Conversation
Updated dependencies to fix Next.js and React CVE vulnerabilities. The fix-react2shell-next tool automatically updated the following packages to their secure versions: - next - react-server-dom-webpack - react-server-dom-parcel - react-server-dom-turbopack All package.json files have been scanned and vulnerable versions have been patched to the correct fixed versions based on the official React advisory. Co-authored-by: Vercel <vercel[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
…cve-vu-7qcqr2 Fix React Server Components CVE vulnerabilities
Reviewer's GuideAdds an initial CircleCI configuration with a single example workflow and job that runs a basic Docker-based 'Hello, World!' command on checkout. Flow diagram for say-hello CircleCI job executionflowchart TD
trigger[Code_push_or_PR_in_repository]
start_pipeline[Start_CircleCI_pipeline]
select_workflow[Select_say_hello_workflow]
start_job[Start_say_hello_job]
pull_image[Pull_cimg_base_current_Docker_image]
checkout[Checkout_repository_code]
run_cmd[Run_command_echo_Hello_World]
job_success[Job_success]
pipeline_success[Pipeline_success]
trigger --> start_pipeline --> select_workflow --> start_job
start_job --> pull_image --> checkout --> run_cmd --> job_success --> pipeline_success
File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
✅ Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.
💻 Catch issues earlier using the plugins for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Visual Studio, and Eclipse. |
Summary of ChangesHello @Dargon789, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request introduces an initial continuous integration setup for the repository by adding a new CircleCI configuration file. The primary purpose of this change is to establish a foundational CI pipeline, which currently includes a basic job to verify the setup. Despite the PR title suggesting a revert related to a CVE, the actual code changes clearly indicate the addition of a new CI workflow. Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey - I've left some high level feedback:
- The CircleCI config currently uses the default 'say-hello' example job; consider replacing it with a job that reflects the actual build/test/deploy workflow for this repo or omitting the config until it's ready to be used.
- The numerous tutorial-style comments in
.circleci/config.ymlmay add noise over time; you might trim them down to only project-specific guidance to keep the config concise.
Prompt for AI Agents
Please address the comments from this code review:
## Overall Comments
- The CircleCI config currently uses the default 'say-hello' example job; consider replacing it with a job that reflects the actual build/test/deploy workflow for this repo or omitting the config until it's ready to be used.
- The numerous tutorial-style comments in `.circleci/config.yml` may add noise over time; you might trim them down to only project-specific guidance to keep the config concise.Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a basic CircleCI configuration. My review identified a couple of areas for improvement to align with best practices. I've suggested pinning the Docker image to a specific version for build reproducibility and adding a newline at the end of the configuration file for better tool compatibility.
| docker: | ||
| # Specify the version you desire here | ||
| # See: https://circleci.com/developer/images/image/cimg/base | ||
| - image: cimg/base:current |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Using the current tag for the Docker image can lead to non-reproducible builds. This tag points to the latest version of the image, which might introduce breaking changes unexpectedly and cause your pipeline to fail. To ensure build stability and predictability, it's a best practice to pin the image to a specific version. You can find available tags on the CircleCI Developer Hub.
- image: cimg/base:2024.02| say-hello-workflow: # This is the name of the workflow, feel free to change it to better match your workflow. | ||
| # Inside the workflow, you define the jobs you want to run. | ||
| jobs: | ||
| - say-hello No newline at end of file |
Summary by Sourcery
CI: