Skip to content

Conversation

@kpanot
Copy link
Contributor

@kpanot kpanot commented Dec 10, 2025

Proposed change

feat(openapi): generator of an openapi extension project

Related issues

- No issue associated -

@kpanot kpanot requested a review from a team as a code owner December 10, 2025 10:25
@nx-cloud
Copy link

nx-cloud bot commented Dec 10, 2025

View your CI Pipeline Execution ↗ for commit f9dabff

Command Status Duration Result
nx run-many --target=test-e2e ✅ Succeeded <1s View ↗
nx run-many --tui=false --target=build --projec... ✅ Succeeded 1s View ↗
nx affected --target=test --collectCoverage --c... ✅ Succeeded 3s View ↗
nx run-many --target=documentation ✅ Succeeded 9s View ↗
nx run ama-sdk-schematics:build-swagger ✅ Succeeded 4s View ↗
nx run-many --target=build,build-swagger ✅ Succeeded 34s View ↗
nx affected --target=lint --configuration ci ✅ Succeeded 13s View ↗
nx affected --target=package-github-action ✅ Succeeded 7s View ↗

☁️ Nx Cloud last updated this comment at 2025-12-17 03:18:03 UTC

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 10, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 72.80%. Comparing base (6a5a399) to head (f9dabff).
⚠️ Report is 29 commits behind head on main.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@guilhermevrs
Copy link

We are approaching 2026 and still I don't see tests in your PRs 🥲

@kpanot kpanot force-pushed the feature/openapi-extension-generator branch from c9a2d2b to 20b47fa Compare December 16, 2025 02:39
| `--target`, `-t` | `.` | Target directory where files will be generated. |
| `--dependency-base-spec`, `-b` | - | Name of the NPM artifact to use as the dependency base specification (e.g. @my-org/specification). |

The command will generate a directory with the same structure of the `design` command but will setup the repository to prepare the generation of 3 specification:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
The command will generate a directory with the same structure of the `design` command but will setup the repository to prepare the generation of 3 specification:
The command will generate a directory with the same structure of the `design` command but will set up the repository to prepare the generation of 3 specifications:

I don't understand what you mean by same structure of the design command, could you explain?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Indeed it may not be very clear :S.
I wanted to say that the command design-extension generate the same files generated by the command design. The only difference is that it prepare the generation of 3 APIs listed below.

@kpanot kpanot force-pushed the feature/openapi-extension-generator branch from 20b47fa to f9dabff Compare December 17, 2025 03:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants