new shuffle feature

[walthierer]

Revised the module.js file to enable different displays of the modules after the website is reloaded.

[timmwille]

I think this change has too many changes, that are not only aiming at the shuffle mode. It changes the internal structure of the platform view and caching/saving the selection. I am not 100% sure how to fix that properly, might be due to not up to date branch?

@saisilinus could you have a quick look on this

[saisilinus]

Please add a description for the PR @walthierer. You can use this template as a guideline:

Pull Request

Description

Please include a summary of the change and which issue is fixed. Please also include relevant motivation and context.

Fixes # (issue)

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
• Documentation update

How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide instructions so we can reproduce.

• Test A
• Test B

Checklist:

• My code follows the style guidelines of this project
• I have performed a self-review of my own code
• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
• My changes generate no new warnings
• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
• New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
• Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules

[timmwille]

good Idea with #229 ... for now if you could help implementing a set switch button to "shuffle" would be awesome @saisilinus - I think this way one can still switch to "regular" unshuffled mode if needed

You can use the feature branch @walthierer created

[saisilinus]

Ok

[timmwille]

I think I found a good compromise, thx for the contribution @saisilinus and your suggestion to add this feature @walthierer

See: #231

lets keep the feature branch for reference