feat: add perf support

[not-matthias]

No description provided.

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #7 will create unknown performance changes

_{Comparing cod-1273-support-perf-in-golang (aa4b9f5) with main (3cc5268)}

Summary

🆕 18 new benchmarks
⁉️ 10 dropped benchmarks

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Benchmarks breakdown

	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Change
🆕	fibonacci(10)	N/A	560 ns	N/A
🆕	BenchmarkFibonacci20_Loop	N/A	107 µs	N/A
🆕	BenchmarkFibonacci20_bN	N/A	69 µs	N/A
🆕	BenchmarkSleep100ns	N/A	231 ns	N/A
🆕	BenchmarkSleep100ns_Loop	N/A	1 µs	N/A
🆕	BenchmarkSleep100us	N/A	100.1 µs	N/A
🆕	BenchmarkSleep100us_Loop	N/A	100.7 µs	N/A
🆕	BenchmarkSleep10ms	N/A	10 ms	N/A
🆕	BenchmarkSleep10ms_Loop	N/A	10 ms	N/A
🆕	BenchmarkSleep10us	N/A	10.1 µs	N/A
🆕	BenchmarkSleep10us_Loop	N/A	10.5 µs	N/A
🆕	BenchmarkSleep1ms	N/A	1 ms	N/A
🆕	BenchmarkSleep1ms_Loop	N/A	1 ms	N/A
🆕	BenchmarkSleep1us	N/A	1.1 µs	N/A
🆕	BenchmarkSleep1us_Loop	N/A	1.8 µs	N/A
🆕	BenchmarkSleep50ms	N/A	50 ms	N/A
🆕	BenchmarkSleep50ms_Loop	N/A	50 ms	N/A
🆕	BenchmarkExample	N/A	< 1 ns	N/A
⁉️	fibonacci(10)	549 ns	N/A	N/A
⁉️	BenchmarkFibonacci20_Loop	69.3 µs	N/A	N/A
...	...	...	...	...

ℹ️ Only the first 20 benchmarks are displayed. Go to the app to view all benchmarks.

[art049]

I think there was an issue with the instrument-hooks submodule or is it expected? Files are committed in this repo

[not-matthias]

I think there was an issue with the instrument-hooks submodule or is it expected?

Oops, I rebased the changes into that commit but forgot to change the commit message. I ended up copying the dist artifacts because Golang doesn't fetch the git submodules within packages. I'll update it.

[art049]

Looks good to me !
It would be better to merge this when the reports actually contain the flamegraphs, just so we're sure everything works

After https://github.com/CodSpeedHQ/codspeed/pull/1393

[art049]

nice

[not-matthias]

Looks good to me ! It would be better to merge this when the reports actually contain the flamegraphs, just so we're sure everything works

After CodSpeedHQ/codspeed#1393

Sounds good, I think I'll also add some logic to the go-runner integration tests to always fetch the codspeed-go package of the current branch when running in CI, cause otherwise I'll have no way to merge this PR when removing the last commit.

[not-matthias]

@art049 Perf works: https://codspeed.io/CodSpeedHQ/codspeed-go/runs/68b6b3b6a013ab1b66caea43 (run of one of the stacked branch)