Request-for-comments about moving away references to footnotes #117
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
vstehle
added
help wanted
vstehle
force-pushed
the
rfc-move
branch
3 times, most recently
from
1d7d82e to
19e1b46
Compare
Move away as many definitions references as possible to footnotes, to ease readability. This is a request-for-comments, to fuel discussions, and is not to be merged. Signed-off-by: Vincent Stehlé <vincent.stehle@arm.com>
Contributor
|
I don't feel that the current style of referring to UEFI chaptests is too distractive. |
Collaborator
Author
|
Ok, thanks for review; let's drop it. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Would it be more readable to move away many references to footnotes?
This is a request-for-comments, to fuel discussions, and is not to be merged.
Please give your feedback in this pull request.