Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Oct 22, 2022. It is now read-only.

Update decorator to 5.0.9#309

Closed
pyup-bot wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
pyup-update-decorator-4.4.1-to-5.0.9
Closed

Update decorator to 5.0.9#309
pyup-bot wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
pyup-update-decorator-4.4.1-to-5.0.9

Conversation

@pyup-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR updates decorator from 4.4.1 to 5.0.9.

Changelog

5.0.9

Fixed a test breaking PyPy. Restored support for Sphinx.

5.0.8

Made the decorator module more robust when decorating builtin functions
lacking dunder attributes, like `dict.__setitem__`.

5.0.7

The decorator module was not passing correctly the defaults inside the
`*args` tuple, thanks to Dan Shult for the fix. Also fixed some mispellings
in the documentation and integrated codespell in the CI, thanks to 
Christian Clauss.

5.0.6

The decorator module was not copying the __module__ attribute anymore. Thanks to
Nikolay Markov for the notice.

5.0.5

Dropped support for Python < 3.5 with a substantial simplification of
the code base (now building a decorator does not require calling "exec").
Added a way to mimic functools.wraps-generated decorators.
Ported the Continuous Integration from Travis to GitHub.

4.4.2

Sylvan Mosberger (https://github.com/Infinisil) contributed a patch to
some doctests that were breaking on NixOS.
John Vandenberg (https://github.com/jayvdb) made a case for removing the usage
of `__file__`, that was breaking PyOxidizer.
Miro Hrončok (https://github.com/hroncok) contributed some fixes for the
future Python 3.9.
Hugo van Kemenade (https://github.com/hugovk) contributed some fixes for the
future Python 3.10.
Links

@pyup-bot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Closing this in favor of #331

@pyup-bot pyup-bot closed this Sep 11, 2021
@ljdursi ljdursi deleted the pyup-update-decorator-4.4.1-to-5.0.9 branch September 11, 2021 07:15
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants