Estringana/collect framework endpoints 2

[estringana]

Description

Reviewer checklist

• Test coverage seems ok.
• Appropriate labels assigned.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 61.64%. Comparing base (560e003) to head (e6692f6).
⚠️ Report is 41 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3548      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   61.74%   61.64%   -0.11%     
==========================================
  Files         143      143              
  Lines       13045    13045              
  Branches     1704     1704              
==========================================
- Hits         8055     8041      -14     
- Misses       4228     4241      +13     
- Partials      762      763       +1     

see 3 files with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 560e003...e6692f6. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[pr-commenter]

Benchmarks [ tracer ]

Benchmark execution time: 2026-01-05 10:41:34

Comparing candidate commit e6692f6 in PR branch estringana/collect-framework-endpoints-2 with baseline commit 560e003 in branch master.

Found 2 performance improvements and 14 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 178 metrics, 0 unstable metrics.

scenario:ComposerTelemetryBench/benchTelemetryParsing

• 🟥 execution_time [+461.739ns; +1338.261ns] or [+4.440%; +12.868%]

scenario:MessagePackSerializationBench/benchMessagePackSerialization

• 🟩 execution_time [-4.575µs; -3.445µs] or [-4.403%; -3.315%]

scenario:SamplingRuleMatchingBench/benchRegexMatching1

• 🟥 execution_time [+60.430ns; +118.370ns] or [+5.100%; +9.991%]

scenario:SamplingRuleMatchingBench/benchRegexMatching2

• 🟥 execution_time [+95.594ns; +144.206ns] or [+8.233%; +12.420%]

scenario:SamplingRuleMatchingBench/benchRegexMatching3

• 🟥 execution_time [+73.104ns; +139.096ns] or [+6.141%; +11.685%]

scenario:SamplingRuleMatchingBench/benchRegexMatching4

• 🟥 execution_time [+39.625ns; +127.175ns] or [+3.324%; +10.668%]

scenario:SpanBench/benchOpenTelemetryAPI

• 🟥 mem_peak [+1.520MB; +1.542MB] or [+3.662%; +3.717%]

scenario:SymfonyBench/benchSymfonyDdprof

• 🟥 execution_time [+3.717ms; +3.839ms] or [+43.740%; +45.183%]

scenario:SymfonyBench/benchSymfonyDdprof-opcache

• 🟥 execution_time [+3.594ms; +3.724ms] or [+40.652%; +42.128%]

scenario:SymfonyBench/benchSymfonyOverhead

• 🟥 execution_time [+3.550ms; +3.682ms] or [+44.607%; +46.267%]

scenario:SymfonyBench/benchSymfonyOverhead-opcache

• 🟥 execution_time [+3.510ms; +3.611ms] or [+43.280%; +44.530%]

scenario:TraceSerializationBench/benchSerializeTrace

• 🟩 execution_time [-47.099µs; -35.001µs] or [-10.456%; -7.770%]

scenario:WordPressBench/benchWordPressDdprof

• 🟥 execution_time [+2.090ms; +2.260ms] or [+7.116%; +7.693%]

scenario:WordPressBench/benchWordPressDdprof-opcache

• 🟥 execution_time [+2.062ms; +2.272ms] or [+7.027%; +7.742%]

scenario:WordPressBench/benchWordPressOverhead

• 🟥 execution_time [+2.035ms; +2.262ms] or [+7.455%; +8.286%]

scenario:WordPressBench/benchWordPressOverhead-opcache

• 🟥 execution_time [+2.042ms; +2.249ms] or [+7.443%; +8.195%]