-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 484
Empty TF protection; CalibDiff combined to one vector #6249
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why? CellID is deterministic and using at() has overhead.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
idem
69953c8 to
7a8bb12
Compare
|
Dear @shahor02, tests failed for PHOS-unrelated reasons. Could you review? |
|
Hi @peressounko |
|
Dear @shahor02, I can not simulate locally any more. Any simulation qed or pythia ends with Thread 2 (Thread 0x7f2df1c8a700 (LWP 671) "ZMQbg/Reaper"): Thread 1 (Thread 0x7f2df2559080 (LWP 669) "o2-sim"): Probably this is related to my switch to gcc20 because of missing in my installation. Can this be the reason: |
|
Hi @peressounko |
d2d0ba1 to
0fd4600
Compare
|
Dear @shahor02, |
|
Hi @peressounko |
|
Thanks @shahor02, indeed installation of AEGIS fixed the problem |
|
so, does it pass the test? |
|
It passed QED test and second simulation. But then is used 16G of ram +16 G of swap and completely hanged laptop |
|
OK, thanks, but did phos digit->raw passed? BTW, you did not the address the comments I left before.. |
|
It passed Digitization with o2-sim-digitizer-workflow --onlyDet PHS But in o2-phos-digi2raw --file-for link -o raw/PHS I see: Concerning your comments: I replied there: I propose to keep this small overhead while we test system to avoid repeating situation where I can not find the reason of errors. |
|
Hi @peressounko
This is probably because the change of the Either the channelID calculation is wrong or the constant....
Strange, I did not find any answer. For the |
|
Hi @peressounko |
Fill out-of-range fixed
|
Hi @shahor02, sorry I was distracted with another stuff. Now return to this issue. |
|
Dear @shahor02, test build/O2/fullCI runs ~10 hours, may be it should be restarted? |
|
Dear @shahor02, I think we can merge this PR. build/O2/fullCI failed at QED test where PHOS does not participate. Do we have similar problems in other PRs? |
|
FST passed locally, merging |
Empty TF protection; CalibDiff combined to one vector. Fill out-of-range fixed