Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Oct 5, 2018. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@docularxu
Copy link
Member

Optimize HDMI resolutions for Hikey. Major changes:

  1. Supports these modes as high priority if existing in EDID:
    1920x1200 16:10 Monitor
    1920x1080 16:9 TV
    1680x1050 16:10 Monitor
    1280x1024 5:4 Monitor
    1280x720 16:9 TV
    800x600 4:3 TV
  2. As boxed mode (boot without HDMI cable), including two modes:
    1280x720@60 16:9 TV
    800x600@60 4:3 TV
    , switchable using the same hot-key: Alt-PrtSc-g
  3. Black list, blocking resolutions less than 640x480.
  • I saw 720x240@60 on some TV. When switching to this mode, driver error occurs.
    4) Using old 720p settings in boxed mode. Suppose this setting can support
    720p on more TVs.

Note: Patch need to be rewrite before merging to hikey branch.

Signed-off-by: Xinliang Liu xinliang.liu@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Guodong Xu guodong.xu@linaro.org

Optimize HDMI resolutions for Hikey. Major changes:
1) Supports these modes as high priority if existing in EDID:
1920x1200	16:10	Monitor
1920x1080	16:9	TV
1680x1050	16:10	Monitor
1280x1024	5:4	Monitor
1280x720	16:9	TV
800x600		4:3	TV
2) As boxed mode (boot without HDMI cable), including two modes:
1280x720@60	16:9	TV
800x600@60	4:3	TV
, switchable using the same hot-key: Alt-PrtSc-g
3) Black list, blocking resolutions less than 640x480.
- I saw 720x240@60 on some TV. When switching to this mode, driver error occurs.
4) Using old 720p settings in boxed mode. Suppose this setting can support
720p on more TVs.

Note: Patch need to be rewrite before merging to hikey branch.

Signed-off-by: Xinliang Liu <xinling.liu@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Guodong Xu <guodong.xu@linaro.org>
docularxu pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 13, 2015
gpu/drm: hisilicon: optimize hdmi resolutions white list and black list
@docularxu docularxu merged commit 4a34dce into topic/hikey/hdmi-resolution-testing Aug 13, 2015
@docularxu docularxu deleted the working-prioritized-resolutions branch December 11, 2015 07:53
docularxu pushed a commit to 96boards-hikey/linux that referenced this pull request Jul 28, 2016
Commit e8d975e ("fixing infinite OPEN loop in 4.0 stateid recovery")
introduced access to state after it was just potentially freed by
nfs4_put_open_state leading to a random data corruption somewhere.

BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffff88004941ee40
IP: [<ffffffff813baf01>] nfs4_do_reclaim+0x461/0x740
PGD 3501067 PUD 3504067 PMD 6ff37067 PTE 800000004941e060
Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
Modules linked in: loop rpcsec_gss_krb5 acpi_cpufreq tpm_tis joydev i2c_piix4 pcspkr tpm virtio_console nfsd ttm drm_kms_helper syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt fb_sys_fops floppy serio_raw virtio_blk drm
CPU: 6 PID: 2161 Comm: 192.168.10.253- Not tainted 4.7.0-rc1-vm-nfs+ 96boards#112
Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
task: ffff8800463dcd00 ti: ffff88003ff48000 task.ti: ffff88003ff48000
RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff813baf01>]  [<ffffffff813baf01>] nfs4_do_reclaim+0x461/0x740
RSP: 0018:ffff88003ff4bd68  EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffffff81a49900 RCX: 00000000000000e8
RDX: 00000000000000e8 RSI: ffff8800418b9930 RDI: ffff880040c96c88
RBP: ffff88003ff4bdf8 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff880040c96c98
R13: ffff88004941ee20 R14: ffff88004941ee40 R15: ffff88004941ee00
FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88006d000000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: ffff88004941ee40 CR3: 0000000060b0b000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
Stack:
 ffffffff813baad5 ffff8800463dcd00 ffff880000000001 ffffffff810e6b68
 ffff880043ddbc88 ffff8800418b9800 ffff8800418b98c8 ffff88004941ee48
 ffff880040c96c90 ffff880040c96c00 ffff880040c96c20 ffff880040c96c40
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff813baad5>] ? nfs4_do_reclaim+0x35/0x740
 [<ffffffff810e6b68>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x128/0x1b0
 [<ffffffff813bb7cd>] nfs4_run_state_manager+0x5ed/0xa40
 [<ffffffff813bb1e0>] ? nfs4_do_reclaim+0x740/0x740
 [<ffffffff813bb1e0>] ? nfs4_do_reclaim+0x740/0x740
 [<ffffffff810af0d1>] kthread+0x101/0x120
 [<ffffffff810e6b68>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x128/0x1b0
 [<ffffffff818843af>] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x40
 [<ffffffff810aefd0>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x250/0x250
Code: 65 80 4c 8b b5 78 ff ff ff e8 fc 88 4c 00 48 8b 7d 88 e8 13 67 d2 ff 49 8b 47 40 a8 02 0f 84 d3 01 00 00 4c 89 ff e8 7f f9 ff ff <f0> 41 80 26 7f 48 8b 7d c8 e8 b1 84 4c 00 e9 39 fd ff ff 3d e6
RIP  [<ffffffff813baf01>] nfs4_do_reclaim+0x461/0x740
 RSP <ffff88003ff4bd68>
CR2: ffff88004941ee40

Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
docularxu pushed a commit to 96boards-hikey/linux that referenced this pull request Jun 8, 2017
Shubham was recently asking on netdev why in arm64 JIT we don't multiply
the index for accessing the tail call map by 8. That led me into testing
out arm64 JIT wrt tail calls and it turned out I got a NULL pointer
dereference on the tail call.

The buggy access is at:

  prog = array->ptrs[index];
  if (prog == NULL)
      goto out;

  [...]
  00000060:  d2800e0a  mov x10, #0x70 // 96boards#112
  00000064:  f86a682a  ldr x10, [x1,x10]
  00000068:  f862694b  ldr x11, [x10,x2]
  0000006c:  b40000ab  cbz x11, 0x00000080
  [...]

The code triggering the crash is f862694b. x1 at the time contains the
address of the bpf array, x10 offsetof(struct bpf_array, ptrs). Meaning,
above we load the pointer to the program at map slot 0 into x10. x10
can then be NULL if the slot is not occupied, which we later on try to
access with a user given offset in x2 that is the map index.

Fix this by emitting the following instead:

  [...]
  00000060:  d2800e0a  mov x10, #0x70 // 96boards#112
  00000064:  8b0a002a  add x10, x1, x10
  00000068:  d37df04b  lsl x11, x2, #3
  0000006c:  f86b694b  ldr x11, [x10,x11]
  00000070:  b40000ab  cbz x11, 0x00000084
  [...]

This basically adds the offset to ptrs to the base address of the bpf
array we got and we later on access the map with an index * 8 offset
relative to that. The tail call map itself is basically one large area
with meta data at the head followed by the array of prog pointers.
This makes tail calls working again, tested on Cavium ThunderX ARMv8.

Fixes: ddb5599 ("arm64: bpf: implement bpf_tail_call() helper")
Reported-by: Shubham Bansal <illusionist.neo@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants