Merged
Conversation
…e fallback to sequential
update readme for tbb
Compaile
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 28, 2025
tbb gcc clang fix and added fallback
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
#3
Since not all compilers support parallel execution without linking to TBB, we add a flag to fall back to sequential calculation of the results.
The CMake in the example folder also shows how to link to TBB (also added it to the README as a note).
If a user is on a compiler which would need TBB for parallel execution but does not want to include TBB, we added a fallback with a sequential mode.