When `&wrap` is set image location is miscalculated

[Bekaboo]

Firstly, thanks for you effort on this amazing plugin!

A small bug I found when playing with it is that when &wrap is set and there is a wrapped long line before the image, the image position will be miscalculated, here are some screenshots:

No wrap:

After :set wrap:

Could we take &wrap into consideration when calculating the image position? In addition, some options, such as &soothscroll, &breakindent, &breakindentpot, &linebreak can affect the visual height of a single logic line.

[3rd]

Hey, thank you for the kind words!
I did try to make it work with wrap & co, but didn't get far.
There are many options that have an impact on how many lines a "line" spans vertically.
Wouldn't do it unless we get some kind of API for measuring that, or find some magic way to do it consistently.
It also has to be very performant, as we have to compute and sum the visual height of all the lines in the buffer to pinpoint where to render.
I'd say that for me at least it's out of scope, but would be happy to merge any good solution for it.
I got used to textwidth and using gw just to avoid wrap issues, many things are not compatible with &wrap.

[xell]

Wouldn't do it unless we get some kind of API for measuring that

hi @3rd , it seems that the built-in vim.fn.screenpos() can return the screen position for wrapped lines. Hope it works on calculating the correct visual height.

[3rd]

Hey, that's interesting, I guess we could at least use it inside the integrations to query the position of the "source tag" for the image. Thank you!