-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
Fix benchmarks of saft-registry #327
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
+196
−91
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
23c554f
chore(origins): try keep EnsureOneOf
clearloop 0adac26
feat(asset-index): use committee origin for pallet-index
clearloop 45d51ba
feat(saft-registry): use committee origin in saft-registry
clearloop 63fcac7
chore(common): add docs to origins in runtime-common
clearloop a2ac59a
feat(asset-index): fix benchmarks without remove_asset
clearloop e0da53c
Merge branch 'main' into cl/chain-spec
clearloop b860003
feat(asset-index): supports new_test_ext_from_genesis
clearloop 498e018
feat(asset-index): fix benchmarks
clearloop eab04eb
feat(asset-index): adapt tests and benchmarks for deposit call
clearloop ecebf46
feat(saft-registry): adds trait AssetRecorderBenchmarks
clearloop 0e5f69f
feat(saft-registry): fix the benchmarks
clearloop 92bc7f9
feat(saft-registry): fix tests
clearloop 978c1a5
feat(asset-index): move back currency deposit call in deposit
clearloop File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is this blocked by something?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This requires calls in
remote-asset-manager, gotInvalidDesterror of xcmThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ah yes, you're right, the XCM dependent calls can't be benchmarked like that. voting to even remove them.