION.md` for complete details - ---- - -## Milestone 3: Method Design & Complexity ✅ COMPLETED - -### Finding 3.1: Long Method - WebSocketClientHandler.subscribe() ✅ RESOLVED -**Status:** FULLY ADDRESSED -**Previous:** 93 lines in one method -**Current:** Refactored with extracted methods and inner classes - -**Evidence:** -- Created `SubscriptionHandle` inner class for resource management -- Created `CloseAccumulator` inner class for error aggregation -- Extracted error handling logic into focused methods -- Method now ~30 lines with clear single responsibility - -**Files Modified:** -- `/nostr-java-api/src/main/java/nostr/api/WebSocketClientHandler.java` - -### Finding 3.2: Long Method - NostrSpringWebSocketClient.subscribe() ✅ RESOLVED -**Status:** ADDRESSED via Finding 2.3 -**Evidence:** Subscription logic now delegated to `NostrSubscriptionManager` - -### Finding 3.3: Method Parameter Count - NIP57.createZapRequestEvent() ✅ RESOLVED -**Status:** FULLY ADDRESSED - -**Evidence:** Parameter object pattern implemented: -```java -@Builder -@Data -public class ZapRequestParameters { - private Long amount; - private String lnUrl; - private List relays; - private String content; - private PublicKey recipientPubKey; - private GenericEvent zappedEvent; - private BaseTag addressTag; -} - -// Usage -public NIP57 createZapRequestEvent(ZapRequestParameters params) { - // Implementation -} -``` - -**Files Created:** -- `/nostr-java-api/src/main/java/nostr/api/nip57/ZapRequestParameters.java` - ---- - -## Milestone 4: Comments & Documentation ✅ COMPLETED - -### Finding 4.1: Template Boilerplate Comments ✅ RESOLVED -**Status:** FULLY ADDRESSED -**Evidence:** 0 instances of "Click nbfs://nbhost" template comments found - -**Files Cleaned:** -- All NIP implementation files (NIP01-NIP61) -- EventNostr.java and related classes -- Factory classes - -**Impact:** ~50 files cleaned of template boilerplate - -### Finding 4.2: TODO Comments in Production Code ⏳ IN PROGRESS -**Status:** PARTIALLY ADDRESSED - -**Addressed:** -- Many TODOs converted to GitHub issues -- Trivial TODOs completed during refactoring - -**Remaining:** -- Calendar event deserializer TODOs (linked to Finding 10.2) -- Some feature TODOs remain for future enhancement - -### Finding 4.3: Minimal JavaDoc on Public APIs ⏳ IN PROGRESS -**Status:** PARTIALLY ADDRESSED - -**Improvements:** -- New classes have comprehensive JavaDoc -- Extracted classes include full documentation -- Method-level JavaDoc improved - -**Remaining:** -- Legacy classes need JavaDoc enhancement -- Exception classes need usage examples - ---- - -## Milestone 5: Naming Conventions ✅ COMPLETED - -### Finding 5.1: Inconsistent Field Naming ✅ RESOLVED -**Status:** ADDRESSED - -**Evidence:** Compatibility maintained while improving: -```java -// GenericEvent.java -private byte[] _serializedEvent; // Internal field - -// Compatibility accessors -public byte[] getSerializedEventCache() { - return this.get_serializedEvent(); -} -``` - -**Future:** Will be renamed in next major version - -### Finding 5.2: Abbreviations in Core Types ✅ ACCEPTED -**Status:** NO CHANGE NEEDED -**Rationale:** Domain-standard abbreviations maintained for NIP compliance - ---- - -## Milestone 6: Design Patterns & Architecture ✅ COMPLETED - -### Finding 6.1: Singleton Pattern with Thread Safety Issues ✅ RESOLVED -**Status:** FULLY ADDRESSED - -**Evidence:** Replaced with initialization-on-demand holder: -```java -private static final class InstanceHolder { - private static final NostrSpringWebSocketClient INSTANCE = - new NostrSpringWebSocketClient(); - private InstanceHolder() {} -} - -public static NostrIF getInstance() { - return InstanceHolder.INSTANCE; -} -``` - -**Files Modified:** -- `/nostr-java-api/src/main/java/nostr/api/NostrSpringWebSocketClient.java` - -**Improvements:** -- Thread-safe without synchronization overhead -- Lazy initialization guaranteed by JVM -- Immutable INSTANCE field - -### Finding 6.4: Static ObjectMapper in Interface ⏳ IN PROGRESS -**Status:** PARTIALLY ADDRESSED - -**Evidence:** Mapper access improved but still in interface - -**Remaining Work:** -- Extract to `EventJsonMapper` utility class -- Remove from `IEvent` interface - ---- - -## Milestone 7: Clean Architecture Boundaries ✅ MAINTAINED - -### Finding 7.1: Module Dependency Analysis ✅ EXCELLENT -**Status:** MAINTAINED - No violations introduced - -**Evidence:** New modules follow dependency rules: -- `nostr-java-api/client` depends on base abstractions -- No circular dependencies created -- Module boundaries respected - -### Finding 7.2: Spring Framework Coupling ⏳ ACKNOWLEDGED -**Status:** ACCEPTED - Low priority for future - ---- - -## Milestone 8: Code Smells & Heuristics ✅ COMPLETED - -### Finding 8.1: Magic Numbers ✅ RESOLVED -**Status:** FULLY ADDRESSED - -**Evidence:** Created `NipConstants` class: -```java -public final class NipConstants { - public static final int EVENT_ID_HEX_LENGTH = 64; - public static final int PUBLIC_KEY_HEX_LENGTH = 64; - public static final int SIGNATURE_HEX_LENGTH = 128; - - public static final int REPLACEABLE_KIND_MIN = 10_000; - public static final int REPLACEABLE_KIND_MAX = 20_000; - public static final int EPHEMERAL_KIND_MIN = 20_000; - public static final int EPHEMERAL_KIND_MAX = 30_000; - public static final int ADDRESSABLE_KIND_MIN = 30_000; - public static final int ADDRESSABLE_KIND_MAX = 40_000; -} -``` - -**Files Created:** -- `/nostr-java-base/src/main/java/nostr/base/NipConstants.java` - -**Usage:** -- `GenericEvent.isReplaceable()` now uses constants -- `HexStringValidator` uses constants -- All NIP range checks use constants - -### Finding 8.2: Primitive Obsession ✅ RESOLVED -**Status:** FULLY ADDRESSED - -**Evidence:** Value objects created: -1. `RelayUri` - Validates WebSocket URIs -2. `SubscriptionId` - Type-safe subscription IDs - -**Files Created:** -- `/nostr-java-base/src/main/java/nostr/base/RelayUri.java` -- `/nostr-java-base/src/main/java/nostr/base/SubscriptionId.java` - -**Implementation:** -```java -@EqualsAndHashCode -public final class RelayUri { - private final String value; - - public RelayUri(@NonNull String value) { - // Validates ws:// or wss:// scheme - URI uri = URI.create(value); - if (!"ws".equalsIgnoreCase(scheme) && !"wss".equalsIgnoreCase(scheme)) { - throw new IllegalArgumentException("Relay URI must use ws or wss scheme"); - } - this.value = value; - } -} - -@EqualsAndHashCode -public final class SubscriptionId { - private final String value; - - public static SubscriptionId of(@NonNull String value) { - if (value.trim().isEmpty()) { - throw new IllegalArgumentException("Subscription id must not be blank"); - } - return new SubscriptionId(value.trim()); - } -} -``` - -**Impact:** Type safety prevents invalid identifiers at compile time - -### Finding 8.3: Feature Envy ⏳ ACKNOWLEDGED -**Status:** ACCEPTED - Low priority - -### Finding 8.4: Dead Code - Deprecated Methods ⏳ IN PROGRESS -**Status:** SOME PROGRESS - -**Evidence:** -- `SpringWebSocketClient.closeSocket()` removed -- Some deprecated methods cleaned up - -**Remaining:** -- Full deprecated method audit needed -- Mark remaining with @Deprecated(forRemoval = true, since = "X.X.X") - ---- - -## Milestone 9: Lombok Usage Review ✅ EXCELLENT - -### Finding 9.1: Appropriate Lombok Usage ✅ MAINTAINED -**Status:** EXEMPLARY - Continue current patterns - -### Finding 9.2: Potential @Builder Candidates ✅ RESOLVED -**Status:** ADDRESSED - -**Evidence:** Builder pattern added to: -- `GenericEvent` - Complex event construction -- `ZapRequestParameters` - Parameter object -- New builder classes created for event construction - ---- - -## Milestone 10: NIP Compliance Verification ✅ MAINTAINED - -### Finding 10.1: Comprehensive NIP Coverage ✅ EXCELLENT -**Status:** MAINTAINED - All 26 NIPs still supported - -### Finding 10.2: Incomplete Calendar Event Implementation ✅ RESOLVED -**Status:** ALREADY COMPLETE - Documented - -**Evidence:** Investigation revealed full NIP-52 implementation: -- ✅ **No TODO comments** in deserializers (already cleaned up) -- ✅ **CalendarDateBasedEvent** (129 lines): Complete tag parsing for all NIP-52 date tags -- ✅ **CalendarTimeBasedEvent** (99 lines): Timezone and summary support -- ✅ **CalendarEvent** (92 lines): Address tags with validation -- ✅ **CalendarRsvpEvent** (126 lines): Status, free/busy, event references - -**NIP-52 Tags Implemented:** -- Required: `d` (identifier), `title`, `start` - All validated -- Optional: `end`, `location`, `g` (geohash), `p` (participants), `t` (hashtags), `r` (references) -- Time-based: `start_tzid`, `end_tzid`, `summary`, `label` -- RSVP: `status`, `a` (address), `e` (event), `fb` (free/busy) - -**Tests:** All 12 calendar-related tests passing - -**Documentation:** See `FINDING_10.2_COMPLETION.md` for complete analysis - -### Finding 10.3: Kind Enum vs Constants Inconsistency ⏳ IN PROGRESS -**Status:** PARTIALLY ADDRESSED - -**Evidence:** -- `Constants.Kind` class updated with integer literals -- Enum approach maintained in `Kind.java` -- Deprecation warnings added - -**Remaining:** -- Full migration to enum approach -- Remove Constants.Kind in next major version - -### Finding 10.4: Event Validation ✅ EXCELLENT -**Status:** MAINTAINED - Strong NIP-01 compliance - ---- - -## Summary of Progress - -### Completed Findings: 22/38 (58%) ⬆️ - -**Critical (4/4 = 100%):** -- ✅ 1.1 Generic Exception Catching -- ✅ 1.2 Excessive @SneakyThrows -- ✅ 1.3 Exception Hierarchy -- ✅ 10.2 NIP-52 Calendar Events - -**High Priority (8/8 = 100%):** ⬆️ -- ✅ 2.1 God Class - NIP01 -- ✅ 2.2 God Class - NIP57 -- ✅ 2.3 NostrSpringWebSocketClient Responsibilities -- ✅ 2.4 GenericEvent Separation -- ✅ 3.1 Long Methods -- ✅ 3.2 Subscribe Method (via 2.3) -- ✅ 6.1 Singleton Pattern -- ✅ 10.2 Calendar Event Implementation - -**Medium Priority (8/17 = 47%):** -- ✅ 3.3 Parameter Count -- ✅ 4.1 Template Comments -- ✅ 4.3 JavaDoc (partial) -- ✅ 8.1 Magic Numbers -- ✅ 8.2 Primitive Obsession -- ⏳ 6.4 Static ObjectMapper (partial) -- ⏳ 10.3 Kind Constants (partial) -- ⏳ Others pending - -**Low Priority (6/9 = 67%):** -- ✅ 5.1 Field Naming (compatibility maintained) -- ✅ 5.2 Abbreviations (accepted) -- ✅ 9.2 Builder Pattern -- ⏳ 4.2 TODO Comments (partial) -- ⏳ 8.4 Deprecated Methods (partial) -- ⏳ Others pending - ---- - -## Code Quality Metrics - -### Before → After - -| Metric | Before | After | Change | -|--------|--------|-------|--------| -| **Overall Grade** | B | **A-** | +1 grade | -| **Source Files** | 252 | 286 | +34 files | -| **God Classes** | 3 | 0 | -3 (refactored) | -| **Generic Exception Catching** | ~14 instances | 0 | -14 | -| **@SneakyThrows Usage** | ~16 instances | 0 | -16 | -| **Template Comments** | ~50 files | 0 | -50 | -| **Magic Numbers** | Multiple | 0 (constants) | Resolved | -| **Value Objects** | 2 (PublicKey, PrivateKey) | 4 (+RelayUri, +SubscriptionId) | +2 | -| **NIP01 Lines** | 452 | 358 | -21% | -| **NIP57 Lines** | 449 | 251 | -44% | -| **NostrSpringWebSocketClient Lines** | 369 | 232 | -37% | -| **GenericEvent Extracted** | - | 472 lines | 3 utility classes | - ---- - -## Updated Priority Action Items - -### ✅ Completed High-Priority Work -1. ✅ ~~Fix Generic Exception Catching~~ DONE -2. ✅ ~~Remove @SneakyThrows~~ DONE -3. ✅ ~~Remove Template Comments~~ DONE -4. ✅ ~~Complete Calendar Event Deserializers~~ DONE (Finding 10.2) -5. ✅ ~~Refactor Exception Hierarchy~~ DONE -6. ✅ ~~Fix Singleton Pattern~~ DONE -7. ✅ ~~Refactor NIP01 God Class~~ DONE -8. ✅ ~~Refactor NIP57 God Class~~ DONE -9. ✅ ~~Extract Magic Numbers~~ DONE -10. ✅ ~~Complete GenericEvent Refactoring~~ DONE (Finding 2.4) - -### 🎯 Current Focus: Medium-Priority Refinements - -#### Phase 1: Code Quality & Maintainability (2-3 days) -11. **Extract Static ObjectMapper** (Finding 6.4) - - Create `EventJsonMapper` utility class - - Remove `ENCODER_MAPPER_BLACKBIRD` from `IEvent` interface - - Update all usages to use utility class - -12. **Clean Up TODO Comments** (Finding 4.2) - - Audit remaining TODO comments - - Convert to GitHub issues or resolve - - Document decision for each TODO - -13. **Remove Deprecated Methods** (Finding 8.4) - - Identify all `@Deprecated` methods - - Add `@Deprecated(forRemoval = true, since = "0.6.2")` - - Plan removal for version 1.0.0 - -#### Phase 2: Documentation (3-5 days) -14. **Add Comprehensive JavaDoc** (Finding 4.3) - - Document all public APIs in legacy classes - - Add usage examples to exception classes - - Document NIP compliance in each NIP module - - Add package-info.java files - -15. **Create Architecture Documentation** - - Document extracted class relationships - - Create sequence diagrams for key flows - - Document design patterns used - -#### Phase 3: Standardization (2-3 days) -16. **Standardize Kind Definitions** (Finding 10.3) - - Complete migration to `Kind` enum - - Deprecate `Constants.Kind` class - - Add migration guide - -17. **Address Feature Envy** (Finding 8.3) - - Review identified cases - - Refactor where beneficial - - Document decisions for accepted cases - -### 🔮 Future Enhancements (Post-1.0.0) -18. **Evaluate WebSocket Abstraction** (Finding 7.2) - - Research WebSocket abstraction libraries - - Prototype Spring WebSocket decoupling - - Measure impact vs benefit - -19. **Add NIP Compliance Test Suite** - - Create NIP-01 compliance test suite - - Add compliance tests for all 26 NIPs - - Automate compliance verification - -20. **Performance Optimization** - - Profile event serialization performance - - Optimize hot paths - - Add benchmarking suite - ---- - -## 📋 Methodical Resolution Plan - -### Current Status Assessment -- ✅ **All critical issues resolved** (4/4 = 100%) -- ✅ **All high-priority issues resolved** (8/8 = 100%) -- 🎯 **Medium-priority issues** (8/17 = 47% complete) -- 🔵 **Low-priority issues** (6/9 = 67% complete) - -**Remaining Work:** 16 findings across medium and low priorities - ---- - -### Phase 1: Code Quality & Maintainability 🎯 -**Duration:** 2-3 days | **Priority:** Medium | **Effort:** 8-12 hours - -**Objectives:** -- Eliminate remaining code smells -- Improve maintainability -- Standardize patterns - -**Tasks:** -1. **Extract Static ObjectMapper** (Finding 6.4) - - [ ] Create `/nostr-java-event/src/main/java/nostr/event/json/EventJsonMapper.java` - - [ ] Move `ENCODER_MAPPER_BLACKBIRD` from `IEvent` interface - - [ ] Update all references in event serialization - - [ ] Run full test suite to verify - - **Estimated:** 2-3 hours - -2. **Clean Up TODO Comments** (Finding 4.2) - - [ ] Search for all remaining TODO comments: `grep -r "TODO" --include="*.java"` - - [ ] Categorize: Convert to GitHub issues, resolve, or document decision - - [ ] Remove or replace with issue references - - **Estimated:** 1-2 hours - -3. **Remove Deprecated Methods** (Finding 8.4) - - [ ] Find all `@Deprecated` annotations: `grep -r "@Deprecated" --include="*.java"` - - [ ] Add removal metadata: `@Deprecated(forRemoval = true, since = "0.6.2")` - - [ ] Document migration path in JavaDoc - - [ ] Create MIGRATION.md guide - - **Estimated:** 2-3 hours - -4. **Address Feature Envy** (Finding 8.3 - Low Priority) - - [ ] Review identified cases from code review - - [ ] Refactor beneficial cases - - [ ] Document accepted cases with rationale - - **Estimated:** 2-3 hours - -**Deliverables:** -- EventJsonMapper utility class -- Zero TODO comments in production code -- All deprecated methods marked for removal -- MIGRATION.md for deprecated APIs - ---- - -### Phase 2: Documentation Enhancement 📚 -**Duration:** 3-5 days | **Priority:** Medium | **Effort:** 16-24 hours - -**Objectives:** -- Improve API discoverability -- Document architectural decisions -- Create comprehensive developer guide - -**Tasks:** -1. **Add Comprehensive JavaDoc** (Finding 4.3) - - [ ] Document all public APIs in core classes: - - GenericEvent, BaseEvent, BaseTag - - All NIP implementation classes (NIP01-NIP61) - - Exception hierarchy classes - - [ ] Add usage examples to EventValidator, EventSerializer - - [ ] Document NIP compliance in each module - - [ ] Create package-info.java for each package - - **Estimated:** 8-12 hours - -2. **Create Architecture Documentation** - - [ ] Document extracted class relationships (NIP01, NIP57, GenericEvent) - - [ ] Create sequence diagrams for: - - Event creation and signing flow - - WebSocket subscription lifecycle - - Event validation and serialization - - [ ] Document design patterns used: - - Facade (NIP01, NIP57) - - Template Method (GenericEvent.validate()) - - Builder (event construction) - - Value Objects (RelayUri, SubscriptionId) - - **Estimated:** 4-6 hours - -3. **Create ARCHITECTURE.md** - - [ ] Module dependency diagram - - [ ] Layer separation explanation - - [ ] Clean Architecture compliance - - [ ] Extension points for new NIPs - - **Estimated:** 2-3 hours - -4. **Update README.md** - - [ ] Add NIP compliance matrix - - [ ] Document recent refactoring improvements - - [ ] Add code quality badges - - [ ] Link to new documentation - - **Estimated:** 2-3 hours - -**Deliverables:** -- Comprehensive JavaDoc on all public APIs -- ARCHITECTURE.md with diagrams -- Enhanced README.md -- package-info.java files - ---- - -### Phase 3: Standardization & Consistency 🔧 -**Duration:** 2-3 days | **Priority:** Medium | **Effort:** 8-12 hours - -**Objectives:** -- Standardize event kind definitions -- Ensure consistent naming -- Improve type safety - -**Tasks:** -1. **Standardize Kind Definitions** (Finding 10.3) - - [ ] Complete migration to `Kind` enum approach - - [ ] Deprecate `Constants.Kind` class - - [ ] Update all references to use enum - - [ ] Add missing event kinds from recent NIPs - - [ ] Create migration guide in MIGRATION.md - - **Estimated:** 4-6 hours - -2. **Inconsistent Field Naming** (Finding 5.1 - Low Priority) - - [ ] Plan `_serializedEvent` → `serializedEventBytes` rename - - [ ] Document in MIGRATION.md for version 1.0.0 - - [ ] Keep compatibility accessors for now - - **Estimated:** 1 hour - -3. **Consistent Exception Messages** - - [ ] Audit all exception messages for consistency - - [ ] Ensure all include context (class, method, values) - - [ ] Standardize format: "Failed to {action}: {reason}" - - **Estimated:** 2-3 hours - -4. **Naming Convention Audit** - - [ ] Review all new classes for naming consistency - - [ ] Ensure factory classes end with "Factory" - - [ ] Ensure builder classes end with "Builder" - - [ ] Document conventions in CONTRIBUTING.md - - **Estimated:** 1-2 hours - -**Deliverables:** -- Standardized Kind enum (deprecated Constants.Kind) -- Enhanced MIGRATION.md -- Consistent exception messages -- CONTRIBUTING.md with naming conventions - ---- - -### Phase 4: Testing & Verification ✅ -**Duration:** 2-3 days | **Priority:** High | **Effort:** 8-12 hours - -**Objectives:** -- Ensure refactored code is well-tested -- Add NIP compliance verification -- Increase code coverage - -**Tasks:** -1. **Test Coverage Analysis** - - [ ] Run JaCoCo coverage report - - [ ] Identify gaps in extracted classes coverage: - - EventValidator, EventSerializer, EventTypeChecker - - NIP01EventBuilder, NIP01TagFactory, NIP01MessageFactory - - NIP57 builders and factories - - NostrRelayRegistry, NostrEventDispatcher, etc. - - [ ] Add missing tests to reach 85%+ coverage - - **Estimated:** 4-6 hours - -2. **NIP Compliance Test Suite** (Finding 10.1 enhancement) - - [ ] Create NIP-01 compliance verification tests - - [ ] Verify event serialization matches spec - - [ ] Verify event ID computation - - [ ] Test all event kind ranges - - [ ] Add test for each NIP implementation - - **Estimated:** 3-4 hours - -3. **Integration Tests** - - [ ] Test extracted class integration - - [ ] Verify NIP01 facade with extracted classes - - [ ] Verify NIP57 facade with extracted classes - - [ ] Test WebSocket client with dispatchers/managers - - **Estimated:** 1-2 hours - -**Deliverables:** -- 85%+ code coverage -- NIP compliance test suite -- Integration tests for refactored components - ---- - -### Phase 5: Polish & Release Preparation 🚀 -**Duration:** 1-2 days | **Priority:** Low | **Effort:** 4-8 hours - -**Objectives:** -- Prepare for version 0.7.0 release -- Ensure all documentation is up-to-date -- Validate build and release process - -**Tasks:** -1. **Version Bump Planning** - - [ ] Update version to 0.7.0 - - [ ] Create CHANGELOG.md for 0.7.0 - - [ ] Document all breaking changes (if any) - - [ ] Update dependency versions - - **Estimated:** 1-2 hours - -2. **Release Documentation** - - [ ] Write release notes highlighting: - - All critical issues resolved - - All high-priority refactoring complete - - New utility classes - - Improved Clean Code compliance - - [ ] Update migration guide - - [ ] Create upgrade instructions - - **Estimated:** 2-3 hours - -3. **Final Verification** - - [ ] Run full build: `mvn clean install` - - [ ] Run all tests: `mvn test` - - [ ] Verify no TODOs in production code - - [ ] Verify all JavaDoc generates without warnings - - [ ] Check for security vulnerabilities: `mvn dependency-check:check` - - **Estimated:** 1-2 hours - -**Deliverables:** -- Version 0.7.0 ready for release -- Complete CHANGELOG.md -- Release notes -- Verified build - ---- - -### Success Metrics - -**Code Quality:** -- ✅ All critical findings resolved (4/4) -- ✅ All high-priority findings resolved (8/8) -- 🎯 Medium-priority findings: Target 14/17 (82%) -- 🎯 Overall completion: Target 28/38 (74%) -- 🎯 Code coverage: Target 85%+ -- 🎯 Overall grade: A- → A - -**Documentation:** -- 🎯 100% public API JavaDoc coverage -- 🎯 Architecture documentation complete -- 🎯 All design patterns documented -- 🎯 Migration guide for deprecated APIs - -**Testing:** -- 🎯 NIP compliance test suite created -- 🎯 All refactored code tested -- 🎯 Integration tests for extracted classes - -**Timeline:** 10-16 days total (2-3 weeks) - ---- - -### Recommended Execution Order - -**Week 1:** -- Days 1-3: Phase 1 (Code Quality & Maintainability) -- Days 4-5: Phase 2 Start (JavaDoc public APIs) - -**Week 2:** -- Days 6-8: Phase 2 Complete (Architecture docs) -- Days 9-10: Phase 3 (Standardization) - -**Week 3:** -- Days 11-13: Phase 4 (Testing & Verification) -- Days 14-15: Phase 5 (Polish & Release) -- Day 16: Buffer for unexpected issues - -**Milestone Checkpoints:** -- End of Week 1: Code quality tasks complete, JavaDoc started -- End of Week 2: Documentation complete, standardization done -- End of Week 3: Ready for 0.7.0 release - -This plan is **methodical, prioritized, and achievable** with clear deliverables and success metrics. - ---- - -## Conclusion - -The refactoring effort has been **highly successful**, addressing **58% of all findings** including **100% of critical and high-priority issues**. The codebase has improved from grade **B to A-** through: - -### ✅ Completed Achievements - -**Critical Issues (4/4 = 100%):** -✅ Complete elimination of generic exception catching -✅ Complete elimination of @SneakyThrows anti-pattern -✅ Unified exception hierarchy with proper categorization -✅ NIP-52 calendar events fully compliant - -**High-Priority Issues (8/8 = 100%):** -✅ Refactored all god classes (NIP01, NIP57, NostrSpringWebSocketClient, GenericEvent) -✅ Fixed long methods and high complexity -✅ Thread-safe singleton pattern -✅ Parameter object pattern for complex methods -✅ Extracted 1,419 lines to 15 focused, SRP-compliant classes - -**Medium-Priority Issues (8/17 = 47%):** -✅ Value objects for type safety (RelayUri, SubscriptionId) -✅ Constants for all magic numbers (NipConstants) -✅ Builder patterns for complex construction -✅ Template comments eliminated (50 files cleaned) -✅ Partial JavaDoc improvements - -### 🎯 Remaining Work - -**16 findings remain** across medium and low priorities: -- 9 medium-priority findings (documentation, standardization, cleanup) -- 3 low-priority findings (minor refactoring, naming conventions) -- 4 accepted findings (domain-standard conventions, architectural decisions) - -All remaining work is **non-blocking** and consists of: -- Documentation enhancements (JavaDoc, architecture docs) -- Code standardization (Kind enum migration, naming consistency) -- Test coverage improvements (85%+ target) -- Minor cleanups (TODO comments, deprecated methods) - -### 📊 Impact Summary - -**Code Metrics:** -- **Files:** 252 → 286 (+34 new focused classes) -- **God Classes:** 3 → 0 (100% elimination) -- **Grade:** B → A- (on track to A) -- **Extracted Lines:** 1,419 lines to 15 new utility classes -- **Size Reductions:** - - NIP01: -21% (452 → 358 lines) - - NIP57: -44% (449 → 251 lines) - - NostrSpringWebSocketClient: -37% (369 → 232 lines) - -**Architecture Quality:** -- ✅ Single Responsibility Principle compliance achieved -- ✅ Clean Architecture boundaries maintained -- ✅ All design patterns properly documented -- ✅ Full NIP-01 and NIP-52 compliance verified - -### 🚀 Next Steps - -**Immediate Focus:** -The **Methodical Resolution Plan** above provides a clear 2-3 week roadmap to complete remaining work: -- **Week 1:** Code quality & maintainability (Phase 1-2 start) -- **Week 2:** Documentation enhancement (Phase 2-3) -- **Week 3:** Testing & release preparation (Phase 4-5) - -**Target Outcome:** -- Overall completion: **74% (28/38 findings)** -- Code coverage: **85%+** -- Grade trajectory: **A- → A** -- Release: **Version 0.7.0** - -### 🎉 Current Status - -**Production-Ready with A- Grade** - -The codebase now has a **solid architectural foundation** with: -- Zero critical issues -- Zero high-priority issues -- Clean, maintainable code following industry best practices -- Clear patterns for future NIP implementations -- Comprehensive test coverage (170+ event tests passing) - -The remaining work is **polish and enhancement** rather than **critical refactoring**. - ---- - -**Update Completed:** 2025-10-06 (Final Update) -**Next Review:** After Phase 1 completion (Week 1) -**Grade Trajectory:** A- → A (achievable in 2-3 weeks) -**Recommended Action:** Begin Phase 1 of Methodical Resolution Plan diff --git a/.project-management/EXCEPTION_MESSAGE_STANDARDS.md b/.project-management/EXCEPTION_MESSAGE_STANDARDS.md deleted file mode 100644 index 54efd38d4..000000000 --- a/.project-management/EXCEPTION_MESSAGE_STANDARDS.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,331 +0,0 @@ -# Exception Message Standards - -**Created:** 2025-10-07 -**Purpose:** Standardize exception messages across nostr-java for better debugging and user experience - ---- - -## Guiding Principles - -1. **Be specific** - Include what failed and why -2. **Include context** - Add relevant values (IDs, names, types) -3. **Use consistent format** - Follow established patterns -4. **Be actionable** - Help developers understand how to fix the issue - ---- - -## Standard Message Formats - -### Pattern 1: "Failed to {action}: {reason}" - -**Use for:** Operational failures (encoding, decoding, network, I/O) - -**Examples:** -```java -// ✅ Good -throw new EventEncodingException("Failed to encode event message: invalid JSON structure"); -throw new NostrNetworkException("Failed to connect to relay: connection timeout after 60s"); -throw new NostrCryptoException("Failed to sign event [id=" + eventId + "]: private key is null"); - -// ❌ Bad -throw new RuntimeException(e); // No context! -throw new EventEncodingException("Error"); // Too vague! -``` - -### Pattern 2: "Invalid {entity}: {reason}" - -**Use for:** Validation failures - -**Examples:** -```java -// ✅ Good -throw new IllegalArgumentException("Invalid event kind: must be between 0 and 65535, got " + kind); -throw new NostrProtocolException("Invalid event: missing required field 'content'"); -throw new IllegalArgumentException("Invalid tag type: expected EventTag, got " + tag.getClass().getSimpleName()); - -// ❌ Bad -throw new IllegalArgumentException("The event is not a channel creation event"); // Use "Invalid" prefix -throw new IllegalArgumentException("tag must be of type RelaysTag"); // Use "Invalid" prefix -``` - -### Pattern 3: "Cannot {action}: {reason}" - -**Use for:** Prevented operations (state issues) - -**Examples:** -```java -// ✅ Good -throw new IllegalStateException("Cannot sign event: sender identity is required"); -throw new IllegalStateException("Cannot verify event: event is not signed"); -throw new NostrProtocolException("Cannot create zap request: relays tag or relay list is required"); - -// ❌ Bad -throw new IllegalStateException("Sender identity is required for zap operations"); // Use "Cannot" prefix -throw new IllegalStateException("The event is not signed"); // Use "Cannot" prefix -``` - -### Pattern 4: "{Entity} is/are {state}" - -**Use for:** Simple state assertions - -**Examples:** -```java -// ✅ Good - for simple cases -throw new NoSuchElementException("No matching p-tag found in event tags"); -throw new IllegalArgumentException("Relay URL is null or empty"); - -// ✅ Also good - with more context -throw new NoSuchElementException("No matching p-tag found in event [id=" + eventId + "]"); -``` - ---- - -## Exception Type Selection - -### Use Domain Exceptions First - -Prefer nostr-java domain exceptions over generic Java exceptions: - -```java -// ✅ Preferred - Domain exceptions -throw new NostrProtocolException("Invalid event: ..."); -throw new NostrCryptoException("Failed to sign: ..."); -throw new NostrEncodingException("Failed to decode: ..."); -throw new NostrNetworkException("Failed to connect: ..."); - -// ⚠️ Acceptable - Standard Java exceptions when appropriate -throw new IllegalArgumentException("Invalid parameter: ..."); -throw new IllegalStateException("Cannot perform action: ..."); -throw new NoSuchElementException("Element not found: ..."); - -// ❌ Avoid - Bare RuntimeException -throw new RuntimeException(e); // Use specific exception type! -throw new RuntimeException("Something failed"); // Use NostrProtocolException or other domain exception -``` - -### Domain Exception Usage Guide - -| Exception Type | When to Use | Example | -|----------------|-------------|---------| -| `NostrProtocolException` | NIP violations, invalid events/messages | Invalid event structure, missing required tags | -| `NostrCryptoException` | Signing, verification, encryption failures | Failed to sign event, invalid signature | -| `NostrEncodingException` | JSON, Bech32, hex encoding/decoding errors | Invalid JSON, malformed Bech32 | -| `NostrNetworkException` | Relay communication, timeouts, connection errors | Connection timeout, relay rejected event | -| `IllegalArgumentException` | Invalid method parameters | Null parameter, out of range value | -| `IllegalStateException` | Object state prevents operation | Event not signed, identity not set | -| `NoSuchElementException` | Expected element not found | Tag not found, subscription not found | - ---- - -## Context Inclusion - -### Include Relevant Context Values - -**Good examples:** -```java -// Event ID -throw new NostrCryptoException("Failed to sign event [id=" + event.getId() + "]: private key is null"); - -// Kind value -throw new IllegalArgumentException("Invalid event kind [" + kind + "]: must be between 0 and 65535"); - -// Tag type -throw new IllegalArgumentException("Invalid tag type: expected " + expectedType + ", got " + actualType); - -// Relay URL -throw new NostrNetworkException("Failed to connect to relay [" + relay.getUrl() + "]: " + cause); - -// Field name -throw new NostrProtocolException("Invalid event: missing required field '" + fieldName + "'"); -``` - -### Use String.format() for Complex Messages - -```java -// ✅ Good - Readable with String.format -throw new NostrCryptoException( - String.format("Failed to sign event [id=%s, kind=%d]: %s", - event.getId(), event.getKind(), reason) -); - -// ⚠️ Okay - String concatenation for simple messages -throw new IllegalArgumentException("Invalid kind: " + kind); -``` - ---- - -## Cause Chain Preservation - -**Always preserve the original exception as the cause:** - -```java -// ✅ Good - Preserve cause -try { - mapper.writeValueAsString(event); -} catch (JsonProcessingException e) { - throw new EventEncodingException("Failed to encode event message", e); -} - -// ❌ Bad - Lost stack trace -try { - mapper.writeValueAsString(event); -} catch (JsonProcessingException e) { - throw new EventEncodingException("Failed to encode event message"); // Cause lost! -} - -// ❌ Bad - No context -try { - mapper.writeValueAsString(event); -} catch (JsonProcessingException e) { - throw new RuntimeException(e); // What operation failed? -} -``` - ---- - -## Common Patterns by Module - -### Event Validation (nostr-java-event) - -```java -// Required field validation -if (content == null) { - throw new NostrProtocolException("Invalid event: missing required field 'content'"); -} - -// Kind range validation -if (kind < 0 || kind > 65535) { - throw new IllegalArgumentException("Invalid event kind [" + kind + "]: must be between 0 and 65535"); -} - -// Signature validation -if (!event.verify()) { - throw new NostrCryptoException("Failed to verify event [id=" + event.getId() + "]: invalid signature"); -} -``` - -### Encoding/Decoding (nostr-java-event) - -```java -// JSON encoding -try { - return mapper.writeValueAsString(message); -} catch (JsonProcessingException e) { - throw new EventEncodingException("Failed to encode " + messageType + " message", e); -} - -// Bech32 decoding -try { - return Bech32.decode(bech32String); -} catch (Exception e) { - throw new NostrEncodingException("Failed to decode Bech32 string [" + bech32String + "]", e); -} -``` - -### API Operations (nostr-java-api) - -```java -// State preconditions -if (sender == null) { - throw new IllegalStateException("Cannot create event: sender identity is required"); -} - -// Type checking -if (!(tag instanceof RelaysTag)) { - throw new IllegalArgumentException( - "Invalid tag type: expected RelaysTag, got " + tag.getClass().getSimpleName() - ); -} - -// Event type validation -if (event.getKind() != Kind.CHANNEL_CREATE.getValue()) { - throw new IllegalArgumentException( - "Invalid event: expected kind " + Kind.CHANNEL_CREATE + ", got " + event.getKind() - ); -} -``` - ---- - -## Migration Examples - -### Before → After Examples - -#### Example 1: Generic RuntimeException -```java -// ❌ Before -throw new RuntimeException(e); - -// ✅ After -throw new NostrEncodingException("Failed to serialize event", e); -``` - -#### Example 2: Vague Message -```java -// ❌ Before -throw new IllegalArgumentException("The event is not a channel creation event"); - -// ✅ After -throw new IllegalArgumentException( - "Invalid event: expected kind " + Kind.CHANNEL_CREATE + ", got " + event.getKind() -); -``` - -#### Example 3: Missing Context -```java -// ❌ Before -throw new IllegalStateException("Sender identity is required for zap operations"); - -// ✅ After -throw new IllegalStateException("Cannot create zap request: sender identity is required"); -``` - -#### Example 4: No Cause Preservation -```java -// ❌ Before -try { - algorithm.sign(data); -} catch (Exception e) { - throw new RuntimeException("Signing failed"); -} - -// ✅ After -try { - algorithm.sign(data); -} catch (Exception e) { - throw new NostrCryptoException("Failed to sign event [id=" + eventId + "]: " + e.getMessage(), e); -} -``` - ---- - -## Audit Checklist - -When reviewing exception throws: - -- [ ] **Type:** Is a domain exception used? (NostrProtocolException, NostrCryptoException, etc.) -- [ ] **Format:** Does it follow a standard pattern? (Failed to.., Invalid.., Cannot..) -- [ ] **Context:** Are relevant values included? (IDs, kinds, types, URLs) -- [ ] **Cause:** Is the original exception preserved in the chain? -- [ ] **Actionable:** Can a developer understand what went wrong and how to fix it? - ---- - -## Statistics - -**Current Status (as of 2025-10-07):** -- Total exception throws: 209 -- Following standard patterns: ~85% (estimated) -- Need improvement: ~15% (bare RuntimeException, vague messages, missing context) - -**Priority Areas for Improvement:** -1. Replace bare `throw new RuntimeException(e)` with domain exceptions -2. Standardize validation messages to use "Invalid {entity}: {reason}" format -3. Add "Cannot {action}" prefix to IllegalStateException messages -4. Include context values (event IDs, kinds, types) where missing - ---- - -**Last Updated:** 2025-10-07 -**Status:** Standards defined, gradual adoption recommended -**Enforcement:** Code review + IDE inspections diff --git a/.project-management/FINDING_10.2_COMPLETION.md b/.project-management/FINDING_10.2_COMPLETION.md deleted file mode 100644 index f4e5e009f..000000000 --- a/.project-management/FINDING_10.2_COMPLETION.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,324 +0,0 @@ -# Finding 10.2: Incomplete Calendar Event Implementation - COMPLETED ✅ - -**Date:** 2025-10-06 -**Finding:** Incomplete Calendar Event Implementation -**Severity:** High (NIP compliance issue) -**Status:** ✅ FULLY RESOLVED - ---- - -## Summary - -Investigation revealed that Finding 10.2 has already been completed. All calendar event implementations have comprehensive tag assignment logic, full NIP-52 compliance, and passing tests. The TODO comments mentioned in the original code review report no longer exist in the codebase. - -## Investigation Results - -### 1. Calendar Event Deserializers ✅ -**Files Reviewed:** -- `CalendarDateBasedEventDeserializer.java` (33 lines) -- `CalendarTimeBasedEventDeserializer.java` (33 lines) -- `CalendarEventDeserializer.java` (33 lines) -- `CalendarRsvpEventDeserializer.java` (33 lines) - -**Status:** ✅ COMPLETE -- No TODO comments found -- Clean implementation using `GenericEvent.convert()` pattern -- All deserializers properly implemented - -### 2. Calendar Event Implementation Classes ✅ - -#### CalendarDateBasedEvent (129 lines) -**Location:** `/nostr-java-event/src/main/java/nostr/event/impl/CalendarDateBasedEvent.java` - -**Tag Assignment Implementation:** -```java -@Override -protected CalendarContent getCalendarContent() { - CalendarContent calendarContent = new CalendarContent<>( - Filterable.requireTagOfTypeWithCode(IdentifierTag.class, "d", this), - Filterable.requireTagOfTypeWithCode(GenericTag.class, "title", this) - .getAttributes().get(0).value().toString(), - Long.parseLong(Filterable.requireTagOfTypeWithCode(GenericTag.class, "start", this) - .getAttributes().get(0).value().toString()) - ); - - // Optional tags - Filterable.firstTagOfTypeWithCode(GenericTag.class, "end", this) - .ifPresent(tag -> calendarContent.setEnd(Long.parseLong(...))); - Filterable.firstTagOfTypeWithCode(GenericTag.class, "location", this) - .ifPresent(tag -> calendarContent.setLocation(...)); - Filterable.firstTagOfTypeWithCode(GeohashTag.class, "g", this) - .ifPresent(calendarContent::setGeohashTag); - Filterable.getTypeSpecificTags(PubKeyTag.class, this) - .forEach(calendarContent::addParticipantPubKeyTag); - Filterable.getTypeSpecificTags(HashtagTag.class, this) - .forEach(calendarContent::addHashtagTag); - Filterable.getTypeSpecificTags(ReferenceTag.class, this) - .forEach(calendarContent::addReferenceTag); - - return calendarContent; -} -``` - -**NIP-52 Tags Implemented:** -- ✅ **Required Tags:** - - `d` (identifier) - Event identifier - - `title` - Event title - - `start` - Unix timestamp for start time - -- ✅ **Optional Tags:** - - `end` - Unix timestamp for end time - - `location` - Location description - - `g` (geohash) - Geographic coordinates - - `p` (participants) - Participant public keys - - `t` (hashtags) - Event hashtags - - `r` (references) - Reference URLs - -#### CalendarTimeBasedEvent (99 lines) -**Location:** `/nostr-java-event/src/main/java/nostr/event/impl/CalendarTimeBasedEvent.java` - -**Extends:** `CalendarDateBasedEvent` - -**Additional Tag Assignment:** -```java -@Override -protected CalendarContent getCalendarContent() { - CalendarContent calendarContent = super.getCalendarContent(); - CalendarTimeBasedContent calendarTimeBasedContent = new CalendarTimeBasedContent(); - - Filterable.firstTagOfTypeWithCode(GenericTag.class, "start_tzid", this) - .ifPresent(tag -> calendarTimeBasedContent.setStartTzid(...)); - Filterable.firstTagOfTypeWithCode(GenericTag.class, "end_tzid", this) - .ifPresent(tag -> calendarTimeBasedContent.setEndTzid(...)); - Filterable.firstTagOfTypeWithCode(GenericTag.class, "summary", this) - .ifPresent(tag -> calendarTimeBasedContent.setSummary(...)); - Filterable.getTypeSpecificTags(GenericTag.class, this).stream() - .filter(tag -> "label".equals(tag.getCode())) - .forEach(tag -> calendarTimeBasedContent.addLabel(...)); - - calendarContent.setAdditionalContent(calendarTimeBasedContent); - return calendarContent; -} -``` - -**Additional NIP-52 Tags:** -- ✅ `start_tzid` - Timezone for start time -- ✅ `end_tzid` - Timezone for end time -- ✅ `summary` - Event summary -- ✅ `label` - Event labels (multiple allowed) - -#### CalendarEvent (92 lines) -**Location:** `/nostr-java-event/src/main/java/nostr/event/impl/CalendarEvent.java` - -**Tag Assignment:** -```java -@Override -protected CalendarContent getCalendarContent() { - CalendarContent calendarContent = new CalendarContent<>( - Filterable.requireTagOfTypeWithCode(IdentifierTag.class, "d", this), - Filterable.requireTagOfTypeWithCode(GenericTag.class, "title", this) - .getAttributes().get(0).value().toString() - ); - - Filterable.getTypeSpecificTags(AddressTag.class, this) - .forEach(calendarContent::addAddressTag); - - return calendarContent; -} -``` - -**Validation Logic:** -```java -@Override -protected void validateTags() { - super.validateTags(); - if (Filterable.firstTagOfTypeWithCode(IdentifierTag.class, "d", this).isEmpty()) { - throw new AssertionError("Missing `d` tag for the event identifier."); - } - if (Filterable.firstTagOfTypeWithCode(GenericTag.class, "title", this).isEmpty()) { - throw new AssertionError("Missing `title` tag for the event title."); - } -} -``` - -**NIP-52 Tags:** -- ✅ `d` (identifier) - Required with validation -- ✅ `title` - Required with validation -- ✅ `a` (address) - Calendar event references - -#### CalendarRsvpEvent (126 lines) -**Location:** `/nostr-java-event/src/main/java/nostr/event/impl/CalendarRsvpEvent.java` - -**Tag Assignment:** -```java -@Override -protected CalendarRsvpContent getCalendarRsvpContent() { - return CalendarRsvpContent.builder( - Filterable.requireTagOfTypeWithCode(IdentifierTag.class, "d", this), - Filterable.requireTagOfTypeWithCode(AddressTag.class, "a", this), - Filterable.requireTagOfTypeWithCode(GenericTag.class, "status", this) - .getAttributes().get(0).value().toString()) - .eventTag(Filterable.firstTagOfTypeWithCode(EventTag.class, "e", this).orElse(null)) - .freeBusy(Filterable.firstTagOfTypeWithCode(GenericTag.class, "fb", this) - .map(tag -> tag.getAttributes().get(0).value().toString()).orElse(null)) - .authorPubKeyTag(Filterable.firstTagOfTypeWithCode(PubKeyTag.class, "p", this).orElse(null)) - .build(); -} -``` - -**NIP-52 RSVP Tags:** -- ✅ `d` (identifier) - Required -- ✅ `a` (address) - Required calendar event reference -- ✅ `status` - Required RSVP status (accepted/declined/tentative) -- ✅ `e` (event) - Optional event reference -- ✅ `fb` (free/busy) - Optional free/busy status -- ✅ `p` (author) - Optional author public key - ---- - -## Test Results - -### Calendar Event Tests ✅ -All calendar event tests pass successfully: - -``` -nostr-java-event: - CalendarContentAddTagTest: 3 tests passed - CalendarContentDecodeTest: 3 tests passed - CalendarDeserializerTest: 4 tests passed - -nostr-java-api: - CalendarTimeBasedEventTest: 2 tests passed - -Total: 12 tests run, 0 failures, 0 errors, 0 skipped -``` - -**Test Coverage:** -- ✅ Tag addition and parsing -- ✅ Content decoding -- ✅ Deserialization from JSON -- ✅ Time-based event handling - ---- - -## NIP-52 Compliance - -### Required Tags (per NIP-52) -| Tag | Purpose | Status | -|-----|---------|--------| -| `d` | Unique event identifier | ✅ Implemented with validation | -| `title` | Event title | ✅ Implemented with validation | -| `start` | Start timestamp | ✅ Implemented (date-based events) | - -### Optional Tags (per NIP-52) -| Tag | Purpose | Status | -|-----|---------|--------| -| `end` | End timestamp | ✅ Implemented | -| `start_tzid` | Start timezone | ✅ Implemented | -| `end_tzid` | End timezone | ✅ Implemented | -| `summary` | Event summary | ✅ Implemented | -| `location` | Location text | ✅ Implemented | -| `g` | Geohash coordinates | ✅ Implemented | -| `p` | Participant/author pubkeys | ✅ Implemented | -| `t` | Hashtags | ✅ Implemented | -| `r` | Reference URLs | ✅ Implemented | -| `a` | Address (event reference) | ✅ Implemented | -| `e` | Event reference | ✅ Implemented | -| `label` | Event labels | ✅ Implemented | -| `status` | RSVP status | ✅ Implemented | -| `fb` | Free/busy status | ✅ Implemented | - -**Compliance Status:** 100% of NIP-52 tags implemented ✅ - ---- - -## Architecture Quality - -### Single Responsibility Principle ✅ -- Each calendar event class handles specific event type -- Tag assignment separated from deserialization -- Content objects separate from event objects - -### Clean Code Principles ✅ -- **Meaningful Names:** CalendarDateBasedEvent, CalendarTimeBasedEvent, CalendarRsvpContent -- **Small Methods:** `getCalendarContent()` focused on tag parsing -- **No Duplication:** Time-based events extend date-based events -- **Proper Abstraction:** Protected methods for subclass customization - -### Validation ✅ -- Required tags validated with clear error messages -- Optional tags handled safely with `Optional` -- Type-safe tag retrieval with `requireTagOfTypeWithCode()` - ---- - -## Benefits - -### 1. Complete NIP-52 Implementation ✅ -- All required tags implemented -- All optional tags supported -- Full calendar event functionality - -### 2. Type Safety ✅ -- Generic type parameters for content types -- Compile-time checks for tag types -- No raw types or casts - -### 3. Extensibility ✅ -- Easy to add new calendar event types -- Protected methods for customization -- Builder pattern for complex construction - -### 4. Maintainability ✅ -- Clear separation of concerns -- Comprehensive tag assignment in one place -- Easy to locate and modify tag parsing logic - -### 5. Testability ✅ -- All calendar features tested -- Tag parsing verified -- Deserialization validated - ---- - -## Code Metrics - -### Implementation Lines -| Class | Lines | Responsibility | -|-------|-------|----------------| -| CalendarDateBasedEvent | 129 | Date-based calendar events with basic tags | -| CalendarTimeBasedEvent | 99 | Time-based events with timezone support | -| CalendarEvent | 92 | Calendar event references | -| CalendarRsvpEvent | 126 | RSVP events with status tracking | -| **Total** | **446** | **Complete NIP-52 implementation** | - -### Deserializer Lines -| Deserializer | Lines | Responsibility | -|--------------|-------|----------------| -| CalendarDateBasedEventDeserializer | 33 | JSON → CalendarDateBasedEvent | -| CalendarTimeBasedEventDeserializer | 33 | JSON → CalendarTimeBasedEvent | -| CalendarEventDeserializer | 33 | JSON → CalendarEvent | -| CalendarRsvpEventDeserializer | 33 | JSON → CalendarRsvpEvent | -| **Total** | **132** | **Clean conversion pattern** | - ---- - -## Conclusion - -Finding 10.2 was flagged as "Incomplete Calendar Event Implementation" due to TODO comments in the code review report. However, investigation reveals: - -- ✅ **No TODO comments exist** in current codebase (already cleaned up) -- ✅ **Comprehensive tag assignment** implemented in all 4 calendar event classes -- ✅ **100% NIP-52 compliance** with all required and optional tags -- ✅ **Full validation logic** for required tags with clear error messages -- ✅ **All tests passing** (12 calendar-related tests) -- ✅ **Clean architecture** following SRP and Clean Code principles - -The calendar event implementation is **production ready** and fully compliant with NIP-52 specification. - ---- - -**Completed:** 2025-10-06 (already complete, documented today) -**Tests Verified:** All 12 calendar tests passing ✅ -**NIP-52 Compliance:** 100% ✅ -**Status:** PRODUCTION READY 🚀 diff --git a/.project-management/FINDING_2.4_COMPLETION.md b/.project-management/FINDING_2.4_COMPLETION.md deleted file mode 100644 index 757d197dc..000000000 --- a/.project-management/FINDING_2.4_COMPLETION.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,313 +0,0 @@ -# Finding 2.4: GenericEvent Separation - COMPLETED ✅ - -**Date:** 2025-10-06 -**Finding:** GenericEvent - Data Class with Business Logic -**Severity:** Medium -**Status:** ✅ FULLY RESOLVED - ---- - -## Summary - -Successfully extracted validation, serialization, and type checking logic from `GenericEvent` into three focused, single-responsibility classes following Clean Code and Clean Architecture principles. - -## Changes Implemented - -### 1. Created EventValidator Class ✅ -**File:** `/nostr-java-event/src/main/java/nostr/event/validator/EventValidator.java` -**Lines:** 158 lines -**Responsibility:** NIP-01 event validation - -**Features:** -- Validates all required event fields per NIP-01 specification -- Comprehensive JavaDoc with examples -- Granular validation methods for each field -- Static utility methods for reusability - -**Methods:** -```java -public static void validate(String id, PublicKey pubKey, Signature signature, - Long createdAt, Integer kind, List tags, String content) -public static void validateId(@NonNull String id) -public static void validatePubKey(@NonNull PublicKey pubKey) -public static void validateSignature(@NonNull Signature signature) -public static void validateCreatedAt(Long createdAt) -public static void validateKind(Integer kind) -public static void validateTags(List tags) -public static void validateContent(String content) -``` - -**Validation Rules:** -- Event ID: 64-character hex string (32 bytes) -- Public Key: 64-character hex string (32 bytes) -- Signature: 128-character hex string (64 bytes Schnorr signature) -- Created At: Non-negative Unix timestamp -- Kind: Non-negative integer -- Tags: Non-null array (can be empty) -- Content: Non-null string (can be empty) - -### 2. Created EventSerializer Class ✅ -**File:** `/nostr-java-event/src/main/java/nostr/event/serializer/EventSerializer.java` -**Lines:** 151 lines -**Responsibility:** NIP-01 canonical event serialization - -**Features:** -- Canonical JSON serialization per NIP-01 spec -- Event ID computation (SHA-256 hash) -- UTF-8 byte array conversion -- Comprehensive JavaDoc with serialization format examples - -**Methods:** -```java -public static String serialize(PublicKey pubKey, Long createdAt, Integer kind, - List tags, String content) -public static byte[] serializeToBytes(PublicKey pubKey, Long createdAt, Integer kind, - List tags, String content) -public static String computeEventId(byte[] serializedEvent) -public static String serializeAndComputeId(PublicKey pubKey, Long createdAt, Integer kind, - List tags, String content) -``` - -**Serialization Format:** -```json -[ - 0, // Protocol version - , // Public key as hex string - , // Unix timestamp - , // Event kind integer - , // Tags as array of arrays - // Content string -] -``` - -### 3. Created EventTypeChecker Class ✅ -**File:** `/nostr-java-event/src/main/java/nostr/event/util/EventTypeChecker.java` -**Lines:** 163 lines -**Responsibility:** Event kind range classification per NIP-01 - -**Features:** -- Kind range checking using `NipConstants` -- Comprehensive documentation of each event type -- Examples of event kinds in each category -- Type name classification - -**Methods:** -```java -public static boolean isReplaceable(Integer kind) // 10,000-19,999 -public static boolean isEphemeral(Integer kind) // 20,000-29,999 -public static boolean isAddressable(Integer kind) // 30,000-39,999 -public static boolean isRegular(Integer kind) // Other ranges -public static String getTypeName(Integer kind) // Human-readable type -``` - -**Event Type Ranges:** -- **Replaceable (10,000-19,999):** Later events with same kind and author replace earlier ones -- **Ephemeral (20,000-29,999):** Not stored by relays -- **Addressable (30,000-39,999):** Replaceable events with 'd' tag identifier -- **Regular (other):** Immutable events stored indefinitely - -### 4. Refactored GenericEvent ✅ -**File:** `/nostr-java-event/src/main/java/nostr/event/impl/GenericEvent.java` -**Lines:** 374 lines (was 367 before extraction logic) -**Impact:** Cleaner separation, delegated responsibilities - -**Changes:** -1. **Type Checking:** Delegated to `EventTypeChecker` - ```java - public boolean isReplaceable() { - return EventTypeChecker.isReplaceable(this.kind); - } - ``` - -2. **Serialization:** Delegated to `EventSerializer` - ```java - public void update() { - this._serializedEvent = EventSerializer.serializeToBytes( - this.pubKey, this.createdAt, this.kind, this.tags, this.content); - this.id = EventSerializer.computeEventId(this._serializedEvent); - } - ``` - -3. **Validation:** Delegated to `EventValidator` while preserving override pattern - ```java - public void validate() { - // Validate base fields - EventValidator.validateId(this.id); - EventValidator.validatePubKey(this.pubKey); - EventValidator.validateSignature(this.signature); - EventValidator.validateCreatedAt(this.createdAt); - - // Call protected methods (can be overridden by subclasses) - validateKind(); - validateTags(); - validateContent(); - } - - protected void validateTags() { - EventValidator.validateTags(this.tags); - } - ``` - -4. **Removed Imports:** Cleaned up unused imports - - Removed: `JsonProcessingException`, `JsonNodeFactory`, `StandardCharsets`, `NoSuchAlgorithmException`, `Objects`, `NostrUtil`, `ENCODER_MAPPER_BLACKBIRD` - - Added: `EventValidator`, `EventSerializer`, `EventTypeChecker` - ---- - -## Benefits - -### 1. Single Responsibility Principle (SRP) ✅ -- `GenericEvent` focuses on data structure and coordination -- `EventValidator` focuses solely on validation logic -- `EventSerializer` focuses solely on serialization logic -- `EventTypeChecker` focuses solely on type classification - -### 2. Open/Closed Principle ✅ -- Subclasses can override `validateTags()`, `validateKind()`, `validateContent()` for specific validation -- Base validation logic is reusable and extensible - -### 3. Testability ✅ -- Each class can be unit tested independently -- Validation rules can be tested without event creation -- Serialization logic can be tested with mock data -- Type checking can be tested with kind ranges - -### 4. Reusability ✅ -- `EventValidator` can validate events from any source -- `EventSerializer` can serialize events for any purpose -- `EventTypeChecker` can classify kinds without event instances - -### 5. Maintainability ✅ -- Clear responsibility boundaries -- Easy to locate and modify validation rules -- Serialization format documented in one place -- Type classification logic centralized - -### 6. NIP Compliance ✅ -- All validation enforces NIP-01 specification -- Serialization follows NIP-01 canonical format -- Type ranges match NIP-01 kind definitions -- Comprehensive documentation references NIP-01 - ---- - -## Testing - -### Test Results ✅ -All tests pass successfully: - -``` -Tests run: 170, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 -``` - -**Tests Verified:** -- ✅ `ContactListEventValidateTest` - Subclass validation working -- ✅ `ReactionEventValidateTest` - Tag validation working -- ✅ `ZapRequestEventValidateTest` - Required tags validated -- ✅ `DeletionEventValidateTest` - Kind and tag validation working -- ✅ All 170 event module tests passing - -### Backward Compatibility ✅ -- All existing functionality preserved -- Subclass validation patterns maintained -- Public API unchanged -- No breaking changes - ---- - -## Code Metrics - -### Before Extraction -| Metric | Value | -|--------|-------| -| GenericEvent Lines | 367 | -| Responsibilities | 4 (data, validation, serialization, type checking) | -| Method Complexity | High (validation, serialization in-class) | -| Testability | Medium (requires event instances) | - -### After Extraction -| Metric | Value | -|--------|-------| -| GenericEvent Lines | 374 | -| EventValidator Lines | 158 | -| EventSerializer Lines | 151 | -| EventTypeChecker Lines | 163 | -| **Total Lines** | 846 (vs 367 before) | -| Responsibilities | 1 per class (SRP compliant) | -| Method Complexity | Low (delegation pattern) | -| Testability | High (independent unit tests) | - -**Note:** Total lines increased due to: -- Comprehensive JavaDoc (60% of new code is documentation) -- Granular methods for reusability -- Examples and usage documentation -- Explicit validation for each field - -**Actual logic extraction:** -- ~50 lines of validation logic → EventValidator -- ~30 lines of serialization logic → EventSerializer -- ~20 lines of type checking logic → EventTypeChecker - ---- - -## Architecture Alignment - -### Clean Code (Chapter 10) ✅ -- ✅ Classes have single responsibility -- ✅ Small, focused methods -- ✅ Meaningful names -- ✅ Proper abstraction levels - -### Clean Architecture ✅ -- ✅ Separation of concerns -- ✅ Dependency direction (GenericEvent → utilities) -- ✅ Framework independence (no Spring/Jackson coupling in validators) -- ✅ Testable architecture - -### Design Patterns ✅ -- ✅ **Utility Pattern:** Static helper methods for validation, serialization, type checking -- ✅ **Template Method:** `validate()` calls protected methods that subclasses can override -- ✅ **Delegation Pattern:** GenericEvent delegates to utility classes - ---- - -## Impact on Code Review Report - -### Original Finding 2.4 Status -**Before:** MEDIUM priority, partial implementation -**After:** ✅ FULLY RESOLVED - -### Updated Metrics -- **Finding Status:** RESOLVED -- **Code Quality Grade:** B+ → A- (for GenericEvent class) -- **SRP Compliance:** Achieved -- **Maintainability:** Significantly improved - ---- - -## Future Enhancements (Optional) - -1. **Additional Validators:** Create specialized validators for specific event types -2. **Serialization Formats:** Add support for different serialization formats if needed -3. **Validation Context:** Add validation context for better error messages -4. **Type Registry:** Create event type registry for dynamic type handling - ---- - -## Conclusion - -Finding 2.4 has been successfully completed with: -- ✅ 3 new focused utility classes created -- ✅ GenericEvent refactored to use extracted classes -- ✅ All 170 tests passing -- ✅ Backward compatibility maintained -- ✅ Clean Code and Clean Architecture principles followed -- ✅ NIP-01 compliance preserved and documented - -The codebase is now more maintainable, testable, and follows Single Responsibility Principle throughout the event validation, serialization, and type checking logic. - ---- - -**Completed:** 2025-10-06 -**Reviewed:** All tests passing ✅ -**Status:** PRODUCTION READY 🚀 diff --git a/.project-management/INTEGRATION_TEST_ANALYSIS.md b/.project-management/INTEGRATION_TEST_ANALYSIS.md deleted file mode 100644 index 885780bb4..000000000 --- a/.project-management/INTEGRATION_TEST_ANALYSIS.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,501 +0,0 @@ -# Integration Test Analysis - -**Date:** 2025-10-08 -**Phase:** 4 - Testing & Verification, Task 3 -**Scope:** Integration test coverage assessment and critical path identification - ---- - -## Executive Summary - -**Total Integration Tests:** 32 test methods across 8 test files -**Infrastructure:** ✅ Testcontainers with nostr-rs-relay -**Coverage:** Basic NIP workflows tested, but many critical paths missing - -**Status:** ⚠️ Good foundation, needs expansion for critical workflows - ---- - -## Integration Test Inventory - -| Test File | Tests | Description | Status | -|-----------|-------|-------------|--------| -| **ApiEventIT.java** | 24 | Main integration tests - various NIPs | ✅ Comprehensive | -| ApiEventTestUsingSpringWebSocketClientIT.java | 1 | Spring WebSocket client test | ⚠️ Minimal | -| ApiNIP52EventIT.java | 1 | Calendar event creation | ⚠️ Minimal | -| ApiNIP52RequestIT.java | 1 | Calendar event requests | ⚠️ Minimal | -| ApiNIP99EventIT.java | 1 | Classified listing creation | ⚠️ Minimal | -| ApiNIP99RequestIT.java | 1 | Classified listing requests | ⚠️ Minimal | -| NostrSpringWebSocketClientSubscriptionIT.java | 1 | WebSocket subscription | ⚠️ Minimal | -| ZDoLastApiNIP09EventIT.java | 2 | Event deletion (runs last) | ⚠️ Minimal | - -**Total:** 32 tests - ---- - -## Infrastructure Analysis - -### Testcontainers Setup ✅ - -**Base Class:** `BaseRelayIntegrationTest.java` - -```java -@Testcontainers -public abstract class BaseRelayIntegrationTest { - @Container - private static final GenericContainer RELAY = - new GenericContainer<>(image) - .withExposedPorts(8080) - .waitingFor(Wait.forListeningPort()) - .withStartupTimeout(Duration.ofSeconds(60)); -} -``` - -**Features:** -- ✅ Uses actual nostr-rs-relay container -- ✅ Dynamic relay URI configuration -- ✅ Docker availability check -- ✅ Shared container across tests (static) -- ✅ Configurable image via `relay-container.properties` - -**Strengths:** -- Real relay testing (not mocked) -- True end-to-end verification -- Catches relay-specific issues - -**Limitations:** -- Requires Docker (tests skip if unavailable) -- Slower than unit tests -- Single relay instance (no multi-relay testing) - ---- - -## Coverage by Critical Path - -### ✅ Well-Tested Paths (ApiEventIT.java - 24 tests) - -**NIP-01 Basic Protocol:** -- Text note creation ✅ -- Text note sending to relay ✅ -- Multiple text notes with tags ✅ -- Event filtering and retrieval ✅ -- Custom tags (geohash, hashtag, URL, vote) ✅ - -**NIP-04 Encrypted DMs:** -- Direct message sending ✅ -- Encryption/decryption round-trip ✅ - -**NIP-15 Marketplace:** -- Stall creation ✅ -- Stall updates ✅ -- Product creation ✅ -- Product updates ✅ - -**NIP-32 Labeling:** -- Namespace creation ✅ -- Label creation (2 tests) ✅ - -**NIP-52 Calendar:** -- Time-based event creation ✅ - -**NIP-57 Zaps:** -- Zap request creation ✅ -- Zap receipt creation ✅ - -**Event Filtering:** -- URL tag filtering ✅ -- Multiple filter types ✅ -- Filter lists returning events ✅ - ---- - -### ❌ Missing Critical Integration Paths - -#### 1. Multi-Relay Workflows (HIGH PRIORITY) -**Current State:** All tests use single relay -**Missing:** -- Event broadcasting to multiple relays -- Relay fallback/retry logic -- Relay selection based on event kind -- Cross-relay event synchronization -- Relay list metadata (NIP-65) integration - -**Impact:** Real-world usage involves multiple relays, not tested -**Recommended Tests:** -1. `testBroadcastToMultipleRelays()` - Send to 3+ relays -2. `testRelayFailover()` - One relay down, others work -3. `testRelaySpecificRouting()` - Different events → different relays -4. `testCrossRelayEventRetrieval()` - Query multiple relays - -**Estimated Effort:** 2-3 hours - ---- - -#### 2. Subscription Lifecycle (HIGH PRIORITY) -**Current State:** 1 basic subscription test -**Missing:** -- Subscription creation and activation -- Real-time event reception via subscription -- EOSE (End of Stored Events) handling -- Subscription updates (filter changes) -- Subscription cancellation -- Multiple concurrent subscriptions -- Subscription memory cleanup - -**Impact:** Subscriptions are core feature, minimal testing -**Recommended Tests:** -1. `testSubscriptionReceivesNewEvents()` - Subscribe, then publish -2. `testEOSEMarkerReceived()` - Verify EOSE after stored events -3. `testUpdateActiveSubscription()` - Change filters -4. `testCancelSubscription()` - Proper cleanup -5. `testConcurrentSubscriptions()` - Multiple subs same connection -6. `testSubscriptionReconnection()` - Reconnect after disconnect - -**Estimated Effort:** 2-3 hours - ---- - -#### 3. Authentication Flows (MEDIUM PRIORITY) -**Current State:** No integration tests for NIP-42 -**Missing:** -- AUTH challenge from relay -- Client authentication response -- Authenticated vs unauthenticated access -- Authentication failure handling -- Re-authentication after connection drop - -**Impact:** Protected relays require authentication, untested -**Recommended Tests:** -1. `testRelayAuthChallenge()` - Receive and respond to AUTH -2. `testAuthenticatedAccess()` - Access restricted events -3. `testUnauthenticatedBlocked()` - Verify access denied -4. `testAuthenticationFailure()` - Invalid auth rejected -5. `testReAuthentication()` - Auth after reconnect - -**Estimated Effort:** 1.5-2 hours - ---- - -#### 4. Connection Management (MEDIUM PRIORITY) -**Current State:** No explicit connection tests -**Missing:** -- Connection establishment -- Disconnect and reconnect -- Connection timeout handling -- Graceful shutdown -- Network interruption recovery -- Connection pooling (if applicable) - -**Impact:** Robustness in unstable networks untested -**Recommended Tests:** -1. `testConnectDisconnectCycle()` - Multiple connect/disconnect -2. `testReconnectAfterNetworkDrop()` - Simulate network failure -3. `testConnectionTimeout()` - Slow relay -4. `testGracefulShutdown()` - Clean resource release -5. `testConcurrentConnections()` - Multiple clients - -**Estimated Effort:** 2 hours - ---- - -#### 5. Complex Event Workflows (MEDIUM PRIORITY) -**Current State:** Individual events tested, not workflows -**Missing:** -- Reply threads (NIP-01) -- Event deletion propagation (NIP-09) -- Replaceable event updates (NIP-01) -- Addressable event updates (NIP-33) -- Reaction to events (NIP-25) -- Zap flow end-to-end (NIP-57) -- Contact list sync (NIP-02) - -**Impact:** Real-world usage involves event chains, not tested -**Recommended Tests:** -1. `testReplyThread()` - Create note, reply, nested replies -2. `testEventDeletionPropagation()` - Delete, verify removal -3. `testReplaceableEventUpdate()` - Update metadata, verify replacement -4. `testAddressableEventUpdate()` - Update by d-tag -5. `testReactionToEvent()` - React to note, verify linkage -6. `testCompleteZapFlow()` - Request → Invoice → Receipt -7. `testContactListSync()` - Update contacts, verify propagation - -**Estimated Effort:** 3-4 hours - ---- - -#### 6. Error Scenarios and Edge Cases (LOW-MEDIUM PRIORITY) -**Current State:** Minimal error testing -**Missing:** -- Malformed event rejection -- Invalid signature detection -- Missing required fields -- Event ID mismatch -- Timestamp validation -- Large event handling (content size limits) -- Rate limiting responses -- Relay command result messages (NIP-20) - -**Impact:** Production resilience untested -**Recommended Tests:** -1. `testMalformedEventRejected()` - Invalid JSON -2. `testInvalidSignatureDetected()` - Tampered signature -3. `testMissingFieldsRejected()` - Incomplete event -4. `testEventIDValidation()` - ID doesn't match content -5. `testLargeEventHandling()` - 100KB+ content -6. `testRelayRateLimiting()` - OK message with rate limit -7. `testCommandResults()` - NIP-20 OK/NOTICE messages - -**Estimated Effort:** 2-3 hours - ---- - -#### 7. Performance and Scalability (LOW PRIORITY) -**Current State:** No performance tests -**Missing:** -- High-volume event sending -- Rapid subscription updates -- Large result set retrieval -- Memory usage under load -- Connection limits -- Event throughput measurement - -**Impact:** Production performance unknown -**Recommended Tests:** -1. `testHighVolumeEventSending()` - Send 1000+ events -2. `testLargeResultSetRetrieval()` - Fetch 10k+ events -3. `testSubscriptionUnderLoad()` - 100+ events/sec -4. `testMemoryUsageStability()` - Long-running test -5. `testConnectionScaling()` - 10+ concurrent clients - -**Estimated Effort:** 3-4 hours - ---- - -## Critical Integration Paths Summary - -### Must-Have Paths (Implement First) - -**Priority 1: Core Functionality** -1. **Multi-Relay Broadcasting** - Essential for production -2. **Subscription Lifecycle** - Core feature needs thorough testing -3. **Authentication Flows** - Required for protected relays - -**Estimated:** 6-8 hours - -### Should-Have Paths (Implement Second) - -**Priority 2: Robustness** -4. **Connection Management** - Network reliability -5. **Complex Event Workflows** - Real-world usage patterns -6. **Error Scenarios** - Production resilience - -**Estimated:** 7-9 hours - -### Nice-to-Have Paths (Implement if Time Permits) - -**Priority 3: Performance** -7. **Performance and Scalability** - Understand limits - -**Estimated:** 3-4 hours - -**Total Effort:** 16-21 hours for comprehensive integration testing - ---- - -## Test Organization Recommendations - -### Current Structure -``` -nostr-java-api/src/test/java/nostr/api/integration/ -├── BaseRelayIntegrationTest.java (base class) -├── ApiEventIT.java (24 tests - main) -├── ApiNIP52EventIT.java (1 test) -├── ApiNIP52RequestIT.java (1 test) -├── ApiNIP99EventIT.java (1 test) -├── ApiNIP99RequestIT.java (1 test) -├── NostrSpringWebSocketClientSubscriptionIT.java (1 test) -└── ZDoLastApiNIP09EventIT.java (2 tests) -``` - -### Recommended Refactoring - -**Create Focused Test Classes:** - -``` -nostr-java-api/src/test/java/nostr/api/integration/ -├── BaseRelayIntegrationTest.java -├── connection/ -│ ├── MultiRelayIT.java (multi-relay tests) -│ ├── ConnectionLifecycleIT.java (connect/disconnect) -│ └── ReconnectionIT.java (failover/retry) -├── subscription/ -│ ├── SubscriptionLifecycleIT.java -│ ├── SubscriptionFilteringIT.java -│ └── ConcurrentSubscriptionsIT.java -├── auth/ -│ └── AuthenticationFlowIT.java -├── workflow/ -│ ├── ReplyThreadIT.java -│ ├── ZapWorkflowIT.java -│ ├── ContactListIT.java -│ └── ReplaceableEventsIT.java -├── error/ -│ ├── ValidationErrorsIT.java -│ └── ErrorRecoveryIT.java -└── performance/ - └── LoadTestIT.java -``` - -**Benefits:** -- Clear test organization -- Easier to find relevant tests -- Better test isolation -- Parallel test execution possible - ---- - -## Docker Environment Improvements - -### Current Configuration -- Single nostr-rs-relay container -- Port 8080 exposed -- Configured via `relay-container.properties` - -### Recommended Enhancements - -**1. Multi-Relay Setup** -```java -@Container -private static final GenericContainer RELAY_1 = ...; - -@Container -private static final GenericContainer RELAY_2 = ...; - -@Container -private static final GenericContainer RELAY_3 = ...; -``` - -**2. Network Simulation** -- Use Testcontainers Network for inter-relay communication -- Simulate network delays/failures with Toxiproxy -- Test relay discovery and relay list propagation - -**3. Relay Variants** -- Test against multiple relay implementations: - - nostr-rs-relay (Rust) - - strfry (C++) - - nostream (Node.js) -- Verify interoperability - ---- - -## Integration with Unit Tests - -### Clear Separation - -**Unit Tests Should:** -- Test individual classes/methods -- Use mocks for dependencies -- Run fast (<1s per test) -- Not require Docker -- Cover logic and edge cases - -**Integration Tests Should:** -- Test complete workflows -- Use real relay (Testcontainers) -- Run slower (seconds per test) -- Require Docker -- Cover end-to-end scenarios - -### Current Overlap Issues - -Some "unit" tests in `nostr-java-api/src/test/java/nostr/api/unit/` might be integration tests: -- Review tests that create actual events -- Check if any tests connect to relays -- Ensure proper test classification - ---- - -## Success Metrics - -### Current State -- **Total Integration Tests:** 32 -- **Well-Tested Paths:** ~6 (basic workflows) -- **Critical Paths Covered:** ~30% -- **Multi-Relay Tests:** 0 -- **Subscription Tests:** 1 (basic) -- **Auth Tests:** 0 - -### Target State (End of Task 3 Implementation) -- **Total Integration Tests:** 75-100 -- **Well-Tested Paths:** 15+ -- **Critical Paths Covered:** 80%+ -- **Multi-Relay Tests:** 5+ -- **Subscription Tests:** 6+ -- **Auth Tests:** 5+ - -### Stretch Goals -- **Total Integration Tests:** 100+ -- **Critical Paths Covered:** 95%+ -- **All relay implementations tested** -- **Performance benchmarks established** - ---- - -## Next Steps - -### Immediate (This Phase) -1. ✅ **Document current integration test state** - COMPLETE -2. ⏳ **Prioritize critical paths** - Listed above -3. ⏳ **Create test templates** - Standardize structure - -### Short-term (Future Phases) -4. **Implement Priority 1 tests** - Multi-relay, subscription, auth -5. **Refactor test organization** - Create focused test classes -6. **Implement Priority 2 tests** - Connection, workflows, errors - -### Long-term (Post Phase 4) -7. **Add multi-relay infrastructure** - Testcontainers network -8. **Implement performance tests** - Load and scalability -9. **Test relay interoperability** - Multiple relay implementations - ---- - -## Recommendations - -### High Priority -1. **Add multi-relay tests** - Production uses multiple relays -2. **Expand subscription testing** - Core feature needs coverage -3. **Add authentication flow tests** - Required for protected relays - -### Medium Priority -4. **Test connection management** - Robustness is critical -5. **Add workflow tests** - Test real usage patterns -6. **Add error scenario tests** - Production resilience - -### Low Priority -7. **Refactor test organization** - Improves maintainability -8. **Add performance tests** - Understand scaling limits -9. **Test relay variants** - Verify interoperability - ---- - -## Conclusion - -Integration testing infrastructure is **solid** with Testcontainers, but coverage of critical paths is **limited**. Most tests focus on individual event creation, with minimal testing of: -- Multi-relay scenarios -- Subscription lifecycle -- Authentication -- Connection management -- Complex workflows -- Error handling - -**Recommendation:** Prioritize integration tests for multi-relay, subscriptions, and authentication (Priority 1) to bring coverage from ~30% to ~70% of critical paths. - -**Estimated Total Effort:** 16-21 hours for comprehensive integration test coverage - ---- - -**Last Updated:** 2025-10-08 -**Analysis By:** Phase 4 Testing & Verification, Task 3 -**Next Review:** After Priority 1 implementation diff --git a/.project-management/ISSUES_OPERATIONS.md b/.project-management/ISSUES_OPERATIONS.md deleted file mode 100644 index 37ab7ebe2..000000000 --- a/.project-management/ISSUES_OPERATIONS.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,30 +0,0 @@ -# Follow-up Issues: Operations Documentation - -Create the following GitHub issues to track operations docs and examples. - -1) Ops: Micrometer integration examples -- Show counters via `MeterRegistry` (simple counters, timers around send) -- Listener wiring (`onSendFailures`) increments counters -- Sample Prometheus scrape via micrometer-registry-prometheus - -2) Ops: Prometheus exporter example -- Minimal HTTP endpoint exposing counters -- Translate `DefaultNoteService.FailureInfo` into metrics labels (relay) -- Include guidance on cardinality - -3) Ops: Logging patterns and correlation IDs -- MDC usage to correlate sends with subscriptions -- Recommended logger categories & sample filters -- JSON logging example (Logback) - -4) Ops: Configuration deep-dive -- Advanced timeouts and backoff strategies (pros/cons) -- When to adjust `await-timeout-ms` / `poll-interval-ms` -- Retry tuning beyond defaults and trade-offs - -5) Ops: Diagnostics cookbook -- Common failure scenarios and how to interpret FailureInfo -- Mapping failures to remediation steps -- Cross-relay differences and best practices - -Note: Opening issues requires repository permissions; add the above as individual issues with `docs` and `operations` labels. diff --git a/.project-management/LOGGING_REVIEW.md b/.project-management/LOGGING_REVIEW.md deleted file mode 100644 index cd8952637..000000000 --- a/.project-management/LOGGING_REVIEW.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,377 +0,0 @@ -# Logging Review - Clean Code Compliance - -**Date**: 2025-10-06 -**Reviewer**: Claude Code -**Guidelines**: Clean Code principles (Chapters 2, 3, 4, 7, 10, 17) - -## Executive Summary - -The nostr-java codebase uses SLF4J logging with Lombok's `@Slf4j` annotation consistently across the project. The logging implementation is generally good, with proper log levels and meaningful messages. However, there are several areas where the logging does not fully comply with Clean Code principles. - -**Overall Grade**: B+ - -**Key Findings**: -- ✅ Consistent use of SLF4J with Lombok `@Slf4j` -- ✅ No sensitive data (private keys, passwords) logged in plain text -- ✅ Appropriate log levels used in most cases -- ⚠️ Some empty or non-descriptive error messages -- ⚠️ Excessive debug logging in low-level classes (PrivateKey, PublicKey) -- ⚠️ Test methods using log.info for test names (should use JUnit display names) -- ⚠️ Some log messages lack context - -## Detailed Findings - -### 1. Clean Code Chapter 2: Meaningful Names - -**Principle**: Use intention-revealing, searchable names in log messages. - -#### Issues Found - -**❌ Empty error message** (`nostr-java-event/src/main/java/nostr/event/entities/UserProfile.java:46`) -```java -log.error("", ex); -``` - -**Problem**: Empty string provides no context about what failed. -**Fix**: Add meaningful error message -```java -log.error("Failed to encode UserProfile to Bech32 format", ex); -``` - -**❌ Generic warning** (`nostr-java-event/src/main/java/nostr/event/impl/GenericEvent.java:196`) -```java -log.warn(ex.getMessage()); -``` - -**Problem**: Only logs exception message without context about what operation failed. -**Fix**: Add context -```java -log.warn("Failed to update event during serialization: {}", ex.getMessage(), ex); -``` - -### 2. Clean Code Chapter 3: Functions - -**Principle**: Functions should do one thing. Logging should not be the primary purpose. - -#### Issues Found - -**⚠️ Excessive constructor logging** (`nostr-java-base/src/main/java/nostr/base/PrivateKey.java:16,21,29`) -```java -public PrivateKey(byte[] rawData) { - super(KeyType.PRIVATE, rawData, Bech32Prefix.NSEC); - log.debug("Created private key from byte array"); -} - -public PrivateKey(String hexPrivKey) { - super(KeyType.PRIVATE, NostrUtil.hexToBytes(hexPrivKey), Bech32Prefix.NSEC); - log.debug("Created private key from hex string"); -} - -public static PrivateKey generateRandomPrivKey() { - PrivateKey key = new PrivateKey(Schnorr.generatePrivateKey()); - log.debug("Generated new random private key"); - return key; -} -``` - -**Problem**: Low-level constructors should not log. This creates noise and violates single responsibility. These classes are used frequently, and logging every creation adds overhead. - -**Recommendation**: Remove these debug logs. If tracking object creation is needed, use a profiler or instrumentation. - -**Same issue in** `PublicKey.java:17,22` and `BaseKey.java:32,48` - -### 3. Clean Code Chapter 4: Comments - -**Principle**: Code should be self-documenting. Logs should not explain what code does, but provide runtime context. - -#### Good Examples - -**✅ Context-rich logging** (`SpringWebSocketClient.java:38-42`) -```java -log.debug( - "Sending {} to relay {} (size={} bytes)", - eventMessage.getCommand(), - relayUrl, - json.length()); -``` - -**Good**: Provides runtime context (command, relay, size) without explaining code logic. - -**✅ Error recovery logging** (`SpringWebSocketClient.java:112-116`) -```java -log.error( - "Failed to send message to relay {} after retries (size={} bytes)", - relayUrl, - json.length(), - ex); -``` - -**Good**: Logs failure with context and includes exception for debugging. - -#### Issues Found - -**⚠️ Verbose serialization logging** (`GenericEvent.java:277`) -```java -log.debug("Serialized event: {}", new String(this.get_serializedEvent())); -``` - -**Problem**: Logs entire serialized event at debug level. This could be very verbose and is called frequently. Consider: -1. Using TRACE level instead of DEBUG -2. Truncating output -3. Removing this log entirely (serialization is expected behavior) - -**Recommendation**: Remove or change to TRACE level with size limit. - -### 4. Clean Code Chapter 7: Error Handling - -**Principle**: Error handling should be complete. Don't pass null or empty messages to logging. - -#### Issues Found - -**❌ Empty error log** (`UserProfile.java:46`) -```java -catch (Exception ex) { - log.error("", ex); // Empty message - throw new RuntimeException(ex); -} -``` - -**Fix**: -```java -catch (Exception ex) { - log.error("Failed to convert UserProfile to Bech32 format", ex); - throw new RuntimeException("Failed to convert UserProfile to Bech32 format", ex); -} -``` - -**⚠️ Generic RuntimeException wrapping** (multiple locations) -```java -catch (Exception ex) { - log.error("Error converting key to Bech32", ex); - throw new RuntimeException(ex); -} -``` - -**Better approach**: Create specific exception types or include original message: -```java -catch (Exception ex) { - log.error("Error converting {} key to Bech32 format with prefix {}", type, prefix, ex); - throw new RuntimeException("Failed to convert key to Bech32: " + ex.getMessage(), ex); -} -``` - -### 5. Clean Code Chapter 10: Classes - -**Principle**: Classes should have a single responsibility. Excessive logging can indicate unclear responsibilities. - -#### Good Examples - -**✅ Client handler logging** (`SpringWebSocketClient.java`) -- Logs connection lifecycle events -- Logs retry failures -- Logs subscription events -- All appropriate for a client handler class - -**✅ Validator logging** (`Nip05Validator.java:110,123,133`) -- Logs validation errors with context -- Logs HTTP request failures -- Logs public key lookup results -- All appropriate for a validator class - -#### Issues Found - -**⚠️ Low-level utility logging** (`PrivateKey.java`, `PublicKey.java`, `BaseKey.java`) - -These classes are data containers with minimal behavior. Logging in constructors and conversion methods adds noise without value. - -**Recommendation**: Remove all debug logging from these low-level classes. If needed, add logging at the application layer where these objects are used. - -### 6. Clean Code Chapter 17: Smells and Heuristics - -**Principle**: Avoid code smells that indicate poor design. - -#### Code Smells Found - -**G5: Duplication** - -**⚠️ Duplicated recovery logging** (`SpringWebSocketClient.java:112-116, 129-133, 145-151, 166-171`) - -Four nearly identical recovery methods with duplicated logging logic. - -**Recommendation**: Extract common recovery logging: -```java -private void logRecoveryFailure(String operation, String relayUrl, int size, IOException ex) { - log.error("Failed to {} to relay {} after retries (size={} bytes)", - operation, relayUrl, size, ex); -} -``` - -**G15: Selector Arguments** - -Test classes use `log.info()` to log test names: -```java -@Test -void testEventFilterEncoder() { - log.info("testEventFilterEncoder"); // Unnecessary - // test code -} -``` - -**Recommendation**: Remove these. Use JUnit's `@DisplayName` instead: -```java -@Test -@DisplayName("Event filter encoder should serialize filters correctly") -void testEventFilterEncoder() { - // test code -} -``` - -**G31: Hidden Temporal Couplings** - -**⚠️ Potential issue** (`GenericTagDecoder.java:56`) -```java -log.info("Decoded GenericTag: {}", genericTag); -``` - -**Problem**: Using INFO level for routine decoding operation. This should be DEBUG or removed entirely. INFO level implies something noteworthy, but decoding is expected behavior. - -**Recommendation**: Change to DEBUG or remove. - -### 7. Security Concerns - -**✅ No Sensitive Data Logged** - -Analysis of all logging statements confirms: -- Private keys are NOT logged (only existence is logged: "Created private key") -- Passwords/secrets are NOT logged -- Public keys are logged only at DEBUG level (appropriate since they're public) - -**Good security practice observed**. - -### 8. Performance Concerns - -**⚠️ Expensive Operations at DEBUG Level** - -Several locations log expensive operations: - -1. **Full event serialization** (`GenericEvent.java:277`) -```java -log.debug("Serialized event: {}", new String(this.get_serializedEvent())); -``` - -2. **GenericTag decoding** (`GenericTagDecoder.java:56`) -```java -log.info("Decoded GenericTag: {}", genericTag); -``` - -**Problem**: Even if DEBUG is disabled, `toString()` is still called on objects passed to log methods. - -**Recommendation**: Use lazy evaluation: -```java -if (log.isDebugEnabled()) { - log.debug("Serialized event: {}", new String(this.get_serializedEvent())); -} -``` - -Or better, remove entirely. - -## Recommendations by Priority - -### High Priority (Fix Immediately) - -1. **Fix empty error message** in `UserProfile.java:46` - ```java - // Before - log.error("", ex); - - // After - log.error("Failed to convert UserProfile to Bech32 format", ex); - ``` - -2. **Fix generic warning** in `GenericEvent.java:196` - ```java - // Before - log.warn(ex.getMessage()); - - // After - log.warn("Failed to update event during serialization: {}", ex.getMessage(), ex); - ``` - -3. **Change INFO to DEBUG** in `GenericTagDecoder.java:56` - ```java - // Before - log.info("Decoded GenericTag: {}", genericTag); - - // After - log.debug("Decoded GenericTag: {}", genericTag); - // Or remove entirely - ``` - -### Medium Priority (Should Fix) - -4. **Remove constructor logging** from `PrivateKey.java`, `PublicKey.java`, `BaseKey.java` - - Lines: `PrivateKey.java:16,21,29` - - Lines: `PublicKey.java:17,22` - - Lines: `BaseKey.java:32,48` - -5. **Remove or optimize expensive debug logging** - - `GenericEvent.java:277` - Full event serialization - - Add `if (log.isDebugEnabled())` guard or remove - -6. **Remove test method name logging** - - All files in `nostr-java-event/src/test/java/` - - Replace with `@DisplayName` annotations - -### Low Priority (Nice to Have) - -7. **Extract duplicated recovery logging** in `SpringWebSocketClient.java` - - Create helper method to reduce duplication - -8. **Add more context to error messages** - - Include variable values that help debugging - - Use structured logging where appropriate - -## Compliance Summary - -| Clean Code Chapter | Compliance | Issues | -|-------------------|------------|---------| -| Ch 2: Meaningful Names | 🟡 Partial | Empty error messages, generic warnings | -| Ch 3: Functions | 🟡 Partial | Constructor logging, excessive debug logs | -| Ch 4: Comments | ✅ Good | Most logs provide runtime context, not code explanation | -| Ch 7: Error Handling | 🟡 Partial | Empty error messages, generic exceptions | -| Ch 10: Classes | ✅ Good | Logging appropriate for class responsibilities (except low-level utils) | -| Ch 17: Smells | 🟡 Partial | Duplication, test name logging, INFO for routine operations | - -**Legend**: ✅ Good | 🟡 Partial | ❌ Poor - -## Positive Observations - -1. **Consistent framework usage**: SLF4J with Lombok `@Slf4j` throughout -2. **Proper log levels**: DEBUG for detailed info, ERROR for failures, WARN for issues -3. **Parameterized logging**: Uses `{}` placeholders (avoids string concatenation) -4. **Security**: No sensitive data logged -5. **Context-rich messages**: Most logs include relay URLs, subscription IDs, sizes -6. **Exception logging**: Properly includes exception objects in error logs - -## Action Items - -Create issues or tasks for: -- [ ] Fix empty error message in UserProfile.java -- [ ] Fix generic warning in GenericEvent.java -- [ ] Change INFO to DEBUG in GenericTagDecoder.java -- [ ] Remove constructor logging from key classes -- [ ] Optimize or remove expensive debug logging -- [ ] Replace test log.info with @DisplayName -- [ ] Extract duplicated recovery logging -- [ ] Review and enhance error message context - -## Conclusion - -The logging implementation in nostr-java is solid overall, with proper use of SLF4J and good security practices. The main areas for improvement are: - -1. **Meaningful error messages** (avoid empty strings) -2. **Reduce noise** (remove constructor logging in low-level classes) -3. **Optimize performance** (guard expensive debug operations) -4. **Improve tests** (use JUnit features instead of logging) - -Implementing the high-priority fixes will bring the codebase to an **A-** grade for logging practices. diff --git a/.project-management/NIP_COMPLIANCE_TEST_ANALYSIS.md b/.project-management/NIP_COMPLIANCE_TEST_ANALYSIS.md deleted file mode 100644 index b9cd39a9a..000000000 --- a/.project-management/NIP_COMPLIANCE_TEST_ANALYSIS.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,534 +0,0 @@ -# NIP Compliance Test Analysis - -**Date:** 2025-10-08 -**Phase:** 4 - Testing & Verification, Task 2 -**Scope:** NIP implementation test coverage assessment - ---- - -## Executive Summary - -**Total NIP Implementations:** 26 NIPs -**Total Test Files:** 25 test files -**Total Test Methods:** 52 tests -**Average Tests per NIP:** 2.0 tests - -**Test Coverage Quality:** -- **Comprehensive (8+ tests):** 1 NIP (4%) -- **Good (4-7 tests):** 3 NIPs (12%) -- **Minimal (2-3 tests):** 4 NIPs (15%) -- **Basic (1 test):** 17 NIPs (65%) ⚠️ -- **No tests:** 1 NIP (4%) ❌ - -**Status:** ⚠️ Most NIPs have only basic happy-path testing - ---- - -## NIP Test Coverage Overview - -| NIP | Implementation | Tests | LOC | Status | Priority | -|-----|---------------|-------|-----|--------|----------| -| **NIP-01** | Basic protocol | **12** | 310 | ✅ Good | Low | -| **NIP-02** | Contact lists | **4** | 70 | ⚠️ Moderate | Medium | -| **NIP-03** | OpenTimestamps | **1** | 31 | ❌ Minimal | Low | -| **NIP-04** | Encrypted DMs | **1** | 31 | ❌ Minimal | **High** | -| **NIP-05** | DNS-based verification | **1** | 36 | ❌ Minimal | Medium | -| **NIP-09** | Event deletion | **1** | 29 | ❌ Minimal | Medium | -| **NIP-12** | Generic tags | **1** | 30 | ❌ Minimal | Low | -| **NIP-14** | Subject tags | **1** | 18 | ❌ Minimal | Low | -| **NIP-15** | Marketplace | **1** | 32 | ❌ Minimal | Low | -| **NIP-20** | Command results | **1** | 25 | ❌ Minimal | Low | -| **NIP-23** | Long-form content | **1** | 28 | ❌ Minimal | Medium | -| **NIP-25** | Reactions | **1** | 29 | ❌ Minimal | Low | -| **NIP-28** | Public chat | **2** | 47 | ❌ Minimal | Low | -| **NIP-30** | Custom emoji | **1** | 19 | ❌ Minimal | Low | -| **NIP-31** | Alt descriptions | **1** | 18 | ❌ Minimal | Low | -| **NIP-32** | Labeling | **1** | 24 | ❌ Minimal | Low | -| **NIP-40** | Expiration | **1** | 18 | ❌ Minimal | Low | -| **NIP-42** | Authentication | **1** | 24 | ❌ Minimal | Medium | -| **NIP-44** | Encrypted Payloads | **2** | 39 | ❌ Minimal | **High** | -| **NIP-46** | Nostr Connect | **2** | 40 | ❌ Minimal | Medium | -| **NIP-52** | Calendar events | **1** | 141 | ❌ Minimal | Low | -| **NIP-57** | Zaps | **2** | 96 | ❌ Minimal | **High** | -| **NIP-60** | Cashu wallet | **4** | 278 | ⚠️ Moderate | Low | -| **NIP-61** | Nutzaps | **3** | 190 | ⚠️ Moderate | Low | -| **NIP-65** | Relay list metadata | **1** | 24 | ❌ Minimal | Low | -| **NIP-99** | Classified listings | **4** | 127 | ⚠️ Moderate | Low | - ---- - -## Detailed Analysis by Priority - -### 🔴 Critical Priority NIPs (Undertested & High Impact) - -#### NIP-04: Encrypted Direct Messages (1 test) -**Current Coverage:** Basic encryption test only -**Missing Tests:** -- Decryption validation -- Invalid ciphertext handling -- Key mismatch scenarios -- Empty/null content handling -- Large message handling -- Special character encoding - -**Recommended Tests:** -1. `testEncryptDecryptRoundtrip()` - Verify encrypt→decrypt produces original -2. `testDecryptInvalidCiphertext()` - Should throw exception -3. `testEncryptWithWrongPublicKey()` - Verify decryption fails -4. `testEncryptEmptyMessage()` - Edge case -5. `testEncryptLargeMessage()` - Performance/limits -6. `testSpecialCharacters()` - Unicode, emojis, etc. - -**Estimated Effort:** 2 hours - ---- - -#### NIP-44: Encrypted Payloads (2 tests) -**Current Coverage:** Basic encryption tests -**Missing Tests:** -- Version handling (v1 vs v2) -- Padding validation -- Nonce generation uniqueness -- ChaCha20 implementation edge cases -- HMAC verification -- Conversation key derivation - -**Recommended Tests:** -1. `testVersionNegotiation()` - Ensure correct version used -2. `testPaddingCorrectness()` - Verify padding scheme -3. `testNonceUniqueness()` - Nonces never repeat -4. `testHMACValidation()` - Tampering detected -5. `testConversationKeyDerivation()` - Consistent keys -6. `testDecryptModifiedCiphertext()` - Should fail - -**Estimated Effort:** 3 hours - ---- - -#### NIP-57: Zaps (2 tests) -**Current Coverage:** Basic zap request/receipt creation -**Missing Tests:** -- Lightning invoice parsing -- Zap receipt validation (signature, amount, etc.) -- Bolt11 invoice verification -- Zap amount validation -- Relay list validation -- Anonymous zaps -- Multiple zap scenarios - -**Recommended Tests:** -1. `testZapRequestWithInvoice()` - Include bolt11 -2. `testZapReceiptValidation()` - Verify all fields -3. `testZapAmountMatches()` - Invoice amount == zap amount -4. `testAnonymousZap()` - No sender identity -5. `testZapWithRelayList()` - Verify relay hints -6. `testInvalidZapReceipt()` - Missing fields should fail -7. `testZapDescriptionHash()` - SHA256 validation - -**Estimated Effort:** 3 hours - ---- - -### 🟡 Medium Priority NIPs (Need Expansion) - -#### NIP-02: Contact Lists (4 tests) -**Current Coverage:** Moderate - basic contact operations -**Missing Tests:** -- Duplicate contact handling -- Contact update scenarios -- Empty contact list -- Very large contact lists -- Relay URL validation - -**Recommended Tests:** -1. `testAddDuplicateContact()` - Should not duplicate -2. `testRemoveNonexistentContact()` - Graceful handling -3. `testEmptyContactList()` - Valid edge case -4. `testLargeContactList()` - 1000+ contacts -5. `testInvalidRelayUrl()` - Validation - -**Estimated Effort:** 1.5 hours - ---- - -#### NIP-09: Event Deletion (1 test) -**Current Coverage:** Basic event deletion only -**Missing Tests:** -- Address tag deletion (code exists but not tested!) -- Multiple event deletion -- Deletion with reason/content -- Invalid deletion targets -- Kind tag addition verification - -**Recommended Tests:** -1. `testDeleteMultipleEvents()` - List of events -2. `testDeleteWithReason()` - Optional content field -3. `testDeleteAddressableEvent()` - Uses AddressTag -4. `testDeleteInvalidEvent()` - Null/empty handling -5. `testKindTagsAdded()` - Verify kind tags present - -**Estimated Effort:** 1.5 hours - ---- - -#### NIP-23: Long-form Content (1 test) -**Current Coverage:** Basic article creation -**Missing Tests:** -- Markdown validation -- Title/summary fields -- Image tags -- Published timestamp -- Article updates (replaceable) -- Hashtags - -**Recommended Tests:** -1. `testArticleWithAllFields()` - Title, summary, image, tags -2. `testArticleUpdate()` - Replaceable event behavior -3. `testArticleWithMarkdown()` - Content formatting -4. `testArticleWithHashtags()` - Multiple t-tags -5. `testArticlePublishedAt()` - Timestamp handling - -**Estimated Effort:** 1.5 hours - ---- - -#### NIP-42: Authentication (1 test) -**Current Coverage:** Basic auth event creation -**Missing Tests:** -- Challenge-response flow -- Relay URL validation -- Signature verification -- Expired challenges -- Invalid challenge format - -**Recommended Tests:** -1. `testAuthChallengeResponse()` - Full flow -2. `testAuthWithInvalidChallenge()` - Should fail -3. `testAuthExpiredChallenge()` - Timestamp check -4. `testAuthRelayValidation()` - Must match relay -5. `testAuthSignatureVerification()` - Cryptographic check - -**Estimated Effort:** 2 hours - ---- - -### 🟢 Low Priority NIPs (Functional but Limited) - -Most other NIPs (03, 05, 12, 14, 15, 20, 25, 28, 30, 31, 32, 40, 46, 52, 65) have: -- 1-2 basic tests -- Happy path coverage only -- No edge case testing -- No error path testing - -**General improvements needed for all:** -1. Null/empty input handling -2. Invalid parameter validation -3. Required field presence checks -4. Tag structure validation -5. Event kind verification -6. Edge cases specific to each NIP - -**Estimated Effort:** 10-15 hours total (1 hour per NIP avg) - ---- - -## Test Quality Analysis - -### Common Missing Test Patterns - -Across all NIPs, these test scenarios are systematically missing: - -#### 1. Input Validation Tests (90% of NIPs missing) -```java -@Test -void testNullInputThrowsException() { - assertThrows(NullPointerException.class, () -> - nip.createEvent(null)); -} - -@Test -void testEmptyInputHandling() { - // Verify behavior with empty strings, lists, etc. -} -``` - -#### 2. Field Validation Tests (85% of NIPs missing) -```java -@Test -void testRequiredFieldsPresent() { - GenericEvent event = nip.createEvent(...).getEvent(); - assertNotNull(event.getContent()); - assertFalse(event.getTags().isEmpty()); - // Verify all required fields per NIP spec -} - -@Test -void testEventKindCorrect() { - assertEquals(Kind.EXPECTED.getValue(), event.getKind()); -} -``` - -#### 3. Edge Case Tests (95% of NIPs missing) -```java -@Test -void testVeryLongContent() { - // Test with 100KB+ content -} - -@Test -void testSpecialCharacters() { - // Unicode, emojis, control chars -} - -@Test -void testBoundaryValues() { - // Max/min allowed values -} -``` - -#### 4. Error Path Tests (98% of NIPs missing) -```java -@Test -void testInvalidSignatureDetected() { - // Modify signature, verify detection -} - -@Test -void testMalformedTagHandling() { - // Invalid tag structure -} -``` - -#### 5. NIP Spec Compliance Tests (80% missing) -```java -@Test -void testCompliesWithNIPSpec() { - // Verify exact spec requirements - // Check tag ordering, field formats, etc. -} -``` - ---- - -## Coverage Improvement Roadmap - -### Phase 1: Critical NIPs (8-9 hours) -**Goal:** Bring high-impact NIPs to comprehensive coverage - -1. **NIP-04 Encrypted DMs** (2 hours) - - Add 6 tests: encryption, decryption, edge cases - - Target: 8+ tests - -2. **NIP-44 Encrypted Payloads** (3 hours) - - Add 6 tests: versioning, padding, HMAC - - Target: 8+ tests - -3. **NIP-57 Zaps** (3 hours) - - Add 7 tests: invoice parsing, validation, amounts - - Target: 9+ tests - -**Expected Impact:** nostr-java-api coverage: 36% → 45% - ---- - -### Phase 2: Medium Priority NIPs (6-7 hours) -**Goal:** Expand important NIPs to good coverage - -1. **NIP-02 Contact Lists** (1.5 hours) - - Add 5 tests: duplicates, large lists, validation - - Target: 9+ tests - -2. **NIP-09 Event Deletion** (1.5 hours) - - Add 5 tests: address deletion, multiple events, reasons - - Target: 6+ tests - -3. **NIP-23 Long-form Content** (1.5 hours) - - Add 5 tests: all fields, markdown, updates - - Target: 6+ tests - -4. **NIP-42 Authentication** (2 hours) - - Add 5 tests: challenge-response, validation, expiry - - Target: 6+ tests - -**Expected Impact:** nostr-java-api coverage: 45% → 52% - ---- - -### Phase 3: Comprehensive Coverage (10-12 hours) -**Goal:** Add edge case and error path tests to all NIPs - -1. **NIP-01 Enhancement** (2 hours) - - Add 8 more tests: all event types, validation, edge cases - - Target: 20+ tests - -2. **Low Priority NIPs** (8-10 hours) - - Add 3-5 tests per NIP for 17 remaining NIPs - - Focus on: input validation, edge cases, error paths - - Target: 4+ tests per NIP minimum - -**Expected Impact:** nostr-java-api coverage: 52% → 70%+ - ---- - -## Recommended Test Template - -For each NIP, implement this standard test suite: - -### 1. Happy Path Tests -- Basic event creation with required fields -- Event with all optional fields -- Round-trip serialization/deserialization - -### 2. Validation Tests -- Required field presence -- Event kind correctness -- Tag structure validation -- Content format validation - -### 3. Edge Case Tests -- Empty inputs -- Null parameters -- Very large inputs -- Special characters -- Boundary values - -### 4. Error Path Tests -- Invalid parameters throw exceptions -- Malformed input detection -- Type mismatches -- Constraint violations - -### 5. NIP Spec Compliance Tests -- Verify exact spec requirements -- Check tag ordering -- Validate field formats -- Test spec examples - -### Example Template -```java -public class NIPxxTest { - - private Identity sender; - private NIPxx nip; - - @BeforeEach - void setup() { - sender = Identity.generateRandomIdentity(); - nip = new NIPxx(sender); - } - - // Happy Path - @Test - void testCreateBasicEvent() { /* ... */ } - - @Test - void testCreateEventWithAllFields() { /* ... */ } - - // Validation - @Test - void testEventKindIsCorrect() { /* ... */ } - - @Test - void testRequiredFieldsPresent() { /* ... */ } - - // Edge Cases - @Test - void testNullInputThrowsException() { /* ... */ } - - @Test - void testEmptyInputHandling() { /* ... */ } - - @Test - void testVeryLargeInput() { /* ... */ } - - // Error Paths - @Test - void testInvalidParametersDetected() { /* ... */ } - - // Spec Compliance - @Test - void testCompliesWithNIPSpec() { /* ... */ } -} -``` - ---- - -## Integration with Existing Tests - -### Current Test Organization -- **Location:** `nostr-java-api/src/test/java/nostr/api/unit/` -- **Pattern:** `NIPxxTest.java` or `NIPxxImplTest.java` -- **Framework:** JUnit 5 (Jupiter) -- **Style:** Given-When-Then pattern (mostly) - -### Best Practices Observed -✅ Use `Identity.generateRandomIdentity()` for test identities -✅ Create NIP instance with sender in `@BeforeEach` -✅ Test event retrieval via `nip.getEvent()` -✅ Assert on event kind, tags, content -✅ Meaningful test method names - -### Areas for Improvement -⚠️ No `@DisplayName` annotations (readability) -⚠️ Limited use of parameterized tests -⚠️ No test helpers/utilities for common assertions -⚠️ Minimal JavaDoc on test methods -⚠️ No NIP spec reference comments - ---- - -## Success Metrics - -### Current State -- **Total Tests:** 52 -- **Comprehensive NIPs (8+ tests):** 1 (NIP-01) -- **Average Tests/NIP:** 2.0 -- **Coverage:** 36% (nostr-java-api) - -### Target State (End of Phase 4, Task 2) -- **Total Tests:** 150+ (+100 tests) -- **Comprehensive NIPs (8+ tests):** 5-6 (NIP-01, 04, 44, 57, 02, 42) -- **Average Tests/NIP:** 5-6 -- **Coverage:** 60%+ (nostr-java-api) - -### Stretch Goals -- **Total Tests:** 200+ -- **Comprehensive NIPs:** 10+ -- **Average Tests/NIP:** 8 -- **Coverage:** 70%+ (nostr-java-api) - ---- - -## Next Steps - -1. ✅ **Baseline established** - 52 tests across 26 NIPs -2. ⏳ **Prioritize critical NIPs** - NIP-04, NIP-44, NIP-57 -3. ⏳ **Create test templates** - Standardize test structure -4. ⏳ **Implement Phase 1** - Critical NIP tests (8-9 hours) -5. ⏳ **Re-measure coverage** - Verify improvement -6. ⏳ **Iterate through Phases 2-3** - Expand coverage - ---- - -## Recommendations - -### Immediate Actions -1. **Add tests for NIP-04, NIP-44, NIP-57** (critical encryption & payment features) -2. **Create test helper utilities** (reduce boilerplate) -3. **Document test patterns** (consistency) - -### Medium-term Actions -1. **Expand NIP-09, NIP-23, NIP-42** (important features) -2. **Add edge case tests** (all NIPs) -3. **Implement error path tests** (all NIPs) - -### Long-term Actions -1. **Achieve 4+ tests per NIP** (comprehensive coverage) -2. **Create NIP compliance test suite** (spec verification) -3. **Add integration tests** (multi-NIP workflows) - ---- - -**Last Updated:** 2025-10-08 -**Analysis By:** Phase 4 Testing & Verification, Task 2 -**Next Review:** After Phase 1 test implementation diff --git a/.project-management/PHASE_1_COMPLETION.md b/.project-management/PHASE_1_COMPLETION.md deleted file mode 100644 index f1410de2f..000000000 --- a/.project-management/PHASE_1_COMPLETION.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,401 +0,0 @@ -# Phase 1: Code Quality & Maintainability - COMPLETED ✅ - -**Date:** 2025-10-06 -**Duration:** ~2 hours -**Status:** ✅ ALL TASKS COMPLETE - ---- - -## Summary - -Successfully completed all Phase 1 tasks from the Methodical Resolution Plan, improving code quality, removing code smells, and preparing for future API evolution. - ---- - -## Task 1: Extract Static ObjectMapper ✅ - -**Finding:** 6.4 - Static ObjectMapper in Interface -**Status:** FULLY RESOLVED - -### Changes Implemented - -#### 1. Created EventJsonMapper Utility Class -**File:** `/nostr-java-event/src/main/java/nostr/event/json/EventJsonMapper.java` (76 lines) - -**Features:** -- Centralized ObjectMapper configuration with Blackbird module -- Comprehensive JavaDoc with usage examples -- Thread-safe singleton pattern -- Factory method for custom mappers - -```java -public final class EventJsonMapper { - private static final ObjectMapper MAPPER = - JsonMapper.builder() - .addModule(new BlackbirdModule()) - .build() - .setSerializationInclusion(Include.NON_NULL); - - public static ObjectMapper getMapper() { - return MAPPER; - } -} -``` - -#### 2. Updated All References (18 files) -**Migrated from:** `Encoder.ENCODER_MAPPER_BLACKBIRD` (static field in interface) -**Migrated to:** `EventJsonMapper.getMapper()` (utility class) - -**Files Updated:** -- ✅ `EventSerializer.java` - Core event serialization -- ✅ `GenericEventSerializer.java` - Generic event support -- ✅ `BaseEventEncoder.java` - Event encoding -- ✅ `BaseTagEncoder.java` - Tag encoding -- ✅ `FiltersEncoder.java` - Filter encoding -- ✅ `RelayAuthenticationMessage.java` - Auth message -- ✅ `NoticeMessage.java` - Notice message -- ✅ `CloseMessage.java` - Close message -- ✅ `EoseMessage.java` - EOSE message -- ✅ `OkMessage.java` - OK message -- ✅ `EventMessage.java` - Event message -- ✅ `CanonicalAuthenticationMessage.java` - Canonical auth -- ✅ `GenericMessage.java` - Generic message -- ✅ `ReqMessage.java` - Request message - -#### 3. Deprecated Old Interface Field -**File:** `/nostr-java-base/src/main/java/nostr/base/Encoder.java` - -```java -/** - * @deprecated Use {@link nostr.event.json.EventJsonMapper#getMapper()} instead. - * This field will be removed in version 1.0.0. - */ -@Deprecated(forRemoval = true, since = "0.6.2") -ObjectMapper ENCODER_MAPPER_BLACKBIRD = ... -``` - -### Benefits - -1. **Better Design:** Removed static field from interface (anti-pattern) -2. **Single Responsibility:** JSON configuration in dedicated utility class -3. **Discoverability:** Clear location for all JSON mapper configuration -4. **Maintainability:** Single place to update mapper configuration -5. **Documentation:** Comprehensive JavaDoc explains Blackbird benefits -6. **Migration Path:** Deprecated old field with clear alternative - ---- - -## Task 2: Clean Up TODO Comments ✅ - -**Finding:** 4.2 - TODO Comments in Production Code -**Status:** FULLY RESOLVED - -### TODOs Resolved: 4 total - -#### 1. NIP60.java - Tag List Encoding -**Location:** `nostr-java-api/src/main/java/nostr/api/NIP60.java:219` - -**Before:** -```java -// TODO: Consider writing a GenericTagListEncoder class for this -private String getContent(@NonNull List tags) { -``` - -**After:** -```java -/** - * Encodes a list of tags to JSON array format. - * - *

Note: This could be extracted to a GenericTagListEncoder class if this pattern - * is used in multiple places. For now, it's kept here as it's NIP-60 specific. - */ -private String getContent(@NonNull List tags) { -``` - -**Resolution:** Documented with JavaDoc, noted future refactoring possibility - -#### 2. CanonicalAuthenticationMessage.java - decode() Review -**Location:** `nostr-java-event/src/main/java/nostr/event/message/CanonicalAuthenticationMessage.java:51` - -**Before:** -```java -// TODO - This needs to be reviewed -@SuppressWarnings("unchecked") -public static T decode(@NonNull Map map) { -``` - -**After:** -```java -/** - * Decodes a map representation into a CanonicalAuthenticationMessage. - * - *

This method converts the map (typically from JSON deserialization) into - * a properly typed CanonicalAuthenticationMessage with a CanonicalAuthenticationEvent. - * - * @param map the map containing event data - * @param the message type (must be BaseMessage) - * @return the decoded CanonicalAuthenticationMessage - * @throws EventEncodingException if decoding fails - */ -@SuppressWarnings("unchecked") -public static T decode(@NonNull Map map) { -``` - -**Resolution:** Reviewed and documented - implementation is correct - -#### 3. CanonicalAuthenticationMessage.java - Stream Optional -**Location:** `nostr-java-event/src/main/java/nostr/event/message/CanonicalAuthenticationMessage.java:72` - -**Before:** -```java -private static String getAttributeValue(List genericTags, String attributeName) { - // TODO: stream optional - return genericTags.stream() -``` - -**After:** -```java -private static String getAttributeValue(List genericTags, String attributeName) { - return genericTags.stream() -``` - -**Resolution:** Current implementation is fine - removed unnecessary TODO - -#### 4. NostrMarketplaceEvent.java - Kind Values -**Location:** `nostr-java-event/src/main/java/nostr/event/impl/NostrMarketplaceEvent.java:26` - -**Before:** -```java -// TODO: Create the Kinds for the events and use it -public NostrMarketplaceEvent(PublicKey sender, Integer kind, List tags, String content) { -``` - -**After:** -```java -/** - * Creates a new marketplace event. - * - *

Note: Kind values for marketplace events are defined in NIP-15. - * Consider using {@link nostr.base.Kind} enum values when available. - * - * @param sender the public key of the event creator - * @param kind the event kind (see NIP-15 for marketplace event kinds) - * @param tags the event tags - * @param content the event content (typically JSON-encoded Product) - */ -public NostrMarketplaceEvent(PublicKey sender, Integer kind, List tags, String content) { -``` - -**Resolution:** Documented with JavaDoc and reference to Kind enum - -### Verification - -```bash -grep -r "TODO" --include="*.java" --exclude-dir=target --exclude-dir=test nostr-java-*/src/main/java -# Result: 0 matches -``` - ---- - -## Task 3: Mark Deprecated Methods for Removal ✅ - -**Finding:** 8.4 - Dead Code - Deprecated Methods -**Status:** FULLY RESOLVED - -### Deprecated Members Updated: 5 total - -#### 1. Encoder.ENCODER_MAPPER_BLACKBIRD -**File:** `nostr-java-base/src/main/java/nostr/base/Encoder.java` - -```java -/** - * @deprecated Use {@link nostr.event.json.EventJsonMapper#getMapper()} instead. - * This field will be removed in version 1.0.0. - */ -@Deprecated(forRemoval = true, since = "0.6.2") -ObjectMapper ENCODER_MAPPER_BLACKBIRD = ... -``` - -#### 2. NIP61.createNutzapEvent() -**File:** `nostr-java-api/src/main/java/nostr/api/NIP61.java:125` - -```java -/** - * @deprecated Use builder pattern or parameter object for complex event creation. - * This method will be removed in version 1.0.0. - */ -@Deprecated(forRemoval = true, since = "0.6.2") -public NIP61 createNutzapEvent(...) { -``` - -**Reason:** Too many parameters (7) - violates method parameter best practices - -#### 3. NIP01.createTextNoteEvent(Identity, String) -**File:** `nostr-java-api/src/main/java/nostr/api/NIP01.java:56` - -```java -/** - * @deprecated Use {@link #createTextNoteEvent(String)} instead. Sender is now configured at NIP01 construction. - * This method will be removed in version 1.0.0. - */ -@Deprecated(forRemoval = true, since = "0.6.2") -public NIP01 createTextNoteEvent(Identity sender, String content) { -``` - -**Reason:** Sender should be configured at construction, not per-method - -#### 4. Constants.Kind.RECOMMENDED_RELAY -**File:** `nostr-java-api/src/main/java/nostr/config/Constants.java:20` - -```java -/** - * @deprecated Use {@link nostr.base.Kind#RECOMMEND_SERVER} instead. - * This constant will be removed in version 1.0.0. - */ -@Deprecated(forRemoval = true, since = "0.6.2") -public static final int RECOMMENDED_RELAY = 2; -``` - -**Reason:** Migrating to Kind enum, old constant should be removed - -#### 5. RelayConfig.legacyRelays() -**File:** `nostr-java-api/src/main/java/nostr/config/RelayConfig.java:24` - -```java -/** - * @deprecated Use {@link RelaysProperties} instead for relay configuration. - * This method will be removed in version 1.0.0. - */ -@Deprecated(forRemoval = true, since = "0.6.2") -private Map legacyRelays() { -``` - -**Reason:** Legacy configuration approach replaced by RelaysProperties - -### Metadata Added - -All deprecated members now include: -- ✅ `forRemoval = true` - Signals intent to remove -- ✅ `since = "0.6.2"` - Documents when deprecated -- ✅ Clear migration path in JavaDoc -- ✅ Version info (1.0.0) for planned removal - -### Verification - -```bash -grep -rn "@Deprecated" --include="*.java" --exclude-dir=target nostr-java-*/src/main/java | grep -v "forRemoval" -# Result: 0 matches - all deprecations now have removal metadata -``` - ---- - -## Task 4: Feature Envy Skipped - -**Finding:** 8.3 - Feature Envy -**Status:** DEFERRED TO PHASE 3 - -**Reason:** This requires deeper code analysis and refactoring. Better addressed in Phase 3 (Standardization & Consistency) after documentation is complete. - -**Plan:** Will audit and address in Phase 3, task 17. - ---- - -## Metrics - -### Code Changes -| Metric | Count | -|--------|-------| -| Files Created | 1 (EventJsonMapper.java) | -| Files Modified | 21 | -| TODOs Resolved | 4 | -| Deprecated Members Updated | 5 | -| Static Mapper References Migrated | 18 | - -### Quality Improvements -- ✅ Eliminated anti-pattern (static field in interface) -- ✅ Zero TODO comments in production code -- ✅ All deprecated members have removal metadata -- ✅ Clear migration paths documented -- ✅ Comprehensive JavaDoc added - -### Build Status -```bash -mvn clean compile -# Result: BUILD SUCCESS -``` - ---- - -## Migration Guide - -### For Developers Using This Library - -#### Migrating from ENCODER_MAPPER_BLACKBIRD - -**Old Code:** -```java -import static nostr.base.Encoder.ENCODER_MAPPER_BLACKBIRD; - -String json = ENCODER_MAPPER_BLACKBIRD.writeValueAsString(event); -``` - -**New Code:** -```java -import nostr.event.json.EventJsonMapper; - -String json = EventJsonMapper.getMapper().writeValueAsString(event); -``` - -#### Replacing Deprecated Methods - -1. **NIP01.createTextNoteEvent(Identity, String)** - ```java - // Old - nip01.createTextNoteEvent(identity, "Hello"); - - // New - configure sender at construction - NIP01 nip01 = new NIP01(identity); - nip01.createTextNoteEvent("Hello"); - ``` - -2. **Constants.Kind.RECOMMENDED_RELAY** - ```java - // Old - int kind = Constants.Kind.RECOMMENDED_RELAY; - - // New - Kind kind = Kind.RECOMMEND_SERVER; - ``` - ---- - -## Next Steps - -### Phase 2: Documentation Enhancement (3-5 days) - -**Upcoming Tasks:** -1. Add comprehensive JavaDoc to all public APIs -2. Create architecture documentation with diagrams -3. Document design patterns used -4. Update README with NIP compliance matrix - -**Estimated Start:** Next session -**Priority:** High - Improves API discoverability and maintainability - ---- - -## Conclusion - -Phase 1 is **100% complete** with all tasks successfully finished: -- ✅ Static ObjectMapper extracted to utility class -- ✅ Zero TODO comments in production code -- ✅ All deprecated members marked for removal -- ✅ Build passing with all changes - -The codebase is now cleaner, more maintainable, and has clear migration paths for deprecated APIs. Ready to proceed with Phase 2 (Documentation Enhancement). - ---- - -**Completed:** 2025-10-06 -**Build Status:** ✅ PASSING -**Next Phase:** Phase 2 - Documentation Enhancement diff --git a/.project-management/PHASE_2_PROGRESS.md b/.project-management/PHASE_2_PROGRESS.md deleted file mode 100644 index 94015dac0..000000000 --- a/.project-management/PHASE_2_PROGRESS.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,663 +0,0 @@ -# Phase 2: Documentation Enhancement - COMPLETE ✅ - -**Date Started:** 2025-10-06 -**Date Completed:** 2025-10-06 -**Status:** **ALL CRITICAL TASKS COMPLETE** (Architecture + Core APIs + README + Contributing) -**Grade:** **A** (target achieved) - ---- - -## Overview - -Phase 2 focuses on improving API discoverability, documenting architectural decisions, and creating comprehensive developer guides. This phase builds on the successful refactoring completed in Phase 1. - ---- - -## Progress Summary - -**Overall Completion:** 100% of critical tasks ✅ (4 of 4 high-priority tasks complete) - -### ✅ Completed Tasks - -#### 1. Enhanced Architecture Documentation ✅ - -**File:** `/docs/explanation/architecture.md` (Enhanced from 75 → 796 lines) - -**Major Additions:** - -1. **Table of Contents** - Easy navigation to all sections - -2. **Expanded Module Documentation** - - 9 modules organized by Clean Architecture layers - - Key classes and responsibilities for each module - - Dependency relationships clearly documented - - Recent refactoring (v0.6.2) highlighted - -3. **Clean Architecture Principles Section** - - Dependency Rule explained with examples - - Layer responsibilities defined - - Benefits documented (testability, flexibility, maintainability) - - Framework independence emphasized - -4. **Design Patterns Section** (8 patterns documented) - - **Facade Pattern:** NIP01, NIP57 usage - - **Builder Pattern:** Event construction, parameter objects - - **Template Method:** GenericEvent validation - - **Value Object:** RelayUri, SubscriptionId - - **Factory Pattern:** Tag and event factories - - **Utility Pattern:** Validators, serializers, type checkers - - **Delegation Pattern:** GenericEvent → specialized classes - - **Singleton Pattern:** Thread-safe initialization-on-demand - - Each pattern includes: - - Where it's used - - Purpose and benefits - - Code examples - - Real implementations from the codebase - -5. **Refactored Components Section** - - GenericEvent extraction (3 utility classes) - - NIP01 extraction (3 builder/factory classes) - - NIP57 extraction (4 builder/factory classes) - - NostrSpringWebSocketClient extraction (5 dispatcher/manager classes) - - EventJsonMapper extraction - - Before/after metrics for each - - Impact analysis - -6. **Enhanced Error Handling Section** - - Complete exception hierarchy diagram - - Principles: Validate Early, Fail Fast, Use Domain Exceptions - - Good vs bad examples - - Context in error messages - -7. **Extensibility Guide** - - Step-by-step instructions for adding new NIPs - - Step-by-step instructions for adding new tags - - Complete code examples - - Test examples - -8. **Security Notes** - - Key management best practices - - BIP-340 Schnorr signing details - - NIP-04 vs NIP-44 encryption comparison - - Immutability, validation, and dependency management - -9. **Summary Section** - - Current grade (A-), test coverage, NIP support - - Production-ready status - -**Metrics:** -- Original: 75 lines (basic structure) -- Enhanced: 796 lines (comprehensive guide) -- **Growth: 960%** (10.6x increase) -- Sections: 2 → 9 major sections -- Code examples: 0 → 20+ examples - -**Impact:** -- ✅ Developers can now understand the full architecture -- ✅ Design patterns clearly documented with real examples -- ✅ Refactoring work is prominently featured -- ✅ Extensibility is well-documented -- ✅ Security considerations are explicit - ---- - -#### 2. Core API JavaDoc Complete ✅ - -**Date Completed:** 2025-10-06 - -**Files Enhanced:** - -1. **GenericEvent.java** ✅ - - Comprehensive class-level JavaDoc (60+ lines) - - NIP-01 structure explanation with JSON examples - - Event kind ranges documented (regular, replaceable, ephemeral, addressable) - - Complete usage example with builder pattern - - Enhanced method-level JavaDoc for: - - `update()` - Explains timestamp + ID computation - - `validate()` - Documents Template Method pattern - - `sign()` - BIP-340 Schnorr signing details - - Marshalling methods - - And 6 more methods - -2. **EventValidator.java** ✅ - - Comprehensive class-level JavaDoc - - All field validation rules documented - - Usage examples (try-catch pattern) - - Design pattern notes (Utility Pattern) - - Reusability section - -3. **EventSerializer.java** ✅ - - Detailed canonical format explanation - - JSON array structure with inline comments - - Usage section covering 3 use cases - - Determinism section explaining why it matters - - Thread safety notes - -4. **EventTypeChecker.java** ✅ - - Enhanced class-level JavaDoc with usage example - - All 4 event type ranges documented - - Real-world examples for each kind range - - Method-level JavaDoc for all public methods - - Design pattern notes - -5. **BaseEvent.java** ✅ - - Comprehensive class hierarchy diagram - - Usage guidelines (when to extend vs use GenericEvent) - - Template Method pattern explanation - - NIP-19 Bech32 encoding support documented - - Code examples - -6. **BaseTag.java** ✅ - - Extensive class-level JavaDoc (100+ lines) - - Tag structure visualization with JSON - - Common tag types listed (e, p, a, d, t, r) - - Three tag creation methods documented - - Tag Registry pattern explained - - Custom tag implementation example - - Complete method-level JavaDoc for all 7 methods - - Reflection API documented - -7. **NIP01.java** ✅ - - Comprehensive facade documentation (110+ lines) - - What is NIP-01 section - - Design pattern explanation (Facade) - - Complete usage examples: - - Simple text note - - Tagged text note - - Metadata event - - Static tag/message creation - - All event types listed and linked - - All tag types listed and linked - - All message types listed and linked - - Method chaining example - - Sender management documented - - Migration notes for deprecated methods - - Thread safety notes - -**Metrics:** -- **Classes documented:** 7 core classes -- **JavaDoc lines added:** ~400+ lines -- **Code examples:** 15+ examples -- **Coverage:** 100% of core public APIs - -**Impact:** -- ✅ IntelliSense/autocomplete now shows helpful documentation -- ✅ Developers can understand event lifecycle without reading source -- ✅ Validator, serializer, and type checker usage is clear -- ✅ Tag creation patterns are well-documented -- ✅ NIP01 facade shows complete usage patterns -- ✅ API discoverability significantly improved - ---- - -#### 3. README Enhancements ✅ - -**Date Completed:** 2025-10-06 - -**Enhancements Made:** - -1. **Features Section** (NEW) - - 6 key features highlighted with checkmarks - - Clean Architecture, NIP support, type-safety emphasized - - Production-ready status highlighted - -2. **Recent Improvements Section** (NEW) - - Refactoring achievements documented (B → A- grade) - - Documentation overhaul highlighted - - API improvements listed (BOM, deprecations, error messages) - - Links to architecture.md - -3. **NIP Compliance Matrix** (NEW) - - 25 NIPs organized by category (7 categories) - - Categories: Core Protocol, Security & Identity, Encryption, Content Types, Commerce & Payments, Utilities - - Each NIP linked to specification - - Status column (all ✅ Complete) - - Coverage summary: 25/100+ NIPs - -4. **Contributing Section** (NEW) - - Links to CONTRIBUTING.md with bullet points - - Links to architecture.md for guidance - - Clear call-to-action for contributors - -5. **License Section** (NEW) - - MIT License explicitly mentioned - - Link to LICENSE file - -**Metrics:** -- Features section: 6 key features -- NIP matrix: 25 NIPs across 7 categories -- New sections: 4 (Features, Recent Improvements, Contributing, License) - -**Impact:** -- ✅ First-time visitors immediately see project maturity and feature richness -- ✅ NIP coverage is transparent and easy to browse -- ✅ Recent work (refactoring, documentation) is prominently featured -- ✅ Professional presentation with clear structure -- ✅ Contributors have clear entry points (CONTRIBUTING.md, architecture.md) - ---- - -#### 4. CONTRIBUTING.md Complete ✅ - -**Date Completed:** 2025-10-06 - -**File:** `/home/eric/IdeaProjects/nostr-java/CONTRIBUTING.md` - -**Enhancements Made:** - -1. **Table of Contents** (NEW) - - 8 sections with anchor links - - Easy navigation to all guidelines - -2. **Getting Started Section** (ENHANCED) - - Prerequisites listed (Java 21+, Maven 3.8+, Git) - - Step-by-step setup instructions - - Commands for clone, build, test - -3. **Development Guidelines** (ENHANCED) - - Before submitting checklist (4 items) - - Clear submission requirements - -4. **Coding Standards Section** (NEW) - - Clean Code principles highlighted - - Naming conventions for classes, methods, variables - - Specific examples for each category - - Code formatting rules (indentation, line length, Lombok usage) - -5. **Architecture Guidelines Section** (NEW) - - Module organization diagram - - Links to architecture.md - - Design patterns list (5 patterns) - -6. **Adding New NIPs Section** (NEW) - - 6-step quick guide - - Example code structure with JavaDoc - - Links to detailed architecture guide - -7. **Testing Requirements Section** (NEW) - - Minimum coverage requirement (80%) - - Test example with `@DisplayName` - - Edge case testing guidance - -8. **Commit Guidelines** (PRESERVED) - - Original guidelines maintained - - Reference to commit_instructions.md preserved - - Allowed types listed - -9. **Pull Request Guidelines** (PRESERVED) - - Original guidelines maintained - - Template reference preserved - -**Metrics:** -- Original file: ~40 lines -- Enhanced file: ~170 lines -- **Growth: 325%** (4.25x increase) -- New sections: 5 major sections added -- Code examples: 2 examples added - -**Impact:** -- ✅ New contributors have clear coding standards -- ✅ Naming conventions prevent inconsistency -- ✅ Architecture guidelines ensure proper module placement -- ✅ NIP addition process is documented end-to-end -- ✅ Testing expectations are explicit -- ✅ Professional, comprehensive contribution guide - ---- - -## Remaining Tasks - -### 🎯 Phase 2 Remaining Work (Optional) - -#### Task 5: Extended JavaDoc for NIP Classes ✅ COMPLETE - -**Date Completed:** 2025-10-07 - -**Scope:** -- ✅ Document additional NIP implementation classes (NIP04, NIP19, NIP44, NIP57, NIP60) -- ✅ Document exception hierarchy classes -- ✅ Package-info.java creation (marked complete) - -**Files Enhanced:** - -**NIP Classes (5 classes, ~860 lines JavaDoc):** -1. **NIP04.java** (Encrypted Direct Messages) - ~170 lines - - Comprehensive class-level JavaDoc with security warnings - - NIP-04 vs NIP-44 comparison - - Encryption/decryption workflow documented - - Method-level JavaDoc for all public methods - - Deprecated status clearly marked (use NIP-44 instead) - -2. **NIP19 - Bech32 Encoding** (2 classes, ~250 lines) - - **Bech32Prefix.java** - ~120 lines - - Complete prefix table (npub, nsec, note, nprofile, nevent) - - Usage examples for each prefix type - - Security considerations (NEVER share nsec) - - **Bech32.java** - ~130 lines - - Encoding/decoding examples - - Character set and error detection explained - - Bech32 vs Bech32m differences documented - -3. **NIP44.java** (Encrypted Payloads) - ~170 lines - - XChaCha20-Poly1305 AEAD encryption documented - - NIP-04 vs NIP-44 comparison table - - Padding scheme explained (power-of-2) - - Security properties (confidentiality, authenticity, metadata protection) - - Method-level JavaDoc for all methods - -4. **NIP57.java** (Lightning Zaps) - ~170 lines - - Zap workflow explained (6 steps) - - Zap types documented (public, private, profile, event, anonymous) - - LNURL, Bolt11, millisatoshi concepts explained - - Zap request/receipt tag documentation - - Design patterns documented (Facade + Builder) - -5. **NIP60.java** (Cashu Wallet) - ~195 lines - - Cashu ecash system explained (Chaumian blind signatures) - - Event kinds table (wallet 37375, token 7375, history 7376, quote 7377) - - Cashu proofs structure documented - - Mint trust model explained - - Security considerations for bearer tokens - -**Exception Hierarchy (4 classes, ~470 lines JavaDoc):** -1. **NostrRuntimeException.java** - ~130 lines - - Complete exception hierarchy diagram - - Design principles (unchecked, domain-specific, fail-fast) - - Usage examples for all exception types - - Responsibility table for subclasses - -2. **NostrProtocolException.java** - ~70 lines - - Common causes (invalid events, missing tags, signature mismatch) - - Recovery strategies for validation failures - -3. **NostrCryptoException.java** - ~80 lines - - Crypto failure causes (signing, verification, ECDH, encryption) - - Security implications documented - - Fail-secure guidance - -4. **NostrEncodingException.java** - ~110 lines - - Encoding format causes (JSON, Bech32, hex, base64) - - Format usage table - - Validation and recovery strategies - -5. **NostrNetworkException.java** - ~120 lines - - Network failure causes (timeouts, connection errors, relay rejections) - - Retry strategies with exponential backoff examples - - Configuration properties documented - -**Metrics:** -- **Classes documented:** 9 classes (5 NIP classes + 4 exception classes) -- **JavaDoc lines added:** ~1,330+ lines -- **Code examples:** 50+ examples -- **Coverage:** 100% of extended NIP classes and exception hierarchy -- **Time invested:** ~5 hours - -**Current Status:** ✅ COMPLETE -**Priority:** Low → High (significantly improves developer experience) -**Impact:** Extended NIP documentation provides comprehensive guidance for encryption, zaps, Cashu wallets, and error handling - -#### Task 6: Create MIGRATION.md ✅ COMPLETE - -**Date Completed:** 2025-10-07 - -**Scope:** -- ✅ Document deprecated API migration paths -- ✅ Version 0.6.2 → 1.0.0 breaking changes -- ✅ ENCODER_MAPPER_BLACKBIRD → EventJsonMapper -- ✅ Constants.Kind migration (25+ constants documented) -- ✅ NIP01.createTextNoteEvent(Identity, String) → createTextNoteEvent(String) -- ✅ Code examples for each migration -- ✅ Automated migration scripts and tools - -**File Created:** `/MIGRATION.md` (330+ lines) - -**Content Includes:** - -1. **Event Kind Constants Migration** - - Complete migration table (25+ constants) - - Before/After code examples - - Find & replace scripts - - Detailed name changes (e.g., RECOMMENDED_RELAY → RECOMMEND_SERVER) - -2. **ObjectMapper Usage Migration** - - Encoder.ENCODER_MAPPER_BLACKBIRD → EventJsonMapper.getMapper() - - Design rationale (anti-pattern removal) - - Alternative approaches (use event.toJson()) - -3. **NIP01 API Changes** - - Method signature changes explained - - Migration steps with grep commands - - Before/After examples - -4. **Breaking Changes Summary** - - Impact assessment (High/Medium/Low) - - Complete removal list for 1.0.0 - -5. **Migration Tools & Scripts** - - IntelliJ IDEA inspection guide - - Eclipse quick fix instructions - - Bash/sed automated migration scripts - - Step-by-step checklist - -6. **Version History Table** - - 0.6.2 → 0.6.3 → 1.0.0 timeline - -**Metrics:** -- Lines: 330+ -- Code examples: 15+ -- Migration table entries: 25+ -- Automation scripts: 3 (IntelliJ, Eclipse, bash) -- Time invested: ~2.5 hours - -**Current Status:** ✅ COMPLETE -**Priority:** Medium → High (essential for 1.0.0 release) -**Impact:** Provides clear upgrade path for all users, reduces migration friction - ---- - -## Estimated Completion - -### Time Breakdown - -| Task | Estimate | Priority | Status | -|------|----------|----------|--------| -| 1. Architecture Documentation | 4-6 hours | High | ✅ DONE | -| 2. JavaDoc Public APIs (Core) | 4-6 hours | High | ✅ DONE | -| 3. README Enhancements | 2-3 hours | High | ✅ DONE | -| 4. CONTRIBUTING.md | 1-2 hours | High | ✅ DONE | -| 5. JavaDoc Extended NIPs | 4-6 hours | High | ✅ DONE | -| 6. MIGRATION.md | 2-3 hours | High | ✅ DONE | -| **Total Critical** | **11-17 hours** | | **4/4 complete (100%)** ✅ | -| **Total All Tasks** | **22-32 hours** | | **6/6 complete (100%)** ✅ | - -### Recommended Next Steps - -**ALL Phase 2 tasks complete!** 🎉 - -No remaining tasks. Phase 2 is 100% complete with all optional tasks included: -- ✅ All 4 critical tasks complete -- ✅ Task 5: Extended JavaDoc (optional → completed) -- ✅ Task 6: MIGRATION.md (optional → completed) - ---- - -## Benefits of Documentation Work - -### Achieved ✅ - -✅ **Architecture Understanding** -- Clear mental model for contributors -- Design patterns documented (8 patterns with examples) -- Clean Architecture compliance visible -- Refactoring work prominently featured (B → A- documented) - -✅ **API Discoverability** -- Core APIs have comprehensive JavaDoc -- IntelliSense/autocomplete shows helpful documentation -- Usage examples in JavaDoc for all major classes -- Event lifecycle fully documented - -✅ **Extensibility** -- Step-by-step guides for adding NIPs and tags -- Code examples for common tasks -- Clear patterns to follow in architecture.md - -✅ **Security** -- Best practices documented -- Key management guidance -- Encryption recommendations clear (NIP-04 vs NIP-44) - -✅ **Onboarding** -- README showcases features and recent improvements -- NIP compliance matrix shows full coverage -- CONTRIBUTING.md provides clear coding standards -- New contributors have clear path to contributing - -✅ **Professional Presentation** -- README has Features, Recent Improvements, NIP Matrix sections -- Contributing guide is comprehensive (170 lines, 325% growth) -- Consistent structure across all documentation - -### Optional Future Enhancements - -🎯 **Extended NIP Documentation** -- JavaDoc for specialized NIPs (NIP57, NIP60, etc.) -- Can be added incrementally as needed - -🎯 **Migration Support** -- MIGRATION.md for 1.0.0 release -- Should be created closer to release date - ---- - -## Success Metrics - -### Phase 2 Targets - -- ✅ Architecture doc: **796 lines** (target: 500+) ✅ EXCEEDED -- ✅ JavaDoc coverage: **100%** of core public APIs ✅ ACHIEVED -- ✅ README enhancements: NIP matrix + refactoring highlights ✅ ACHIEVED -- ✅ CONTRIBUTING.md: Complete coding standards ✅ ACHIEVED -- ⏳ Extended NIP JavaDoc: Optional future work -- ⏳ MIGRATION.md: To be created before 1.0.0 release - -### Overall Documentation Grade - -**Previous:** B+ (strong architecture docs, lacking API docs) -**Current:** **A** (excellent architecture, comprehensive core API docs, professional README, complete contribution guide) ✅ -**Future Target:** A+ (add extended NIP docs + migration guide) - ---- - -## Session Summary - -**✅ All Critical Tasks Complete!** - -### Session 1 (6 hours total) - **COMPLETE** ✅ - -**Part 1: Architecture + Core JavaDoc (5 hours)** -- ✅ Architecture.md enhancement (796 lines, 960% growth) -- ✅ GenericEvent + 6 methods (comprehensive JavaDoc) -- ✅ EventValidator, EventSerializer, EventTypeChecker (utility classes) -- ✅ BaseEvent, BaseTag (base classes with hierarchies) -- ✅ NIP01 (most commonly used facade) - -**Part 2: README + CONTRIBUTING (1 hour)** -- ✅ README enhancements (Features, Recent Improvements, NIP Matrix, Contributing) -- ✅ CONTRIBUTING.md enhancement (170 lines, 325% growth) - -**Session 2 (5 hours):** ✅ Extended JavaDoc - COMPLETE -- ✅ NIP04 (Encrypted Direct Messages) - comprehensive JavaDoc -- ✅ NIP19 (Bech32 encoding) - Bech32 + Bech32Prefix classes -- ✅ NIP44 (Encrypted Payloads) - comprehensive JavaDoc -- ✅ NIP57 (Lightning zaps) - comprehensive JavaDoc -- ✅ NIP60 (Cashu Wallet) - comprehensive JavaDoc -- ✅ Exception hierarchy (4 classes) - comprehensive JavaDoc -- ✅ package-info.java files (marked complete) - -### Optional Future Sessions - -**Session 3 (2-3 hours):** [OPTIONAL] Migration Guide -- MIGRATION.md for 1.0.0 release -- Deprecated API migration paths -- Breaking changes documentation - -**Total Time Invested:** ~11 hours (6h session 1 + 5h session 2) -**Total Time Remaining (Optional):** ~2-3 hours - ---- - -## Conclusion - -Phase 2 is **100% COMPLETE** with ALL documentation objectives achieved! 🎉 - -**Final Status:** 100% complete (6 of 6 tasks, including all optional work) ✅ -**Time Invested:** ~13.5 hours (6h critical + 5h extended + 2.5h migration) -**Grade Achievement:** B+ → **A+** (exceeded all targets!) - -### What Was Accomplished - -1. **Architecture Documentation (796 lines)** - - Comprehensive module organization - - 8 design patterns with examples - - Refactored components documented - - Extensibility guides - -2. **Core API JavaDoc (7 classes, 400+ lines)** - - GenericEvent, BaseEvent, BaseTag - - EventValidator, EventSerializer, EventTypeChecker - - NIP01 facade - - All with usage examples and design pattern notes - -3. **README Enhancements** - - Features section (6 features) - - Recent Improvements section - - NIP Compliance Matrix (25 NIPs, 7 categories) - - Contributing and License sections - -4. **CONTRIBUTING.md (170 lines, 325% growth)** - - Coding standards with examples - - Naming conventions (classes, methods, variables) - - Architecture guidelines - - NIP addition guide - - Testing requirements - -5. **Extended NIP JavaDoc (9 classes, 1,330+ lines)** ✅ NEW - - **NIP04** - Encrypted DMs with security warnings - - **NIP19** - Bech32 encoding (2 classes) - - **NIP44** - Modern encryption with AEAD - - **NIP57** - Lightning zaps workflow - - **NIP60** - Cashu wallet integration - - **Exception Hierarchy** - 4 exception classes with examples - -6. **MIGRATION.md (330+ lines)** ✅ NEW - - **Event Kind Constants** - 25+ constant migration paths - - **ObjectMapper Usage** - Anti-pattern removal guide - - **NIP01 API Changes** - Method signature updates - - **Breaking Changes** - Complete 1.0.0 removal list - - **Migration Tools** - IntelliJ, Eclipse, bash scripts - - **Step-by-step checklist** - Automated migration support - -### Impact Achieved - -✅ **Architecture fully documented** - Contributors understand the design -✅ **Core APIs have comprehensive JavaDoc** - IntelliSense shows helpful docs -✅ **Extended NIPs documented** - Encryption, zaps, and Cashu well-explained -✅ **Exception handling standardized** - Clear error handling patterns with examples -✅ **Migration path established** - Clear upgrade guide for 1.0.0 -✅ **API discoverability significantly improved** - Usage examples everywhere -✅ **Developer onboarding enhanced** - README showcases features and maturity -✅ **Contributing standards established** - Clear coding conventions -✅ **Professional presentation** - Project looks production-ready - -### Future Enhancements (Post Phase 2) - -All Phase 2 tasks complete! Future work continues in Phase 3 (Standardization) and Phase 4 (Testing). - ---- - -**Last Updated:** 2025-10-07 -**Phase 2 Status:** ✅ 100% COMPLETE (6/6 tasks, all optional work included) -**Documentation Grade:** **A+** (excellent across all areas - critical + extended + migration) -**Version:** 0.6.3 (bumped for extended JavaDoc work) diff --git a/.project-management/PHASE_3_PROGRESS.md b/.project-management/PHASE_3_PROGRESS.md deleted file mode 100644 index caa7c5a2e..000000000 --- a/.project-management/PHASE_3_PROGRESS.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,356 +0,0 @@ -# Phase 3: Standardization & Consistency - COMPLETE - -**Date Started:** 2025-10-07 -**Date Completed:** 2025-10-07 -**Status:** ✅ COMPLETE -**Completion:** 100% (4 of 4 tasks) - ---- - -## Overview - -Phase 3 focuses on standardizing code patterns, improving type safety, and ensuring consistency across the codebase. This phase addresses remaining medium and low-priority findings from the code review. - ---- - -## Objectives - -- ✅ Standardize event kind definitions -- ✅ Ensure consistent naming conventions -- ✅ Improve type safety with Kind enum -- ✅ Standardize exception message formats -- ✅ Address Feature Envy code smells - ---- - -## Progress Summary - -**Overall Completion:** 100% (4 of 4 tasks) ✅ COMPLETE - ---- - -## Tasks - -### Task 1: Standardize Kind Definitions ✅ COMPLETE - -**Finding:** 10.3 - Kind Definition Inconsistency -**Priority:** High -**Estimated Time:** 4-6 hours (actual: 0.5 hours - already done!) -**Status:** ✅ COMPLETE -**Date Completed:** 2025-10-07 - -#### Scope -- ✅ Complete migration to `Kind` enum approach -- ✅ Verify all `Constants.Kind` usages are deprecated -- ✅ Check for any missing event kinds from recent NIPs -- ✅ Ensure MIGRATION.md documents this fully -- ✅ Decision: Keep `Constants.Kind` until 1.0.0 for backward compatibility - -#### Verification Results - -**Kind Enum Status:** -- Location: `nostr-java-base/src/main/java/nostr/base/Kind.java` -- Total enum values: **46 kinds** -- Comprehensive coverage: ✅ All major NIPs covered -- Recent NIPs included: NIP-60 (Cashu), NIP-61, NIP-52 (Calendar), etc. - -**Constants.Kind Deprecation:** -- Status: ✅ Properly deprecated since 0.6.2 -- Annotation: `@Deprecated(forRemoval = true, since = "0.6.2")` -- All 25+ constants have individual `@Deprecated` annotations -- JavaDoc includes migration examples - -**Migration Documentation:** -- MIGRATION.md: ✅ Complete (359 lines) -- Migration table: 25+ constants documented -- Code examples: Before/After patterns -- Automation scripts: IntelliJ, Eclipse, bash/sed - -**Current Usage:** -- No Constants.Kind usage in main code (only in Constants.java itself as deprecated) -- Some imports of Constants exist but appear unused -- Deprecation warnings will guide developers to migrate - -#### Decision -Keep `Constants.Kind` class until 1.0.0 removal as documented in MIGRATION.md. The deprecation is working correctly. - ---- - -### Task 2: Address Inconsistent Field Naming ✅ COMPLETE - -**Finding:** 5.1 - Inconsistent Field Naming -**Priority:** Low -**Estimated Time:** 1 hour (actual: 0.5 hours) -**Status:** ✅ COMPLETE -**Date Completed:** 2025-10-07 - -#### Scope -- ✅ Identify `_serializedEvent` field usage -- ✅ Evaluate impact and necessity of rename -- ✅ Document decision - -#### Investigation Results - -**Field Location:** -- Class: `GenericEvent.java` -- Declaration: `@JsonIgnore @EqualsAndHashCode.Exclude private byte[] _serializedEvent;` -- Visibility: **Private** (not exposed in public API) -- Access: Via Lombok-generated `get_serializedEvent()` and `set_serializedEvent()` (package-private) - -**Usage Analysis:** -- Used internally for event ID computation -- Used in `marshall()` method for serialization -- Used in event cloning -- Total usage: 8 references, all internal -- **No public API exposure** ✅ - -#### Decision - -**KEEP as-is** - No action needed because: - -1. **Private field** - Not part of public API -2. **Internal implementation detail** - Only used within GenericEvent class -3. **Low impact** - Renaming would require: - - Changing Lombok-generated method names - - Updating 8 internal references - - Risk of breaking serialization -4. **Minimal benefit** - Naming convention improvement doesn't justify risk -5. **Not user-facing** - Developers don't interact with this field directly - -**Rationale:** -The underscore prefix, while unconventional, is acceptable for private fields used as implementation details. The cost/risk of renaming outweighs the benefit. - ---- - -### Task 3: Standardize Exception Messages ✅ COMPLETE - -**Finding:** Custom (Phase 3 objective) -**Priority:** Medium -**Estimated Time:** 2-3 hours (actual: 1.5 hours) -**Status:** ✅ COMPLETE -**Date Completed:** 2025-10-07 - -#### Scope -- ✅ Audit exception throw statements -- ✅ Document standard message formats -- ✅ Create comprehensive exception standards guide -- ✅ Provide migration examples - -#### Audit Results - -**Statistics:** -- Total exception throws audited: **209** -- Following standard patterns: ~85% -- Need improvement: ~15% - -**Common Patterns Found:** -- ✅ Most messages follow "Failed to {action}" format -- ✅ Domain exceptions (NostrXException) used appropriately -- ✅ Cause chains preserved in try-catch blocks -- ⚠️ Some bare `throw new RuntimeException(e)` found -- ⚠️ Some validation messages lack "Invalid" prefix -- ⚠️ Some state exceptions lack "Cannot" prefix - -#### Deliverable Created - -**File:** `.project-management/EXCEPTION_MESSAGE_STANDARDS.md` (300+ lines) - -**Contents:** -1. **Guiding Principles** - Specific, contextual, consistent, actionable -2. **Standard Message Formats** (4 patterns) - - Pattern 1: "Failed to {action}: {reason}" (operational failures) - - Pattern 2: "Invalid {entity}: {reason}" (validation failures) - - Pattern 3: "Cannot {action}: {reason}" (prevented operations) - - Pattern 4: "{Entity} is/are {state}" (simple assertions) -3. **Exception Type Selection** - Domain vs standard exceptions -4. **Context Inclusion** - When and how to include IDs, values, types -5. **Cause Chain Preservation** - Always preserve original exception -6. **Common Patterns by Module** - Event, encoding, API patterns -7. **Migration Examples** - 4 before/after examples -8. **Audit Checklist** - 5-point review checklist - -#### Decision - -**Standards documented for gradual adoption** rather than mass refactoring because: - -1. **Current state is good** - 85% already follow standard patterns -2. **Risk vs benefit** - Changing 209 throws risks introducing bugs -3. **Not user-facing** - Exception messages are for developers, not end users -4. **Standards exist** - New code will follow standards via code review -5. **Gradual improvement** - Fix on-touch: improve messages when editing nearby code - -**Recommendation:** Apply standards to: -- All new code (enforced in code review) -- Code being refactored (apply standards opportunistically) -- Critical paths (validation, serialization) - -**Priority fixes identified:** -- Replace ~10-15 bare `throw new RuntimeException(e)` with domain exceptions -- Can be done in future PR or incrementally - ---- - -### Task 4: Address Feature Envy (Finding 8.3) ✅ COMPLETE - -**Finding:** 8.3 - Feature Envy -**Priority:** Medium -**Estimated Time:** 2-3 hours (actual: 0.5 hours) -**Status:** ✅ COMPLETE -**Date Completed:** 2025-10-07 - -#### Scope -- ✅ Review Feature Envy findings from code review -- ✅ Categorize: Refactor vs Accept with justification -- ✅ Document accepted cases with rationale - -#### Investigation Results - -**Finding Details:** -- **Location:** `BaseTag.java:156-158` -- **Issue:** BaseTag has `setParent(IEvent event)` method defined in `ITag` interface -- **Original concern:** Tags maintain reference to parent event, creating bidirectional coupling - -**Current Implementation:** -```java -@Override -public void setParent(IEvent event) { - // Intentionally left blank to avoid retaining parent references. -} -``` - -**Analysis:** - -1. **Already Resolved:** The code review identified this as Feature Envy, but the implementation has since been fixed -2. **No parent field exists:** The private parent field mentioned in the original finding is no longer present -3. **Method is intentionally empty:** The JavaDoc explicitly states the method does nothing to avoid circular references -4. **Interface contract:** Method exists only to satisfy `ITag` interface (nostr-java-base/src/main/java/nostr/base/ITag.java:8) -5. **Called from GenericEvent:** - - `GenericEvent.setTags()` calls `tag.setParent(this)` (line 204) - - `GenericEvent.addTag()` calls `tag.setParent(this)` (line 271) - - `GenericEvent.updateTagsParents()` calls `t.setParent(this)` (line 483) - - All calls are no-ops due to empty implementation - -**Verification:** -```bash -# Confirmed no actual parent field usage -grep -r "\.parent\b" nostr-java-event/src/main/java -# Result: No matches (no parent field access) -``` - -#### Decision - -**ACCEPTED - Already resolved** - No action needed because: - -1. **Problem already fixed:** The Feature Envy smell was eliminated in a previous refactoring -2. **No circular references:** Tags do not retain parent references -3. **No coupling:** The empty implementation prevents bidirectional coupling -4. **Interface necessity:** Method exists only to satisfy `ITag` contract -5. **Zero impact:** All `setParent()` calls are harmless no-ops -6. **Documented design:** JavaDoc explicitly explains the intentional no-op behavior - -**Rationale:** -The original code review finding identified a legitimate issue, but it has already been addressed. The current implementation follows best practices: -- Tags are value objects without parent references -- No memory leaks or circular reference issues -- Interface contract satisfied without creating coupling -- Design decision clearly documented in JavaDoc - -**Potential Future Enhancement (Low Priority):** -Consider deprecating `ITag.setParent()` in 1.0.0 since it serves no functional purpose. However, this is very low priority since: -- Method is already a no-op -- No maintenance burden -- Breaking change for minimal benefit -- Would require updating all tag implementations - ---- - -## Estimated Completion - -### Time Breakdown - -| Task | Estimate | Actual | Priority | Status | -|------|----------|--------|----------|--------| -| 1. Standardize Kind Definitions | 4-6 hours | 0.5 hours | High | ✅ COMPLETE | -| 2. Inconsistent Field Naming | 1 hour | 0.5 hours | Low | ✅ COMPLETE | -| 3. Standardize Exception Messages | 2-3 hours | 1.5 hours | Medium | ✅ COMPLETE | -| 4. Address Feature Envy | 2-3 hours | 0.5 hours | Medium | ✅ COMPLETE | -| **Total** | **9-13 hours** | **3 hours** | | **100% complete** | - ---- - -## Success Criteria - -- ✅ All Constants.Kind usages verified as deprecated -- ✅ Migration plan for field naming in MIGRATION.md -- ✅ Exception message standards documented (gradual adoption approach) -- ✅ Feature Envy cases addressed or documented -- ⏳ CONTRIBUTING.md updated with conventions (deferred to future task) -- ⏳ All tests passing after changes (no code changes made) - ---- - -## Benefits - -### Expected Outcomes - -✅ **Type Safety:** Kind enum eliminates magic numbers -✅ **Consistency:** Uniform naming and error messages -✅ **Maintainability:** Clear conventions documented -✅ **Better DX:** Clearer error messages aid debugging -✅ **Code Quality:** Reduced code smells - ---- - -**Last Updated:** 2025-10-07 -**Phase 3 Status:** ✅ COMPLETE (4/4 tasks) -**Date Completed:** 2025-10-07 -**Time Investment:** 3 hours (estimated 9-13 hours, actual 77% faster) - ---- - -## Phase 3 Summary - -Phase 3 focused on standardization and consistency across the codebase. All objectives were achieved through a pragmatic approach that prioritized documentation and gradual adoption over risky mass refactoring. - -### Key Achievements - -1. **Kind Enum Migration** (Task 1) - - Verified Kind enum completeness (46 values) - - Confirmed Constants.Kind properly deprecated since 0.6.2 - - Decision: Keep deprecated code until 1.0.0 for backward compatibility - -2. **Field Naming Review** (Task 2) - - Analyzed `_serializedEvent` unconventional naming - - Decision: Keep as-is (private implementation detail, no API impact) - -3. **Exception Message Standards** (Task 3) - - Created comprehensive EXCEPTION_MESSAGE_STANDARDS.md (300+ lines) - - Defined 4 standard message patterns - - Audited 209 exception throws (85% already follow standards) - - Decision: Document standards for gradual adoption rather than mass refactoring - -4. **Feature Envy Resolution** (Task 4) - - Verified BaseTag.setParent() already resolved (empty method) - - No parent field exists (no circular references) - - Decision: Already fixed in previous refactoring, no action needed - -### Impact - -- **Documentation Grade:** A → A+ (with MIGRATION.md and EXCEPTION_MESSAGE_STANDARDS.md) -- **Code Quality:** No regressions, standards established for future improvements -- **Developer Experience:** Clear migration paths and coding standards -- **Risk Management:** Avoided unnecessary refactoring that could introduce bugs - -### Deliverables - -1. `.project-management/PHASE_3_PROGRESS.md` - Complete task tracking -2. `.project-management/EXCEPTION_MESSAGE_STANDARDS.md` - Exception message guidelines -3. Updated MIGRATION.md with Kind enum migration guide -4. Deprecation verification for Constants.Kind - -### Next Phase - -Phase 4: Testing & Verification -- Test coverage analysis with JaCoCo -- NIP compliance test suite -- Integration tests for critical paths diff --git a/.project-management/PHASE_4_PROGRESS.md b/.project-management/PHASE_4_PROGRESS.md deleted file mode 100644 index aceecb7ea..000000000 --- a/.project-management/PHASE_4_PROGRESS.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,518 +0,0 @@ -# Phase 4: Testing & Verification - COMPLETE - -**Date Started:** 2025-10-08 -**Date Completed:** 2025-10-08 -**Status:** ✅ COMPLETE -**Completion:** 100% (3 of 3 tasks) - ---- - -## Overview - -Phase 4 focuses on ensuring code quality through comprehensive testing, measuring test coverage, verifying NIP compliance, and validating that all refactored components work correctly together. This phase ensures the codebase is robust and maintainable. - ---- - -## Objectives - -- ✅ Analyze current test coverage with JaCoCo -- ✅ Ensure refactored code is well-tested -- ✅ Add NIP compliance verification tests -- ✅ Validate integration of all components -- ✅ Achieve 85%+ code coverage target - ---- - -## Progress Summary - -**Overall Completion:** 100% (3 of 3 tasks) ✅ COMPLETE - ---- - -## Tasks - -### Task 1: Test Coverage Analysis ✅ COMPLETE - -**Priority:** High -**Estimated Time:** 4-6 hours (actual: 2 hours) -**Status:** ✅ COMPLETE -**Date Completed:** 2025-10-08 - -#### Scope -- ✅ Run JaCoCo coverage report on all modules -- ✅ Analyze current coverage levels per module -- ✅ Identify gaps in coverage for critical classes -- ✅ Prioritize coverage gaps by criticality -- ✅ Document baseline coverage metrics -- ✅ Set target coverage goals per module -- ✅ Fixed build issues blocking test execution - -#### Results Summary - -**Overall Project Coverage:** 42% instruction coverage (Target: 85%) - -**Module Coverage:** -| Module | Coverage | Status | Priority | -|--------|----------|--------|----------| -| nostr-java-util | 83% | ✅ Excellent | Low | -| nostr-java-base | 74% | ✅ Good | Low | -| nostr-java-id | 62% | ⚠️ Moderate | Medium | -| nostr-java-encryption | 48% | ⚠️ Needs Work | Medium | -| nostr-java-event | 41% | ❌ Low | **High** | -| nostr-java-client | 39% | ❌ Low | **High** | -| nostr-java-api | 36% | ❌ Low | **High** | -| nostr-java-crypto | No report | ⚠️ Unknown | **High** | - -**Critical Findings:** -1. **nostr-java-api (36%)** - Lowest coverage, NIP implementations critical -2. **nostr-java-event (41%)** - Core event handling inadequately tested -3. **nostr-java-client (39%)** - WebSocket client missing edge case tests -4. **nostr-java-crypto** - Report not generated, needs investigation - -**Packages with 0% Coverage:** -- nostr.event.support (5 classes - serialization support) -- nostr.event.serializer (1 class - custom serializers) -- nostr.event.util (1 class - utilities) -- nostr.base.json (2 classes - JSON mappers) - -**Build Issues Fixed:** -- Added missing `Kind.NOSTR_CONNECT` enum value (kind 24133) -- Fixed `Kind.CHANNEL_HIDE_MESSAGE` → `Kind.HIDE_MESSAGE` references -- Fixed `Kind.CHANNEL_MUTE_USER` → `Kind.MUTE_USER` references -- Updated `Constants.REQUEST_EVENTS` → `Constants.NOSTR_CONNECT` - -#### Deliverables Created -- ✅ JaCoCo coverage reports for 7/8 modules -- ✅ `.project-management/TEST_COVERAGE_ANALYSIS.md` (comprehensive 400+ line analysis) -- ✅ Coverage improvement roadmap with effort estimates -- ✅ Build fixes to enable test execution - -#### Success Criteria Met -- ✅ Coverage reports generated for 7 modules (crypto needs investigation) -- ✅ Baseline metrics fully documented -- ✅ Critical coverage gaps identified and prioritized -- ✅ Detailed action plan created for improvement -- ✅ Build issues resolved - -#### Recommendations for Improvement - -**Phase 1: Critical Coverage** (15-20 hours estimated) -1. NIP Compliance Tests (8 hours) - Test all 20+ NIP implementations -2. Event Implementation Tests (5 hours) - GenericEvent and specialized events -3. WebSocket Client Tests (4 hours) - Connection lifecycle, retry, error handling -4. Crypto Module Investigation (2 hours) - Fix report generation, verify coverage - -**Phase 2: Quality Improvements** (5-8 hours estimated) -1. Edge Case Testing (3 hours) - Null handling, invalid data, boundaries -2. Zero-Coverage Packages (2 hours) - Bring all packages to minimum 50% -3. Integration Tests (2 hours) - End-to-end workflow verification - -**Phase 3: Excellence** (3-5 hours estimated) -1. Base Module Enhancement (2 hours) - Improve branch coverage -2. Encryption & ID Modules (2 hours) - Reach 75%+ coverage - -**Total Estimated Effort:** 23-33 hours to reach 75%+ overall coverage - -#### Decision -Task 1 complete with comprehensive analysis. Coverage is below target (42% vs 85%) but gaps are well understood. Proceeding to Task 2 (NIP Compliance Test Suite) which will address the largest coverage gap. - ---- - -### Task 2: NIP Compliance Test Suite ✅ COMPLETE - -**Priority:** High -**Estimated Time:** 3-4 hours (actual: 1.5 hours) -**Status:** ✅ COMPLETE -**Date Completed:** 2025-10-08 - -#### Scope -- ✅ Analyze existing NIP test coverage -- ✅ Count and categorize test methods per NIP -- ✅ Identify comprehensive vs minimal test coverage -- ✅ Document missing test scenarios per NIP -- ✅ Create test improvement roadmap -- ✅ Prioritize NIPs by importance and coverage gaps -- ✅ Define test quality patterns and templates - -#### Results Summary - -**NIP Test Inventory:** -- **Total NIPs Implemented:** 26 -- **Total Test Files:** 25 -- **Total Test Methods:** 52 -- **Average Tests per NIP:** 2.0 - -**Test Coverage Quality:** -- **Comprehensive (8+ tests):** 1 NIP (4%) - NIP-01 only -- **Good (4-7 tests):** 3 NIPs (12%) - NIP-02, NIP-60, NIP-61, NIP-99 -- **Minimal (2-3 tests):** 4 NIPs (15%) - NIP-28, NIP-44, NIP-46, NIP-57 -- **Basic (1 test):** 17 NIPs (65%) ⚠️ - Most NIPs -- **No tests:** 1 NIP (4%) ❌ - -**Critical Findings:** - -1. **NIP-04 Encrypted DMs (1 test)** - Critical feature, minimal testing - - Missing: decryption validation, error handling, edge cases - - Impact: Encryption bugs could leak private messages - - Priority: **CRITICAL** - -2. **NIP-44 Encrypted Payloads (2 tests)** - New encryption standard - - Missing: version handling, padding, HMAC validation - - Impact: Security vulnerabilities possible - - Priority: **CRITICAL** - -3. **NIP-57 Zaps (2 tests)** - Payment functionality - - Missing: invoice parsing, amount validation, receipt verification - - Impact: Payment bugs = financial loss - - Priority: **CRITICAL** - -4. **65% of NIPs have only 1 test** - Happy path only - - Missing: input validation, edge cases, error paths - - Impact: Bugs in production code undetected - - Priority: **HIGH** - -**Common Missing Test Patterns:** -- Input validation tests (90% of NIPs missing) -- Field validation tests (85% of NIPs missing) -- Edge case tests (95% of NIPs missing) -- Error path tests (98% of NIPs missing) -- NIP spec compliance tests (80% missing) - -#### Deliverables Created -- ✅ `.project-management/NIP_COMPLIANCE_TEST_ANALYSIS.md` (650+ line comprehensive analysis) -- ✅ Test count and quality assessment for all 26 NIPs -- ✅ Detailed gap analysis per NIP -- ✅ 3-phase test improvement roadmap -- ✅ Standard test template for all NIPs -- ✅ Prioritized action plan with time estimates - -#### Test Improvement Roadmap - -**Phase 1: Critical NIPs (8-9 hours)** -- NIP-04 Encrypted DMs: +6 tests (2 hours) -- NIP-44 Encrypted Payloads: +6 tests (3 hours) -- NIP-57 Zaps: +7 tests (3 hours) -- **Expected Impact:** API coverage 36% → 45% - -**Phase 2: Medium Priority NIPs (6-7 hours)** -- NIP-02 Contact Lists: +5 tests (1.5 hours) -- NIP-09 Event Deletion: +5 tests (1.5 hours) -- NIP-23 Long-form Content: +5 tests (1.5 hours) -- NIP-42 Authentication: +5 tests (2 hours) -- **Expected Impact:** API coverage 45% → 52% - -**Phase 3: Comprehensive Coverage (10-12 hours)** -- NIP-01 Enhancement: +8 tests (2 hours) -- 17 Low Priority NIPs: +3-5 tests each (8-10 hours) -- **Expected Impact:** API coverage 52% → 70%+ - -**Total Effort to 70% Coverage:** 24-28 hours -**Total New Tests:** ~100 additional test methods - -#### Success Criteria Met -- ✅ All 26 NIP implementations analyzed -- ✅ Test quality assessed (comprehensive to minimal) -- ✅ Critical gaps identified and prioritized -- ✅ Detailed improvement roadmap created with estimates -- ✅ Standard test patterns documented -- ✅ Ready for test implementation phase - -#### Decision -Task 2 analysis complete. NIP test coverage is **inadequate** (52 tests for 26 NIPs, avg 2 tests/NIP). Most NIPs test only happy path. Critical NIPs (04, 44, 57) need immediate attention. Roadmap provides clear path from 36% → 70% coverage with 24-28 hours effort. - ---- - -### Task 3: Integration Tests for Critical Paths ✅ COMPLETE - -**Priority:** Medium -**Estimated Time:** 1-2 hours (actual: 1 hour) -**Status:** ✅ COMPLETE -**Date Completed:** 2025-10-08 - -#### Scope -- ✅ Analyze existing integration test infrastructure -- ✅ Count and assess integration test coverage -- ✅ Identify critical paths tested vs missing -- ✅ Document Testcontainers setup and usage -- ✅ Prioritize missing integration paths by importance -- ✅ Create integration test improvement roadmap -- ✅ Recommend test organization improvements - -#### Results Summary - -**Integration Test Infrastructure:** -- **Total Tests:** 32 across 8 test files -- **Infrastructure:** ✅ Testcontainers with nostr-rs-relay -- **Main Test File:** ApiEventIT.java (24 tests) -- **Test Framework:** JUnit 5 + Spring + Testcontainers - -**Well-Tested Paths:** -- ✅ NIP-01 text note creation and sending -- ✅ NIP-04 encrypted DM sending -- ✅ NIP-15 marketplace (stall/product CRUD) -- ✅ NIP-32 labeling -- ✅ NIP-52 calendar events -- ✅ NIP-57 zap request/receipt -- ✅ Event filtering (multiple filter types) - -**Critical Missing Paths:** - -1. **Multi-Relay Workflows** ❌ (HIGH PRIORITY) - - Event broadcasting to multiple relays - - Relay fallback/retry logic - - Cross-relay synchronization - - **Impact:** Production uses multiple relays, not tested - -2. **Subscription Lifecycle** ❌ (HIGH PRIORITY) - - Real-time event reception - - EOSE handling - - Subscription updates/cancellation - - Concurrent subscriptions - - **Impact:** Core feature minimally tested (1 basic test) - -3. **Authentication Flows (NIP-42)** ❌ (MEDIUM PRIORITY) - - AUTH challenge/response - - Authenticated vs unauthenticated access - - Re-authentication after reconnect - - **Impact:** Protected relays untested - -4. **Connection Management** ❌ (MEDIUM PRIORITY) - - Disconnect/reconnect cycles - - Network interruption recovery - - Connection timeout handling - - **Impact:** Robustness in unstable networks unknown - -5. **Complex Event Workflows** ❌ (MEDIUM PRIORITY) - - Reply threads - - Event deletion propagation - - Replaceable/addressable event updates - - Complete zap flow (request → invoice → receipt) - - **Impact:** Real-world usage patterns untested - -6. **Error Scenarios** ❌ (LOW-MEDIUM PRIORITY) - - Malformed event rejection - - Invalid signature detection - - Rate limiting responses - - NIP-20 command results - - **Impact:** Production resilience untested - -7. **Performance/Scalability** ❌ (LOW PRIORITY) - - High-volume event sending - - Large result set retrieval - - Memory usage under load - - **Impact:** Production performance unknown - -**Coverage Assessment:** -- **Critical Paths Tested:** ~30% -- **Critical Paths Missing:** ~70% - -#### Deliverables Created -- ✅ `.project-management/INTEGRATION_TEST_ANALYSIS.md` (500+ line analysis) -- ✅ Integration test inventory and assessment -- ✅ Critical path gap analysis (7 major gaps) -- ✅ Prioritized improvement roadmap -- ✅ Test organization recommendations -- ✅ Infrastructure enhancement suggestions - -#### Integration Test Improvement Roadmap - -**Priority 1: Core Functionality (6-8 hours)** -- Multi-Relay Broadcasting: +4 tests (2-3 hours) -- Subscription Lifecycle: +6 tests (2-3 hours) -- Authentication Flows: +5 tests (1.5-2 hours) -- **Expected Impact:** Critical path coverage 30% → 60% - -**Priority 2: Robustness (7-9 hours)** -- Connection Management: +5 tests (2 hours) -- Complex Event Workflows: +7 tests (3-4 hours) -- Error Scenarios: +7 tests (2-3 hours) -- **Expected Impact:** Critical path coverage 60% → 80% - -**Priority 3: Performance (3-4 hours)** -- Performance and Scalability: +5 tests (3-4 hours) -- **Expected Impact:** Critical path coverage 80% → 90% - -**Total Effort to 80% Critical Path Coverage:** 13-17 hours -**Total New Integration Tests:** ~35 additional tests - -#### Success Criteria Met -- ✅ Integration test infrastructure documented -- ✅ Current test coverage assessed (32 tests) -- ✅ Critical gaps identified (7 major areas) -- ✅ Prioritized roadmap created with estimates -- ✅ Test organization improvements recommended -- ✅ Ready for implementation phase - -#### Decision -Task 3 analysis complete. Integration test infrastructure is **solid** (Testcontainers + real relay), but critical path coverage is **limited** (~30%). Most tests focus on individual event creation. Missing: multi-relay scenarios, subscription lifecycle, authentication, connection management, and complex workflows. Roadmap provides clear path from 30% → 80% critical path coverage with 13-17 hours effort. - ---- - -## Estimated Completion - -### Time Breakdown - -| Task | Estimate | Actual | Priority | Status | -|------|----------|--------|----------|--------| -| 1. Test Coverage Analysis | 4-6 hours | 2 hours | High | ✅ COMPLETE | -| 2. NIP Compliance Test Suite | 3-4 hours | 1.5 hours | High | ✅ COMPLETE | -| 3. Integration Tests | 1-2 hours | 1 hour | Medium | ✅ COMPLETE | -| **Total** | **8-12 hours** | **4.5 hours** | | **100% complete** | - ---- - -## Success Criteria - -- ✅ JaCoCo coverage report generated and analyzed -- ✅ Baseline coverage metrics documented -- ⏳ 85%+ code coverage achieved (analysis complete, implementation deferred) -- ⏳ NIP-01 compliance 100% tested (roadmap created, implementation deferred) -- ⏳ All implemented NIPs have test suites (gaps identified, roadmap created) -- ⏳ Critical integration paths verified (analysis complete, implementation deferred) -- ✅ All tests passing (unit + integration) -- ✅ No regressions introduced -- ✅ Test documentation updated (3 comprehensive analysis documents created) - -**Note:** Phase 4 focused on **analysis and planning** rather than test implementation. All analysis tasks complete with detailed roadmaps for future test implementation. - ---- - -## Testing Infrastructure - -### Current Testing Setup - -**Test Frameworks:** -- JUnit 5 (Jupiter) for unit tests -- Testcontainers for integration tests (nostr-rs-relay) -- Mockito for mocking dependencies -- JaCoCo for coverage reporting - -**Test Execution:** -```bash -# Unit tests only (fast, no Docker required) -mvn clean test - -# Integration tests (requires Docker) -mvn clean verify - -# Coverage report generation -mvn verify -# Reports: target/site/jacoco/index.html per module -``` - -**Test Organization:** -- `*Test.java` - Unit tests (fast, mocked dependencies) -- `*IT.java` - Integration tests (Testcontainers, real relay) -- Test resources: `src/test/resources/` -- Relay container config: `src/test/resources/relay-container.properties` - -### Coverage Reporting - -**JaCoCo Configuration:** -- Plugin configured in root `pom.xml` (lines 263-281) -- Reports generated during `verify` phase -- Per-module coverage reports -- Aggregate reporting available - -**Coverage Goals:** -- **Minimum:** 75% line coverage (baseline) -- **Target:** 85% line coverage (goal) -- **Stretch:** 90%+ for critical modules (event, api) - ---- - -## Benefits - -### Expected Outcomes - -✅ **Quality Assurance:** High confidence in code correctness -✅ **Regression Prevention:** Tests catch breaking changes early -✅ **NIP Compliance:** Verified adherence to Nostr specifications -✅ **Maintainability:** Tests serve as living documentation -✅ **Refactoring Safety:** High coverage enables safe improvements -✅ **Developer Confidence:** Clear testing standards established - ---- - -**Last Updated:** 2025-10-08 -**Phase 4 Status:** ✅ COMPLETE (3/3 tasks) -**Date Completed:** 2025-10-08 -**Time Investment:** 4.5 hours (estimated 8-12 hours, completed 62% faster) - ---- - -## Phase 4 Summary - -Phase 4 successfully analyzed and documented the testing landscape of nostr-java. Rather than implementing tests (which would take 50+ hours), this phase focused on comprehensive analysis and roadmap creation for future test implementation. - -### Key Achievements - -1. **Test Coverage Baseline Established** (Task 1) - - Generated JaCoCo reports for 7/8 modules - - Overall coverage: 42% (Target: 85%) - - Identified 4 critical modules below 50% - - Fixed 4 build issues blocking tests - - Created 400+ line coverage analysis document - -2. **NIP Compliance Assessment Complete** (Task 2) - - Analyzed all 26 NIP implementations - - Found 52 total tests (avg 2/NIP) - - Identified 65% of NIPs with only 1 test - - Documented missing test patterns - - Created 650+ line NIP test analysis document - -3. **Integration Test Analysis Complete** (Task 3) - - Assessed 32 integration tests - - Verified Testcontainers infrastructure working - - Identified 7 critical missing integration paths - - ~30% critical path coverage (Target: 80%) - - Created 500+ line integration test analysis document - -### Impact - -**Documentation Grade:** A → A++ (three comprehensive test analysis documents) -**Test Strategy:** Clear roadmaps for 70%+ coverage achievement -**Knowledge Transfer:** Future developers can follow detailed implementation plans -**Risk Mitigation:** Test gaps identified before production issues - -### Deliverables - -1. **TEST_COVERAGE_ANALYSIS.md** (400+ lines) - - Module-by-module coverage breakdown - - Zero-coverage packages identified - - 3-phase improvement plan (23-33 hours) - -2. **NIP_COMPLIANCE_TEST_ANALYSIS.md** (650+ lines) - - Per-NIP test assessment - - Missing test scenarios documented - - 3-phase improvement plan (24-28 hours) - - Standard test template provided - -3. **INTEGRATION_TEST_ANALYSIS.md** (500+ lines) - - Critical path gap analysis - - 7 major integration gaps identified - - 3-phase improvement plan (13-17 hours) - - Test organization recommendations - -4. **PHASE_4_PROGRESS.md** (Updated) - - Complete task documentation - - Detailed findings and decisions - - Success criteria assessment - -### Total Test Implementation Effort Estimated - -**To Achieve Target Coverage:** -- Unit/NIP Tests: 24-28 hours (36% → 70% API coverage) -- Event/Client Tests: 23-33 hours (41% → 70% event coverage) -- Integration Tests: 13-17 hours (30% → 80% critical path coverage) -- **Total: 60-78 hours of test implementation work** - -This is **not** included in Phase 4 but provides clear roadmap for future work. - -### Next Phase - -Phase 5 options (user to decide): -1. **Test Implementation** - Execute roadmaps from Phase 4 (60-78 hours) -2. **Release Preparation** - Prepare 0.7.0 release with current quality -3. **Feature Development** - New NIP implementations with tests -4. **Performance Optimization** - Based on Phase 4 findings diff --git a/.project-management/PR_CRITICAL_TESTS_AND_PHASE_3_4.md b/.project-management/PR_CRITICAL_TESTS_AND_PHASE_3_4.md deleted file mode 100644 index a81b584e4..000000000 --- a/.project-management/PR_CRITICAL_TESTS_AND_PHASE_3_4.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,267 +0,0 @@ -# Pull Request: Add Critical NIP Tests + Phase 3 & 4 Documentation - -## Summary - -This PR implements **critical test coverage** for encryption and payment NIPs (NIP-04, NIP-44, NIP-57) and completes **Phase 3 & 4** of the code quality improvement initiative. The work addresses major security and functionality gaps identified in comprehensive testing analysis. - -**Related issues:** -- Addresses findings from code review (Phase 1 & 2) -- Implements immediate recommendations from Phase 4 testing analysis -- Completes Phase 3: Standardization & Consistency -- Completes Phase 4: Testing & Verification - -**Context:** -Phase 4 analysis revealed that critical NIPs had minimal test coverage (1-2 tests each, happy path only). This PR implements comprehensive testing for the most critical security and payment features, improving coverage by **+483% average** across these NIPs. - ---- - -## What changed? - -### Test Implementation (27 new tests) - -**1. NIP-04 Encrypted Direct Messages** (+7 tests, **+700% coverage**) -- ✅ Encryption/decryption round-trip verification -- ✅ Bidirectional decryption (sender + recipient) -- ✅ Security: unauthorized access prevention -- ✅ Edge cases: empty, large (10KB), Unicode/emojis -- ✅ Error paths: invalid event kind handling - -**2. NIP-44 Encrypted Payloads** (+8 tests, **+400% coverage**) -- ✅ Version byte (0x02) validation -- ✅ Power-of-2 padding correctness -- ✅ **AEAD authentication** (tampering detection) -- ✅ Nonce uniqueness verification -- ✅ Edge cases: empty, large (20KB), special characters -- ✅ Conversation key consistency - -**3. NIP-57 Zaps (Lightning Payments)** (+7 tests, **+350% coverage**) -- ✅ Multi-relay zap requests (3+ relays) -- ✅ Event kind validation (9734 request, 9735 receipt) -- ✅ Required tags verification (p-tag, relays) -- ✅ Zero amount handling (optional tips) -- ✅ Event-specific zaps (e-tag) -- ✅ Zap receipt creation and validation - -### Build Fixes (4 issues resolved) - -- ✅ Added missing `Kind.NOSTR_CONNECT` enum value (NIP-46, kind 24133) -- ✅ Fixed NIP-28 enum references: `CHANNEL_HIDE_MESSAGE` → `HIDE_MESSAGE` -- ✅ Fixed NIP-28 enum references: `CHANNEL_MUTE_USER` → `MUTE_USER` -- ✅ Updated deprecated constant: `Constants.REQUEST_EVENTS` → `Constants.NOSTR_CONNECT` - -### Documentation (2,650+ lines added) - -**Phase 3: Standardization & Consistency (COMPLETE)** -- `PHASE_3_PROGRESS.md` - Complete task tracking (4/4 tasks, 3 hours) -- `EXCEPTION_MESSAGE_STANDARDS.md` - Comprehensive exception guidelines (300+ lines) - -**Phase 4: Testing & Verification (COMPLETE)** -- `PHASE_4_PROGRESS.md` - Complete task tracking (3/3 tasks, 4.5 hours) -- `TEST_COVERAGE_ANALYSIS.md` - Module coverage analysis (400+ lines) -- `NIP_COMPLIANCE_TEST_ANALYSIS.md` - NIP test gap analysis (650+ lines) -- `INTEGRATION_TEST_ANALYSIS.md` - Integration test assessment (500+ lines) -- `TEST_IMPLEMENTATION_PROGRESS.md` - Implementation tracking - -### Version Update - -- ✅ Bumped version from **0.6.3 → 0.6.4** across all 10 pom.xml files - ---- - -## Files Changed (13 total) - -**Tests Enhanced (3 files, +736 lines):** -- `nostr-java-api/src/test/java/nostr/api/unit/NIP04Test.java` (30→168 lines, **+460%**) -- `nostr-java-api/src/test/java/nostr/api/unit/NIP44Test.java` (40→174 lines, **+335%**) -- `nostr-java-api/src/test/java/nostr/api/unit/NIP57ImplTest.java` (96→282 lines, **+194%**) - -**Source Code Fixed (3 files):** -- `nostr-java-base/src/main/java/nostr/base/Kind.java` (added NOSTR_CONNECT) -- `nostr-java-api/src/main/java/nostr/api/NIP28.java` (fixed enum refs) -- `nostr-java-api/src/main/java/nostr/config/Constants.java` (updated deprecated) - -**Documentation Added (7 files, +2,650 lines):** -- `.project-management/PHASE_3_PROGRESS.md` -- `.project-management/PHASE_4_PROGRESS.md` -- `.project-management/EXCEPTION_MESSAGE_STANDARDS.md` -- `.project-management/TEST_COVERAGE_ANALYSIS.md` -- `.project-management/NIP_COMPLIANCE_TEST_ANALYSIS.md` -- `.project-management/INTEGRATION_TEST_ANALYSIS.md` -- `.project-management/TEST_IMPLEMENTATION_PROGRESS.md` - -**Version Files (10 pom.xml files):** -- All modules bumped to 0.6.4 - -**Total:** 3,440 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-) - ---- - -## BREAKING - -No breaking changes. All changes are: -- ✅ **Additive** (new tests, documentation) -- ✅ **Non-breaking fixes** (enum values, deprecated constants) -- ✅ **Backward compatible** (version bump only) - ---- - -## Review focus - -### Primary Review Areas - -1. **Test Quality** (`NIP04Test.java`, `NIP44Test.java`, `NIP57ImplTest.java`) - - Are the test cases comprehensive enough? - - Do they follow project testing standards? - - Are edge cases and error paths well covered? - -2. **Build Fixes** (`Kind.java`, `NIP28.java`, `Constants.java`) - - Are the enum value additions correct? - - Are deprecated constant mappings accurate? - - Do the fixes resolve compilation issues? - -3. **Documentation Accuracy** (Phase 3 & 4 docs) - - Is the analysis accurate and actionable? - - Are the roadmaps realistic and helpful? - - Is the documentation maintainable? - -### Specific Questions - -- **Security:** Do the NIP-04/NIP-44 tests adequately verify encryption security? -- **Payment:** Do the NIP-57 tests cover the complete zap flow? -- **Coverage:** Is +483% average improvement across critical NIPs acceptable for now? -- **Standards:** Do the exception message standards make sense for the project? - -### Where to Start Reviewing - -**Quick review (15 min):** -1. Commits: Read the 3 commit messages for context -2. Tests: Skim `NIP04Test.java` to understand test pattern -3. Docs: Review `PHASE_4_PROGRESS.md` summary section - -**Full review (1 hour):** -1. Tests: Review all 3 test files in detail -2. Analysis: Read `TEST_COVERAGE_ANALYSIS.md` findings -3. Standards: Review `EXCEPTION_MESSAGE_STANDARDS.md` patterns -4. Build fixes: Verify enum additions in `Kind.java` - ---- - -## Checklist - -- [x] ~~Scope ≤ 300 lines~~ (3,440 lines - **justified**: multiple phases + comprehensive tests) -- [x] Title is **verb + object**: "Add critical NIP tests and Phase 3 & 4 documentation" -- [x] Description links context and answers "why now?" - - Critical security/payment gaps identified in Phase 4 analysis - - Immediate recommendations to reduce risk before production -- [x] **BREAKING** flagged if needed (N/A - no breaking changes) -- [x] Tests/docs updated - - ✅ 27 new tests added - - ✅ 2,650+ lines of documentation - - ✅ All tests follow Phase 4 standards - -### Additional Checks - -- [x] All tests pass locally -- [x] Build issues resolved (4 compilation errors fixed) -- [x] Version bumped (0.6.3 → 0.6.4) -- [x] Commit messages follow conventional commits -- [x] Documentation is comprehensive and actionable -- [x] No regressions introduced - ---- - -## Impact Summary - -### Security & Reliability ✅ -- **Encryption integrity:** NIP-04 and NIP-44 encryption verified -- **Tampering detection:** AEAD authentication tested (NIP-44) -- **Access control:** Unauthorized decryption prevented -- **Payment flow:** Zap request→receipt workflow validated - -### Test Coverage ✅ -- **Before:** 3 NIPs with 1-2 basic tests each -- **After:** 3 NIPs with 8-10 comprehensive tests each -- **Improvement:** +483% average coverage increase -- **Quality:** All tests include happy path + edge cases + error paths - -### Documentation ✅ -- **Phase 3:** Complete (4/4 tasks, 3 hours) -- **Phase 4:** Complete (3/3 tasks, 4.5 hours) -- **Analysis:** 2,650+ lines of comprehensive documentation -- **Roadmaps:** Clear paths to 70-85% overall coverage - -### Developer Experience ✅ -- **Build stability:** 4 compilation errors fixed -- **Test standards:** Comprehensive test patterns established -- **Exception standards:** Clear guidelines documented -- **Knowledge transfer:** Detailed roadmaps for future work - ---- - -## Commits - -1. **`89c05b00`** - `test: add comprehensive tests for NIP-04, NIP-44, and NIP-57` - - 27 new tests, +700%/+400%/+350% coverage improvements - - 4 build fixes - -2. **`afb5ffa4`** - `docs: add Phase 3 & 4 testing analysis and progress tracking` - - 6 documentation files (2,650+ lines) - - Complete phase tracking and analysis - -3. **`482fff99`** - `chore: bump version to 0.6.4` - - Version update across all modules - - Release preparation - ---- - -## Testing - -**All tests verified:** -```bash -# Unit tests (including new NIP tests) -mvn clean test - -# Verify build with new changes -mvn clean verify -``` - -**Results:** -- ✅ All existing tests pass -- ✅ All 27 new tests pass -- ✅ Build completes successfully -- ✅ No regressions detected - ---- - -## Next Steps (Future Work) - -**Remaining from Phase 4 Immediate Recommendations:** -- Multi-relay integration tests (4 tests, 2-3 hours) -- Subscription lifecycle tests (6 tests, 2-3 hours) - -**From Phase 4 Roadmaps:** -- Unit/NIP Tests: 24-28 hours to reach 70% API coverage -- Event/Client Tests: 23-33 hours to reach 70% coverage -- Integration Tests: 13-17 hours to reach 80% critical path coverage - -**Total estimated:** 60-78 hours to achieve target coverage across all modules - ---- - -## References - -- **Analysis Documents:** `TEST_COVERAGE_ANALYSIS.md`, `NIP_COMPLIANCE_TEST_ANALYSIS.md`, `INTEGRATION_TEST_ANALYSIS.md` -- **Phase Tracking:** `PHASE_3_PROGRESS.md`, `PHASE_4_PROGRESS.md` -- **Implementation:** `TEST_IMPLEMENTATION_PROGRESS.md` -- **Standards:** `EXCEPTION_MESSAGE_STANDARDS.md`, `MIGRATION.md` -- **Previous Work:** Phase 1 & 2 code review and documentation - ---- - -**Branch:** `test/critical-nip-tests-implementation` -**Target:** `develop` -**Merge Strategy:** Squash or merge (recommend squash to 3 commits) - -🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) - -Co-Authored-By: Claude diff --git a/.project-management/PR_LOGGING_IMPROVEMENTS_0.6.1.md b/.project-management/PR_LOGGING_IMPROVEMENTS_0.6.1.md deleted file mode 100644 index e9057b601..000000000 --- a/.project-management/PR_LOGGING_IMPROVEMENTS_0.6.1.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,395 +0,0 @@ -# Pull Request: Logging Improvements and Version 0.6.1 - -## Summary - -This PR addresses comprehensive logging improvements across the nostr-java codebase to comply with Clean Code principles (chapters 2, 3, 4, 7, 10, 17) as outlined in AGENTS.md. The changes improve code quality, reduce noise, enhance debugging capabilities, and eliminate code smells related to logging practices. - -The logging review identified several areas where logging did not follow best practices: -- Empty or non-descriptive error messages -- Excessive debug logging in low-level utility classes -- Test methods using log statements instead of JUnit features -- Duplicated logging code in recovery methods - -All issues have been systematically addressed and the logging grade has improved from **B+** to **A-**. - -Related issue: N/A (proactive code quality improvement) - -## What changed? - -**Review the changes in this order:** - -1. **LOGGING_REVIEW.md** - Complete analysis document with findings and recommendations -2. **High-priority fixes** (commit 6e1ee6a5): - - `UserProfile.java` - Fixed empty error message - - `GenericEvent.java` - Improved warning context, optimized serialization logging - - `GenericTagDecoder.java` - Changed INFO to DEBUG for routine operations -3. **Medium-priority fixes** (commit 911ab87b): - - `PrivateKey.java`, `PublicKey.java`, `BaseKey.java` - Removed constructor logging -4. **Test cleanup** (commit 33270a7c): - - 9 test files - Removed 89 log.info("testMethodName") statements -5. **Refactoring** (commit 337bce4f): - - `SpringWebSocketClient.java` - Extracted duplicated recovery logging -6. **Version bump** (commit 90a4c8b8): - - All 10 pom.xml files - Updated from 0.6.0 to 0.6.1 - -### Summary of Changes by Category - -**Logging Quality Improvements:** -- Fixed 2 empty/generic error messages with meaningful context -- Optimized 1 expensive debug operation (DEBUG → TRACE with guard) -- Fixed 1 inappropriate log level (INFO → DEBUG) -- Enhanced 1 error message with additional context (type, prefix) - -**Code Cleanup:** -- Removed 7 constructor/utility log statements from low-level classes -- Removed 89 test method name log statements -- Extracted 4 duplicated log.error() calls into 2 reusable helper methods - -**Files Modified:** 17 files across 4 commits (plus version bump) - -## BREAKING - -**No breaking changes.** All changes are internal improvements to logging behavior: -- Public API remains unchanged -- Log messages may differ slightly (more descriptive) -- Log levels adjusted (DEBUG → TRACE for one expensive operation, INFO → DEBUG for routine operation) -- No configuration changes required - -## Review focus - -1. **Error message clarity**: Are the new error messages in `UserProfile.java` and `GenericEvent.java` sufficiently descriptive for debugging? - -2. **Performance optimization**: Is the `log.isTraceEnabled()` guard in `GenericEvent.getByteArraySupplier()` the right approach for expensive serialization logging? - -3. **Abstraction level**: Does removing constructor logging from `PrivateKey`, `PublicKey`, and `BaseKey` align with your vision for low-level utility classes? - -4. **Refactoring pattern**: Are the extracted `logRecoveryFailure()` helper methods in `SpringWebSocketClient` clear and maintainable? - -5. **Test philosophy**: Confirm that removing log.info("testMethodName") is acceptable and JUnit's native output is sufficient? - -## Detailed Changes - -### 1. High-Priority Fixes (Commit: 6e1ee6a5) - -**UserProfile.java:46** - Fixed empty error message -```java -// Before -catch (Exception ex) { - log.error("", ex); // Empty message - throw new RuntimeException(ex); -} - -// After -catch (Exception ex) { - log.error("Failed to convert UserProfile to Bech32 format", ex); - throw new RuntimeException("Failed to convert UserProfile to Bech32 format", ex); -} -``` - -**GenericEvent.java:196** - Improved generic warning -```java -// Before -catch (AssertionError ex) { - log.warn(ex.getMessage()); // No context - throw new RuntimeException(ex); -} - -// After -catch (AssertionError ex) { - log.warn("Failed to update event during serialization: {}", ex.getMessage(), ex); - throw new RuntimeException(ex); -} -``` - -**GenericEvent.java:277** - Optimized expensive debug logging -```java -// Before -public Supplier getByteArraySupplier() { - this.update(); - log.debug("Serialized event: {}", new String(this.get_serializedEvent())); - return () -> ByteBuffer.wrap(this.get_serializedEvent()); -} - -// After -public Supplier getByteArraySupplier() { - this.update(); - if (log.isTraceEnabled()) { - log.trace("Serialized event: {}", new String(this.get_serializedEvent())); - } - return () -> ByteBuffer.wrap(this.get_serializedEvent()); -} -``` - -**GenericTagDecoder.java:56** - Fixed inappropriate INFO level -```java -// Before -log.info("Decoded GenericTag: {}", genericTag); // INFO for routine operation - -// After -log.debug("Decoded GenericTag: {}", genericTag); // DEBUG is appropriate -``` - -### 2. Medium-Priority Fixes (Commit: 911ab87b) - -Removed constructor logging from low-level key classes: - -**PrivateKey.java** - 3 log statements removed -```java -// Removed from constructors and generateRandomPrivKey() -log.debug("Created private key from byte array"); -log.debug("Created private key from hex string"); -log.debug("Generated new random private key"); -``` - -**PublicKey.java** - 2 log statements removed -```java -// Removed from constructors -log.debug("Created public key from byte array"); -log.debug("Created public key from hex string"); -``` - -**BaseKey.java** - 2 log statements removed, 1 enhanced -```java -// Removed routine operation logging -log.debug("Converted key to Bech32 with prefix {}", prefix); -log.debug("Converted key to hex string"); - -// Enhanced error logging with more context -log.error("Failed to convert {} key to Bech32 format with prefix {}", type, prefix, ex); -``` - -### 3. Test Cleanup (Commit: 33270a7c) - -Removed 89 test method name log statements across: -- **nostr-java-event**: 58 removals (FiltersEncoderTest, FiltersDecoderTest, BaseMessageDecoderTest, BaseMessageCommandMapperTest) -- **nostr-java-api**: 26 removals (JsonParseTest, NIP57ImplTest) -- **nostr-java-id**: 4 removals (EventTest, ZapReceiptEventTest) -- **nostr-java-util**: 1 removal (NostrUtilTest) - -All instances of: -```java -@Test -void testSomething() { - log.info("testSomething"); // Removed - redundant with JUnit output - // test code -} -``` - -### 4. Refactoring (Commit: 337bce4f) - -**SpringWebSocketClient.java** - Extracted duplicated recovery logging - -Added helper methods: -```java -/** - * Logs a recovery failure with operation context. - */ -private void logRecoveryFailure(String operation, int size, IOException ex) { - log.error( - "Failed to {} to relay {} after retries (size={} bytes)", - operation, relayUrl, size, ex); -} - -/** - * Logs a recovery failure with operation and command context. - */ -private void logRecoveryFailure(String operation, String command, int size, IOException ex) { - log.error( - "Failed to {} {} to relay {} after retries (size={} bytes)", - operation, command, relayUrl, size, ex); -} -``` - -Simplified 4 recovery methods: -```java -// Before: Duplicated log.error() in each method -@Recover -public List recover(IOException ex, String json) throws IOException { - log.error( - "Failed to send message to relay {} after retries (size={} bytes)", - relayUrl, json.length(), ex); - throw ex; -} - -// After: One-line call to helper -@Recover -public List recover(IOException ex, String json) throws IOException { - logRecoveryFailure("send message", json.length(), ex); - throw ex; -} -``` - -### 5. Version Bump (Commit: 90a4c8b8) - -Updated version from 0.6.0 to 0.6.1 in: -- Root `pom.xml` (project version + nostr-java.version property) -- All 9 module pom.xml files - -## Clean Code Compliance - -### Chapter 2: Meaningful Names ✅ -- Fixed empty error messages -- Added descriptive context to all error logs -- Error messages now reveal intent and aid debugging - -### Chapter 3: Functions ✅ -- Removed constructor logging (functions do one thing) -- Extracted duplicated logging into helper methods -- No logging side effects in data container classes - -### Chapter 4: Comments ✅ -- Logs provide runtime context, not code explanation -- Most logs include meaningful parameters (relay URL, size, command) -- Removed redundant test name logging - -### Chapter 7: Error Handling ✅ -- All error logs include exception context -- No null or empty error messages -- Enhanced exception messages match log messages - -### Chapter 10: Classes ✅ -- Removed logging from single-responsibility data classes -- Logging appropriate for class responsibilities -- Low-level utilities no longer pollute logs - -### Chapter 17: Smells and Heuristics ✅ -- Eliminated G5 (Duplication) - extracted common logging -- Eliminated G15 (Selector Arguments) - removed test logging -- Fixed G31 (Hidden Temporal Couplings) - appropriate log levels - -## Benefits - -### For Developers -- **Clearer error messages**: Empty logs replaced with descriptive context -- **Less noise**: 98 unnecessary log statements removed -- **Better debugging**: Enhanced error context (type, prefix, operation) -- **Performance**: Expensive debug logging optimized with guards - -### For Operations/Support -- **Faster troubleshooting**: Meaningful error messages reduce investigation time -- **Better log signal-to-noise ratio**: Routine operations don't clutter INFO logs -- **Consistent format**: Extracted helpers ensure uniform logging patterns - -### For Codebase Quality -- **DRY principle**: Eliminated duplicated logging code -- **Single Responsibility**: Low-level classes no longer handle logging concerns -- **Maintainability**: Centralized logging logic easier to update - -## Testing & Verification - -### Manual Testing -- [x] Verified all pom.xml files updated to 0.6.1 -- [x] Confirmed no test log.info statements remain (grep verified 0 results) -- [x] Reviewed error logging includes proper context -- [x] Checked TRACE level guard prevents string creation when disabled - -### Build Verification -```bash -mvn clean verify -# All tests pass with cleaner output -``` - -### Log Output Samples - -**Before** (noisy constructor logging): -``` -DEBUG Created private key from byte array -DEBUG Created public key from byte array -DEBUG Converted key to Bech32 with prefix npub -DEBUG Converted key to hex string -``` - -**After** (clean, focused logging): -``` -(no noise from object creation) -ERROR Failed to convert PUBLIC key to Bech32 format with prefix npub - (only on actual errors) -``` - -## Migration Notes - -### For Library Users -**No action required.** This is a patch release with no breaking changes. - -### For Contributors -- **New guideline**: Don't add logging to low-level data classes (keys, tags, etc.) -- **Use JUnit features**: For readable test names, use `@DisplayName` instead of log.info() -- **Error messages**: Always include context - what failed, what operation, relevant parameters -- **Expensive logging**: Guard expensive operations with `log.isXXXEnabled()` - -### For Future Development -- Refer to `LOGGING_REVIEW.md` for logging best practices -- Use extracted logging helpers as pattern for new retry/recovery code -- Keep logging focused on application/integration layer, not utilities - -## Impact Assessment - -### Performance Impact -- ✅ **Positive**: Eliminated 98 unnecessary log calls -- ✅ **Positive**: Added guard for expensive serialization logging -- ✅ **Neutral**: Simple log statement changes have negligible overhead - -### Security Impact -- ✅ **No change**: Verified no sensitive data logged (private keys, passwords) -- ✅ **Positive**: Better error context helps security incident investigation - -### Compatibility Impact -- ✅ **Backward compatible**: No API changes -- ✅ **Log consumers**: May see different/better log messages (improvement) -- ⚠️ **Log parsers**: If parsing exact log messages, patterns may differ slightly - -## Documentation - -- ✅ Created `LOGGING_REVIEW.md` - Complete analysis and guidelines -- ✅ All commits include detailed rationale and Clean Code references -- ✅ Helper methods include JavaDoc explaining purpose and parameters - -## Checklist - -- [x] Scope ≤ 300 lines (split into 4 logical commits: 384, 20, 89, 60 lines) -- [x] Title is **verb + object**: "Improve logging and bump version to 0.6.1" -- [x] Description links the issue and answers "why now?" - Proactive quality improvement based on Clean Code review -- [x] **BREAKING** flagged if needed - No breaking changes -- [x] Tests/docs updated (if relevant) - LOGGING_REVIEW.md added, test logs cleaned - -## References - -- **LOGGING_REVIEW.md** - Complete logging analysis and recommendations -- **AGENTS.md** - Clean Code guidelines (chapters 2, 3, 4, 7, 10, 17) -- **Clean Code by Robert C. Martin** - Source of principles applied - -## Release Notes (0.6.1) - -### Fixed -- Empty error message in UserProfile Bech32 conversion -- Generic warning in GenericEvent serialization -- Inappropriate INFO log level for routine tag decoding - -### Improved -- Error logging now includes full context (operation, type, parameters) -- Performance: Expensive debug logging optimized with lazy evaluation -- Code quality: Removed 98 unnecessary log statements - -### Refactored -- Extracted duplicated recovery logging into reusable helpers -- Removed constructor logging from low-level key classes -- Cleaned up test method name logging (use JUnit features instead) - -### Documentation -- Added comprehensive LOGGING_REVIEW.md with guidelines and analysis - ---- - -**Logging Grade**: B+ → A- - -**Commits**: 5 (4 logging improvements + 1 version bump) - -**Files Changed**: 17 total -- 4 source files (logging fixes) -- 3 base/key files (constructor cleanup) -- 9 test files (log statement removal) -- 1 client file (refactoring) -- 10 pom.xml files (version bump) - -🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) - -Co-Authored-By: Claude diff --git a/.project-management/PR_PHASE_2_DOCUMENTATION.md b/.project-management/PR_PHASE_2_DOCUMENTATION.md deleted file mode 100644 index 513f23b14..000000000 --- a/.project-management/PR_PHASE_2_DOCUMENTATION.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,131 +0,0 @@ -## Summary - -This PR completes **Phase 2: Documentation Enhancement**, achieving comprehensive documentation coverage across the project with a grade improvement from B+ to **A**. - -The work addresses the need for better API discoverability, architectural understanding, and contributor onboarding identified in the code review process. This documentation overhaul significantly improves the developer experience for both library users and contributors. - -Related to ongoing code quality improvements following Clean Code principles. - -## What changed? - -**4 major documentation areas enhanced** (12 files, ~2,926 lines added): - -### 1. Architecture Documentation (796 lines, 960% growth) -- **File:** `docs/explanation/architecture.md` -- Enhanced from 75 to 796 lines -- 9 modules documented across 6 Clean Architecture layers -- 8 design patterns with real code examples -- Refactored components section with before/after metrics -- Complete extensibility guides for adding NIPs and tags -- Error handling, security best practices - -**Suggested review:** Start with the Table of Contents, then review the Design Patterns section to understand the architectural approach. - -### 2. Core API JavaDoc (7 classes, 400+ lines) -Enhanced with comprehensive documentation: -- `GenericEvent.java` - Event lifecycle, NIP-01 structure, usage examples -- `EventValidator.java` - Validation rules with usage patterns -- `EventSerializer.java` - NIP-01 canonical format, determinism -- `EventTypeChecker.java` - Event type ranges with examples -- `BaseEvent.java` - Class hierarchy and guidelines -- `BaseTag.java` - Tag structure, creation patterns, registry -- `NIP01.java` - Complete facade documentation - -**Suggested review:** Check `GenericEvent.java` and `NIP01.java` for the most comprehensive examples. - -### 3. README.md Enhancements -Added 5 new sections: -- **Features** - 6 key capabilities highlighted -- **Recent Improvements (v0.6.2)** - Refactoring achievements documented -- **NIP Compliance Matrix** - 25 NIPs organized into 7 categories -- **Contributing** - Links to comprehensive guidelines -- **License** - MIT License explicitly stated - -**Suggested review:** View the rendered Markdown to see the professional presentation. - -### 4. CONTRIBUTING.md Enhancement (325% growth) -- Enhanced from 40 to 170 lines -- Coding standards with Clean Code principles -- Naming conventions (classes, methods, variables) -- Architecture guidelines with module organization -- Complete NIP addition guide with code examples -- Testing requirements (80% coverage minimum) - -**Suggested review:** Review the "Adding New NIPs" section for the practical guide. - -### 5. Extracted Utility Classes (Phase 1 continuation) -New files created from god class extraction: -- `EventValidator.java` - Single Responsibility validation -- `EventSerializer.java` - NIP-01 canonical serialization -- `EventTypeChecker.java` - Event kind range checking - -These support the refactoring work from Phase 1. - -## BREAKING - -**No breaking changes** - This is purely documentation enhancement. - -The extracted utility classes (`EventValidator`, `EventSerializer`, `EventTypeChecker`) are implementation details used internally by `GenericEvent` and do not change the public API. - -## Review focus - -1. **Architecture.md completeness** - Does it provide sufficient guidance for contributors? -2. **JavaDoc quality** - Are the usage examples helpful? Do they show best practices? -3. **NIP Compliance Matrix accuracy** - Are the 25 NIPs correctly categorized? -4. **CONTRIBUTING.md clarity** - Are coding standards clear enough to prevent inconsistency? -5. **Professional presentation** - Does the README effectively showcase the project's maturity? - -**Key questions:** -- Does the documentation make the codebase approachable for new contributors? -- Are the design patterns clearly explained with good examples? -- Is the NIP addition guide detailed enough to follow? - -## Checklist - -- [x] Scope ≤ 300 lines (or split/stack) - **Note:** This is documentation-heavy (2,926 lines), but it's cohesive work that should stay together. The actual code changes (utility classes) are small. -- [x] Title is **verb + object** - "Complete Phase 2 documentation enhancement" -- [x] Description links context and answers "why now?" - Addresses code review findings and improves developer experience -- [ ] **BREAKING** flagged if needed - No breaking changes -- [x] Tests/docs updated (if relevant) - This IS the docs update; tests unchanged - -## Additional Context - -**Time invested:** ~6 hours -**Documentation grade:** B+ → **A** -**Lines of documentation added:** ~1,600+ (excluding utility class code) - -**Impact achieved:** -- ✅ Architecture fully documented with design patterns -- ✅ Core APIs have comprehensive JavaDoc with IntelliSense -- ✅ API discoverability significantly improved -- ✅ Developer onboarding enhanced with professional README -- ✅ Contributing standards established -- ✅ Professional presentation demonstrating production-readiness - -**Files modified:** -- 3 documentation files (README, CONTRIBUTING, architecture.md) -- 7 core classes with JavaDoc enhancements -- 3 new utility classes (extracted from Phase 1) -- 1 progress tracking file (PHASE_2_PROGRESS.md) - -**Optional future work** (not included in this PR): -- Extended JavaDoc for specialized NIPs (NIP57, NIP60, NIP04, NIP44) -- MIGRATION.md for 1.0.0 release preparation - -## Testing Output - -All documentation compiles successfully: - -```bash -$ mvn -q compile -pl :nostr-java-event -# BUILD SUCCESS - -$ mvn -q compile -pl :nostr-java-api -# BUILD SUCCESS -``` - -JavaDoc renders correctly without errors. Markdown rendering verified locally. - ---- - -**Generated with Claude Code** - Phase 2 Documentation Enhancement Complete diff --git a/.project-management/README.md b/.project-management/README.md deleted file mode 100644 index 4b2e53a36..000000000 --- a/.project-management/README.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,43 +0,0 @@ -# Project Management Files - -This directory contains internal project management documentation, including code review reports, phase completion tracking, and issue analysis. - -## Contents - -### Phase Tracking -- **PHASE_1_COMPLETION.md** - Phase 1: Code Quality & Maintainability (Complete) -- **PHASE_2_PROGRESS.md** - Phase 2: Documentation Enhancement (Complete) - -### Code Review -- **CODE_REVIEW_REPORT.md** - Initial comprehensive code review (38 findings) -- **CODE_REVIEW_UPDATE_2025-10-06.md** - Post-refactoring progress update (Grade: A-) - -### Finding Completions -- **FINDING_2.4_COMPLETION.md** - GenericEvent refactoring (extract business logic) -- **FINDING_10.2_COMPLETION.md** - Logging improvements - -### Pull Request Documentation -- **PR_PHASE_2_DOCUMENTATION.md** - Phase 2 documentation PR summary - -### Analysis -- **TEST_FAILURE_ANALYSIS.md** - Test failure investigation and resolution - -## Purpose - -These files track: -- Project improvement phases and milestones -- Code quality metrics and progress -- Refactoring decisions and rationale -- Issue resolutions and findings - -## For Contributors - -If you're working on code improvements, check these files for: -- Current project status and completed work -- Architectural decisions and patterns -- Known issues and their resolutions -- Future planned enhancements - -## Note - -These are internal tracking documents. User-facing documentation is in the `/docs` directory. diff --git a/.project-management/TEST_COVERAGE_ANALYSIS.md b/.project-management/TEST_COVERAGE_ANALYSIS.md deleted file mode 100644 index 57340285a..000000000 --- a/.project-management/TEST_COVERAGE_ANALYSIS.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,410 +0,0 @@ -# Test Coverage Analysis - -**Date:** 2025-10-08 -**Phase:** 4 - Testing & Verification -**Tool:** JaCoCo 0.8.13 - ---- - -## Executive Summary - -**Overall Project Coverage:** 42% instruction coverage -**Target:** 85% instruction coverage -**Gap:** 43 percentage points -**Status:** ⚠️ Below target - significant improvement needed - ---- - -## Coverage by Module - -| Module | Instruction | Branch | Status | Priority | -|--------|------------|--------|--------|----------| -| nostr-java-util | 83% | 68% | ✅ Excellent | Low | -| nostr-java-base | 74% | 38% | ✅ Good | Low | -| nostr-java-id | 62% | 50% | ⚠️ Moderate | Medium | -| nostr-java-encryption | 48% | 50% | ⚠️ Needs Work | Medium | -| nostr-java-event | 41% | 30% | ❌ Low | **High** | -| nostr-java-client | 39% | 33% | ❌ Low | **High** | -| nostr-java-api | 36% | 24% | ❌ Low | **High** | -| nostr-java-crypto | No report | No report | ⚠️ Unknown | **High** | - -### Module-Specific Analysis - -#### ✅ nostr-java-util (83% coverage) -**Status:** Excellent coverage, meets target -**Key packages:** -- nostr.util: Well tested -- nostr.util.validator: Good coverage -- nostr.util.http: Adequately tested - -**Action:** Maintain current coverage level - ---- - -#### ✅ nostr-java-base (74% coverage) -**Status:** Good coverage, close to target -**Key findings:** -- nostr.base: 75% instruction, 38% branch -- nostr.base.json: 0% coverage (2 classes untested) - -**Gaps:** -- Low branch coverage (38%) indicates missing edge case tests -- JSON mapper classes untested - -**Action:** -- Add tests for nostr.base.json package -- Improve branch coverage with edge case testing -- Target: 85% instruction, 60% branch - ---- - -#### ⚠️ nostr-java-id (62% coverage) -**Status:** Moderate coverage -**Key findings:** -- nostr.id: Basic functionality tested -- Missing coverage for edge cases - -**Action:** -- Add tests for key generation edge cases -- Test Bech32 encoding/decoding error paths -- Target: 75% coverage - ---- - -#### ⚠️ nostr-java-encryption (48% coverage) -**Status:** Needs improvement -**Key findings:** -- nostr.encryption: 48% instruction, 50% branch -- NIP-04 and NIP-44 encryption partially tested - -**Gaps:** -- Encryption failure scenarios not tested -- Decryption error paths not covered - -**Action:** -- Add tests for encryption/decryption failures -- Test invalid key scenarios -- Test malformed ciphertext handling -- Target: 70% coverage - ---- - -#### ❌ nostr-java-event (41% coverage - CRITICAL) -**Status:** Low coverage for critical module -**Package breakdown:** -- nostr.event.json.deserializer: 91% ✅ (excellent) -- nostr.event.json.codec: 70% ✅ (good) -- nostr.event.tag: 61% ⚠️ (moderate) -- nostr.event.filter: 57% ⚠️ (moderate) -- nostr.event: 54% ⚠️ (moderate) -- nostr.event.json.serializer: 48% ⚠️ (needs work) -- nostr.event.impl: 34% ❌ (low - **CRITICAL**) -- nostr.event.message: 21% ❌ (very low - **CRITICAL**) -- nostr.event.entities: 22% ❌ (very low - **CRITICAL**) -- nostr.event.support: 0% ❌ (untested) -- nostr.event.serializer: 0% ❌ (untested) -- nostr.event.util: 0% ❌ (untested) - -**Critical Gaps:** -1. **nostr.event.impl** (34%) - Core event implementations - - GenericEvent: Partially tested - - Specialized event types: Low coverage - - Event validation: Incomplete - - Event signing: Missing edge cases - -2. **nostr.event.message** (21%) - Protocol messages - - EventMessage, ReqMessage, OkMessage: Low coverage - - Message serialization: Partially tested - - Error handling: Not tested - -3. **nostr.event.entities** (22%) - Entity classes - - Calendar events: Low coverage - - Marketplace events: Minimal testing - - Wallet events: Incomplete - -4. **Zero coverage packages:** - - nostr.event.support: GenericEventSerializer and support classes - - nostr.event.serializer: Custom serializers - - nostr.event.util: Utility classes - -**Action (HIGH PRIORITY):** -- Add comprehensive tests for GenericEvent class -- Test all event implementations (NIP-01 through NIP-65) -- Add message serialization/deserialization tests -- Test event validation for all NIPs -- Test error scenarios and malformed events -- Target: 70% coverage minimum - ---- - -#### ❌ nostr-java-client (39% coverage - CRITICAL) -**Status:** Low coverage for WebSocket client -**Key findings:** -- nostr.client.springwebsocket: 39% instruction, 33% branch -- SpringWebSocketClient: Partially tested -- Connection lifecycle: Some coverage -- Retry logic: Some coverage - -**Critical Gaps:** -- Error handling paths not fully tested -- Reconnection scenarios incomplete -- Message routing: Partially covered -- Subscription management: Missing tests - -**Action (HIGH PRIORITY):** -- Add tests for connection failure scenarios -- Test retry logic thoroughly -- Test message routing edge cases -- Test subscription lifecycle -- Test concurrent operations -- Target: 70% coverage - ---- - -#### ❌ nostr-java-api (36% coverage - CRITICAL) -**Status:** Lowest coverage in project -**Package breakdown:** -- nostr.config: 82% ✅ (good - mostly deprecated constants) -- nostr.api.factory: 49% ⚠️ -- nostr.api.nip01: 46% ⚠️ -- nostr.api: 36% ❌ (NIP implementations - **CRITICAL**) -- nostr.api.factory.impl: 33% ❌ -- nostr.api.nip57: 27% ❌ -- nostr.api.client: 25% ❌ -- nostr.api.service.impl: 9% ❌ - -**Critical Gaps:** -1. **NIP Implementations** (nostr.api package - 36%) - - NIP01, NIP02, NIP03, NIP04, NIP05: Low coverage - - NIP09, NIP15, NIP23, NIP25, NIP28: Minimal testing - - NIP42, NIP46, NIP52, NIP60, NIP61, NIP65, NIP99: Very low coverage - - Most NIP classes have <50% coverage - -2. **NIP-57 Zaps** (27%) - - Zap request creation: Partially tested - - Zap receipt validation: Missing tests - - Lightning invoice handling: Not tested - -3. **API Client** (25%) - - NostrSubscriptionManager: Low coverage - - NostrSpringWebSocketClient: Minimal testing - -4. **Service Layer** (9%) - - Service implementations nearly untested - -**Action (HIGHEST PRIORITY):** -- Create comprehensive NIP compliance test suite -- Test each NIP implementation class individually -- Add end-to-end NIP workflow tests -- Test NIP-57 zap flow completely -- Test subscription management thoroughly -- Target: 70% coverage minimum - ---- - -#### ⚠️ nostr-java-crypto (No Report) -**Status:** JaCoCo report not generated -**Issue:** Module has tests but coverage report missing - -**Investigation needed:** -- Verify test execution during build -- Check if test actually runs (dependency issue) -- Generate standalone coverage report - -**Test file exists:** `nostr/crypto/CryptoTest.java` - -**Action:** -- Investigate why report wasn't generated -- Run tests in isolation to verify functionality -- Generate coverage report manually if needed -- Expected coverage: 70%+ (crypto is critical) - ---- - -## Priority Areas for Improvement - -### Critical (Must Fix) -1. **nostr-java-api** - 36% → Target 70% - - NIP implementations are core functionality - - Low coverage represents high risk - - Estimated effort: 8-10 hours - -2. **nostr-java-event** - 41% → Target 70% - - Event handling is fundamental - - Many packages at 0% coverage - - Estimated effort: 6-8 hours - -3. **nostr-java-client** - 39% → Target 70% - - WebSocket client is critical path - - Connection/retry logic needs thorough testing - - Estimated effort: 4-5 hours - -4. **nostr-java-crypto** - Unknown → Target 70% - - Cryptographic operations cannot fail - - Needs investigation and testing - - Estimated effort: 2-3 hours - -### Medium Priority -5. **nostr-java-encryption** - 48% → Target 70% - - Encryption is important but less complex - - Estimated effort: 2-3 hours - -6. **nostr-java-id** - 62% → Target 75% - - Close to acceptable coverage - - Estimated effort: 1-2 hours - -### Low Priority -7. **nostr-java-base** - 74% → Target 85% - - Already good coverage - - Estimated effort: 1 hour - -8. **nostr-java-util** - 83% → Maintain - - Meets target, maintain quality - - Estimated effort: 0 hours - ---- - -## Test Quality Issues - -Beyond coverage numbers, the following test quality issues were identified: - -### 1. Missing Edge Case Tests -- **Branch coverage consistently lower than instruction coverage** -- Indicates: Happy path tested, error paths not tested -- Impact: Bugs may exist in error handling -- Action: Add tests for error scenarios, null inputs, invalid data - -### 2. Zero-Coverage Packages -The following packages have 0% coverage: -- nostr.event.support (5 classes) -- nostr.event.serializer (1 class) -- nostr.event.util (1 class) -- nostr.base.json (2 classes) - -**Action:** Add tests for all untested packages - -### 3. Integration Test Coverage -- Unit tests exist but integration coverage unknown -- Need to verify end-to-end workflows are tested -- Action: Run integration tests and measure coverage - ---- - -## Recommended Test Additions - -### Phase 1: Critical Coverage (15-20 hours) -**Goal:** Bring critical modules to 70% coverage - -1. **NIP Compliance Tests** (8 hours) - - One test class per NIP implementation - - Verify event creation matches NIP spec - - Test all required fields and tags - - Test edge cases and validation - -2. **Event Implementation Tests** (5 hours) - - GenericEvent core functionality - - Event validation edge cases - - Event serialization/deserialization - - Event signing and verification - -3. **WebSocket Client Tests** (4 hours) - - Connection lifecycle complete coverage - - Retry logic all scenarios - - Message routing edge cases - - Error handling comprehensive - -4. **Crypto Module Investigation** (2 hours) - - Fix report generation - - Verify test coverage - - Add missing tests if needed - -### Phase 2: Quality Improvements (5-8 hours) -**Goal:** Improve branch coverage and test quality - -1. **Edge Case Testing** (3 hours) - - Null input handling - - Invalid data scenarios - - Boundary conditions - - Error path coverage - -2. **Zero-Coverage Packages** (2 hours) - - Add tests for all 0% packages - - Bring to minimum 50% coverage - -3. **Integration Tests** (2 hours) - - End-to-end workflow verification - - Multi-NIP interaction tests - - Real relay integration (Testcontainers) - -### Phase 3: Excellence (3-5 hours) -**Goal:** Achieve 85% overall coverage - -1. **Base Module Enhancement** (2 hours) - - Improve branch coverage to 60%+ - - Test JSON mappers - - Edge case coverage - -2. **Encryption & ID Modules** (2 hours) - - Bring both to 75%+ coverage - - Error scenario testing - - Edge case coverage - ---- - -## Build Issues Discovered - -During coverage analysis, several build/compilation issues were found and fixed: - -### Fixed Issues: -1. **Kind enum missing values:** - - Added `Kind.NOSTR_CONNECT` (24133) for NIP-46 - - Fixed references to `CHANNEL_HIDE_MESSAGE` → `HIDE_MESSAGE` - - Fixed references to `CHANNEL_MUTE_USER` → `MUTE_USER` - -2. **Deprecated constant mismatch:** - - Updated `Constants.REQUEST_EVENTS` → `Constants.NOSTR_CONNECT` - -**Files Modified:** -- `nostr-java-base/src/main/java/nostr/base/Kind.java` -- `nostr-java-api/src/main/java/nostr/api/NIP28.java` -- `nostr-java-api/src/main/java/nostr/config/Constants.java` - ---- - -## Success Metrics - -### Current State -- **Overall Coverage:** 42% -- **Modules >70%:** 2 of 8 (25%) -- **Critical modules >70%:** 0 of 4 (0%) - -### Target State (End of Phase 4) -- **Overall Coverage:** 75%+ (stretch: 85%) -- **Modules >70%:** 7 of 8 (88%) -- **Critical modules >70%:** 4 of 4 (100%) - -### Progress Tracking -- [ ] nostr-java-api: 36% → 70% (**+34%**) -- [ ] nostr-java-event: 41% → 70% (**+29%**) -- [ ] nostr-java-client: 39% → 70% (**+31%**) -- [ ] nostr-java-crypto: Unknown → 70% -- [ ] nostr-java-encryption: 48% → 70% (+22%) -- [ ] nostr-java-id: 62% → 75% (+13%) -- [ ] nostr-java-base: 74% → 85% (+11%) -- [ ] nostr-java-util: 83% → 85% (+2%) - ---- - -## Next Steps - -1. ✅ **Coverage baseline established** -2. ⏳ **Create NIP compliance test suite** (Task 2) -3. ⏳ **Add critical path tests** -4. ⏳ **Improve branch coverage** -5. ⏳ **Re-measure coverage and iterate** - ---- - -**Last Updated:** 2025-10-08 -**Analysis By:** Phase 4 Testing & Verification -**Next Review:** After Task 2 completion diff --git a/.project-management/TEST_FAILURE_ANALYSIS.md b/.project-management/TEST_FAILURE_ANALYSIS.md deleted file mode 100644 index a9e20ffe1..000000000 --- a/.project-management/TEST_FAILURE_ANALYSIS.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,246 +0,0 @@ -# Test Failure Analysis & Resolution - -**Date:** 2025-10-06 -**Context:** Post-refactoring code review implementation -**Branch:** Current development branch - ---- - -## Summary - -After implementing the code review improvements (error handling, refactoring, etc.), unit tests revealed **1 test class failure** due to invalid test data. - ---- - -## Test Failures Identified - -### 1. GenericEventBuilderTest - Class Initialization Error - -**Module:** `nostr-java-event` -**Test Class:** `nostr.event.unit.GenericEventBuilderTest` -**Severity:** CRITICAL (blocked all 3 tests in class) - -#### Error Details - -``` -java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError -Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: - Invalid hex string: [f6f8a2d4c6e8b0a1f2d3c4b5a6e7d8c9b0a1c2d3e4f5a6b7c8d9e0f1a2b3c4d], - length: [63], target length: [64] -``` - -#### Root Cause - -The test class had a static field with an invalid public key hex string: - -**File:** `nostr-java-event/src/test/java/nostr/event/unit/GenericEventBuilderTest.java:17` - -```java -// BEFORE (INVALID - 63 chars) -private static final PublicKey PUBLIC_KEY = - new PublicKey("f6f8a2d4c6e8b0a1f2d3c4b5a6e7d8c9b0a1c2d3e4f5a6b7c8d9e0f1a2b3c4d"); -``` - -The hex string was **63 characters** when NIP-01 requires **64 hex characters** (32 bytes) for public keys. - -#### Fix Applied - -**Fixed hex string to 64 characters:** - -```java -// AFTER (VALID - 64 chars) -private static final PublicKey PUBLIC_KEY = - new PublicKey("f6f8a2d4c6e8b0a1f2d3c4b5a6e7d8c9b0a1c2d3e4f5a6b7c8d9e0f1a2b3c4d5"); - ^ - Added missing char -``` - -#### Impact - -**Failed Tests:** -1. `shouldBuildGenericEventWithStandardKind()` - ✓ Fixed -2. `shouldBuildGenericEventWithCustomKind()` - ✓ Fixed -3. `shouldRequireKindWhenBuilding()` - ✓ Fixed - -**Result:** All 3 tests now pass successfully. - ---- - -## Why This Occurred - -### Context of Recent Changes - -Our refactoring included: -1. **Enhanced exception handling** - specific exceptions instead of generic `Exception` -2. **Stricter validation** - `HexStringValidator` now enforces exact length requirements -3. **Better error messages** - clear indication of what's wrong - -### Previous Behavior (Pre-Refactoring) - -The test might have passed before due to: -- Less strict validation -- Generic exception catching that swallowed validation errors -- Different constructor implementation in `PublicKey` - -### New Behavior (Post-Refactoring) - -Now properly validates: -```java -// HexStringValidator.validateHex() -if (hexString.length() != targetLength) { - throw new IllegalArgumentException( - String.format("Invalid hex string: [%s], length: [%d], target length: [%d]", - hexString, hexString.length(), targetLength) - ); -} -``` - -This is **correct behavior** per NIP-01 specification. - ---- - -## Verification Steps Taken - -1. ✅ Fixed invalid hex string in test data -2. ✅ Verified test class compiles successfully -3. ✅ Ran `GenericEventBuilderTest` - all tests pass -4. ✅ Verified no compilation errors in other modules -5. ✅ Confirmed NIP-01 compliance (64-char hex = 32 bytes) - ---- - -## Lessons Learned - -### 1. Test Data Quality -- **Issue:** Test data wasn't validated against NIP specifications -- **Solution:** Ensure all test data conforms to protocol requirements -- **Prevention:** Add test data validation in test setup - -### 2. Refactoring Impact on Tests -- **Observation:** Stricter validation exposed existing test data issues -- **Positive:** This is actually good - reveals hidden bugs -- **Action:** Review all test data for NIP compliance - -### 3. Error Messages Value -- **Before:** Generic error, hard to debug -- **After:** Clear message showing exact issue: - ``` - Invalid hex string: [...], length: [63], target length: [64] - ``` -- **Value:** Made root cause immediately obvious - ---- - -## Additional Findings - -### Other Test Data to Review - -I recommend auditing test data in these areas: - -1. **Public Key Test Data** - - ✓ `GenericEventBuilderTest` - FIXED - - Check: `PublicKeyTest`, `IdentityTest`, etc. - -2. **Event ID Test Data** - - Verify all test event IDs are 64 hex chars - - Location: Event test classes - -3. **Signature Test Data** - - Verify all test signatures are 128 hex chars (64 bytes) - - Location: Signing test classes - -4. **Hex String Validation Tests** - - Ensure boundary tests cover exact length requirements - - Location: `HexStringValidatorTest` - ---- - -## Recommendations - -### Immediate Actions - -1. ✅ **DONE:** Fix `GenericEventBuilderTest` hex string -2. ⏭️ **TODO:** Audit all test data for NIP compliance -3. ⏭️ **TODO:** Add test data validators in base test class -4. ⏭️ **TODO:** Document test data requirements - -### Future Improvements - -1. **Create Test Data Factory** - ```java - public class NIPTestData { - public static final String VALID_PUBLIC_KEY_HEX = - "a".repeat(64); // Clearly 64 chars - - public static final String VALID_EVENT_ID_HEX = - "b".repeat(64); // Clearly 64 chars - - public static final String VALID_SIGNATURE_HEX = - "c".repeat(128); // Clearly 128 chars - } - ``` - -2. **Add Test Data Validation** - ```java - @BeforeAll - static void validateTestData() { - HexStringValidator.validateHex(TEST_PUBLIC_KEY, 64); - HexStringValidator.validateHex(TEST_EVENT_ID, 64); - HexStringValidator.validateHex(TEST_SIGNATURE, 128); - } - ``` - -3. **Document in AGENTS.md** - - Add section on test data requirements - - Reference NIP specifications for test data - - Provide examples of valid test data - ---- - -## Test Execution Summary - -### Before Fix -``` -[ERROR] Tests run: 170, Failures: 0, Errors: 3, Skipped: 0 -[ERROR] GenericEventBuilderTest.shouldBuildGenericEventWithCustomKind » ExceptionInInitializer -[ERROR] GenericEventBuilderTest.shouldBuildGenericEventWithStandardKind » NoClassDefFound -[ERROR] GenericEventBuilderTest.shouldRequireKindWhenBuilding » NoClassDefFound -``` - -### After Fix -``` -[INFO] Tests run: 170, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 -✅ All tests pass -``` - ---- - -## Conclusion - -The test failure was **caused by invalid test data**, not by our refactoring code. The refactoring actually **improved the situation** by: - -1. ✅ Exposing the invalid test data through stricter validation -2. ✅ Providing clear error messages for debugging -3. ✅ Enforcing NIP-01 compliance at compile/test time - -**Root Cause:** Invalid test data (63-char hex instead of 64-char) -**Fix:** Corrected test data to meet NIP-01 specification -**Status:** ✅ RESOLVED - -**NIP Compliance:** ✅ MAINTAINED - All changes conform to protocol specifications - ---- - -## Next Steps - -1. ✅ **DONE:** Fix immediate test failure -2. **RECOMMENDED:** Run full test suite to identify any other test data issues -3. **RECOMMENDED:** Create test data factory with validated constants -4. **RECOMMENDED:** Update AGENTS.md with test data guidelines - -**Estimated effort for recommendations:** 2-3 hours - ---- - -**Analysis Completed:** 2025-10-06 -**Tests Status:** ✅ PASSING (170 tests, 0 failures, 0 errors) diff --git a/.project-management/TEST_IMPLEMENTATION_PROGRESS.md b/.project-management/TEST_IMPLEMENTATION_PROGRESS.md deleted file mode 100644 index 23a0cc703..000000000 --- a/.project-management/TEST_IMPLEMENTATION_PROGRESS.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,281 +0,0 @@ -# Test Implementation Progress - -**Date Started:** 2025-10-08 -**Status:** 🚧 IN PROGRESS -**Focus:** Immediate Recommendations from Phase 4 - ---- - -## Overview - -Implementing the immediate/critical test recommendations identified in Phase 4 analysis. These tests address the most critical gaps in encryption and payment functionality. - ---- - -## Progress Summary - -**Completed:** 2 of 5 immediate priorities (40%) -**Tests Added:** 18 new tests -**Time Invested:** ~1.5 hours (of estimated 12-15 hours) - ---- - -## Completed Tasks - -### ✅ Task 1: NIP-04 Encrypted DM Tests (COMPLETE) - -**Status:** ✅ COMPLETE -**Time:** ~30 minutes (estimated 2 hours) -**Tests Added:** 7 new tests (1 existing + 7 new = 8 total) - -**File Modified:** `nostr-java-api/src/test/java/nostr/api/unit/NIP04Test.java` -- **Before:** 30 lines, 1 test (happy path only) -- **After:** 168 lines, 8 tests (comprehensive) -- **LOC Growth:** +460% - -**New Tests:** -1. ✅ `testEncryptDecryptRoundtrip()` - Verifies encryption→decryption integrity, IV format validation -2. ✅ `testSenderCanDecryptOwnMessage()` - Both sender and recipient can decrypt (bidirectional) -3. ✅ `testDecryptWithWrongRecipientFails()` - Security: third party cannot decrypt -4. ✅ `testEncryptEmptyMessage()` - Edge case: empty string handling -5. ✅ `testEncryptLargeMessage()` - Edge case: 10KB+ content (1000 lines) -6. ✅ `testEncryptSpecialCharacters()` - Unicode, emojis, special chars (世界🔐€£¥) -7. ✅ `testDecryptInvalidEventKindThrowsException()` - Error path: wrong event kind - -**Test Coverage Improvement:** -- **Input validation:** ✅ Wrong recipient, invalid event kind -- **Edge cases:** ✅ Empty messages, large messages (10KB+), special characters -- **Round-trip correctness:** ✅ Encrypt→decrypt produces original -- **Security:** ✅ Unauthorized decryption fails -- **Error paths:** ✅ Exception handling tested - -**Impact:** NIP-04 test coverage increased by **700%** - ---- - -### ✅ Task 2: NIP-44 Encrypted Payloads Tests (COMPLETE) - -**Status:** ✅ COMPLETE -**Time:** ~45 minutes (estimated 3 hours) -**Tests Added:** 8 new tests (2 existing + 8 new = 10 total) - -**File Modified:** `nostr-java-api/src/test/java/nostr/api/unit/NIP44Test.java` -- **Before:** 40 lines, 2 tests (basic encryption only) -- **After:** 174 lines, 10 tests (comprehensive) -- **LOC Growth:** +335% - -**New Tests:** -1. ✅ `testVersionBytePresent()` - Validates NIP-44 version byte in payload -2. ✅ `testPaddingHidesMessageLength()` - Verifies power-of-2 padding scheme -3. ✅ `testAuthenticationDetectsTampering()` - AEAD: tampered messages fail decryption -4. ✅ `testEncryptEmptyMessage()` - Edge case: empty string handling -5. ✅ `testEncryptSpecialCharacters()` - Unicode, emojis, Chinese characters (世界🔒中文€£¥) -6. ✅ `testEncryptLargeMessage()` - Edge case: 20KB+ content (2000 lines) -7. ✅ `testConversationKeyConsistency()` - Multiple messages with same key pair, different nonces - -**Test Coverage Improvement:** -- **Version handling:** ✅ Version byte (0x02) present -- **Padding correctness:** ✅ Power-of-2 padding verified -- **AEAD authentication:** ✅ Tampering detected and rejected -- **Edge cases:** ✅ Empty, large, special characters -- **Nonce uniqueness:** ✅ Same plaintext → different ciphertext -- **Conversation key:** ✅ Consistent encryption with same key pair - -**Impact:** NIP-44 test coverage increased by **400%** - ---- - -## In Progress / Pending Tasks - -### ⏳ Task 3: NIP-57 Zap Tests (PENDING) - -**Status:** ⏳ PENDING -**Estimated Time:** 3 hours -**Tests to Add:** 7 tests - -**Planned Tests:** -1. `testZapRequestWithInvoice()` - Include bolt11 invoice -2. `testZapReceiptValidation()` - Verify all required fields -3. `testZapAmountMatches()` - Invoice amount == zap amount -4. `testAnonymousZap()` - No sender identity -5. `testZapWithRelayList()` - Verify relay hints -6. `testInvalidZapReceipt()` - Missing fields should fail -7. `testZapDescriptionHash()` - SHA256 validation - -**Priority:** HIGH (payment functionality) - ---- - -### ⏳ Task 4: Multi-Relay Integration Tests (PENDING) - -**Status:** ⏳ PENDING -**Estimated Time:** 2-3 hours -**Tests to Add:** 4 tests - -**Planned Tests:** -1. `testBroadcastToMultipleRelays()` - Send event to 3+ relays -2. `testRelayFailover()` - One relay down, others work -3. `testRelaySpecificRouting()` - Different events → different relays -4. `testCrossRelayEventRetrieval()` - Query multiple relays - -**Priority:** HIGH (production requirement) - ---- - -### ⏳ Task 5: Subscription Lifecycle Tests (PENDING) - -**Status:** ⏳ PENDING -**Estimated Time:** 2-3 hours -**Tests to Add:** 6 tests - -**Planned Tests:** -1. `testSubscriptionReceivesNewEvents()` - Subscribe, then publish -2. `testEOSEMarkerReceived()` - Verify EOSE after stored events -3. `testUpdateActiveSubscription()` - Change filters -4. `testCancelSubscription()` - Proper cleanup -5. `testConcurrentSubscriptions()` - Multiple subs same connection -6. `testSubscriptionReconnection()` - Reconnect after disconnect - -**Priority:** HIGH (core feature) - ---- - -## Test Quality Metrics - -### Standards Applied - -All new tests follow Phase 4 recommended patterns: - -✅ **Structure:** -- `@BeforeEach` setup methods for test data -- Comprehensive JavaDoc explaining test purpose -- Descriptive test method names - -✅ **Coverage:** -- Happy path testing -- Edge case testing (empty, large, special chars) -- Error path testing (invalid inputs, exceptions) -- Security testing (unauthorized access, tampering) - -✅ **Assertions:** -- Positive assertions (correct behavior) -- Negative assertions (failures detected) -- Descriptive assertion messages - -✅ **Documentation:** -- Class-level JavaDoc -- Test-level comments -- Clear test intent - -### Code Quality - -**NIP-04 Tests:** -- Lines of code: 168 -- Test methods: 8 -- Assertions: ~15 -- Edge cases covered: 6 -- Error paths tested: 2 - -**NIP-44 Tests:** -- Lines of code: 174 -- Test methods: 10 -- Assertions: ~18 -- Edge cases covered: 7 -- Error paths tested: 2 -- Security tests: 2 (tampering, AEAD) - ---- - -## Impact Analysis - -### Coverage Improvement Projection - -**NIP-04 Module:** -- Before: 1 test (basic) -- After: 8 tests (comprehensive) -- **Coverage increase: +700%** - -**NIP-44 Module:** -- Before: 2 tests (basic) -- After: 10 tests (comprehensive) -- **Coverage increase: +400%** - -**Overall API Module (projected):** -- Current: 36% instruction coverage -- After immediate tests: ~40-42% (estimated) -- After all planned tests: ~45-50% (with NIP-57, multi-relay, subscriptions) - -### Risk Reduction - -**Security Risks Mitigated:** -- ✅ Encryption tampering detection (NIP-44 AEAD) -- ✅ Unauthorized decryption attempts (NIP-04) -- ✅ Special character handling (Unicode, emojis) -- ✅ Large message handling (10KB+ encrypted) - -**Reliability Improvements:** -- ✅ Edge case handling (empty messages) -- ✅ Error path validation (wrong keys, invalid events) -- ✅ Round-trip integrity (encrypt→decrypt) - ---- - -## Next Steps - -### Immediate (Next Session) -1. **Implement NIP-57 Zap Tests** (3 hours estimated) - - Payment functionality is critical - - Tests for invoice parsing, amount validation, receipt verification - -2. **Add Multi-Relay Integration Tests** (2-3 hours estimated) - - Production environments use multiple relays - - Tests for broadcasting, failover, cross-relay queries - -3. **Expand Subscription Tests** (2-3 hours estimated) - - Core feature needs thorough testing - - Tests for lifecycle, EOSE, concurrent subscriptions - -### Medium-term -4. Review Phase 4 roadmap for additional tests -5. Run coverage analysis to measure improvement -6. Commit and document all test additions - ---- - -## Files Modified - -1. ✅ `/nostr-java-api/src/test/java/nostr/api/unit/NIP04Test.java` - - Before: 30 lines, 1 test - - After: 168 lines, 8 tests - -2. ✅ `/nostr-java-api/src/test/java/nostr/api/unit/NIP44Test.java` - - Before: 40 lines, 2 tests - - After: 174 lines, 10 tests - -3. ⏳ `/nostr-java-api/src/test/java/nostr/api/unit/NIP57ImplTest.java` (planned) - -4. ⏳ `/nostr-java-api/src/test/java/nostr/api/integration/MultiRelayIT.java` (planned, new file) - -5. ⏳ `/nostr-java-api/src/test/java/nostr/api/integration/SubscriptionLifecycleIT.java` (planned, new file) - ---- - -## Success Metrics - -### Current Progress -- **Tests Added:** 18 (of planned ~30 for immediate priorities) -- **Progress:** 60% of immediate test additions -- **Time Spent:** 1.5 hours (of 12-15 hours estimated) -- **Efficiency:** 200% faster than estimated - -### Targets -- **Immediate Goal:** Complete all 5 immediate priority areas -- **Tests Target:** 30+ new tests total -- **Coverage Target:** 45-50% API module coverage -- **Time Target:** 12-15 hours total - ---- - -**Last Updated:** 2025-10-08 -**Status:** 40% complete (2/5 tasks) -**Next Task:** NIP-57 Zap Tests diff --git a/QODANA_TODOS.md b/QODANA_TODOS.md deleted file mode 100644 index 6eb70388d..000000000 --- a/QODANA_TODOS.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,526 +0,0 @@ -# Qodana Code Quality Issues - TODO List - -Generated: 2025-10-11 -Version: 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT -Total Issues: 293 (all warnings, 0 errors) - ---- - -## Summary Statistics - -- **Total Issues**: 293 -- **Severity**: 292 warnings, 1 note -- **Affected Files**: Main source code only (no test files) -- **Top Issue Categories**: - - JavadocReference: 158 (54%) - - FieldCanBeLocal: 55 (19%) - - FieldMayBeFinal: 18 (6%) - - UnnecessaryLocalVariable: 12 (4%) - - UNCHECKED_WARNING: 11 (4%) - ---- - -## Priority 1: Critical Issues (Immediate Action Required) - -### 1.1 Potential NullPointerException - -**Status**: ⚠️ NEEDS REVIEW -**File**: `nostr-java-api/src/main/java/nostr/api/nip01/NIP01TagFactory.java:78` - -**Issue**: Method invocation `getUuid()` may produce NullPointerException - -**Current Code**: -```java -if (idTag instanceof IdentifierTag identifierTag) { - param += identifierTag.getUuid(); // Line 78 -} -``` - -**Analysis**: The pattern matching ensures `identifierTag` is not null, but `getUuid()` might return null. - -**Action Required**: -- [ ] Verify `IdentifierTag.getUuid()` return type and nullability -- [ ] Add null check: `String uuid = identifierTag.getUuid(); if (uuid != null) param += uuid;` -- [ ] Or use `Objects.requireNonNullElse(identifierTag.getUuid(), "")` - ---- - -### 1.2 Suspicious Name Combination - -**Status**: 🔴 HIGH PRIORITY -**File**: `nostr-java-crypto/src/main/java/nostr/crypto/Point.java:24` - -**Issue**: Variable 'y' should probably not be passed as parameter 'elementRight' - -**Action Required**: -- [ ] Review the `Pair.of(x, y)` call at line 24 -- [ ] Verify parameter order matches expected x/y coordinates -- [ ] Check if `Pair` constructor parameters are correctly named -- [ ] Add documentation/comments clarifying the coordinate system - ---- - -### 1.3 Dead Code - Always False Conditions - -**Status**: 🔴 HIGH PRIORITY (Logic Bugs) - -#### 1.3.1 AddressableEvent.java:27 -**File**: `nostr-java-event/src/main/java/nostr/event/impl/AddressableEvent.java` - -**Issue**: Condition `30_000 <= n && n < 40_000` is always false - -**Action Required**: -- [ ] Review event kind range validation logic -- [ ] Fix or remove the always-false condition -- [ ] Verify against Nostr protocol specification (NIP-01) - -#### 1.3.2 ClassifiedListingEvent.java:159 -**File**: `nostr-java-event/src/main/java/nostr/event/impl/ClassifiedListingEvent.java` - -**Issue**: Condition `30402 <= n && n <= 30403` is always false - -**Action Required**: -- [ ] Review classified listing event kind validation -- [ ] Fix or remove the always-false condition -- [ ] Verify against NIP-99 specification - -#### 1.3.3 EphemeralEvent.java:33 -**File**: `nostr-java-event/src/main/java/nostr/event/impl/EphemeralEvent.java` - -**Issue**: Condition `20_000 <= n && n < 30_000` is always false - -**Action Required**: -- [ ] Review ephemeral event kind range validation -- [ ] Fix or remove the always-false condition -- [ ] Verify against Nostr protocol specification - ---- - -## Priority 2: Important Issues (Short-term) - -### 2.1 Mismatched Collection Query/Update (Potential Bugs) - -**Status**: 🟡 MEDIUM PRIORITY -**Impact**: Possible logic errors or dead code - -#### 2.1.1 CashuToken.java:22 -**File**: `nostr-java-event/src/main/java/nostr/event/entities/CashuToken.java` - -**Issue**: Collection `proofs` is queried but never populated - -**Action Required**: -- [ ] Review if `proofs` should be populated somewhere -- [ ] Add initialization logic if needed -- [ ] Remove query code if not needed - -#### 2.1.2 NutZap.java:15 -**File**: `nostr-java-event/src/main/java/nostr/event/entities/NutZap.java` - -**Issue**: Collection `proofs` is updated but never queried - -**Action Required**: -- [ ] Review if `proofs` should be queried somewhere -- [ ] Add query logic if needed -- [ ] Remove update code if not needed - -#### 2.1.3 SpendingHistory.java:21 -**File**: `nostr-java-event/src/main/java/nostr/event/entities/SpendingHistory.java` - -**Issue**: Collection `eventTags` is updated but never queried - -**Action Required**: -- [ ] Review if `eventTags` should be queried somewhere -- [ ] Add query logic if needed -- [ ] Remove update code if not needed - -#### 2.1.4 NIP46.java:71 -**File**: `nostr-java-api/src/main/java/nostr/api/NIP46.java` - -**Issue**: Collection `params` is updated but never queried - -**Action Required**: -- [ ] Review if `params` should be queried somewhere -- [ ] Add query logic if needed -- [ ] Remove update code if not needed - -#### 2.1.5 CashuToken.java:24 -**File**: `nostr-java-event/src/main/java/nostr/event/entities/CashuToken.java` - -**Issue**: Collection `destroyed` is updated but never queried - -**Action Required**: -- [ ] Review if `destroyed` should be queried somewhere -- [ ] Add query logic if needed -- [ ] Remove update code if not needed - ---- - -### 2.2 Non-Serializable with serialVersionUID Field - -**Status**: 🟢 LOW PRIORITY (Code Cleanliness) -**Effort**: Easy fix - -#### Files Affected: -1. `nostr-java-event/src/main/java/nostr/event/json/serializer/TagSerializer.java:13` -2. `nostr-java-event/src/main/java/nostr/event/json/serializer/GenericTagSerializer.java:7` -3. `nostr-java-event/src/main/java/nostr/event/json/serializer/BaseTagSerializer.java:6` - -**Issue**: Classes define `serialVersionUID` but don't implement `Serializable` - -**Action Required**: -- [ ] Remove `serialVersionUID` fields (recommended) -- [ ] OR implement `Serializable` interface if serialization is needed - -**Example Fix**: -```java -// Before -public class TagSerializer extends StdSerializer { - private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L; // Remove this - -// After -public class TagSerializer extends StdSerializer { - // serialVersionUID removed -``` - ---- - -### 2.3 Pointless Null Check - -**Status**: 🟢 LOW PRIORITY -**File**: `nostr-java-base/src/main/java/nostr/base/RelayUri.java:19` - -**Issue**: Unnecessary null check before `equalsIgnoreCase()` call - -**Action Required**: -- [ ] Review code at line 19 -- [ ] Remove redundant null check -- [ ] Simplify conditional logic - ---- - -### 2.4 DataFlow Issues (Redundant Conditions) - -**Status**: 🟡 MEDIUM PRIORITY - -#### 2.4.1 NIP09.java:61 -**File**: `nostr-java-api/src/main/java/nostr/api/NIP09.java` - -**Issue**: Condition `GenericEvent.class::isInstance` is redundant - -**Action Required**: -- [ ] Replace with simple null check -- [ ] Simplify conditional logic - -#### 2.4.2 NIP09.java:55 -**File**: `nostr-java-api/src/main/java/nostr/api/NIP09.java` - -**Issue**: Same as above - -**Action Required**: -- [ ] Replace with simple null check -- [ ] Simplify conditional logic - ---- - -## Priority 3: Documentation Issues (Long-term) - -### 3.1 JavadocReference Errors - -**Status**: 📚 DOCUMENTATION -**Effort**: Large (158 issues) -**Impact**: Medium (documentation quality) - -**Top Affected File**: `nostr-java-api/src/main/java/nostr/config/Constants.java` (82 issues) - -#### Common Issues: -- Cannot resolve symbol (e.g., 'NipConstants', 'GenericEvent') -- Inaccessible symbols (e.g., private fields, wrong imports) -- Missing fully qualified names - -**Action Required**: -- [ ] Review Constants.java Javadoc (82 issues) -- [ ] Fix inaccessible symbol references -- [ ] Add proper imports or use fully qualified names -- [ ] Verify all `@link` and `@see` tags - -**Distribution**: -- Constants.java: 82 issues -- CalendarContent.java: 12 issues -- NIP60.java: 8 issues -- Identity.java: 7 issues -- Other files: 49 issues - ---- - -### 3.2 Javadoc Declaration Issues - -**Status**: 📚 DOCUMENTATION -**Count**: 12 occurrences - -**Issue**: Javadoc syntax/structure problems - -**Action Required**: -- [ ] Review all Javadoc syntax errors -- [ ] Fix malformed tags -- [ ] Ensure proper Javadoc structure - ---- - -### 3.3 Javadoc Link as Plain Text - -**Status**: 📚 DOCUMENTATION -**Count**: 2 occurrences - -**Issue**: Javadoc links not using proper `{@link}` syntax - -**Action Required**: -- [ ] Convert plain text links to `{@link}` tags -- [ ] Ensure proper link formatting - ---- - -## Priority 4: Code Quality Improvements (Nice-to-have) - -### 4.1 Field Can Be Local - -**Status**: ♻️ REFACTORING -**Count**: 55 occurrences -**Effort**: Medium -**Impact**: Reduces class state complexity - -**Top Affected Files**: -- `nostr-java-event/src/main/java/nostr/event/message/OkMessage.java` (3 issues) -- Various entity classes in `nostr-java-event/src/main/java/nostr/event/entities/` (3 each) - -**Action Required**: -- [ ] Review each field usage -- [ ] Convert to local variables where appropriate -- [ ] Reduce class state complexity - -**Example**: -```java -// Before -private String tempResult; - -public void process() { - tempResult = calculate(); - return tempResult; -} - -// After -public void process() { - String tempResult = calculate(); - return tempResult; -} -``` - ---- - -### 4.2 Field May Be Final - -**Status**: ♻️ REFACTORING -**Count**: 18 occurrences -**Effort**: Easy -**Impact**: Improves immutability - -**Action Required**: -- [ ] Review fields that are never reassigned -- [ ] Add `final` modifier where appropriate -- [ ] Document why fields can't be final if needed - -**Example**: -```java -// Before -private String id; // Never reassigned after constructor - -// After -private final String id; -``` - ---- - -### 4.3 Unnecessary Local Variable - -**Status**: ♻️ REFACTORING -**Count**: 12 occurrences -**Effort**: Easy -**Impact**: Code simplification - -**Action Required**: -- [ ] Remove variables that are immediately returned -- [ ] Simplify method bodies - -**Example**: -```java -// Before -public String getId() { - String result = this.id; - return result; -} - -// After -public String getId() { - return this.id; -} -``` - ---- - -### 4.4 Unchecked Warnings - -**Status**: ⚠️ TYPE SAFETY -**Count**: 11 occurrences -**Impact**: Type safety - -**Top Affected Files**: -- CalendarContent.java -- NIP02.java -- NIP09.java - -**Action Required**: -- [ ] Review all raw type usage -- [ ] Add proper generic type parameters -- [ ] Use `@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")` only when truly necessary with justification - -**Example**: -```java -// Before -List items = new ArrayList(); // Raw type - -// After -List items = new ArrayList<>(); // Generic type -``` - ---- - -### 4.5 Deprecated Usage - -**Status**: 🔧 MAINTENANCE -**Count**: 4 occurrences - -**Issue**: Deprecated members still being referenced - -**Action Required**: -- [ ] Identify deprecated API usage -- [ ] Migrate to replacement APIs -- [ ] Remove deprecated references - ---- - -### 4.6 Unused Imports - -**Status**: 🧹 CLEANUP -**Count**: 2 occurrences -**Effort**: Trivial - -**Action Required**: -- [ ] Remove unused import statements -- [ ] Configure IDE to auto-remove on save - ---- - -## Implementation Plan - -### Phase 1: Critical Fixes (Week 1) -- [ ] Fix NullPointerException risk in NIP01TagFactory -- [ ] Verify Point.java coordinate parameter order -- [ ] Fix dead code conditions in event validators -- [ ] Test all changes - -### Phase 2: Important Fixes (Week 2) -- [ ] Address mismatched collection issues -- [ ] Remove serialVersionUID from non-Serializable classes -- [ ] Fix redundant null checks -- [ ] Fix redundant conditions in NIP09 - -### Phase 3: Documentation (Week 3-4) -- [ ] Fix Constants.java Javadoc (82 issues) -- [ ] Fix remaining Javadoc reference errors (76 issues) -- [ ] Fix Javadoc declaration issues -- [ ] Fix Javadoc link formatting - -### Phase 4: Code Quality (Week 5-6) -- [ ] Convert fields to local variables (55 issues) -- [ ] Add final modifiers (18 issues) -- [ ] Remove unnecessary local variables (12 issues) -- [ ] Fix unchecked warnings (11 issues) -- [ ] Address deprecated usage (4 issues) -- [ ] Remove unused imports (2 issues) - ---- - -## Testing Requirements - -For each fix: -- [ ] Ensure existing unit tests pass -- [ ] Add new tests if logic changes -- [ ] Verify no regressions -- [ ] Update integration tests if needed - ---- - -## Files Requiring Most Attention - -### Top 10 Files by Issue Count - -1. **Constants.java** (85 issues) - - 82 JavadocReference - - 2 FieldMayBeFinal - - 1 Other - -2. **CalendarContent.java** (12 issues) - - Javadoc + Unchecked warnings - -3. **NIP60.java** (8 issues) - - Javadoc references - -4. **Identity.java** (7 issues) - - Mixed issues - -5. **NostrCryptoException.java** (6 issues) - - Documentation - -6. **Bech32Prefix.java** (6 issues) - - Code quality - -7. **NIP46.java** (6 issues) - - Collection + Javadoc - -8. **Product.java** (5 issues) - - Entity class issues - -9. **NIP01.java** (5 issues) - - Mixed issues - -10. **PubKeyTag.java** (4 issues) - - Code quality - ---- - -## Estimated Effort - -| Priority | Issue Count | Estimated Hours | Difficulty | -|----------|-------------|-----------------|------------| -| P1 - Critical | 6 | 8-12 hours | Medium-High | -| P2 - Important | 14 | 6-8 hours | Low-Medium | -| P3 - Documentation | 172 | 20-30 hours | Low | -| P4 - Code Quality | 101 | 15-20 hours | Low | -| **Total** | **293** | **49-70 hours** | **Mixed** | - ---- - -## Notes - -- All issues are warnings (no errors blocking compilation) -- No critical security vulnerabilities detected -- Focus on P1 and P2 issues for immediate release -- P3 and P4 can be addressed incrementally -- Consider adding Qodana to CI/CD pipeline - ---- - -## References - -- Qodana Report: `.qodana/qodana.sarif.json` -- Project Version: 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT -- Analysis Date: 2025-10-11 diff --git a/nostr-java-api/pom.xml b/nostr-java-api/pom.xml index 0faaed2f2..6dad036b7 100644 --- a/nostr-java-api/pom.xml +++ b/nostr-java-api/pom.xml @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ xyz.tcheeric nostr-java - 1.0.2-SNAPSHOT + 1.0.0 ../pom.xml diff --git a/nostr-java-base/pom.xml b/nostr-java-base/pom.xml index 348ad56b2..86ed36849 100644 --- a/nostr-java-base/pom.xml +++ b/nostr-java-base/pom.xml @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ xyz.tcheeric nostr-java - 1.0.2-SNAPSHOT + 1.0.0 ../pom.xml diff --git a/nostr-java-client/pom.xml b/nostr-java-client/pom.xml index 14e7ef6be..4090fc8f3 100644 --- a/nostr-java-client/pom.xml +++ b/nostr-java-client/pom.xml @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ xyz.tcheeric nostr-java - 1.0.2-SNAPSHOT + 1.0.0 ../pom.xml diff --git a/nostr-java-crypto/pom.xml b/nostr-java-crypto/pom.xml index c4e866893..221ee437c 100644 --- a/nostr-java-crypto/pom.xml +++ b/nostr-java-crypto/pom.xml @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ xyz.tcheeric nostr-java - 1.0.2-SNAPSHOT + 1.0.0 ../pom.xml diff --git a/nostr-java-encryption/pom.xml b/nostr-java-encryption/pom.xml index 538d29d4a..f4f922ff0 100644 --- a/nostr-java-encryption/pom.xml +++ b/nostr-java-encryption/pom.xml @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ xyz.tcheeric nostr-java - 1.0.2-SNAPSHOT + 1.0.0 ../pom.xml diff --git a/nostr-java-event/pom.xml b/nostr-java-event/pom.xml index fe8f2babb..1078ddd21 100644 --- a/nostr-java-event/pom.xml +++ b/nostr-java-event/pom.xml @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ xyz.tcheeric nostr-java - 1.0.2-SNAPSHOT + 1.0.0 ../pom.xml diff --git a/nostr-java-examples/pom.xml b/nostr-java-examples/pom.xml index 4796971f9..d1c854c13 100644 --- a/nostr-java-examples/pom.xml +++ b/nostr-java-examples/pom.xml @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ xyz.tcheeric nostr-java - 1.0.2-SNAPSHOT + 1.0.0 ../pom.xml diff --git a/nostr-java-id/pom.xml b/nostr-java-id/pom.xml index 0b81bfbbd..b64f61c89 100644 --- a/nostr-java-id/pom.xml +++ b/nostr-java-id/pom.xml @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ xyz.tcheeric nostr-java - 1.0.2-SNAPSHOT + 1.0.0 ../pom.xml diff --git a/nostr-java-util/pom.xml b/nostr-java-util/pom.xml index 242af10f5..a81b394ec 100644 --- a/nostr-java-util/pom.xml +++ b/nostr-java-util/pom.xml @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ xyz.tcheeric nostr-java - 1.0.2-SNAPSHOT + 1.0.0 ../pom.xml diff --git a/pom.xml b/pom.xml index 712fd241b..a5f5778f0 100644 --- a/pom.xml +++ b/pom.xml @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ xyz.tcheeric nostr-java - 1.0.2-SNAPSHOT + 1.0.0 pom ${project.artifactId} diff --git a/scripts/create-roadmap-project.sh b/scripts/create-roadmap-project.sh index bfe4882cb..66fa99d6f 100755 --- a/scripts/create-roadmap-project.sh +++ b/scripts/create-roadmap-project.sh @@ -78,96 +78,137 @@ add_task() { fi } -#add_task "Remove deprecated constants facade" "Delete nostr.config.Constants.Kind before 1.0. See docs/explanation/roadmap-1.0.md." -#add_task "Retire legacy encoder singleton" "Drop Encoder.ENCODER_MAPPER_BLACKBIRD after migrating callers to EventJsonMapper." -#add_task "Drop deprecated NIP overloads" "Purge for-removal overloads in NIP01 and NIP61 to stabilize fluent APIs." -#add_task "Remove deprecated tag constructors" "Clean up GenericTag and EntityFactory compatibility constructors." -#add_task "Cover all relay command decoding" "Extend BaseMessageDecoderTest and BaseMessageCommandMapperTest fixtures beyond REQ." -#add_task "Stabilize NIP-52 calendar integration" "Re-enable flaky assertions in ApiNIP52RequestIT with deterministic relay handling." -#add_task "Stabilize NIP-99 classifieds integration" "Repair ApiNIP99RequestIT expectations for NOTICE/EOSE relay responses." -#add_task "Complete migration checklist" "Fill MIGRATION.md deprecated API removals section before cutting 1.0." -#add_task "Document dependency alignment plan" "Record and streamline parent POM overrides tied to 0.6.5-SNAPSHOT." -#add_task "Plan version uplift workflow" "Outline tagging and publishing steps for the 1.0.0 release in docs." - -# Newly documented release engineering tasks -#add_task "Configure release workflow secrets" "Set CENTRAL_USERNAME/PASSWORD, GPG_PRIVATE_KEY/PASSPHRASE for .github/workflows/release.yml." -#add_task "Validate tag/version parity in release" "Ensure pushed tags match POM version; workflow enforces v format." -#add_task "Update docs version references" "Refresh GETTING_STARTED.md and howto/use-nostr-java-api.md to current version and BOM usage." -#add_task "Publish CI + IT stability plan" "Keep Docker-based IT job green; document no-docker profile and failure triage." - -# Qodana-derived tasks (from QODANA_TODOS.md) -# Priority 1: Critical Issues -add_task "Fix NPE risk in NIP01TagFactory#getUuid" \ - "nostr-java-api/src/main/java/nostr/api/nip01/NIP01TagFactory.java:78\n- Ensure null-safe handling of IdentifierTag.getUuid().\n- Add null check or use Objects.requireNonNullElse.\n- Add/adjust unit tests." +echo "=== PHASE 1: Critical Blockers ===" + +add_task "[BLOCKER] Fix BOM version resolution" \ + "**Status**: CRITICAL - Build currently broken\n\n**Issue**: BOM version 1.1.8 not found in Maven Central (pom.xml:99)\n- Error: mvn test fails immediately with 'Non-resolvable import POM'\n\n**Actions**:\n- [ ] Check available BOM versions in repository\n- [ ] Downgrade to existing version OR\n- [ ] Publish 1.1.8 to Maven repository\n- [ ] Verify 'mvn clean test' succeeds\n\n**Priority**: P0 - Cannot proceed without fixing this" + +echo "=== PHASE 2: API Stabilization (Breaking Changes for 1.0) ===" + +add_task "Remove deprecated Constants.Kind facade" \ + "**File**: nostr-java-api/src/main/java/nostr/config/Constants.java\n\n**Actions**:\n- [ ] Delete nostr.config.Constants.Kind nested class\n- [ ] Migrate all internal usages to nostr.base.Kind\n- [ ] Search codebase: grep -r 'Constants.Kind' src/\n- [ ] Run tests to verify migration\n\n**Ref**: MIGRATION.md, roadmap-1.0.md" + +add_task "Remove Encoder.ENCODER_MAPPER_BLACKBIRD" \ + "**File**: nostr-java-base/src/main/java/nostr/base/Encoder.java\n\n**Actions**:\n- [ ] Remove ENCODER_MAPPER_BLACKBIRD field\n- [ ] Migrate callers to EventJsonMapper.getMapper()\n- [ ] Search: grep -r 'ENCODER_MAPPER_BLACKBIRD' src/\n- [ ] Update tests\n\n**Ref**: MIGRATION.md" + +add_task "Remove deprecated NIP01 method overloads" \ + "**File**: nostr-java-api/src/main/java/nostr/api/NIP01.java:152-195\n\n**Actions**:\n- [ ] Remove createTextNoteEvent(Identity, String)\n- [ ] Keep createTextNoteEvent(String) with instance sender\n- [ ] Update all callers\n- [ ] Run NIP01 tests\n\n**Ref**: MIGRATION.md" + +add_task "Remove deprecated NIP61 method overload" \ + "**File**: nostr-java-api/src/main/java/nostr/api/NIP61.java:103-156\n\n**Actions**:\n- [ ] Remove old createNutzapEvent signature\n- [ ] Update callers to use slimmer overload + NIP60 tags\n- [ ] Run NIP61 tests\n\n**Ref**: MIGRATION.md" + +add_task "Remove deprecated GenericTag constructor" \ + "**Files**:\n- nostr-java-event/src/main/java/nostr/event/tag/GenericTag.java\n- nostr-java-id/src/test/java/nostr/id/EntityFactory.java\n\n**Actions**:\n- [ ] Remove GenericTag(String, Integer) constructor\n- [ ] Remove EntityFactory.Events#createGenericTag(PublicKey, IEvent, Integer)\n- [ ] Update tests\n\n**Ref**: MIGRATION.md" + +echo "=== PHASE 3: Critical Bug Fixes (Qodana P1) ===" + +add_task "✅ [DONE] Fix NPE risk in NIP01TagFactory#getUuid" \ + "**Status**: COMPLETED\n**File**: nostr-java-api/src/main/java/nostr/api/nip01/NIP01TagFactory.java:78\n\n**Fixed**:\n- Added null check for identifierTag.getUuid()\n- Pattern: String uuid = getUuid(); if (uuid != null) param += uuid;\n\n**Ref**: Session work, QODANA_TODOS.md P1.1" add_task "Verify coordinate pair order in Point.java:24" \ - "nostr-java-crypto/src/main/java/nostr/crypto/Point.java:24\n- Review Pair.of(x,y) usage and parameter semantics.\n- Confirm coordinates match expected order and document." + "**Status**: HIGH PRIORITY\n**File**: nostr-java-crypto/src/main/java/nostr/crypto/Point.java:24\n\n**Issue**: Variable 'y' may be incorrectly passed as 'elementRight'\n\n**Actions**:\n- [ ] Review Pair.of(x,y) call semantics\n- [ ] Verify parameter order matches coordinate system\n- [ ] Add documentation/comments\n- [ ] Add unit tests for Point coordinate handling\n\n**Ref**: QODANA_TODOS.md P1.2" -add_task "Fix always-false condition in AddressableEvent" \ - "nostr-java-event/src/main/java/nostr/event/impl/AddressableEvent.java:27\n- Condition '30_000 <= n && n < 40_000' reported as always false.\n- Correct validation logic per NIP-01.\n- Add unit test coverage." +add_task "✅ [DONE] Fix always-false condition in AddressableEvent" \ + "**Status**: COMPLETED\n**File**: nostr-java-event/src/main/java/nostr/event/impl/AddressableEvent.java:27\n\n**Fixed**:\n- Clarified validation logic with explicit Integer type\n- Added comprehensive Javadoc per NIP-01 spec\n- Improved error messages with actual kind value\n- Created AddressableEventTest with 6 test cases\n- Verified condition works correctly (was Qodana false positive)\n\n**Ref**: Session work, QODANA_TODOS.md P1.3.1" add_task "Fix always-false condition in ClassifiedListingEvent" \ - "nostr-java-event/src/main/java/nostr/event/impl/ClassifiedListingEvent.java:159\n- Condition '30402 <= n && n <= 30403' reported as always false.\n- Verify expected kinds per NIP-99; correct logic.\n- Add unit tests." + "**Status**: HIGH PRIORITY\n**File**: nostr-java-event/src/main/java/nostr/event/impl/ClassifiedListingEvent.java:159\n\n**Issue**: Condition '30402 <= n && n <= 30403' reported as always false\n\n**Actions**:\n- [ ] Review against NIP-99 specification\n- [ ] Test with kinds 30402 and 30403\n- [ ] Fix validation logic or mark as false positive\n- [ ] Add ClassifiedListingEventTest with edge cases\n- [ ] Document expected kind range\n\n**Ref**: QODANA_TODOS.md P1.3.2" add_task "Fix always-false condition in EphemeralEvent" \ - "nostr-java-event/src/main/java/nostr/event/impl/EphemeralEvent.java:33\n- Condition '20_000 <= n && n < 30_000' reported as always false.\n- Correct range checks per spec; add tests." + "**Status**: HIGH PRIORITY\n**File**: nostr-java-event/src/main/java/nostr/event/impl/EphemeralEvent.java:33\n\n**Issue**: Condition '20_000 <= n && n < 30_000' reported as always false\n\n**Actions**:\n- [ ] Review against NIP-01 ephemeral event spec\n- [ ] Test with kinds 20000-29999 range\n- [ ] Fix validation logic or mark as false positive\n- [ ] Add EphemeralEventTest with edge cases\n- [ ] Add Javadoc explaining ephemeral event kinds\n\n**Ref**: QODANA_TODOS.md P1.3.3" + +echo "=== PHASE 4: Test Coverage Gaps ===" + +add_task "Complete relay command decoding tests" \ + "**Status**: BLOCKER for 1.0\n**Files**:\n- nostr-java-event/src/test/java/nostr/event/unit/BaseMessageDecoderTest.java:16-117\n- nostr-java-event/src/test/java/nostr/event/unit/BaseMessageCommandMapperTest.java:16-74\n\n**Issue**: Only REQ command tested; missing EVENT, CLOSE, EOSE, NOTICE, OK, AUTH\n\n**Actions**:\n- [ ] Add test fixtures for all relay command types\n- [ ] Extend BaseMessageDecoderTest coverage\n- [ ] Extend BaseMessageCommandMapperTest coverage\n- [ ] Verify all protocol message paths\n\n**Ref**: roadmap-1.0.md" + +add_task "Stabilize NIP-52 calendar integration tests" \ + "**Status**: BLOCKER for 1.0\n**File**: nostr-java-api/src/test/java/nostr/api/integration/ApiNIP52RequestIT.java:82-160\n\n**Issue**: Flaky assertions disabled; inconsistent relay responses\n\n**Actions**:\n- [ ] Diagnose relay behavior (EVENT vs EOSE ordering)\n- [ ] Update test expectations to match actual behavior\n- [ ] Re-enable commented assertions\n- [ ] Consider deterministic relay mocking\n- [ ] Verify tests pass consistently (3+ runs)\n\n**Ref**: roadmap-1.0.md" -# Priority 2: Important Issues -add_task "CashuToken: proofs queried but never populated" \ - "nostr-java-event/src/main/java/nostr/event/entities/CashuToken.java:22\n- Initialize or populate 'proofs' where required, or remove query.\n- Add tests for expected behavior." +add_task "Stabilize NIP-99 classifieds integration tests" \ + "**Status**: BLOCKER for 1.0\n**File**: nostr-java-api/src/test/java/nostr/api/integration/ApiNIP99RequestIT.java:71-165\n\n**Issue**: Flaky assertions disabled; NOTICE/EOSE inconsistencies\n\n**Actions**:\n- [ ] Document expected relay response patterns\n- [ ] Fix or clarify NOTICE vs EOSE expectations\n- [ ] Re-enable all assertions\n- [ ] Add retry logic if needed\n- [ ] Verify stability across runs\n\n**Ref**: roadmap-1.0.md" -add_task "NutZap: proofs updated but never queried" \ - "nostr-java-event/src/main/java/nostr/event/entities/NutZap.java:15\n- Ensure 'proofs' has corresponding reads or remove writes.\n- Add tests verifying usage." +add_task "✅ [DONE] Fix BOLT11 invoice parsing" \ + "**Status**: COMPLETED\n**File**: nostr-java-api/src/main/java/nostr/api/nip57/Bolt11Util.java:25\n\n**Fixed**:\n- Changed indexOf('1') to lastIndexOf('1') per Bech32 spec\n- Fixed test invoice format in Bolt11UtilTest.parseWholeBtcNoUnit\n- All Bolt11UtilTest tests now pass\n\n**Ref**: Session work" -add_task "SpendingHistory: eventTags updated but never queried" \ - "nostr-java-event/src/main/java/nostr/event/entities/SpendingHistory.java:21\n- Add reads for 'eventTags' or remove dead writes.\n- Add/adjust tests." +echo "=== PHASE 5: Collection Usage Issues (Qodana P2) ===" -add_task "NIP46: params updated but never queried" \ - "nostr-java-api/src/main/java/nostr/api/NIP46.java:71\n- Align 'params' usage (reads/writes) or remove redundant code.\n- Add tests." +add_task "Fix CashuToken: proofs queried but never populated" \ + "**File**: nostr-java-event/src/main/java/nostr/event/entities/CashuToken.java:22\n\n**Actions**:\n- [ ] Review if 'proofs' should be initialized/populated\n- [ ] Add initialization logic OR remove query\n- [ ] Add tests for expected behavior\n\n**Ref**: QODANA_TODOS.md P2.1.1" -add_task "CashuToken: destroyed updated but never queried" \ - "nostr-java-event/src/main/java/nostr/event/entities/CashuToken.java:24\n- Align 'destroyed' usage or remove redundant updates.\n- Add tests." +add_task "Fix NutZap: proofs updated but never queried" \ + "**File**: nostr-java-event/src/main/java/nostr/event/entities/NutZap.java:15\n\n**Actions**:\n- [ ] Add reads for 'proofs' OR remove writes\n- [ ] Add tests verifying usage\n\n**Ref**: QODANA_TODOS.md P2.1.2" + +add_task "Fix SpendingHistory: eventTags updated but never queried" \ + "**File**: nostr-java-event/src/main/java/nostr/event/entities/SpendingHistory.java:21\n\n**Actions**:\n- [ ] Add reads for 'eventTags' OR remove writes\n- [ ] Add/adjust tests\n\n**Ref**: QODANA_TODOS.md P2.1.3" + +add_task "Fix NIP46: params updated but never queried" \ + "**File**: nostr-java-api/src/main/java/nostr/api/NIP46.java:71\n\n**Actions**:\n- [ ] Align 'params' usage (reads/writes)\n- [ ] Remove if redundant\n- [ ] Add tests\n\n**Ref**: QODANA_TODOS.md P2.1.4" + +add_task "Fix CashuToken: destroyed updated but never queried" \ + "**File**: nostr-java-event/src/main/java/nostr/event/entities/CashuToken.java:24\n\n**Actions**:\n- [ ] Align 'destroyed' usage\n- [ ] Remove if redundant\n- [ ] Add tests\n\n**Ref**: QODANA_TODOS.md P2.1.5" + +echo "=== PHASE 6: Code Cleanup (Qodana P2) ===" add_task "Remove serialVersionUID from non-Serializable serializers" \ - "Files:\n- TagSerializer.java:13\n- GenericTagSerializer.java:7\n- BaseTagSerializer.java:6\nActions:\n- Remove serialVersionUID or implement Serializable if needed." + "**Files**:\n- nostr-java-event/src/main/java/nostr/event/json/serializer/TagSerializer.java:13\n- nostr-java-event/src/main/java/nostr/event/json/serializer/GenericTagSerializer.java:7\n- nostr-java-event/src/main/java/nostr/event/json/serializer/BaseTagSerializer.java:6\n\n**Actions**:\n- [ ] Remove serialVersionUID fields (recommended)\n- [ ] OR implement Serializable if needed\n\n**Ref**: QODANA_TODOS.md P2.2" + +add_task "Fix RelayUri: remove redundant null check" \ + "**File**: nostr-java-base/src/main/java/nostr/base/RelayUri.java:19\n\n**Actions**:\n- [ ] Simplify conditional before equalsIgnoreCase\n- [ ] Add unit test\n\n**Ref**: QODANA_TODOS.md P2.3" + +add_task "Fix NIP09: simplify redundant conditions" \ + "**File**: nostr-java-api/src/main/java/nostr/api/NIP09.java:55,61\n\n**Actions**:\n- [ ] Replace redundant GenericEvent.class::isInstance checks\n- [ ] Simplify with null checks\n- [ ] Add tests\n\n**Ref**: QODANA_TODOS.md P2.4" -add_task "RelayUri: remove redundant null check before equalsIgnoreCase" \ - "nostr-java-base/src/main/java/nostr/base/RelayUri.java:19\n- Simplify conditional logic; remove pointless null check.\n- Add small unit test." +echo "=== PHASE 7: Release Engineering ===" -add_task "NIP09: simplify redundant conditions" \ - "nostr-java-api/src/main/java/nostr/api/NIP09.java:55,61\n- Replace 'GenericEvent.class::isInstance' redundant checks with simpler logic.\n- Add tests to cover branches." +add_task "Update version to 1.0.0" \ + "**Status**: Ready when all blockers resolved\n**File**: pom.xml:6\n\n**Actions**:\n- [ ] Change version from 1.0.2-SNAPSHOT to 1.0.0\n- [ ] Update all module POMs if needed\n- [ ] Verify no SNAPSHOT dependencies remain\n- [ ] Run full build: mvn clean verify\n\n**Ref**: docs/howto/version-uplift-workflow.md" + +add_task "Publish 1.0.0 to Maven Central" \ + "**Status**: After version bump and tests pass\n\n**Actions**:\n- [ ] Configure release workflow secrets (CENTRAL_USERNAME/PASSWORD, GPG keys)\n- [ ] Tag release: git tag v1.0.0\n- [ ] Push tag: git push origin v1.0.0\n- [ ] Verify GitHub Actions release workflow succeeds\n- [ ] Confirm artifacts published to Maven Central\n\n**Ref**: .github/workflows/release.yml" + +add_task "Update BOM and remove module overrides" \ + "**Status**: After 1.0.0 published\n**File**: pom.xml:78,99\n\n**Actions**:\n- [ ] Publish/update BOM with 1.0.0 coordinates\n- [ ] Bump nostr-java-bom.version to matching BOM\n- [ ] Remove temporary module overrides in dependencyManagement\n- [ ] Verify mvn dependency:tree shows BOM-managed versions\n\n**Ref**: docs/explanation/dependency-alignment.md" + +add_task "Update documentation version references" \ + "**Status**: Before/during release\n\n**Actions**:\n- [ ] Update GETTING_STARTED.md with 1.0.0 examples\n- [ ] Update docs/howto/use-nostr-java-api.md version refs\n- [ ] Update README.md badges and examples\n- [ ] Update CHANGELOG.md with release notes\n- [ ] Update MIGRATION.md with actual release date\n\n**Ref**: roadmap-1.0.md" + +add_task "Create GitHub release and announcement" \ + "**Status**: After successful publish\n\n**Actions**:\n- [ ] Draft GitHub release with CHANGELOG content\n- [ ] Highlight breaking changes and migration guide\n- [ ] Tag as v1.0.0 milestone\n- [ ] Post announcement (if applicable)\n- [ ] Close 1.0 roadmap project\n\n**Ref**: CHANGELOG.md" + +echo "=== PHASE 8: Documentation (Qodana P3 - Post-1.0 acceptable) ===" -# Priority 3: Documentation Issues add_task "Fix Javadoc @link references in Constants.java (82 issues)" \ - "nostr-java-api/src/main/java/nostr/config/Constants.java\n- Resolve broken symbols and use fully-qualified names where needed.\n- Verify all @link/@see entries." + "**Priority**: P3 - Can defer post-1.0\n**File**: nostr-java-api/src/main/java/nostr/config/Constants.java\n\n**Actions**:\n- [ ] Resolve broken symbols\n- [ ] Use fully-qualified names where needed\n- [ ] Verify all @link/@see entries\n\n**Ref**: QODANA_TODOS.md P3.1" + +add_task "Fix remaining JavadocReference issues (76 issues)" \ + "**Priority**: P3 - Can defer post-1.0\n**Files**: CalendarContent.java, NIP60.java, Identity.java, others\n\n**Actions**:\n- [ ] Address unresolved Javadoc symbols\n- [ ] Fix imports and references\n\n**Ref**: QODANA_TODOS.md P3.1" -add_task "Fix remaining JavadocReference issues across API/event modules" \ - "Multiple files (see QODANA_TODOS.md)\n- Address unresolved Javadoc symbols and imports.\n- Focus on CalendarContent.java and NIP60.java next." +add_task "Fix Javadoc declaration syntax issues (12)" \ + "**Priority**: P3 - Can defer post-1.0\n**Scope**: Project-wide\n\n**Actions**:\n- [ ] Repair malformed Javadoc tags\n- [ ] Ensure proper structure\n\n**Ref**: QODANA_TODOS.md P3.2" -add_task "Fix Javadoc declaration syntax issues (12 occurrences)" \ - "Project-wide\n- Repair malformed tags and ensure proper structure." +add_task "Convert plain text links to {@link} (2)" \ + "**Priority**: P3 - Can defer post-1.0\n**Scope**: Project-wide\n\n**Actions**:\n- [ ] Replace plain links with {@link} tags\n\n**Ref**: QODANA_TODOS.md P3.3" -add_task "Convert plain text links to {@link} (2 occurrences)" \ - "Project-wide\n- Replace plain links with proper {@link} tags where appropriate." +echo "=== PHASE 9: Code Quality (Qodana P4 - Post-1.0 acceptable) ===" -# Priority 4: Code Quality Improvements -add_task "Refactor: convert fields to local variables (55 issues)" \ - "Project-wide\n- Reduce class state by inlining temporary fields.\n- Prioritize OkMessage and entities package." +add_task "Refactor: convert fields to local variables (55)" \ + "**Priority**: P4 - Nice-to-have\n**Scope**: Project-wide, focus on OkMessage and entities\n\n**Actions**:\n- [ ] Inline temporary fields\n- [ ] Reduce class state complexity\n\n**Ref**: QODANA_TODOS.md P4.1" -add_task "Refactor: mark fields final where applicable (18 issues)" \ - "Project-wide\n- Add 'final' to fields never reassigned." +add_task "Refactor: mark fields final (18)" \ + "**Priority**: P4 - Nice-to-have\n**Scope**: Project-wide\n\n**Actions**:\n- [ ] Add 'final' to fields never reassigned\n\n**Ref**: QODANA_TODOS.md P4.2" -add_task "Refactor: remove unnecessary local variables (12 issues)" \ - "Project-wide\n- Inline trivial temps; improve readability." +add_task "Refactor: remove unnecessary local variables (12)" \ + "**Priority**: P4 - Nice-to-have\n**Scope**: Project-wide\n\n**Actions**:\n- [ ] Inline trivial temps\n\n**Ref**: QODANA_TODOS.md P4.3" -add_task "Fix unchecked warnings (11 occurrences)" \ - "Project-wide\n- Add generics or justified @SuppressWarnings with comments." +add_task "Fix unchecked warnings (11)" \ + "**Priority**: P4 - Nice-to-have\n**Scope**: Project-wide\n\n**Actions**:\n- [ ] Add proper generics\n- [ ] Or add justified @SuppressWarnings\n\n**Ref**: QODANA_TODOS.md P4.4" -add_task "Migrate deprecated API usage (4 occurrences)" \ - "Project-wide\n- Replace deprecated members with supported alternatives." +add_task "Migrate deprecated API usage (4)" \ + "**Priority**: P4 - Nice-to-have\n**Scope**: Project-wide\n\n**Actions**:\n- [ ] Replace deprecated members\n\n**Ref**: QODANA_TODOS.md P4.5" -add_task "Remove unused imports (2 occurrences)" \ - "Project-wide\n- Delete unused imports; enable auto-remove in IDE." +add_task "Remove unused imports (2)" \ + "**Priority**: P4 - Nice-to-have\n**Scope**: Project-wide\n\n**Actions**:\n- [ ] Delete unused imports\n- [ ] Enable auto-remove in IDE\n\n**Ref**: QODANA_TODOS.md P4.6" cat < Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2025 00:00:52 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 3/3] refactor(api): remove deprecated Identity parameter methods from NIP01 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Remove deprecated method overloads that accept Identity parameter from NIP01 and NIP01EventBuilder: - NIP01.createTextNoteEvent(Identity, String, List) - NIP01EventBuilder.buildTextNote(Identity, String) - NIP01EventBuilder.buildRecipientTextNote(Identity, String, List) These methods are superseded by instance-configured sender pattern where the Identity is set at NIP01 construction time. This simplifies the API and reduces parameter duplication across method calls. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude --- nostr-java-api/src/main/java/nostr/api/NIP01.java | 13 +------------ .../java/nostr/api/nip01/NIP01EventBuilder.java | 13 +++---------- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) diff --git a/nostr-java-api/src/main/java/nostr/api/NIP01.java b/nostr-java-api/src/main/java/nostr/api/NIP01.java index 21f85f8ba..cbef29ee9 100644 --- a/nostr-java-api/src/main/java/nostr/api/NIP01.java +++ b/nostr-java-api/src/main/java/nostr/api/NIP01.java @@ -163,18 +163,7 @@ public NIP01 createTextNoteEvent(String content) { - /** - * Create a NIP01 text note event addressed to specific recipients. - * - * @param sender the identity used to sign the event - * @param content the content of the note - * @param recipients the list of {@code p} tags identifying recipients' public keys - * @return this instance for chaining - */ - public NIP01 createTextNoteEvent(Identity sender, String content, List recipients) { - this.updateEvent(eventBuilder.buildRecipientTextNote(sender, content, recipients)); - return this; - } + // Removed deprecated overload accepting Identity. Use instance sender instead. /** * Create a NIP01 text note event addressed to specific recipients using the configured sender. diff --git a/nostr-java-api/src/main/java/nostr/api/nip01/NIP01EventBuilder.java b/nostr-java-api/src/main/java/nostr/api/nip01/NIP01EventBuilder.java index 117af10bb..cfaec9bf0 100644 --- a/nostr-java-api/src/main/java/nostr/api/nip01/NIP01EventBuilder.java +++ b/nostr-java-api/src/main/java/nostr/api/nip01/NIP01EventBuilder.java @@ -31,18 +31,11 @@ public GenericEvent buildTextNote(String content) { .create(); } - public GenericEvent buildTextNote(Identity sender, String content) { - return new GenericEventFactory(resolveSender(sender), Kind.TEXT_NOTE.getValue(), content) - .create(); - } - - public GenericEvent buildRecipientTextNote(Identity sender, String content, List tags) { - return new GenericEventFactory(resolveSender(sender), Kind.TEXT_NOTE.getValue(), tags, content) - .create(); - } + // Removed deprecated Identity-accepting overloads; use instance-configured sender public GenericEvent buildRecipientTextNote(String content, List tags) { - return buildRecipientTextNote(null, content, tags); + return new GenericEventFactory(resolveSender(null), Kind.TEXT_NOTE.getValue(), tags, content) + .create(); } public GenericEvent buildTaggedTextNote(@NonNull List tags, @NonNull String content) {