Skip to content

Conversation

@MinCrohn
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@MinCrohn MinCrohn changed the title fix: register selection position fix: fix register selection position Aug 20, 2025
Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @MinCrohn, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a bug related to the selection position within the Patchmap component by refining its state management initialization. The changes ensure that the SelectionState is correctly registered and the overall StateManager is reset when the Patchmap instance is created. This refactoring aims to provide a more robust and predictable handling of selections, preventing potential issues with their initial positioning or behavior.

Highlights

  • Refactored Selection State Registration: The registration of the 'selection' state, which manages the position and behavior of selections, has been relocated from the 'draw' method to the 'Patchmap' constructor. This change ensures that the selection state is initialized and registered precisely once when the 'Patchmap' component is created, rather than potentially being re-registered on subsequent draw calls.
  • Added State Manager Reset on Initialization: A new call to 'this.stateManager.resetState()' has been introduced within the 'Patchmap' constructor. This addition ensures that the state manager is explicitly reset to a clean slate upon the initialization of the 'Patchmap' component, which is crucial for preventing stale or incorrect state from previous operations and ensuring accurate selection positioning from the start.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly refactors the state registration by moving it from the draw method to init, ensuring it runs only once. However, it introduces a critical issue by calling this.stateManager.resetState() in the constructor before the state manager is initialized in init(). This will lead to a runtime error. I have provided a comment on how to resolve this.

@MinCrohn MinCrohn merged commit 5a1f606 into v0.3.x Aug 20, 2025
@MinCrohn MinCrohn deleted the fix/register-selection branch August 20, 2025 06:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants