Skip to content

Conversation

@MinCrohn
Copy link
Collaborator

@MinCrohn MinCrohn commented Sep 5, 2025

No description provided.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @MinCrohn, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a potential runtime error in the selection clearing logic by adding a defensive check. The change ensures that operations are only performed on valid, existing objects, thereby improving the robustness and stability of the selection state management.

Highlights

  • Bug Fix: Implemented a check within the SelectionState's private #clear() method to ensure that the _selectionBox object is not destroyed before attempting to clear it. This prevents potential errors that could occur if the _selectionBox has already been deallocated or invalidated.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@MinCrohn MinCrohn merged commit db2e6fa into v0.3.x Sep 5, 2025
@MinCrohn MinCrohn deleted the bugfix/fix-browser-test branch September 5, 2025 02:50
Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly handles a potential exception in the SelectionState.clear method by adding a defensive check before calling _selectionBox.clear(). This prevents a runtime error that could occur when the state is destroyed. The fix is effective. For future consideration, the root cause appears to be the order of operations in the destroy method, where _selectionBox is destroyed before super.destroy() (which triggers the exit lifecycle). Reversing this order could provide a more robust lifecycle management and might make guards like this one unnecessary.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants