Skip to content

[Modules] Cross referencing linkedServices module in automationAccount#1494

Merged
eriqua merged 3 commits intomainfrom
users/erikag/linkedServicesCrossRef
Jun 6, 2022
Merged

[Modules] Cross referencing linkedServices module in automationAccount#1494
eriqua merged 3 commits intomainfrom
users/erikag/linkedServicesCrossRef

Conversation

@eriqua
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@eriqua eriqua commented Jun 6, 2022

Description

Using cross reference to deploy linkedServices in an automationAccount

Pipeline references

For module/pipeline changes, please create and attach the status badge of your successful run.

Pipeline
OperationalInsights: Workspaces
Automation: AutomationAccounts

Type of Change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Update to documentation

Checklist

  • I'm sure there are no other open Pull Requests for the same update/change
  • My corresponding pipelines / checks run clean and green without any errors or warnings
  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation (readme)
  • I did format my code

@eriqua eriqua added enhancement New feature or request [cat] modules category: modules labels Jun 6, 2022
@eriqua eriqua self-assigned this Jun 6, 2022
@eriqua eriqua merged commit d1649dd into main Jun 6, 2022
@eriqua eriqua deleted the users/erikag/linkedServicesCrossRef branch June 6, 2022 19:22
@eriqua eriqua mentioned this pull request Jun 15, 2022
15 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

[cat] modules category: modules enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants