Skip to content

Conversation

@robjtede
Copy link
Contributor

@robjtede robjtede commented Jul 8, 2023

No description provided.

There are a couple of things going on here, so let's break it down.

First of all, it's worth noticing that **we changed the return type** of the function to `String`. This obbeys to two different reasons:
First of all, it's worth noticing that **we changed the return type** of the function to `String`. This is for two different reasons:
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This was the only change I couldn't quite figure out what "obbeys" was trying to say, hope the semantics make sense.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, totally makes sense, Thank you for the fix @robjtede ❤️

Copy link
Member

@piny4man piny4man left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for taking care and fix some typos around the documentation

@piny4man piny4man merged commit f768bbf into BcnRust:main Jul 10, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants