[ServiceBus] Keep connnection alive#12937
Conversation
yunhaoling
requested review from
KieranBrantnerMagee,
YijunXieMS and
annatisch
as code owners
ghost
added
the
|
/azp run python - servicebus - tests |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
yunhaoling
added
the
Client
|
/azp run python - servicebus - tests |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
| self.auth_timeout = kwargs.get("auth_timeout", 60) # type: int | ||
| self.encoding = kwargs.get("encoding", "UTF-8") | ||
| self.auto_reconnect = kwargs.get("auto_reconnect", True) | ||
| self.keep_alive = kwargs.get("keep_alive", 30) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I assume 30 aligns with cross-language consistency? (just double-checking)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This 30 seconds default value is used in eventhub track1.
The working mechanism in uamqp is "every 30 seconds, call connection.do_work(), connection.do_work() would check whether it has passed 0.5*remote idle timeout (240s), if passed, send a empty frame out"
.Net is sending out empty frame like every ~ 50s seconds.
JS is sending out empty frame every 0.5 *remote idle timeout.
I think 30 seconds is a reasonable interval in our case.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm wondering how we tell the users to configure this value. 240s is the hard expiry time. So is 220s always better than 200s to keep the connection alive because it does the work with less traffic? If so, a bool value is better than a number.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@YijunXieMS , right now we don't expose this parameter to users to keep consistent with other languages -- JS and .Net don't allow users to set/tweak this interval, it is turned on by default in their SDK.
If there're customer needs to configure the value/turn on the switch, this could be a post ga feature.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This echoes a question I posed for autolockrenew, and I don't recall if we settled on an answer: Should we disallow setting a keepalive > 240s? Or caveat emptor? I might classify it a "semantic error"; if someone wants to disable keepalive they should show intent and pass None. (Context: Have had at least one user who adjusted a value such as this and unintentionally ran into lock expiry as a result)
Should be precise that this is likely a consideration for whenever we would expose this setting and thus lock it for backcompat, but is something to be mentioned/kept in mind in case there were strong feelings. (I've added it to our discussion list)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
as person discussion OOB:
The proposal of flag is preferred as it's simple, users don't need to care about the value.
But we will leave it untouched (turned on by default) until there're customer requests for turning it off.
|
/azp run python - servicebus - tests |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
3 participants
The service side has 240 seconds connection idle timeout limitation. In this PR, we turn on the keep_alive feature supported by uamqp to keep the connection active. see issue: #11935
This feature will call connection.do_work() every keep_alive_interval (the default value is 30, which is the value used in EH track1) and send empty frame to the service if uamqp finds it has passed 0.5*remote-idle-timeout since last connection activity.
I don't plan to expose it as a public configurable to users in this preview because: