-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
Add support for Transfer-Encoding header for GCP Go Gen 1 Cloud Functions #18
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
bcf83cf
Add support for Transfer-Encoding header for GCP Go Gen 1 Cloud Funct…
nina9753 dc674ec
update tests
nina9753 b34bd4f
update format
nina9753 ab28372
revert cargo
nina9753 86f0544
update LICENSE-3rdparty.csv
nina9753 db14b97
add debug log
nina9753 ddeb51d
cargo fmt
nina9753 b22beb7
remove log::debug
nina9753 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What do you think about adding this check inside the
verify_request_content_lengthmethod? It would be consistent with the rest of the return statements in that method giving an HttpResponse.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would prefer not to, as that would require me to update other functions like
StatsProcessor::process_stats, which doesn't generate the request size outside ofverify_request_content_length. I’d also need to update functions in several spots where including the request length might not be as important. Please feel free to correct me if I’m mistaken, but I thought that we were mainly concerned about the content length for submitting the traces.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see what you're saying. If we wanted to make this check inside
verify_request_content_lengthwe would need to change the signature of the method to acceptbody_size, which affects other calls to it (like fromStatsProcessor:process_stats. I think it would be preferable to have all of the content length checks in the method for that (verify_request_content_length) but if we only want to make this check for traces then I think your current approach is the best option.