Skip to content

Comments

Clean Up Logging for Net Init#3206

Merged
shelhamer merged 1 commit intoBVLC:masterfrom
shelhamer:net-init-logging
Oct 17, 2015
Merged

Clean Up Logging for Net Init#3206
shelhamer merged 1 commit intoBVLC:masterfrom
shelhamer:net-init-logging

Conversation

@shelhamer
Copy link
Member

  • condense conditions by LOG_IF
  • only log memory usage once after all tops are made

Comment to vote for the current memory usage logging if there's a use case out there.

@shelhamer shelhamer force-pushed the net-init-logging branch 3 times, most recently from eeda081 to bd27899 Compare October 17, 2015 04:48
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You seem to have removed a necessary } here.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ronghanghu fixed, thanks.

- condense conditions by `LOG_IF`
- only log memory use once after all tops
shelhamer added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 17, 2015
[style] Clean Up Logging for Net Init
@shelhamer shelhamer merged commit 46dac40 into BVLC:master Oct 17, 2015
@shelhamer shelhamer deleted the net-init-logging branch October 17, 2015 07:23
@seanbell
Copy link

I think it makes sense to not print memory usage, since it's not the total memory usage and thus leads to confusion such as #2387 and #3042.

@shelhamer
Copy link
Member Author

Dropping the memory usage log line is fine by me. It does cause confusion
and I don't know that anyone is making use of it.

Evan Shelhamer

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 7:53 PM, Sean Bell notifications@github.com wrote:

I think it makes sense to not print memory usage, since it's not the total
memory usage and thus leads to confusion such as #2387
#2387 and #3042
#3042.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#3206 (comment).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants