Create properties for ETPL

[siuc-nate]

Per our 6-15-2020 meeting:

Create:

URI: ceterms:hasETPLResource
Label: Has ETPL Resource
Definition: Resource that is on the WIOA Eligible Training Provider List described by this resource.
Comment: State or Local Workforce Board indicates the resource being referenced (e.g., credential and its learning opportunity or assessment) is on their Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) Eligible Training Provider List.
Domain: ceterms:QualityAssuranceCredential
Range: ceterms:Credential (and subclasses), ceterms:AssessmentProfile, ceterms:LearningOpportunityProfile

URI: ceterms:isETPLResourceOn
Label: Is ETPL Resource On
Definition: WIOA Eligible Training Provider List on which this resource is listed.
Comment: This resource (e.g., credential and its learning opportunity or assessment) is referenced on a State or Local Workforce Board's Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) Eligible Training Provider List.
Domain: ceterms:Credential (and subclasses), ceterms:AssessmentProfile, ceterms:LearningOpportunityProfile
Range: ceterms:QualityAssuranceCredential

See #698 for schema:baseSalary

Usage:

Examples:

{
  "@type": "ceterms:QualityAssuranceCredential",
  "ceterms:name": { "en": "New Jersey ETPL 3" },
  "ceterms:description": { "en": "descriptive text" },
  "ceterms:ownedBy": [
    "https://uri-to-newjersey-org"
  ],
  "ceterms:availableAt": [
    {
      "@type": "ceterms:Place",
      "ceterms:name": { "en": "WIOA 3" },
      "ceterms:geoURI": [
        "https://uri-for-county1",
        "https://uri-for-county2",
        "https://uri-for-county3"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "ceterms:occupationType": [
    {
      "@type": "ceterms:CredentialAlignmentObject",
      "ceterms:targetNodeName": { "en": "name of demand occupation" },
      "ceterms:targetNode": "https://uri-for-soc-code"
    }
  ],
  "ceterms:requires": [
    {
      "@type": "ceterms:ConditionProfile",
      "...": "//requirements to be on the ETPL"
    }
  ],
  "ceterms:hasETPLResource": [
    "https://credentialengineregistry.org/resources/ce-...",
    "https://credentialengineregistry.org/resources/ce-...",
    "https://credentialengineregistry.org/resources/ce-...",
    "https://credentialengineregistry.org/resources/ce-...",
    "https://credentialengineregistry.org/resources/ce-...",
    "..."
  ]
}

See issue #645 for more details

[mparsons-ce]

@siuc-nate
re: AvailableAt -Physical location where the credential, assessment, or learning opportunity can be pursued.
Use of this property for the context of where the QA credential applies, would seem to be confusing based on the definition and how used for other credentials.
Wouldn't jurisdiction make more sense? I don't recall if the latter was considered and rejected for some reason.

[siuc-nate]

The key here is that QA credentials are issued to things other than people.

In this case, the QA credential is to be issued to the other credentials/assessments/learning opportunities that are part of the ETPL. As such, it would be interpreted as "this QA credential is ceterms:availableAt [place] to be pursued by your credential" - so if your credential is also ceterms:availableAt [place], it might be a good fit. But that assertion is kind of loose and is probably more useful to those looking to submit their credentials for approval to such an ETPL.

More tightly, the QA credential can (as you suggest) ceterms:requires a ceterms:jurisdiction that precisely covers the area where the credential hoping to "earn" that QA credential must operate (in other words, "this QA credential requires that your credential have a jurisdiction of [place]").

This is something that can, with adequate data, be programmatically compared against the other credential's jurisdiction/availableAt to see if the QA credential's required jurisdiction falls inside of (or is congruent with) the other credential's ceterms:Place (in other words, if the other credential applies to the whole state and that state contains the counties that make up the ETPL's LWIA, it would qualify).

[jeannekitchens]

@siuc-nate @stuartasutton schema/estimatedsalary is not the right term to use for a person's salary. See the Schema.org defintion here https://schema.org/estimatedSalary.

Use schema/baseSalary

See the JDX Schema @siuc-nate this was designed by @stuartasutton https://www.uschamberfoundation.org/sites/default/files/U.S.%20Chamber%20Foundation_JDXJobSchema%2B_ForPublicComment.pdf

See Shema.org Base Salary https://schema.org/baseSalary.

@siuc-nate please update all related domain models and add to definitions proposal.

[stuartasutton]

Using schema.org/baseSalary is fine. If we need anything from JDX, that PDF is not the place to go. I've attached a zip with the last state of JDX in HTML pages generated by me. Stuart

…

On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 5:49 AM Jeanne Kitchens ***@***.***> wrote: @siuc-nate <https://github.com/siuc-nate> @stuartasutton <https://github.com/stuartasutton> schema/estimatedsalary is not the right term to use for a person's salary. See the Schema.org defintion here https://schema.org/estimatedSalary. Use schema/baseSalary See the JDX Schema @siuc-nate <https://github.com/siuc-nate> this was designed by @stuartasutton <https://github.com/stuartasutton> https://www.uschamberfoundation.org/sites/default/files/U.S.%20Chamber%20Foundation_JDXJobSchema%2B_ForPublicComment.pdf See Shema.org Base Salary https://schema.org/baseSalary. @siuc-nate <https://github.com/siuc-nate> please update all related domain models and add to definitions proposal. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#696 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAWNRJSDKQITXNZLL5ZKRKLRYNBWDANCNFSM4N6J4CHQ> .

[mparsons-ce]

Will we have any constraints on which credentials baseSalary can be referenced (e.g. apprenticeships) or allow for all credentials?
moved to #698

[mparsons-ce]

MonetaryAmount has the property UnitText. In the CTDL context, the latter has the conceptScheme CreditUnit which relates to Degree credit etc.
Will UnitText in the Monetary amount context be a different concept scheme, or just text. If the latter, should it be a lang string?
Especially if it will be used to indicate per hour, per years, etc.
moved to #698

[siuc-nate]

I created #698 to handle figuring out what to do with schema:baseSalary and its range, so that this issue can stay focused on the two ETPL properties.

[siuc-nate]

Per our 6-29-2020 meeting:

We need to find out whether or not partners will expect a "training program type" using the following terms, and how/where these might already be embodied in CTDL:

• Basic Skills/Remedial - Core academic skills such as literacy and numeracy, including English as a second language
• Registered Apprenticeship - A combination of paid on-the-job training and related instruction
• Vocational - Training for employment specific to an occupation or career pathway

References:
http://illinoisworknet.com/Training/Pages/WIOATrainingProgramSearch.aspx
https://apps.il-work-net.com/WIOAPolicy/Policy/Index/58