Skip to content

Conversation

@Roberta-Ferioli
Copy link
Contributor

@mconcas mconcas changed the title create Ptresolution, add efficiency of sec study ITS-Study: create pt resolution, add efficiency of sec study Aug 14, 2023
mconcas
mconcas previously approved these changes Aug 14, 2023
Copy link
Collaborator

@mconcas mconcas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approving just for CI, do nt merge yet.

@mconcas mconcas changed the title ITS-Study: create pt resolution, add efficiency of sec study [WIP]: ITS-Study: create pt resolution, add efficiency of sec study Aug 14, 2023
@mconcas mconcas changed the title [WIP]: ITS-Study: create pt resolution, add efficiency of sec study ITS-Study: create pt resolution, add efficiency of sec study Sep 12, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

This PR did not have any update in the last 30 days. Is it still needed? Unless further action in will be closed in 5 days.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Oct 13, 2023
mconcas
mconcas previously approved these changes Oct 13, 2023
@alibuild
Copy link
Collaborator

Error while checking build/O2/fullCI for c3b6b62 at 2023-10-13 21:42:

No log files found

Full log here.

@mconcas
Copy link
Collaborator

mconcas commented Oct 16, 2023

Hi @TimoWilken, I see CentOS 8 builders failing the git fetch on multiple PRs. Will it run periodically so I can expect to have it going through at some point or shall I re-trigger the builds somehow? Thanks in advance.

@mconcas mconcas merged commit ab840bc into AliceO2Group:dev Oct 17, 2023
@ktf
Copy link
Member

ktf commented Oct 18, 2023

@mconcas @TimoWilken it's not clear to me how this could have passed the fullCI, given it breaks the code checker but apparently the test was green. Do we have some race condition in the tests? Was it force merged?

@ktf
Copy link
Member

ktf commented Oct 18, 2023

Regression in code checker hopefully fixed by #12094.

@mconcas
Copy link
Collaborator

mconcas commented Oct 18, 2023

@mconcas @TimoWilken it's not clear to me how this could have passed the fullCI, given it breaks the code checker but apparently the test was green. Do we have some race condition in the tests? Was it force merged?

PR was merged with macos red as it always is lately, fullCI and co were green.
Similar issue in this open pr: #12044 (comment)

Thanks for the fixes, I admittedly relied on automatic checks for this kind of problems.

@ktf
Copy link
Member

ktf commented Oct 18, 2023

PR was merged with macos red as it always is lately, fullCI and co were green.

Yes, that's exactly my point. fullCI should have caught it already when checking the PR.

shahor02 pushed a commit to shahor02/AliceO2 that referenced this pull request Oct 20, 2023
…Group#11763)

* create Ptresolution, add efficiency of sec study

* Fix format

* Add Pt res study at TrackChech

* Add Pt resolution at check study

* ITS-Study: add some study on efficiency of secondary tracks, add fake clusters of secondary analysis

* fix formatting

* fix formatting

* ITS-Study: change structure, add Fake cluster study

* ITS-Study:add fake clusters identification

* [WIP] ITS-Study: completed study on fake clusters

* ITS-Study:Completed the study on secondary tracks and fake clusters, start study on Pt resolution

* ITS-Study: completed secondary tracks efficiency study, started studies on fake clusters and Pt resolution

* Update Detectors/ITSMFT/ITS/postprocessing/studies/src/TrackCheck.cxx

* Update Detectors/ITSMFT/ITS/postprocessing/studies/src/TrackCheck.cxx

* Update Detectors/ITSMFT/ITS/postprocessing/studies/src/TrackCheck.cxx

* Update Detectors/ITSMFT/ITS/postprocessing/studies/src/TrackCheck.cxx

* Update Detectors/ITSMFT/ITS/postprocessing/studies/src/TrackCheck.cxx

* Update Detectors/ITSMFT/ITS/postprocessing/studies/src/TrackCheck.cxx

* Update Detectors/ITSMFT/ITS/postprocessing/studies/src/TrackCheck.cxx

---------

Co-authored-by: Matteo Concas <mconcas@cern.ch>
leo-barreto pushed a commit to leo-barreto/AliceO2 that referenced this pull request Nov 16, 2023
…Group#11763)

* create Ptresolution, add efficiency of sec study

* Fix format

* Add Pt res study at TrackChech

* Add Pt resolution at check study

* ITS-Study: add some study on efficiency of secondary tracks, add fake clusters of secondary analysis

* fix formatting

* fix formatting

* ITS-Study: change structure, add Fake cluster study

* ITS-Study:add fake clusters identification

* [WIP] ITS-Study: completed study on fake clusters

* ITS-Study:Completed the study on secondary tracks and fake clusters, start study on Pt resolution

* ITS-Study: completed secondary tracks efficiency study, started studies on fake clusters and Pt resolution

* Update Detectors/ITSMFT/ITS/postprocessing/studies/src/TrackCheck.cxx

* Update Detectors/ITSMFT/ITS/postprocessing/studies/src/TrackCheck.cxx

* Update Detectors/ITSMFT/ITS/postprocessing/studies/src/TrackCheck.cxx

* Update Detectors/ITSMFT/ITS/postprocessing/studies/src/TrackCheck.cxx

* Update Detectors/ITSMFT/ITS/postprocessing/studies/src/TrackCheck.cxx

* Update Detectors/ITSMFT/ITS/postprocessing/studies/src/TrackCheck.cxx

* Update Detectors/ITSMFT/ITS/postprocessing/studies/src/TrackCheck.cxx

---------

Co-authored-by: Matteo Concas <mconcas@cern.ch>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants