Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Jun 30, 2025. It is now read-only.

CU-8699g3ajp v2 beta compatibility#91

Merged
mart-r merged 3 commits intomainfrom
CU-8699g3ajp-v2-beta-compatibility
Jun 19, 2025
Merged

CU-8699g3ajp v2 beta compatibility#91
mart-r merged 3 commits intomainfrom
CU-8699g3ajp-v2-beta-compatibility

Conversation

@mart-r
Copy link
Collaborator

@mart-r mart-r commented Jun 19, 2025

This fixes the compatibility issues.

The effect of the PR is 2fold:

  1. It fixes the backwards compatibility workflow
  • Before failure wouldn't actually fail the workflow
  1. It fixes the load time module name handling

On top of that, I also updated the backwards compatibility model pack with a better / more representative example. But that won't be readily apparent here since it's done on the S3 side.

@mart-r mart-r merged commit 88e16ed into main Jun 19, 2025
4 checks passed
mart-r added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 20, 2025
* CU-8699g3ajp: Update backwards compatibility workflow.

Will now fail upon any individual model failing

* CU-8699g3ajp: Add method to remap module packages when loading model with dill

* CU-8699g3ajp: Using fixed module/class name when deserialising with dill
alhendrickson pushed a commit to CogStack/cogstack-nlp that referenced this pull request Jun 24, 2025
* CU-8699g3ajp: Update backwards compatibility workflow.

Will now fail upon any individual model failing

* CU-8699g3ajp: Add method to remap module packages when loading model with dill

* CU-8699g3ajp: Using fixed module/class name when deserialising with dill
alhendrickson pushed a commit to CogStack/cogstack-nlp that referenced this pull request Jun 24, 2025
* CU-8699g3ajp: Update backwards compatibility workflow.

Will now fail upon any individual model failing

* CU-8699g3ajp: Add method to remap module packages when loading model with dill

* CU-8699g3ajp: Using fixed module/class name when deserialising with dill
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant