Skip to content

Conversation

@njacazio
Copy link
Collaborator

  • Add single particle QA task
  • Add 2D efficiency to efficiency QA task
  • Add possibility to select charge depending on PDG code

@njacazio njacazio requested review from a team, iarsene and jgrosseo as code owners June 22, 2021 17:14
@njacazio
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Input for the PR in AliceO2Group/DelphesO2#79

@njacazio
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@ddobrigk here it is, what do you think?

- Add single particle QA task
- Add 2D efficiency to efficiency QA task
- Add possibility to select charge depending on PDG code
- Add Y for MC particles
Copy link
Collaborator

@jgrosseo jgrosseo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I approve.
@njacazio I think we should consider making expression columns for the MC table as well.

@jgrosseo jgrosseo merged commit c02e74c into AliceO2Group:dev Jul 2, 2021
@jgrosseo
Copy link
Collaborator

jgrosseo commented Jul 2, 2021

FullCI was waiting too long. Rest fine. Fingers crossed :)

@njacazio njacazio deleted the nj-dev-lutmaker branch July 2, 2021 08:41
Comment on lines +201 to +212
if (noFakes) { // Selecting tracks with no fake hits
bool hasFake = false;
for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) { // From ITS to TPC
if (track.mcMask() & 1 << i) {
hasFake = true;
break;
}
}
if (hasFake) {
continue;
}
}
Copy link
Contributor

@anerokhi anerokhi Jul 25, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Isn't this the same as just

      if (noFakes and (track.mcMask() & 0b11'1111'1111)) { // Selecting tracks with no fake hits from ITS to TPC
        continue;
      }

or you'll want to know the exact bit in the future?

EmilGorm pushed a commit to EmilGorm/AliceO2 that referenced this pull request Nov 22, 2021
- Add single particle QA task
- Add 2D efficiency to efficiency QA task
- Add possibility to select charge depending on PDG code
- Add Y for MC particles
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants