[codex] fix seo meta copy#717
Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughFive static English copy strings in ChangesCapacitor Live Updates Marketing Copy
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes Possibly related PRs
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches📝 Generate docstrings
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure. 🔧 ESLint
ESLint skipped: no ESLint configuration detected in root package.json. To enable, add Comment |
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
What changed
Why
The previous copy leaked positioning language into metadata, weakening search intent for the homepage and comparison pages.
Impact
Search snippets and titles now target the product/category terms users actually search for while keeping the change scoped to shared copy.
Root cause
Shared marketing strings were reused by Astro page metadata, so non-SEO positioning copy ended up in
<title>and meta description content.Checks
bunx prettier --write apps/shared/copy/messages.tsbun run checkSummary by CodeRabbit