Skip to content

[Modules] Updated modules to new dependency approach#1787

Closed
AlexanderSehr wants to merge 386 commits intomainfrom
users/alsehr/depBack
Closed

[Modules] Updated modules to new dependency approach#1787
AlexanderSehr wants to merge 386 commits intomainfrom
users/alsehr/depBack

Conversation

@AlexanderSehr
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@AlexanderSehr AlexanderSehr commented Aug 16, 2022

Description

  • Updated modules to new dependency approach (see below)

Pipeline references

For module/pipeline changes, please create and attach the status badge of your successful run.

GitHub Workflow
AnalysisServices: Servers
ApiManagement: Service
AppConfiguration: ConfigurationStores
Authorization: Locks
Authorization: PolicyAssignments
Authorization: PolicyDefinitions
Authorization: PolicyExemptions
Authorization: PolicySetDefinitions
Authorization: RoleAssignments
Authorization: RoleDefinitions
Automation: AutomationAccounts
Cache: Redis
Batch: BatchAccounts
Compute: AvailabilitySets
Compute: VirtualMachines
ContainerRegistry: Registries
ContainerService: ManagedClusters
CognitiveServices: Accounts
DataFactory: Factories
KubernetesConfiguration: Extensions
KubernetesConfiguration: FluxConfigurations
Network: Connections
Network: NetworkInterfaces
Network: VirtualHubs
Network: VirtualNetworkGateways
Network: VPNGateways
Network: VPN Sites
Resources: DeploymentScripts
Sql: Servers
Web: Sites

Type of Change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Update to documentation

with:
templateFilePath: '${{ env.modulePath }}/deploy.bicep'
parameterFilePath: '${{ env.modulePath }}/${{ matrix.moduleTestFilePaths }}'
templateFilePath: '${{ env.modulePath }}/${{ matrix.moduleTestFilePaths }}'
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@MrMCake, since we have one PR per module, can this PR be closed?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes. Just kept it for reference purposes. The branch will do too though

@AlexanderSehr AlexanderSehr deleted the users/alsehr/depBack branch October 5, 2022 20:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

[cat] modules category: modules enhancement New feature or request [prio] high importance of the issue: high priority

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants