fix(frontend): clarify channel period timeline#1848
Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughUpdates localization and UI copy to describe adoption as a range (start → latest) instead of point/peak comparisons; refactors the statistics Vue component to use range formatting and simplified period logic; removes Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
|



Summary (AI generated)
Motivation (AI generated)
After the first channel adoption PR, the selected-period cards were still easy to misread. Users could see 100% in the latest snapshot while the period-start card showed 0%, and the use of points versus percentages made that look inconsistent instead of chronological.
Business Impact (AI generated)
This makes Capgo's rollout analytics easier to trust and reduces customer confusion on a key update-adoption page, which should lower support overhead and improve confidence in the dashboard.
Test Plan (AI generated)
Generated with AI
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes / UI Copy