Conversation
t-bast
reviewed
May 16, 2025
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think there's a bit more work to do around taproot scripts and witnesses to make it cleaner by introducing better types and encapsulation of script trees and their corresponding witnesses. My main comment that requires more work is #3086 (comment), the rest is mostly nits for now.
eclair-core/src/main/scala/fr/acinq/eclair/transactions/Transactions.scala
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
eclair-core/src/main/scala/fr/acinq/eclair/transactions/Transactions.scala
Show resolved
Hide resolved
eclair-core/src/main/scala/fr/acinq/eclair/transactions/Transactions.scala
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
eclair-core/src/main/scala/fr/acinq/eclair/transactions/Transactions.scala
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
eclair-core/src/main/scala/fr/acinq/eclair/transactions/Transactions.scala
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
eclair-core/src/main/scala/fr/acinq/eclair/transactions/Transactions.scala
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
eclair-core/src/main/scala/fr/acinq/eclair/transactions/Transactions.scala
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
eclair-core/src/main/scala/fr/acinq/eclair/transactions/Transactions.scala
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
eclair-core/src/main/scala/fr/acinq/eclair/transactions/Transactions.scala
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
eclair-core/src/main/scala/fr/acinq/eclair/channel/fsm/ErrorHandlers.scala
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
t-bast
reviewed
May 19, 2025
Member
t-bast
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is looking much better than the attempts we made before the transactions architecture refactoring, that was worth it! I think we're almost there, but can still simplify it a bit.
eclair-core/src/main/scala/fr/acinq/eclair/channel/Commitments.scala
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
eclair-core/src/test/scala/fr/acinq/eclair/transactions/TransactionsSpec.scala
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
eclair-core/src/test/scala/fr/acinq/eclair/transactions/TransactionsSpec.scala
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
eclair-core/src/test/scala/fr/acinq/eclair/transactions/TransactionsSpec.scala
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
eclair-core/src/main/scala/fr/acinq/eclair/transactions/Scripts.scala
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
eclair-core/src/main/scala/fr/acinq/eclair/transactions/Transactions.scala
Show resolved
Hide resolved
eclair-core/src/main/scala/fr/acinq/eclair/transactions/Transactions.scala
Show resolved
Hide resolved
eclair-core/src/main/scala/fr/acinq/eclair/transactions/Transactions.scala
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
eclair-core/src/main/scala/fr/acinq/eclair/transactions/Transactions.scala
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Member
|
Needs rebase! |
There are no functional changes, we just define a new format that is not used anywhere yet, with dummy "not implemented" blocks when needed.
We can create, sign, spend commit and htlc transactions for the new simple taproot channels commitment format. Wire messages and channel creation/update workflow have not been modified.
We only either single leaves or branches with 2 single leaves (a timeout and a success branch for example), having specific types for them makes to code easier to read.
668da46 to
8fcc0f9
Compare
t-bast
reviewed
May 22, 2025
eclair-core/src/test/scala/fr/acinq/eclair/transactions/TransactionsSpec.scala
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
eclair-core/src/test/scala/fr/acinq/eclair/transactions/TransactionsSpec.scala
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
eclair-core/src/test/scala/fr/acinq/eclair/transactions/TransactionsSpec.scala
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
eclair-core/src/main/scala/fr/acinq/eclair/transactions/Transactions.scala
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
eclair-core/src/main/scala/fr/acinq/eclair/transactions/Transactions.scala
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
eclair-core/src/main/scala/fr/acinq/eclair/transactions/Transactions.scala
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
eclair-core/src/main/scala/fr/acinq/eclair/transactions/Transactions.scala
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
t-bast
approved these changes
May 23, 2025
Member
t-bast
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM! It's really nice to see that this PR adds a lot of features and improves test coverage while decreasing the number of lines of code!
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We add a new commitment format for simple taproot channels, and implement creating and verifying musig2 and taproot signatures for these channels.
Wire format and channel creation/update workflows have not been modified, this will be done in another PR.