Vendor list incomplete?

[paolino773]

Hi, I'm new to GitHub. I just signed up because, ever since I discovered your amazing NETworkManager software, I've been working hard to replace the commercial Softperfect. However, there are still a few things to fix, like the vendor list in IP scans, which is essential for me because it helps me quickly identify the devices I'm looking for. I forgot one important thing: I need the software for my work, not for fun. I'm very happy you created it, and I hope it continues to offer more functionality and comprehensive features!
Congratulations!

[BornToBeRoot]

Hi, maybe the list is outdated. Do you have an example MAC? The first 24 bits / 3 octets are enough to check the vendor.
You can also check under Lookup > OUI if the mac resolves to multiple vendors.

I will update the list later... haven't done it in a while...

[paolino773]

Good morning, I'm writing from Italy! It's much more useful for the application to display the vendor's name while scanning the IP address, avoiding wasting time using another command. Your software should be very similar (at its core) to SoftPerfect's network scanner, and should eventually surpass it in every way, becoming a leader in the IP scanner field! 14 dic 2025 11:20:38 BornToBeRoot ***@***.***>:

…

[Immagine]*BornToBeRoot* left a comment (BornToBeRoot/NETworkManager#3272)[#3272 (comment)] Hi, maybe the list is outdated. Do you have an example MAC? The first 24 bits / 3 octets are enough to check the vendor. You can also check under *Lookup > OUI* if the mac resolves to multiple vendors. I will update the list later... haven't done it in a while... — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub[#3272 (comment)], or unsubscribe[https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/B3P72DHAX2OHQBLTZ4CYPXL4BU2XNAVCNFSM6AAAAACO7OIFQ6VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZTMNJQGY3DKNBUGY]. You are receiving this because you authored the thread. [Immagine di monitoraggio][https://github.com/notifications/beacon/B3P72DHHIPGTDKW33LONWYT4BU2XNA5CNFSM6AAAAACO7OIFQ6WGG33NNVSW45C7OR4XAZNMJFZXG5LFINXW23LFNZ2KUY3PNVWWK3TUL5UWJTWZTC56M.gif]

[paolino773]

The Mac Is of reolink ip camera 14 dic 2025 11:20:38 BornToBeRoot ***@***.***>:

…

[Immagine]*BornToBeRoot* left a comment (BornToBeRoot/NETworkManager#3272)[#3272 (comment)] Hi, maybe the list is outdated. Do you have an example MAC? The first 24 bits / 3 octets are enough to check the vendor. You can also check under *Lookup > OUI* if the mac resolves to multiple vendors. I will update the list later... haven't done it in a while... — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub[#3272 (comment)], or unsubscribe[https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/B3P72DHAX2OHQBLTZ4CYPXL4BU2XNAVCNFSM6AAAAACO7OIFQ6VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZTMNJQGY3DKNBUGY]. You are receiving this because you authored the thread. [Immagine di monitoraggio][https://github.com/notifications/beacon/B3P72DHHIPGTDKW33LONWYT4BU2XNA5CNFSM6AAAAACO7OIFQ6WGG33NNVSW45C7OR4XAZNMJFZXG5LFINXW23LFNZ2KUY3PNVWWK3TUL5UWJTWZTC56M.gif]

[BornToBeRoot]

Just to make sure I understand correctly, we talk about this part of the IP scanner:

The Vendor is detected based on the MAC adress which is either resolved via ARP (only in the same subnet - because it's layer2) or via NETBIOS if the client supports this.

The vendor is matched agains the first 24 bits (3 octets) of the MAC address (this is the organization). I use the official list from the IEEE here: https://standards-oui.ieee.org/oui/oui.txt

Can you check if the MAC address of the reolink camera starts with EC71DB, because this is the only entry in the list:

EC-71-DB   (hex)		Reolink Innovation Limited
EC71DB     (base 16)		Reolink Innovation Limited
				705,7/F,FA YUEN COMMERCIAL BUILDING,75-77 FA YUEN STREET
				MONG KOK  KL  999077
				CN 

Maybe the camera is using a wifi/network module from a different vendor with their MAC address prefix, then it would be "wrong". Would be interesting if you can verify if the MAC address is in the list.

[BornToBeRoot]

@paolino773 thanks for the feedback.

FYI: I deleted your comment because you leaked your phone number / name with the email signature...

[BornToBeRoot]

I close the issue for now if it's working. Feel free to reopen it / create a new issue if you have any feedback / problems.

[paolino773]

Awesome, thanks for the update! Il giorno dom 14 dic 2025 alle ore 23:02 BornToBeRoot < ***@***.***> ha scritto:

…

Closed #3272 <#3272> as completed. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#3272 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/B3P72DAJCZOCV3LEKHKQ7YL4BXM55AVCNFSM6AAAAACO7OIFQ6VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV45UABCJFZXG5LFIV3GK3TUJZXXI2LGNFRWC5DJN5XDWMRRGU2TENRXHE3TGNY> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.*** com>