Skip to content

[Snyk] Security upgrade python from 3.9-slim to 3.14.3-slim#12

Open
Dustin4444 wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
snyk-fix-cf5a4020c2b4f9ddbd1ada299c68e16e
Open

[Snyk] Security upgrade python from 3.9-slim to 3.14.3-slim#12
Dustin4444 wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
snyk-fix-cf5a4020c2b4f9ddbd1ada299c68e16e

Conversation

@Dustin4444
Copy link
Owner

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 5 vulnerabilities in the dockerfile dependencies of this project.

Keeping your Docker base image up-to-date means you’ll benefit from security fixes in the latest version of your chosen image.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • Dockerfile.tests

We recommend upgrading to python:3.14.3-slim, as this image has only 26 known vulnerabilities. To do this, merge this pull request, then verify your application still works as expected.

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score
low severity CVE-2025-15468
SNYK-DEBIAN13-OPENSSL-15123158
  436  
low severity CVE-2026-22795
SNYK-DEBIAN13-OPENSSL-15123206
  436  
low severity CVE-2025-11187
SNYK-DEBIAN13-OPENSSL-15123211
  436  
low severity CVE-2025-69418
SNYK-DEBIAN13-OPENSSL-15123213
  436  
low severity CVE-2025-69419
SNYK-DEBIAN13-OPENSSL-15123214
  436  

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Learn about vulnerability in an interactive lesson of Snyk Learn.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @Dustin4444, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on improving the security of the project's test environment by updating the Python base image within the Dockerfile.tests. This essential upgrade addresses multiple identified vulnerabilities, contributing to a more robust and secure development workflow and reducing potential risks associated with outdated dependencies.

Highlights

  • Security Upgrade: This pull request performs a security upgrade by updating the Python base image in Dockerfile.tests.
  • Python Version Update: The base image is upgraded from python:3.9-slim to python:3.14.3-slim.
  • Vulnerability Fixes: This upgrade fixes 5 low-severity vulnerabilities, primarily related to OpenSSL in Debian 13, as identified by Snyk.
  • Automated PR: The pull request was automatically generated by Snyk to address detected security issues.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Changelog
  • Dockerfile.tests
    • Updated the base image from python:3.9-slim to python:3.14.3-slim to incorporate security fixes.
Activity
  • The pull request was automatically created by Snyk to propose a security upgrade.
  • The PR description includes a list of 5 low-severity vulnerabilities that will be fixed by this change.
  • It advises checking the changes to ensure no project issues arise and to verify application functionality after merging.
  • Links to Snyk project reports, customization options for PR templates, project settings, and documentation on Snyk's upgrade logic are provided.
  • An interactive lesson on vulnerabilities from Snyk Learn is also linked.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 8, 2026

Important

Review skipped

Ignore keyword(s) in the title.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

  • 🔍 Trigger a full review
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch snyk-fix-cf5a4020c2b4f9ddbd1ada299c68e16e

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request, automatically generated by Snyk, proposes upgrading the Python base image to python:3.14.3-slim. However, this version of Python does not exist, which will cause the Docker build to fail. The CVEs listed in the description also have future dates (e.g., CVE-2025-...), which suggests an issue with the Snyk scan data. I've left a comment with a suggestion to use a valid and recent Python version, like 3.12-slim. Please be aware that any major Python version upgrade requires careful testing to ensure compatibility.

# syntax=docker/dockerfile:1.2

FROM python:3.9-slim
FROM python:3.14.3-slim

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

critical

The proposed Python version 3.14.3 does not exist. The latest stable Python version is 3.12. This will cause the Docker build to fail because the image python:3.14.3-slim cannot be found.

I recommend upgrading to a recent, stable version, such as Python 3.12. Please note that a major version upgrade from 3.9 to 3.12 may introduce breaking changes, so thorough testing will be required after updating the base image.

FROM python:3.12-slim

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants