Skip to content

Feat fix using windows path, now use normalizePath#70

Merged
ZHallen122 merged 13 commits intomainfrom
feat-fix-windows-path
Dec 15, 2024
Merged

Feat fix using windows path, now use normalizePath#70
ZHallen122 merged 13 commits intomainfrom
feat-fix-windows-path

Conversation

@ZHallen122
Copy link
Collaborator

@ZHallen122 ZHallen122 commented Dec 15, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved cross-platform compatibility by standardizing file path handling in test files.
  • New Features

    • Updated the instantiation method for FileGeneratorHandler, potentially altering its operational behavior.

Sma1lboy and others added 11 commits November 28, 2024 10:07
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

## Release Notes

- **New Features**
- Introduced a new template for React applications using TypeScript and
Vite, including essential setup files.
	- Added a main HTML entry point for the application.
- Configured ESLint for improved code quality and best practices in
TypeScript and React environments.

- **Documentation**
- Added a README file outlining setup instructions and recommended
configurations for the template.

- **Configuration**
- New TypeScript and Vite configuration files created to optimize the
development environment.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
@ZHallen122 ZHallen122 requested a review from Sma1lboy December 15, 2024 00:01
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 15, 2024

Warning

There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure.

🔧 eslint

If the error stems from missing dependencies, add them to the package.json file. For unrecoverable errors (e.g., due to private dependencies), disable the tool in the CodeRabbit configuration.

backend/src/build-system/__tests__/test-file-create.spec.ts

Oops! Something went wrong! :(

ESLint: 8.57.1

ESLint couldn't find the plugin "eslint-plugin-prettier".

(The package "eslint-plugin-prettier" was not found when loaded as a Node module from the directory "/backend".)

It's likely that the plugin isn't installed correctly. Try reinstalling by running the following:

npm install eslint-plugin-prettier@latest --save-dev

The plugin "eslint-plugin-prettier" was referenced from the config file in "backend/.eslintrc.js".

If you still can't figure out the problem, please stop by https://eslint.org/chat/help to chat with the team.

Walkthrough

The pull request focuses on enhancing cross-platform compatibility in test files within the backend build system. The changes primarily involve path normalization using path.join() and normalizePath to ensure consistent file path handling across different operating systems. Additionally, there's a modification to the FileGeneratorHandler constructor, removing a previous parameter and potentially indicating a change in the handler's initialization process.

Changes

File Change Summary
backend/src/build-system/__tests__/test-file-create.spec.ts - Updated path handling using normalizePath and path.join()
- Modified FileGeneratorHandler constructor to remove structMarkdownContent parameter
backend/src/build-system/__tests__/testVirtualDir.spec.ts - Replaced hardcoded backslash paths with path.join() for cross-platform compatibility

Possibly related PRs

  • Feat(bcakend) more detail ux structure #62: Changes in test-file-create.spec.ts and testVirtualDir.spec.ts focus on enhancing path handling for cross-platform compatibility, similar to modifications in frontend-file-structure/index.ts involving file structure generation.

Suggested reviewers

  • Sma1lboy

Poem

🐰 A rabbit's tale of paths so neat,
Backslashes flee, cross-platform's sweet.
Normalization, our coding delight,
Paths now dance with universal might.
No more OS woes, our code takes flight! 🚀

Tip

CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command @coderabbitai generate docstrings to have CodeRabbit automatically generate docstrings for your pull request. This feature will be included in our Pro Plan when released.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@ZHallen122 ZHallen122 marked this pull request as ready for review December 15, 2024 00:31
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
backend/src/build-system/__tests__/test-file-create.spec.ts (1)

40-45: Consider consolidating file reading operations

Both file reading operations follow the same pattern. Consider extracting this into a helper function to reduce code duplication.

+ const readNormalizedFile = (filePath: string): string => 
+   fs.readFileSync(normalizePath(path.resolve(filePath)), 'utf8');

- const archMarkdownContent = fs.readFileSync(
-   normalizePath(path.resolve(mdFilePath)),
-   'utf8',
- );
- const structMarkdownContent = fs.readFileSync(
-   normalizePath(path.resolve(structMdFilePath)),
-   'utf8',
- );
+ const archMarkdownContent = readNormalizedFile(mdFilePath);
+ const structMarkdownContent = readNormalizedFile(structMdFilePath);
backend/src/build-system/__tests__/testVirtualDir.spec.ts (1)

Line range hint 26-38: Consider updating test paths to use normalized paths

While the file path construction has been updated, the test assertions still use hardcoded forward slashes. Consider updating these for consistency.

- expect(virtualDir.isValidFile('src/pages/Home/index.tsx')).toBeTruthy();
+ expect(virtualDir.isValidFile(normalizePath('src/pages/Home/index.tsx'))).toBeTruthy();
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ea71ef2 and 009ba39.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • backend/src/build-system/__tests__/test-file-create.spec.ts (1 hunks)
  • backend/src/build-system/__tests__/testVirtualDir.spec.ts (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
backend/src/build-system/__tests__/test-file-create.spec.ts (3)

4-4: LGTM: Path normalization implementation looks correct

The implementation correctly uses both path.join() for platform-agnostic path construction and normalizePath for standardization. This is a robust approach for cross-platform compatibility.

Also applies to: 8-17


22-35: Verify cleanup paths are consistent across all test runs

The cleanup paths in both hooks are identical and properly normalized. However, let's verify there are no other cleanup operations in the codebase that might need similar updates.

✅ Verification successful

Path cleanup operations are consistent

The search results show that fs.remove() is only used in the file under review (test-file-create.spec.ts), and both instances properly use normalizePath() with path.join(). No other cleanup operations were found in the codebase that would need similar updates.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for fs.remove calls that might need path normalization
rg -A 2 "fs\.remove\(" --type typescript

Length of output: 77


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for fs.remove calls that might need path normalization, using ripgrep without file type filter
rg -A 2 "fs\.remove\("

Length of output: 627


48-48: Verify impact of FileGeneratorHandler constructor change

The constructor no longer accepts structMarkdownContent. This is a breaking change that needs verification.

backend/src/build-system/__tests__/testVirtualDir.spec.ts (1)

7-9: LGTM: Path normalization consistent with other changes

The path construction follows the same pattern established in test-file-create.spec.ts, ensuring consistency across the test suite.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
backend/src/build-system/__tests__/test-file-create.spec.ts (3)

7-16: Consider using __dirname for more robust path resolution

While the current path normalization is good for cross-platform compatibility, using relative paths can be fragile if the test file location changes. Consider using __dirname for more robust path resolution.

-  const projectSrcPath = normalizePath(
-    path.join('src', 'build-system', '__tests__', 'test-project'),
-  );
+  const projectSrcPath = normalizePath(
+    path.join(__dirname, 'test-project'),
+  );

-  const mdFilePath = normalizePath(
-    path.join('src', 'build-system', '__tests__', 'file-arch.md'),
-  );
+  const mdFilePath = normalizePath(
+    path.join(__dirname, 'file-arch.md'),
+  );

-  const structMdFilePath = normalizePath(
-    path.join('src', 'build-system', '__tests__', 'file-structure-document.md'),
-  );
+  const structMdFilePath = normalizePath(
+    path.join(__dirname, 'file-structure-document.md'),
+  );

39-44: Simplify path handling in file reading operations

The paths are being normalized twice - once during variable declaration and again during file reading. Since the paths are already normalized, path.resolve is redundant here.

   const archMarkdownContent = fs.readFileSync(
-    normalizePath(path.resolve(mdFilePath)),
+    mdFilePath,
     'utf8',
   );
   const structMarkdownContent = fs.readFileSync(
-    normalizePath(path.resolve(structMdFilePath)),
+    structMdFilePath,
     'utf8',
   );

Line range hint 54-54: Clean up test implementation

A few suggestions for improving the test:

  1. Remove the console.log statement as it's typically not needed in tests
  2. Consider investigating why a 30-second timeout is needed - this might indicate a performance issue that should be addressed

Also applies to: 66-66

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 009ba39 and 1a4b31c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • backend/src/build-system/__tests__/test-file-create.spec.ts (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
backend/src/build-system/__tests__/test-file-create.spec.ts (1)

47-47: Verify the impact of FileGeneratorHandler constructor change

The constructor signature has changed to remove the structMarkdownContent parameter. This is a breaking change that needs to be verified across the codebase.

✅ Verification successful

Constructor change is correctly reflected across the codebase

After examining the implementation and all usages, the removal of structMarkdownContent parameter from FileGeneratorHandler constructor is correctly reflected across the codebase. The only instantiation is in the test file, and it's using the new parameter-less constructor. The implementation in index.ts also confirms this change is consistent.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for all instantiations of FileGeneratorHandler to ensure they've been updated
ast-grep --pattern 'new FileGeneratorHandler($$$)'

# Search for any imports of FileGeneratorHandler to find all files that might be affected
rg -l "FileGeneratorHandler"

Length of output: 322


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the implementation and usage of FileGeneratorHandler
cat backend/src/build-system/handlers/file-manager/file-generate/index.ts

# Also check the test file for context
cat backend/src/build-system/__tests__/test-file-create.spec.ts

Length of output: 8116

Comment on lines +21 to +34
await fs.remove(
normalizePath(
path.join('src', 'build-system', '__tests__', 'test-project', 'src'),
),
);
});

afterEach(async () => {
// Clean up the generated test files
await fs.remove('src\\build-system\\__tests__\\test-project\\src\\');
await fs.remove(
normalizePath(
path.join('src', 'build-system', '__tests__', 'test-project', 'src'),
),
);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Deduplicate cleanup path and reuse projectSrcPath

The cleanup path is duplicated in both hooks and doesn't reuse the previously defined projectSrcPath. Consider refactoring to reduce duplication and maintain consistency.

+  const cleanupPath = normalizePath(path.join(projectSrcPath, 'src'));

   beforeEach(async () => {
-    await fs.remove(
-      normalizePath(
-        path.join('src', 'build-system', '__tests__', 'test-project', 'src'),
-      ),
-    );
+    await fs.remove(cleanupPath);
   });

   afterEach(async () => {
-    await fs.remove(
-      normalizePath(
-        path.join('src', 'build-system', '__tests__', 'test-project', 'src'),
-      ),
-    );
+    await fs.remove(cleanupPath);
   });

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

Copy link
Collaborator

@Sma1lboy Sma1lboy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants